Archive for the ‘Legislation’ Category

Rangel Hit With 13 Counts of Ethics Violations

Thursday, July 29th, 2010

Congressman Charlie Rangel (D-NY), the former chairman of the tax writing House Ways and Means Committee, has been charged with 13 ethics violations. The charges include failing to report the rental income on property in the Dominican Republic on his tax return, not disclosing all of his assets on his financial disclosure forms, violating a ban on gifts, and soliciting funds from from an individual who might be impacted by the performance of his duties. A trial on these charges will likely be held in September.

Of course, this is, according to Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi, “The most ethical Congress in history.” Yeah, right.

2011 Doesn’t Look Bright

Tuesday, June 8th, 2010

Arthur Laffer, the noted economist, penned an op-ed in the Wall Street Journal. An excerpt:

But at the tax boundary of Jan. 1, 1983 the economy took off like a rocket, with average real growth reaching 7.5% in 1983 and 5.5% in 1984. It has always amazed me how tax cuts don’t work until they take effect. Mr. Obama’s experience with deferred tax rate increases will be the reverse. The economy will collapse in 2011.

Dr. Laffer also notes something that I’ve been saying since I began this blog:

It shouldn’t surprise anyone that the nine states without an income tax are growing far faster and attracting more people than are the nine states with the highest income tax rates. People and businesses change the location of income based on incentives.

In any case, the entire article is well worth your perusal; you can find it here.

Your Tax Return May Cost More

Tuesday, June 1st, 2010

Something that all economists know is that all tax increases on businesses are passed on to consumers. All of them. There is no such thing as a free lunch.

The Tax Extenders Bill, HR 4213, would impose a new tax on small S Corporations…like mine. If this bill becomes law, I will be forced to increase my rates. I’d guess the increase at somewhere around 10% (I’m in Las Vegas for the week, so I can’t run the numbers as well as I could in Irvine). Please call your Senators (you can find their phone numbers here) if you don’t like the idea of such a rate increase and a discriminatory tax against small S Corporations. For Californians, you can reach Barbara Boxer’s office at (202) 224-3553 and Dianne Feinstein’s office (202) 224-3841. You can also send emails to them through the contact page I linked to.

On the other hand, if you like the idea of only large tax firms and higher charges from small tax practices, do nothing. NASCAR, Iowa diesel biofuels, and other wonders are part of the tax extenders package. I’m sure they’re important (to those people) but I don’t think they need tax subsidies.

The Who Needs Small Tax Practices Act

Thursday, May 27th, 2010

Call me bitter, but I’m unhappy with the new Extenders legislation. While it would extend several tax breaks, it would deal a blow to many entrepreneurs–myself included.

My practice is set up as an S Corporation. A 5% (or greater) S Corp owner must be paid a reasonable salary. He can take any additional profits as distributions. That’s exactly what I do, but perhaps not for long.

You see, the new Extenders bill would penalize businesses like me. Joe Kristan noted,

It would penalize the smallest personal service providers to the benefit of their larger competitors.. A sole proprietorship would pay taxes at a rate at least 2.9% higher than a competitor whose “principal asset” is the reputation of more than three employees.

The bill also will require businesses and the IRS to determine what the “principal asset” of a personal service corporation is. The bill obviously requires the valuation of intangible assets — reputation and skill — but in a way not elsewhere attempted in the tax law. How do you do this?

Joe notes that if I owned a building (through my business) that could be my largest asset, and that might make me exempt from this legislation.

I have a better idea: Dump this legislation. Why in the world does Congress want to penalize entrepreneurs such as myself? Could it be that larger service firms are annoyed that with the Internet smaller, more nimble competitors are driving away business? I saw that H&R Block’s business was down about 5% this past tax season.

Of course, Congress being what it is I doubt this legislation won’t pass as written. It’s stupid and penalizes people (remember the Health Care legislation?) so it’s passage is likely assured….

Why I’m Against This Health Care Bill

Sunday, March 21st, 2010

Most tax professionals I know want a limited government and limited taxation. The measure that the House will likely approve tonight will be disastrous in so many ways.

First, there are twenty new taxes in the measure. I’ve talked about this before but an essential reality of taxes is that all taxes are passed on to consumers. If a business must pay $10 more for an item, you will be paying at least $10 more for that item.

The only way the measure scared up enough Democratic votes in Congress was using phony accounting. The Congressional Budget Office (CBO) “scored” the measure as a deficit reducer. Well, the CBO scores only the first ten years of the measure. The taxes go into effect in the near future, while the health plan doesn’t go into effect for four years. With ten years of revenues and six years of costs, of course it reduces the deficits.

But for our children and grandchildren, the Obama Administration is mortgaging their future. This measure can’t be paid for, and added to the “Stimulus” legislation that passed last year the disaster is huge. Taxes will continue to go up, probably to confiscatory levels in high-tax states such as California and New York.

Governor Chris Christie (R-NJ) has the right idea. Let’s live within our means. Let’s cut spending, eliminate government programs to what’s necessary (rather than having what’s nice). We need to do this in Washington.

This health care bill spends money, creates bureaucracy (I’ve read that 16,000 new individuals will be needed at the IRS to enforce this) and will hurt American industry. More money will leave our pockets for taxes to fund this bureaucracy–funding that’s not acknowledged in the measure.

Unfortunately, the current Administration has absolutely no desire to limit government spending. There’s an option, though, and it comes as we vote later this year for our Representatives and Senators. Ask yourself if the individuals you are voting for have your fiscal future in mind. A good proxy for this is how they voted on health care (assuming they are in Washington today). In June (for California) and in November (for the country) we’ll have an option to let Congress know what they should be doing by electing individuals who understand what limited government means.

Unearned Income Tax in New Healthcare Bill Will Impact Gambling

Thursday, March 18th, 2010

The new healthcare legislation contains plenty of taxes. One especially bad one is a new 3.8% tax on unearned income above $200,000. This will have a very bad impact on amateur gamblers.

When I last looked at the bill, the tax was 2.9%. In the “final” version of the bill, it’s up to 3.8%. Let’s take a hypothetical gambler, Joe Student. Mr. Student has $500,000 of winning sessions and $495,000 of losing sessions. After his standard deduction and exemption he owes no tax.

But not in the near future. He’ll owe 3.8% on $300,000 of mostly phantom income, or $11,400. What will Joe Student do? He’ll cheat on his taxes, of course. Pay $6,400 more than what he made on his income—you must be kidding! But that’s exactly what the legislation dictates.

This legislation is bad in many ways, but from a tax standpoint it’s a disaster. Unfortunately, I don’t have the time right now to read the bill and find out what other nuggets are in the legislation; I’m forced to rely on others such as Keith Hennessey. Luckily, Mr. Hennessey and others do have the time to review legislation that remains unpopular, unworkable, and insane.

The Wyden/Gregg Tax Reform Bill: Interesting, but DOA

Sunday, February 28th, 2010

Senators Ron Wyden (D-OR) and Judd Gregg (R-NH) introduced a bill, “To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to make the Federal income tax system simpler, fairer, and more fiscally responsible, and for other purposes.” The bill would have a major impact on the US tax system. Though there are many good points about the bill, they really don’t matter: This legislation has no chance of passing this Congress in an election year.

The bill would lower the number of individual tax brackets from six to three (15%, 25%, and 35%). It would eliminate the dreaded Alternative Minimum Tax (AMT). It would triple the standard deduction. All Miscellaneous Itemized Deductions would be eliminated. The first 35% of capital gains would not be taxed (the remainder would be taxed as ordinary income). And the corporate tax would become flat, with a single 24% bracket.

There’s another aspect of the legislation that got my attention. I received a call from one of my gambling clients; he told me that the legislation would lead to regulated Internet Gambling in the United States. My client is correct: Subtitle C of the legislation would allow for legalized Internet Gambling in the United States, with licensing and record-keeping requirements.

Speaking of gambling, the measure does have a huge negative for amateur gamblers. Gambling losses are a miscellaneous itemized deduction; this measure would eliminate all such deductions. Amateur gamblers would be taxed on their winning sessions and would pay income tax on phantom wins that would no longer be offset by gambling losses.

However, this is all irrelevant. This measure has no chance of passing this Congress. Democrats in Congress are, for the most part, talking about massive tax increases rather than tax simplification. It’s also an election year, with Democrats running the risk of losing one or both houses of Congress. Finally, if Democrats are serious about moving health care legislation forward this will likely cause the failure of any other substantive legislation this year. Simply put, this measure is DOA.

Overall, though, I (like most tax professionals) would love to see a simpler Tax Code. It’s just not happening in 2010.

It’s Unpopular, Unworkable, and Insane, So Naturally They’re in a Hurry to Pass It (Part 2)

Monday, February 22nd, 2010

When I last wrote about the healthcare legislation, I noted the 17 taxes which would be in the plan. Let’s see what’s new in the “Unified Health Care Legislation” proposed by President Obama.

1. Individual Mandate Tax. For those who don’t purchase health insurance, this income tax surcharge continues to exist in this plan. I couldn’t determine the exact rate.

2. Employer Mandate Tax. On businesses with 50+ employees that do not offer health care, and at least one employee qualifies for a tax credit, $750/employee. This will cause many small businesses to stop growing once they reach 49 employees. Those figures come from the prior version. News reports indicate that this tax is still in the proposal.

It is unclear if a waiting period tax remains in the legislation.

3. Excise Tax on Health Insurance Plans. Beginning in 2013 2018, 40% tax (the percentage may be wrong) on plans costing $8500/$23,000 $10,200/$27,500. Is indexed to CPI. It is unclear whether exemptions in the Senate version have been continued in this proposal.

4. Health Insurance would be reported on W-2s. Another mandate that increases costs for business. It’s unclear whether this mandate survived. However, the White House release states that loopholes will be closed which implies this remains.

5. “Medicine Cabinet Tax.” Limitation on HSAs, FSAs, and MSAs to purchase non-prescription medication except insulin. Note that this is also in the House healthcare bill. This is definitely in the new proposal.

6. HSA Withdrawal Tax Increased. The tax would increase to 20% from 10%. This is also in the House legislation. This is definitely in the proposal.

7. FSAs capped at a maximum of $2500. They are now uncapped. This is definitely in the proposal.

8. 1099 Reporting for corporations. Requires businesses to send 1099-MISCs to corporations. This is another cost for businesses. This will begin in 2011 and will definitely increase my income. This is definitely in the proposal, but it’s unclear if this starts in 2011.

9. Tax on Charitable Hospitals. This excise tax of $50,000 per hospital impacts hospitals that don’t meet new Department of Health and Human Services regulations. It’s unclear whether this is in the proposal.

10. Tax on Drug Companies. The tax would be $2.3 billion based on sales percentage. There’s definitely a tax on drug companies, but the size and timing of the tax is unclear.

11. Tax on Medical Device Manufacturers. The $2 billion tax is also based on sales percentage. It rises to $3 billion in 2017. This tax is in the bill, but the size and timing of the tax is not clear.

12. Tax on Health Insurers. A $6.7 $10 billion tax based on percentage of health insurance premiums collected. It now phases in gradually until 2017. This tax is definitely in the bill, but the size and timing of the tax is unclear.

13. Elimination of tax deduction for employer provided retirement prescription drug coverage. It is unclear whether this tax is in the measure.

14. Increase of percentage of AGI required to deduct medical expenses from 7.5% to 10%. Few can deduct medical expenses today; fewer will be able to deduct them tomorrow. It is unclear whether this tax is in the proposal.

15. Compensation Limitation for Health Insurance Executives. If you work in that industry, you will be limited to a salary of $500,000. There’s no mention of this in the measure. However, given the Obama Administration’s stance on various pay-related measures, it’s likely included.

16. Medicare Payroll Tax Hikes. Once your income exceeds $200,000/$250,000 (MFJ), you will pay an additional 0.9% tax. Note that the employer will only collect (and be responsible for this tax) if you earn $200,000/$250,000 or more. This also impacts the self-employed. And the law is written so that the self-employed cannot deduct half of the new tax as a deduction to income tax. It appears this provision is dead. However, it’s been replaced with something worse (see below).

16. New Hospital Insurance Tax. “The Act will include an additional 0.9 percentage point Hospital Insurance tax for households with incomes exceeding $200,000 for singles and $250,000 for married couples filing jointly.” I remember then-candidate Obama stating that if you made under $250,000, he wouldn’t increase your taxes. Yeah, right.

17. New Unearned Income Tax. “[The Act] would add a 2.9 percent tax for households with incomes exceeding $200,000 for singles and $250,000 for married couples filing jointly to unearned income including interest, dividends, annuities, royalties and rents (excluding income from active participation in S corporations).” This is yet another measure which will stifle the economy in the United States. For my amateur gambling clients, this is particularly bad—it means your taxes will go up based on your gambling winnings, not your gambling net income.

18. Blue Cross Tax. There is a tax deduction available today for Blue Cross and Blue Shield companies; this tax deduction will vanish if they don’t spend 85% (or more) of premiums on clinical services. There’s no mention of this in the proposal. However, it was in both the House and Senate Democratic proposals and I expect it’s in this one, too.

19. Excise Tax on Cosmetic Medical Procedures. A new 5% excise tax on these procedures. This one is dead.

19. Tax on Indoor Tanning. A new 10% excise tax on indoor tanning salons. This one made the cut.

20. Paper Production and Cellulosic Biofuels. “[Close] the loophole that allows certain byproducts of paper production to be eligible for the cellulosic biofuels producer credit.” This new tax provision is in the measure.

21. Strengthen Economic Substance Rules. “[Help] prevent tax shelters by clarifying the definition of when activities have true “economic substance” beyond evading taxes.” While the details aren’t listed, it’s clear that this provision will strengthen the economic substance rules. This will increase costs for complex transactions, and will likely depress economic activity.


Obviously, the devil is in the details and all that’s been released is a framework. Unfortunately, the framework looks rotten to the core. The Congressional Budget Office can’t determine what the cost of the measure is. And until the actual legislation appears, line by line, who knows what’s in it. The House bill was a model of brevity at just under 2,000 pages. The Senate bill was just a wee bit longer, at around 2,800 pages. I suppose this measure (when we see it) will be about 3,500 pages. What appears certain is that there are more taxes in this measure.

The public doesn’t want this. They believe (rightly) it will add yet more bureaucracy to Washington, and that it reeks of socialized medicine. So who cares about the cost (estimated at just under $1 Trillion by the White House), public opinion, or that it will devastate the economy.

Taxing the Man Behind the Tree

Tuesday, February 2nd, 2010

Don’t tax me; don’t tax thee; tax that fellow behind the tree. — Senator Russell Long

It appears that the President’s budget aims to copy California and Oregon in spending our way to bankruptcy. Additionally, the philosophy noted above is ever-present in the budget.

Increasing taxes in a recession—even threatening to do so—will cause business owners to change their actions. “Why should I expand my business when the government will just take more and more of my money?” This will continue the economic slowdown, causing the need for more spending (in the view of the current Administration) and lead to more tax hikes. It’s a never-ending spiral.

The Tax Lawyer Blog has more on the bad budget coming out of Washington.

The big tax increase is the elimination of the Bush Tax Cuts. Let me be blunt: The ending of a tax cut is a tax increase. President Obama can say that he has never raised taxes, but he’s about to. I’ll have more on this as the year moves forward.

Senate Passes Haiti Charitable Contributions Bill

Thursday, January 21st, 2010

As expected, the Senate quickly and unanimously passed a bill allowing Americans who make charitable contributions to Haitian earthquake relief to take those charitable contributions on their 2009 tax returns. I expect President Obama to sign the measure very quickly.

As I’ve mentioned before, do not expect conformity in California. Our legislature has its own issues (see the next post), and there are more important things on its agenda.