At least the title isn’t deceiving. And that’s about the only good thing to say about this measure.
The impartial analysis by the Legislative Analyst notes, “Because there is uncertainty over how the Constitution would be interpreted in its current form, it is unknown how Proposition 98 funding would work in the future under current law. As a result, it is difficult to know how this measure would change the state’s finances.” And it also depends on Proposition 1A (my analysis of that measure will appear tomorrow).
The Legislature and Governor can also overrule Proposition 1B, and fund less or more than the limits in Proposition 1B.
This measure is a complex mishmash designed to appeal to the education industry’s proponents. While education is good, spending run amok isn’t and that’s where California is today. This measure, in my view, does not lead toward a solution of California’s fiscal problems. I’ll be voting against it. If you’re a Californian, make sure your vote is heard on Tuesday, May 19th.