Archive for the ‘California’ Category

If Anyone Wonders Why the Economy Isn’t Adding Jobs

Wednesday, November 17th, 2010

First, there’s the news that a deal to extend the Bush Tax Cuts is unlikely to pass Congress before year-end. I expected that (this Congress hasn’t shown any ability to pass anything useful). While both Democrats and Republicans have publicly stated they’ll pass an AMT patch, that hasn’t happened yet (though this is the one item that I actually expect Congress to deal with before year-end).

For business, that means uncertainty. Here’s what that does to businesses:

Meanwhile, here’s what happens to many individuals who want to start businesses today:

Finally, I’ll point out that I’m impacted by all of this. With California facing a $30 billion budget deficit, and Democrats in full control of the legislature and a new Democratic governor about to come on board, I expect tax increases here in the Bronze Golden State. For those who want to hear some different (edgier) music, that brings to mind this tune:

California Starts the Year $6 Billion in the Hole

Monday, November 15th, 2010

California’s Budget Analyst announced that the state is already $6 billion in the hole, and that the state faces a $25 billion deficit for 2011. Personally, I think that’s understating the problem: I suspect the deficit will rise to $30 billion. Governor-Elect Jerry Brown has pledged no new taxes or tax hikes but the public doesn’t believe him.

Current Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger has called the current legislature into a special session to deal with the $6 billion deficit. I’m not sure what he hopes for by this, as the only solution is drastic cuts to state government. And that solution is one which the Democrats who control the legislature will not touch.

Franchise Tax Board Implements New “MyFTB Account”

Tuesday, November 9th, 2010

The Franchise Tax Board has implemented a new “MyFTB Account.” This replaces the old “My Account” on the FTB’s website. Back in September I saw a demonstration of the new website and I was impressed. The system shows withholding, estimated payments, 1099-Gs and 1099-INTs issued by the FTB, and allows taxpayers and their representatives access to that information. Individuals (but not tax professionals) can change their addresses using the system.

Tax professionals must register to use the system. Registration is simple and straightforward. (Individuals must also register and its also simple and straightforward.)

There is one change, though, that will impact tax professionals. You must now collect a Form 743 from your client to obtain his information.

It looks to me like the system is an improvement over the old My Account system. No more looking up Customer Service Numbers, and then reentering the same information to get the data you need. Kudos to the FTB.

We Want It All But Don’t Tax Us To Get It

Wednesday, November 3rd, 2010

Californians demonstrated their usual inimitable politics yesterday. Democrats won nearly every statewide office. The next Governor is Jerry Brown. Mr. Brown promised that there would be no tax increases without a vote of the people. (Barbara Boxer was reelected to the Senate.) How Mr. Brown assuages his union supporters and doesn’t make the drastic cuts that just have to happen without tax increases will be the story of next summer.

It will be easier for Democrats to pass a budget. They no longer need Republican votes as Proposition 25 passed (a majority can now enact a budget rather than a 2/3 vote). However, Californians also passed Proposition 26; most “user fees” will need a 2/3 vote to pass. Californians rejected Proposition 21, so there won’t be a tax to support state parks. Proposition 24 failed, so we’ll have conformity between federal and California law for some business NOLs and multi-state issues.

Voters don’t like gerrymandering, and they supported Proposition 20 (letting a non-partisan commission draw Congressional districts) and rejected Proposition 27 (which would have disbanded the non-partisan commission). Proposition 19, which would have legalized marijuana, failed; it’s almost certain had it passed that it would have been thrown out by the courts as being in violation of federal law.

Proposition 22 passed. The state can’t raid transportation funds and other local funds in the future.

I’m disappointed that Proposition 23 (the proposed suspension of the global warming/greenhouse gas measure) failed. California’s attempt to change the laws of thermodynamics is doomed to failure, and a lot of good money will be wasted here.

Overall, Governor-Elect Brown is looking at a Hobson’s choice for his first budget. He can cut funding to his supporters (public employee unions) or he can renege on his promise regarding tax increases. When the state finance office notes the likely $30 billion deficit, it will be interesting to see if he offends his supporters, the voters, or both.

Proposition 26: Fees Require 2/3 Vote

Friday, October 29th, 2010

Proposition 26 on the California ballot would require many state and local fees to be approved by a 2/3 vote. Proponents of the measure argue that there are numerous hidden fees (taxes, in their view) that have been approved by the legislature and local governments and treats fees like taxes. Opponents argue that the measure would harm the environment.

The California Supreme Court has ruled that regulatory fees aren’t taxes. They may not be in name, but in effect they are. Still, the legislature does need some flexibility and this would definitely impact that.

No matter where you stand remember to vote on November 2nd.

Proposition 25: Majority Budget Instead of 2/3 Vote

Thursday, October 28th, 2010

Current law requires California to have a two-thirds vote in order to pass a budget. Proposition 25 would eliminate the two-thirds requirement and would allow the budget to be approved by a simple majority vote.

Wow, it seems fair to have the majority rule. Well, that may seem to be the case but the reality in California budgeting is quite different. Democrats in the legislature have proposed massive tax increases in the last several budgets. The only reason those tax increases haven’t taken place is the two-thirds requirement; that requirement forces Democrats to compromise with Republicans in order for a budget to pass.

Shockingly, public employee unions are in favor of Proposition 25. Meanwhile, the Howard Jarvis Taxpayers Association is against the measure. No matter where you stand, remember to vote on November 2nd.

Proposition 24: Business NOLs and Multi-State Taxes

Thursday, October 28th, 2010

Proposition 24 on the California ballot would eliminate the ability of businesses to take Net Operating Losses (NOLs) as federal tax law allows. Additionally, the measure would continue the usage of a three-factor system for taxation of multi-state entities by California.

Under federal tax law, an NOL can be carried back two years or carried forward 20 years. Under California law as it currently exists NOLs cannot be carried back and can only be carried forward 10 years. However, as part of the 2008 budget compromise, beginning in 2010, California law now conforms to federal law. Proposition 24 would revert California law to the old rules. It would also stop a single-factor method of apportioning California sales rather than the current three-factor system.

This may seem like much ado about nothing–it doesn’t directly impact consumers. Well, that’s not really the case because California tax law is so anti-business that anything causes pro-business tax policy should be enshrined into law. That’s not how public employee unions see it (they’re proponents of Proposition 24); they don’t want anything to stop tax revenues. Of course, that’s rather short-sighted: Many businesses have expanded outside of California and/or have moved out-of-state due to California’s business climate.

No matter where you stand on Proposition 24, remember to vote on November 2nd.

Proposition 23: Suspension of AB32 (Global Warming Tax)

Thursday, October 28th, 2010

Back in 2006, the California legislature passed AB32. This measure, which was signed by Governor Schwarzenegger, allows the state to regulate greenhouse gases such as carbon dioxide (CO2). The goal of AB32 is to reduce such gas emissions by 2020.

AB32 is a huge job-killer. It’s a huge boon for regulators and a disaster for California taxpayers. Proposition 23 on the ballot would suspend AB32 until unemployment in California was 5.5% (or less).

Whether global warming is a reality or not continues to be debated. Whether AB32 would change anything is fairly clear, though. California is not the world, and if the world continues to emit CO2 the state can’t wall itself off into its own atmosphere.

I agree with opponents of Proposition 23 that the measure would hurt California’s alternative energy industries. Of course, opponents don’t tell you that (a) Proposition 23 would save far more jobs in other industries; (b) alternative energy industries either need heavy subsidies or heavy taxes on other sources of energy to be competitive; and (c) AB32 being implemented will harm California’s competitiveness.

Remember to vote on November 2nd.

We’re Number Two!

Wednesday, October 27th, 2010

Congratulations, California! You have the second worst business climate in the country!

Earlier today the Tax Foundation released its 2011 report on the Business Tax Climate Index. Here are the ten worst states:

50. New York
49. California
48. New Jersey
47. Connecticut
46. Ohio
45. Iowa
44. Maryland
43. Minnesota
42. Rhode Island
41. North Carolina

Here are the ten best states:

1. South Dakota
2. Alaska
3. Wyoming
4. Nevada
5. Florida
6. Montana
7. New Hampshire
8. Delaware
9. Utah
10. Indiana

One conclusion the Tax Foundation notes is, hopefully, self-obvious:

The lesson is simple; a state that raises sufficient revenue without one of the major taxes will, all things being equal, out-compete those states that levy every tax in the state tax collector’s arsenal.

Meanwhile, “The states in the bottom ten suffer from the same afflictions: complex, non-neutral taxes with comparatively high rates.”

The report is lengthy but has numerous nuggets that all tax geeks (and policymakers) should read. Unfortunately, it is highly unlikely that any lawmakers in the Bronze Golden State will take heed of the ideas noted above.

Proposition 22: Transportation Funding

Wednesday, October 27th, 2010

Proposition 22 on the California ballot would prohibit the raiding of transportation funding for anything. The measure, if approved, would stop the practice of the legislature of using transportation funds (including the gasoline tax) to fund anything and everything else.

Not surprisingly, the Chamber of Commerce and California cities are generally for the measure while public employee unions oppose the measure. Cities are especially annoyed with the legislature’s annual raiding of local funding.

No matter where you stand on the measure, remember to vote on November 2nd.