Notwithstanding sections 109 (d) and 301 of this title, a case under this chapter concerning an unincorporated tax or special assessment district that does not have such district’s own officials is commenced by the filing under section 301 of this title of a petition under this chapter by such district’s governing authority or the board or body having authority to levy taxes or assessments to meet the obligations of such district.
Thus begins Section 921 of Title 11, Chapter 9, Subchapter II of the US Bankruptcy Code. I bring this up because I read over the weekend that the Bronze Golden State is in “de facto bankruptcy.”
Such is the title of Steven Greenhut’s OpEd. Unfortunately, it appears dead-on accurate. You can’t spend more than you take in yet the “solution” to those in Sacramento (especially Democrats) and Washington is to spend more. It’s sort of like what I learned in business school: If you’re losing money on a per-item basis, just increase your sales!
Oh, yes: If you lose money on a per-item basis, selling more will just make your problem worse.
The solution has been obvious from day one, but it’s anathema to public employees, public employee unions, and the people they contribute to (Democrats, generally): there needs to be fewer of them making a lot less per person. California has the 48th worst business climate in the country, yet Service Employees International Union California President Bill Lloyd said, “The only way to do that is to make sure that everyone in the state pays their share, including the corporations who keep getting a free pass from the governor and the Legislature.” I guess Mr. Lloyd would like us to be at number 50.
Unfortunately, Democrats in the Legislature continue to hope that tomorrow will bring good news. With a structural deficit, it won’t until the underlying problems are addressed. There really is no choice.
Tags: 2010CalBudget