Archive for the ‘California’ Category

I’m Shocked to Find That People Move from High-Tax States to Low-Tax States

Sunday, June 3rd, 2012

Well, not really. This post by the Tax Foundation notes that New Yorkers are finding other states, such as Florida, far less taxing and are relocating there. The story references the New York Post; that newspaper ran a story noting that $20 billion of income migrated south.

Foundation analyst Nick Kasprak said taxes play a role in people’s decisions to relocate.

“You generally see people moving from higher-tax states to lower-tax states,” he said. “Certainly, taxes are one way that states compete with one another.”

Now, you know that, I know that, but do the people running California know that? Back in December I posted about how California has lost $48 billion of AGI (Adjusted Gross Income) from 1993 to 2008. In total, the Bronze Golden State lost just over 720,000 tax returns while losing that income. However, at the same time, California’s population increased by 5 million.

The conclusion is obvious: High income individuals have left and were replaced by low income individuals. People like me left the state and have gone to less taxing environments.

Another conclusion is equally obvious: California must make fundamental reforms to its taxation system. This is going to be horribly painful (especially if you are in a public employee union). Both the number of employees, what they do, what they’re paid, and what their benefits are, must all be cut–and cut substantially. Even the most golden of climates can turn ugly.

Another Survey, Another Bad Result for California

Wednesday, May 30th, 2012

Yet another survey puts California among the worst three states from a tax perspective. Alvarez & Marsal Taxand, a consulting and tax advisory firm, surveyed 800 financial executives (302 responded). Among the questions asked was Which states do you view as most competitive from a tax perspective? The usual suspects finished on the bottom: California, New York, and New Jersey. As Alvarez & Marsal Taxand noted, “…the states generally viewed as having complex tax systems and high tax rates are the three states listed (by a wide margin) as the least competitive states.” Alvaraz & Marsal Taxand Managing Director Don Roverto told the the Orange County Register, “The feedback from clients who do business in California is that it has one of the highest combinations of high rates and complex systems and that’s why it’s at the bottom.”

It’s also not a surprise which states finished at the top: Texas, Florida, and Nevada. These states all feature a tax exclusion or non-income tax based system.

Perhaps California will consider tax simplification, lowering rates, and making businesses feel wanted. Of course not–the Bronze Golden State will have one or two tax hike proposals on the November ballot.

Strip Club Tax Proposed in California; Unlikely to Become Law

Tuesday, May 22nd, 2012

There’s now a proposal in California to tax strip clubs. The revenue that would be raised by the tax, proposed at $10 per patron, would go to rape crisis centers in the state. However, because this is a tax it requires a 2/3 vote for passage. Given Republican’s hostility to anything with the word “tax” in it, this measure is very unlikely to become law.

Budgeting, California Style

Sunday, May 20th, 2012

The news came out this week from California’s non-partisan Legislative Analyst that the budget deficit in the Bronze Golden State is now $17 billion, up from $15.7 billion (and the $9 billion it was noted as just a couple of weeks ago). So what are the Democrats proposing? Tax increases.

I keep harping on the same things, because, well, the Democrats (and Governor Brown) are treating a symptom of the problem, not the problem itself. California continues to lose valuable members of the state: People who create jobs and bring tax revenues. They’re being replaced by people who don’t; the state has 12% of the nation’s population but 33% of its welfare recipients.

Jerry Brown also said that it’s full speed ahead for the high-speed rail project. Good luck finding the $55.7 billion more you need. As the Wall Street Journal noted,

Transportation experts warn that the 500-mile bullet train from San Francisco to Los Angeles could cost more than $100 billion, though the Governor pegs the price at a mere $68 billion. The state has $12.3 billion in pocket, $9 billion from the state and $3.3 billion from the feds, but Mr. Brown hasn’t a clue where he’ll get the rest. Maybe he’s hoping Facebook will buy the train, though he’ll have a hard time convincing Mark Zuckerberg that it’s worth 100 Instagrams.

What will increased taxes accomplish? More people like me, fleeing California. Joseph Vranich, a business relocation coach from my old homestead of Irvine, told Advisorone, “Every client I’ve ever served has saved various taxes by moving out of [California].” Here’s more:

“The No. 1 reason why a company leaves varies depending on whether they are in a profitable or unprofitable position,” Vranich says. “If you are profitable, the No. 1 reason is high taxes. If you are unprofitable, the No. 1 reason is the regulatory burden,” he says, noting that fees, fines and compliance costs are so significant that their elimination could be all that is needed to bring a company to profitability.

I met former California Assemblyman Chuck DeVore (another former Irvinite) at the Exchange Club of Irvine. Mr. DeVore now resides in Texas.

My divorce from California was long in the making: call it a case of irreconcilable differences. I constantly warned that the nation’s biggest state was spending too much, that its meddlesome regulatory climate was choking off job creation, and that its “green” energy policies were driving out manufacturing. I was called a nag and ignored…

As a share of its economic output, California spends about 46 percent more on state and local government than does Texas.

There’s much more in the article — it’s well worth your time.

I’ll leave you with three links to op-eds that spotlight the reality of socialism (for that’s what California has become):

As Margaret Thatcher said, the problem with Socialism… as well as California’s model… (perhaps I repeat myself) is that at some point, you run out of other people’s money.

That comes from Jim Geraghty at the Campaign Spot. You may also want to read Steven Greenhut: Jerry Brown a dishonest bore and Mark Landsbaum: Don’t buy Jerry Brown’s poor-mouthing.

Another Survey, Another “F” for California

Thursday, May 10th, 2012

While Governor Brown and others in the Bronze Golden State continue to debate how to increase taxes, perhaps they’ll look at yet another survey which shows that California is at the bottom for business (among US states). With thanks to the TaxProfBlog for noting this, Thumbtack.com, in partnership with the Ewing Marion Kauffman Foundation released a survey of small business owners of which states were the best for business.

Receiving “A+” grades were Idaho, Oklahoma, Texas, and Utah; receiving “F” grades were California, Hawaii, Rhode Island, and Vermont. The three worst performing cities were all in California: Los Angeles, Sacramento, and San Diego. The top three cities were Oklahoma City, Dallas/Fort Worth, and San Antonio. Nevada received a “B+” while Maryland received a “C-“. Las Vegas ranked 10th of the 40 cities surveyed.

The interactive map is available here while the full survey can be found here. A press release on the results is also available.

Texas #1, California #50 in Business Location Survey

Thursday, May 3rd, 2012

Another week, another survey of which state is best for business. For the eighth straight year, Chief Executive magazine ranked Texas as the best state in the union as to where to conduct business. Unsurprisingly, California is at the bottom. My state, Nevada, is at #12; Aaron’s home of Maryland is #40. Here are the top ten and bottom ten states:

1. Texas
2. Florida
3. North Carolina
4. Tennessee
5. Indiana
6. Virginia
7. South Carolina
8. Georgia
9. Utah
10. Arizona

41. Hawaii
42. Oregon
43. Pennsylvania
44. Connecticut
45. New Jersey
46. Michigan
47. Massachusetts
48. Illinois
49. New York
50. California

The two states that made the biggest moves were Oregon and Louisiana. Oregon fell nine spots in the ranking, likely due to their income tax increase that passed last year. On the other end of the spectrum is Louisiana, which was ranked 47th in 2006 but is now ranked 13th (up 27 spots from 2011).

Meanwhile, Chief Executive describes California as having slipped deeper into the ninth circle of business hell. Perhaps this section of the report will enlighten Sacramento:

The following is a representative sample of comments from participating CEOs:

  • California is the worst! They are doing everything possible to drive a business out of their state. If it were not for the climate, they would have lost half their population.
  • California regulations, taxes and costs will leave only tech, life sciences and entertainment as viable. If you aren’t an elitist, no room here for the middle or working classes.
  • California treats business owners like criminals. California has different overtime policies for its own employees vs. private sector.
  • California’s labor regulation is a job killer. We will be moving our business out of the state, which will lose hundreds of jobs simply due to the poor regulatory environment.
  • California should secede from the union—it is like doing business in a foreign country, it has its own exchange rate, and its regulation is crazy.

Meanwhile, the budget deficit in California grows (the Legislative Analyst says it’s at $3 billion and will grow from that number). Perhaps the idea of cutting regulations and spending just what the state takes in might garner some support in Sacramento. Well, one can always dream….

Franchise Tax Board v. Hyatt to be Argued on May 7th

Sunday, April 29th, 2012

The oral arguments in the appeal by California’s Franchise tax Board in Gilbert Hyatt’s lawsuit against the Board will be heard on May 7th in Carson City by the Nevada Supreme Court. The FTB is appealing the nearly $500 million judgment that was levied against them in February 2009. The case itself was filed in 1998, but took a circuitous path to trial in Las Vegas: It first went to the US Supreme Court as the Franchise Tax Board argued it was immune from being sued. The FTB lost that argument unanimously in 2003, and then lost the case in 2009.

The good news is that a decision in the case will likely come this summer or fall. The bad news is the oral arguments will be heard in Carson City so I can’t attend. Hopefully there will be news stories on the hearing (I’ll pass those on).

California Tax Revenues Lag

Thursday, April 26th, 2012

In what is, for me, the biggest non-surprise, California looks to be facing a $9 billion deficit. Reports are that income tax collections in April have severely lagged behind estimates. Given that the economy remains in the doldrums, only bureaucrats and Democrats in Sacramento should be surprised by the news.

Actually, Governor Jerry Brown has called upon Democrats in the legislature to approve cuts. The problem, though, is that they are beholden to special interest groups (mainly public employee unions) which would be directly impacted by those cuts. Sooner or later those cuts will have to be made, and they’ll be a lot less painful if they’re made sooner. Unfortunately, I expect later to win rather than sooner.

Meanwhile, Governor Brown’s proposed tax increase this fall would increase the amount of money to education. If the measure passes, that is; under California’s constitution, 40% of taxes go to education. So will schools see any of those funds? No, they’d all go to pensions. As more Californians find out about this expect the measure to flunk in November.

I’ve been saying for years the solution is that government must be small and nimble. I’ve written in the past about California’s plethora of government agencies. The size of government must shrink drastically for fiscal sanity to again exist in the Bronze Golden State.

Best States for Entrepreneurs: South Dakota, Texas, and Nevada Lead the Way

Sunday, April 22nd, 2012

The Small Business & Entrepreneurship Council released last Monday their 2012 Business Tax Index. There aren’t many surprises when you look at the list of best and worst (at least, for regular readers of this blog). The top seven states have no income tax on individuals. Meanwhile, the usual suspects (with one exception) are on the list of the bottom ten.

First, the top ten:
1. South Dakota
2. Texas
3. Nevada
4. Wyoming
5. Washington
6. Florida
7. Alaska
8. Alabama
9. Ohio
10. Colorado

The bottom ten has a lot of the usual high-tax “Blue” states:
42. Connecticut
43. Hawaii
44. Vermont
45. California
46. Maine
47. Iowa
48. New York
49. New Jersey
50. Minnesota
51. District of Columbia

I was surprised to see Minnesota so low on the list. Minnesota has a high capital gains tax rate; that, combined with its relatively high personal income tax rate, inheritance tax, and the state’s AMT, led to it being near the bottom of the list.

I also need to compliment Michigan. I’ve been down on the state–at times, saying it has been worse than California–but the SBEC ranks the Great Lakes State number 12. Under a Republican governor, Michigan has improved its tax policies.

For those wondering why I’m now in Nevada rather than California, this is just another measure of the problems with the Golden State. Governor Brown and Democrats in the state are discussing measures to further increase the state’s taxes. Well, there are six more spots to go before reaching the top (worst) position!

The SBEC has a nice interactive map showing the 50 states (plus DC); you can view the map here.

California Property Tax Payments Due

Sunday, April 8th, 2012

The second half of California property tax payments are due on Tuesday, April 10th. That’s a postmark deadline (US postmarks only). Your local assessor may also accept online payments, but it is time for you to make those property tax payments.