North Carolina changed its tax law over a year ago. While I have professional gambling clients in North Carolina, I do not currently have amateur gambling clients. It’s likely I won’t be getting many of those, as North Carolina legislators have made the Tar Heel State a bad state for gamblers.
North Carolina eliminated many itemized deductions for the 2014 tax year while increasing the standard deduction. Overall, this simplification is likely a good thing for most residents. Gamblers, though, are severely penalized. There’s no longer a deduction for gambling losses, so an amateur gambler residing in North Carolina who has $100,000 of wins and $100,000 of losses owes tax on the $100,000 of wins.
So here is my current list of bad states for gamblers:
Connecticut [1]
Hawaii [2]
Illinois [1]
Indiana [1]
Kansas [1]
Massachusetts [1]
Michigan [1]
Minnesota [3]
Mississippi [4]
New York [5]
North Carolina [1]
Ohio [1]
Rhode Island [1]
Washington [6]
West Virginia [1]
Wisconsin [1]
NOTES:
1. CT, IL, IN, KS, MA, MI, NC, OH, RI, WV, and WI do not allow gambling losses as an itemized deduction. These states’ income taxes are written so that taxpayers pay based (generally) on their federal Adjusted Gross Income (AGI). AGI includes gambling winnings but does not include gambling losses. Thus, a taxpayer who has (say) $100,000 of gambling winnings and $100,000 of gambling losses will owe state income tax on the phantom gambling winnings. (Michigan does exempt the first $300 of gambling winnings from state income tax.)
2. Hawaii has an excise tax (the General Excise and Use Tax) that’s thought of as a sales tax. It is, but it is also a tax on various professions. A professional gambler is subject to this 4% tax (an amateur gambler is not).
3. Minnesota’s state Alternative Minimum Tax (AMT) negatively impacts amateur gamblers. Because of the design of the Minnesota AMT, amateur gamblers with significant losses effectively cannot deduct those losses.
4. Mississippi only allows Mississippi gambling losses as an itemized deduction.
5. New York has a limitation on itemized deductions. If your AGI is over $500,000, you lose 50% of your itemized deductions (including gambling losses). You begin to lose itemized deductions at an AGI of $100,000.
6. Washington state has no state income tax. However, the state does have a Business & Occupations Tax (B&O Tax). The B&O Tax has not been applied toward professional gamblers, but my reading of the law says that it could be at any time.
Dear Mr. Fox,
I think the list of bad states for gamblers means that advantage players cannot achieve an edge in video poker and other games where losses are used to offset winnings.
Is this correct? Thank you.
Scott
It depends on the state. Some states are bad for amateur gamblers while others are bad for professionals.
Russ Fox
They sure don’t let you know that at the casino. So what is. The precent the same on slots and table game winnings you
Hi
Cannot deduct losses in bad states. 2017 I won 103K lost 100K and had to pay tax on the winnings 103K which in truth wasonly 3K. How can they tax income that did not conclude to income ? In essence they are taxing wealth/income that does not exist. Had to borrow 6K to pay tax on income I did not actually have. Now I understand this but has no one challenged this in federal court ? It would seem unconstitutional to tax wealth that does not tangibly exist and therefore puts a liability on citizens for conditions they cannot meet not having the wealth based on losses to pay the taxes.
There is a Wisconsin case where this was challenged. The Wisconsin Court of Appeals ruled that the law was logical. See http://www.taxabletalk.com/2007/03/29/wisconsin-is-no-place-to-gamble/