Archive for February, 2010

Hot Air Leads to Trouble

Sunday, February 28th, 2010

When I was an undergraduate in college, I did research at the Lawrence Berkeley Laboratory on the catalyzed production of methane from graphite. I don’t believe that research led to commercial production of natural gas (which is methane, CH4.

The government likes the idea of obtaining methane from unconventional sources. There’s a tax credit available for recovering methane from landfills. Some enterprising individuals had the not-so-brilliant idea of just reporting that they recovered the methane from landfills without actually recovering any. They helped their clients obtain more than $30 million in phony tax credits.

Well, the government found out about 32 individuals. Twelve of them were permanently barred last week (23 of the 32 have now been barred). Additionally, four individuals pleaded guilty last year in a related criminal case.

If you were one of the lucky investors who bought some of the non-existent methane credits, you’re likely looking at a “Dear Valued Taxpayer” letter in your future. And if you knowingly participated in the scheme, it’s time to find an attorney. For if you’re going to take a tax credit based on methane, that methane has to be real.

The Wyden/Gregg Tax Reform Bill: Interesting, but DOA

Sunday, February 28th, 2010

Senators Ron Wyden (D-OR) and Judd Gregg (R-NH) introduced a bill, “To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to make the Federal income tax system simpler, fairer, and more fiscally responsible, and for other purposes.” The bill would have a major impact on the US tax system. Though there are many good points about the bill, they really don’t matter: This legislation has no chance of passing this Congress in an election year.

The bill would lower the number of individual tax brackets from six to three (15%, 25%, and 35%). It would eliminate the dreaded Alternative Minimum Tax (AMT). It would triple the standard deduction. All Miscellaneous Itemized Deductions would be eliminated. The first 35% of capital gains would not be taxed (the remainder would be taxed as ordinary income). And the corporate tax would become flat, with a single 24% bracket.

There’s another aspect of the legislation that got my attention. I received a call from one of my gambling clients; he told me that the legislation would lead to regulated Internet Gambling in the United States. My client is correct: Subtitle C of the legislation would allow for legalized Internet Gambling in the United States, with licensing and record-keeping requirements.

Speaking of gambling, the measure does have a huge negative for amateur gamblers. Gambling losses are a miscellaneous itemized deduction; this measure would eliminate all such deductions. Amateur gamblers would be taxed on their winning sessions and would pay income tax on phantom wins that would no longer be offset by gambling losses.

However, this is all irrelevant. This measure has no chance of passing this Congress. Democrats in Congress are, for the most part, talking about massive tax increases rather than tax simplification. It’s also an election year, with Democrats running the risk of losing one or both houses of Congress. Finally, if Democrats are serious about moving health care legislation forward this will likely cause the failure of any other substantive legislation this year. Simply put, this measure is DOA.

Overall, though, I (like most tax professionals) would love to see a simpler Tax Code. It’s just not happening in 2010.

Dumb Criminals, Tax Evading Style

Sunday, February 28th, 2010

If you commit a crime, it’s definitely not a good idea to brag about it to others. It’s an especially bad idea to brag about it on the Internet. Yes, law enforcement and the IRS read the Internet. Joe Kristan has the news of how two women in Des Moines allegedly stole from their employer…and are now in deep trouble because they bragged about it on social media.

It’s Unpopular, Unworkable, and Insane, So Naturally They’re in a Hurry to Pass It (Part 2)

Monday, February 22nd, 2010

When I last wrote about the healthcare legislation, I noted the 17 taxes which would be in the plan. Let’s see what’s new in the “Unified Health Care Legislation” proposed by President Obama.

1. Individual Mandate Tax. For those who don’t purchase health insurance, this income tax surcharge continues to exist in this plan. I couldn’t determine the exact rate.

2. Employer Mandate Tax. On businesses with 50+ employees that do not offer health care, and at least one employee qualifies for a tax credit, $750/employee. This will cause many small businesses to stop growing once they reach 49 employees. Those figures come from the prior version. News reports indicate that this tax is still in the proposal.

It is unclear if a waiting period tax remains in the legislation.

3. Excise Tax on Health Insurance Plans. Beginning in 2013 2018, 40% tax (the percentage may be wrong) on plans costing $8500/$23,000 $10,200/$27,500. Is indexed to CPI. It is unclear whether exemptions in the Senate version have been continued in this proposal.

4. Health Insurance would be reported on W-2s. Another mandate that increases costs for business. It’s unclear whether this mandate survived. However, the White House release states that loopholes will be closed which implies this remains.

5. “Medicine Cabinet Tax.” Limitation on HSAs, FSAs, and MSAs to purchase non-prescription medication except insulin. Note that this is also in the House healthcare bill. This is definitely in the new proposal.

6. HSA Withdrawal Tax Increased. The tax would increase to 20% from 10%. This is also in the House legislation. This is definitely in the proposal.

7. FSAs capped at a maximum of $2500. They are now uncapped. This is definitely in the proposal.

8. 1099 Reporting for corporations. Requires businesses to send 1099-MISCs to corporations. This is another cost for businesses. This will begin in 2011 and will definitely increase my income. This is definitely in the proposal, but it’s unclear if this starts in 2011.

9. Tax on Charitable Hospitals. This excise tax of $50,000 per hospital impacts hospitals that don’t meet new Department of Health and Human Services regulations. It’s unclear whether this is in the proposal.

10. Tax on Drug Companies. The tax would be $2.3 billion based on sales percentage. There’s definitely a tax on drug companies, but the size and timing of the tax is unclear.

11. Tax on Medical Device Manufacturers. The $2 billion tax is also based on sales percentage. It rises to $3 billion in 2017. This tax is in the bill, but the size and timing of the tax is not clear.

12. Tax on Health Insurers. A $6.7 $10 billion tax based on percentage of health insurance premiums collected. It now phases in gradually until 2017. This tax is definitely in the bill, but the size and timing of the tax is unclear.

13. Elimination of tax deduction for employer provided retirement prescription drug coverage. It is unclear whether this tax is in the measure.

14. Increase of percentage of AGI required to deduct medical expenses from 7.5% to 10%. Few can deduct medical expenses today; fewer will be able to deduct them tomorrow. It is unclear whether this tax is in the proposal.

15. Compensation Limitation for Health Insurance Executives. If you work in that industry, you will be limited to a salary of $500,000. There’s no mention of this in the measure. However, given the Obama Administration’s stance on various pay-related measures, it’s likely included.

16. Medicare Payroll Tax Hikes. Once your income exceeds $200,000/$250,000 (MFJ), you will pay an additional 0.9% tax. Note that the employer will only collect (and be responsible for this tax) if you earn $200,000/$250,000 or more. This also impacts the self-employed. And the law is written so that the self-employed cannot deduct half of the new tax as a deduction to income tax. It appears this provision is dead. However, it’s been replaced with something worse (see below).

16. New Hospital Insurance Tax. “The Act will include an additional 0.9 percentage point Hospital Insurance tax for households with incomes exceeding $200,000 for singles and $250,000 for married couples filing jointly.” I remember then-candidate Obama stating that if you made under $250,000, he wouldn’t increase your taxes. Yeah, right.

17. New Unearned Income Tax. “[The Act] would add a 2.9 percent tax for households with incomes exceeding $200,000 for singles and $250,000 for married couples filing jointly to unearned income including interest, dividends, annuities, royalties and rents (excluding income from active participation in S corporations).” This is yet another measure which will stifle the economy in the United States. For my amateur gambling clients, this is particularly bad—it means your taxes will go up based on your gambling winnings, not your gambling net income.

18. Blue Cross Tax. There is a tax deduction available today for Blue Cross and Blue Shield companies; this tax deduction will vanish if they don’t spend 85% (or more) of premiums on clinical services. There’s no mention of this in the proposal. However, it was in both the House and Senate Democratic proposals and I expect it’s in this one, too.

19. Excise Tax on Cosmetic Medical Procedures. A new 5% excise tax on these procedures. This one is dead.

19. Tax on Indoor Tanning. A new 10% excise tax on indoor tanning salons. This one made the cut.

20. Paper Production and Cellulosic Biofuels. “[Close] the loophole that allows certain byproducts of paper production to be eligible for the cellulosic biofuels producer credit.” This new tax provision is in the measure.

21. Strengthen Economic Substance Rules. “[Help] prevent tax shelters by clarifying the definition of when activities have true “economic substance” beyond evading taxes.” While the details aren’t listed, it’s clear that this provision will strengthen the economic substance rules. This will increase costs for complex transactions, and will likely depress economic activity.


Obviously, the devil is in the details and all that’s been released is a framework. Unfortunately, the framework looks rotten to the core. The Congressional Budget Office can’t determine what the cost of the measure is. And until the actual legislation appears, line by line, who knows what’s in it. The House bill was a model of brevity at just under 2,000 pages. The Senate bill was just a wee bit longer, at around 2,800 pages. I suppose this measure (when we see it) will be about 3,500 pages. What appears certain is that there are more taxes in this measure.

The public doesn’t want this. They believe (rightly) it will add yet more bureaucracy to Washington, and that it reeks of socialized medicine. So who cares about the cost (estimated at just under $1 Trillion by the White House), public opinion, or that it will devastate the economy.

Annualization Method for Estimated Taxes in California

Sunday, February 21st, 2010

Many taxpayers, especially those with income streams that are inconsistent, use the Annualization Method to make their estimated tax payments. For federal tax purposes, it’s relatively easy. You take the year-to-date income through the period end (March 31st, May 31st, August 31st, or December 31st), annualize it, compute the annual tax, and then pro-rate it for the tax payment that’s due. But how do you work the Annuzliation Method in California, when the first payment (due April 15th) is for 30% of the tax?


The Franchise Tax Board has come out with an article with the answer.
For those who do not use the Annualization Method, 30% of the tax is due on April 15th, 40% is due on June 15th, nothing is due on September 15th, and 30% is due on January 18, 2011. For taxpayers using the Annualization Method, 27% is due on April 15th, 63% is due on June 15th, 63% is due on September 15th, and 90% is due on January 18, 2011.

The Franchise Tax Board also had good news for taxpayers who made estimated payments using the old 25% rule for the first three estimated payments of 2009.

The good news is R&TC Section 19136(g) prevents the imposition of a penalty for underpayment of estimated tax if the underpayment was created or increased by a law chaptered during and operative for the same taxable year. Since the amendments to R&TC Section 19136.1 by ABX4 17 with respect to the percentages for the annualized method were enacted in 2009 and operative for the 2009 taxable year, no penalty for underpayment of estimated tax can be imposed if the underpayment was created or increased by the changes made by ABX4 17…If an underpayment of estimated tax exists due to the changes to the annualized percentages for the first three estimated tax payments, you may request a waiver or reduction of the underpayment of estimated tax penalty by completing Part I of Form 5805.

Do note that this exception, in existence for 2009, will not work for 2010. The law changing California’s estimated tax payments to 30%-40%-0%-30% passed in 2009. At the rate the Bronze Golden State is going, we’ll soon be required to pay 100% of our estimated tax in April.

What Do Hawaii, North Carolina, New York, Illinois, and California Have In Common?

Sunday, February 21st, 2010

The Tax Foundation noted last week that several states will be delaying income tax refunds. Hawaii won’t be sending out refunds until July 1st; North Carolina will send them out “when they feel like it,” and New York Governor David Paterson wants to delay refunds for those who file in March. Meanwhile, Illinois is simply not paying its debts.

Meanwhile, it’s almost a certainty that California will be joining this list. Barring a miracle in the Legislature (the Democrats and Republicans and Governor Schwarzenegger coming to an agreement in the next few weeks), registered warrants (aka IOUs) will have to be sent out beginning in late March or early April. Controller John Chiang implied this when he said the state was running out of cash. Meanwhile, the Democrats in the legislature continue to pass big ticket programs (e.g. healthcare legislation) so it’s as if they’re living in dreamland.

When the Whine Under the Hood Is a Dead Rat

Sunday, February 21st, 2010

Finding a good, honest automobile mechanic can be difficult. I’ve been lucky; my car is fairly reliable and my mechanic really is honest. Unfortunately, there’s a mechanic in the Bay Area who invented a unique way to rip off the public.

Mehran Baranriz and his wife Bita Imani owned Group Specialist, an automobile repair facility in Redwood City. Their method of operation was quite profitable…for themselves. They billed insurance companies $875,000 for work that was never performed. But it’s what they did to some unlucky individuals that is the Pièce de résistance.

Many customers were told they had damage from rats. The mechanics would show them the dead rats. What the customers didn’t know was that the repair shop bought rats, killed them, and planted them under the hood of customers’ cars.

Last year Mr. Baranriz pleaded no contest to multiple counts of insurance fraud. He was sentenced on Friday to four years in prison. His wife had pleaded no contest to felony tax evasion; she received six months.

Traficant to Run as an Independent

Sunday, February 21st, 2010

James Traficant is leaving the Democratic party. He is now planning on running as an independent in the May Ohio primary. The Associated Press noted that he doesn’t like the Congressional leadership of House Speaker Nancy Pelosi and Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid.

Nevada’s Budget Troubles

Thursday, February 18th, 2010

While California has been on center stage with its budget troubles, Nevada, too, has had problems. The Silver State is facing an $887 million budget deficit (by comparison, California is facing a $19.9 billion deficit). Unemployment is high, and revenues in the gaming industry fell by the largest percentage ever in 2009.

Governor Jim Gibbons (R) has proposed two tax increases (mining and sales) but in his view they’re not tax increases. “That is not a tax increase if you look at it carefully,” Gibbons said about the mining-tax proposal. “That is simply clarifying the deductions that they are allowed to take.” Well, when taxes go up it’s an increase. I’ll ignore the semantics and say that’s what’s happening.

Meanwhile, Democrats in the Nevada legislature also want to increase taxes according to a story in the Las Vegas Review Journal. Since it appears that the only people who don’t want taxes to increase in Nevada are Republicans in the legislature taxes are going up in Nevada.

As I’ve been saying about California, what must happen everywhere is that spending needs to be cut to revenues. Pension benefits will need to be cut. Public employees salaries will be decreasing in the future. That’s the reality: The public (voters) don’t want tax increases. If you’re running for office, ignoring the voters is a way to head to a new career.

Austin Plane Crash

Thursday, February 18th, 2010

As I’m sure you’ve heard, a man set fire to his home in Austin, Texas and then flew his private plane into an office building housing IRS offices. Two bodies have been found. Nineteen individuals were injured in the crash.

Andrew Stack, formerly of Riverside County, California, flew his plane into the building after posting a manifesto on the Internet. Mr. Stack has had beefs with the IRS over the years, and it appears he snapped.