Archive for the ‘Legislation’ Category

House Passes Haiti Charitable Donation Law

Thursday, January 21st, 2010

The House of Representatives unanimously passed a law allowing individuals to take 2010 contributions toward earthquake relief in Haiti on their 2009 tax returns. I expect the Senate to pass the law very quickly, perhaps by the State of the Union address next week. I do not expect California to conform to the federal change.

Whether you should take the deduction in 2009 is another question, though. For most individuals, it won’t make a huge difference. For high income individuals, given that 2010 tax rates figure to be higher, you will likely get more bang for the buck by waiting until you file your 2010 taxes to take the deduction.

They’re Mad as Hell and They’re Not Going to Take It Any More!

Wednesday, January 20th, 2010

Many of you may remember the movie classic Network:

On Tuesday, voters in Massachusetts sent a message to politicians. Massachusetts elected a Republican Senator. To put that in perspective, the last time a Republican was elected to the Senate in Massachusetts was in 1976, nearly forty years ago.

Massachusetts elects Democrats the same as the Sun rises in the eastern sky every day. But that didn’t happen on Tuesday. The why of that has to both directly and indirectly with taxes.

Massachusetts has been known informally for years as “Taxachusetts.” Actually, the Commonwealth is no longer among the “leaders” in high taxes in the U.S. It’s not that Massachusetts has gotten better; rather, other states, California included, have gotten worse. Still, Massachusetts recently had an initiative to eliminate its income tax (it failed). The current governor, Democrat Deval Patrick, has proposed tax increases. The voters in Massachusetts haven’t shown much love for that idea.

With the Massachusetts legislature and the governship in the hands of Democrats, wouldn’t voters in liberal Massachusetts be happy? Not hardly. Now add in Congress–completely in the hands of Democrats–and a Democratic President. During the past year, they have spent like there’s no tomorrow. Massachusetts residents may be liberal, but they’re not dumb. Sooner or later the bill for that spending must come due.

The last straw was the current health care “reform” measure. It doesn’t take a genius to see the money being wasted in this legislation. To get enough votes so that it would pass the Senate, giveaways (measured in billions of dollars) were done for Louisiana, Nebraska, and Connecticut; there are probably many, many more that no one knows about. After all, the legislation runs over 2,700 pages. I, and other bloggers, have noted, “It’s unpopular, unworkable, and insane, so naturally they’re in a hurry to pass it.”

Voters in Massachusetts and elsewhere want a small, nimble government. What they see coming out of Washington and the local state house is bloated bureaucracy. If you are a politician running for office this year a message has been sent. Imagine you’re going through a tunnel, and you see a light getting brighter and brighter. For those politicians who will embrace what voters want, the tunnel is at an end. I believe that for many politicians the light is an oncoming train.

It’s Unpopular, Unworkable, and Insane, So Naturally They’re in a Hurry to Pass It

Monday, December 21st, 2009

So I noted last month (more accurately, noting that Joe Kristan’s comment was completely accurate). We have a new listing of the taxes in the healthcare legislation. The new taxes are noted by italics while taxes that have been removed are noted by strikeout text.

1. Individual Mandate Tax. For those who don’t purchase health insurance, this income tax surcharge will start at $95 $495 (S)/$295 $990 (2)/$1485 (3+) or 0.5% of AGI in 2014 and rise in 2016 and future years to $750 $495/$2250 $990/$1485 or 2% of AGI.

2. Employer Mandate Tax. On businesses with 50+ employees that do not offer health care, and at least one employee qualifies for a tax credit, $750/employee. This will cause many small businesses to stop growing once they reach 49 employees.

There is also a waiting period tax of $400 (if the wait is 30-60 days) or $600 (60+ days). This tax also starts in 2014.

3. Excise Tax on Health Insurance Plans. Beginning in 2013, 40% tax on plans costing $8500/$23,000. Is indexed to CPI. In high premium states such as California, many plans would pay this tax. My health insurance would likely pay this tax…and it’s not a Cadillac plan. There’s a higher threshold for early retirees ($9850/$26,000) and those in “high-risk” professions. Longshoremen are exempt.

4. Health Insurance would be reported on W-2s. Another mandate that increases costs for business.

5. “Medicine Cabinet Tax.” Limitation on HSAs, FSAs, and MSAs to purchase non-prescription medication except insulin. Note that this is also in the House healthcare bill.

6. HSA Withdrawal Tax Increased. The tax would increase to 20% from 10%. This is also in the House legislation.

7. FSAs capped at a maximum of $2500. They are now uncapped.

8. 1099 Reporting for corporations. Requires businesses to send 1099-MISCs to corporations. This is another cost for businesses. This will begin in 2011 and will definitely increase my income.

9. Tax on Charitable Hospitals. This excise tax of $50,000 per hospital impacts hospitals that don’t meet new Department of Health and Human Services regulations.

10. Tax on Drug Companies. The tax would be $2.3 billion based on sales percentage.

11. Tax on Medical Device Manufacturers. The $2 billion tax is also based on sales percentage. It rises to $3 billion in 2017.

12. Tax on Health Insurers. A $6.7 $10 billion tax based on percentage of health insurance premiums collected. It now phases in gradually until 2017.

13. Elimination of tax deduction for employer provided retirement prescription drug coverage.

14. Increase of percentage of AGI required to deduct medical expenses from 7.5% to 10%. Few can deduct medical expenses today; fewer will be able to deduct them tomorrow.

15. Compensation Limitation for Health Insurance Executives. If you work in that industry, you will be limited to a salary of $500,000.

16. Medicare Payroll Tax Hikes. Once your income exceeds $200,000/$250,000 (MFJ), you will pay an additional 0.5% 0.9% tax. Note that the employer will only collect (and be responsible for this tax) if you earn $200,000/$250,000 or more. This also impacts the self-employed. And the law is written so that the self-employed cannot deduct half of the new tax as a deduction to income tax.

17. Blue Cross Tax. There is a tax deduction available today for Blue Cross and Blue Shield companies; this tax deduction will vanish if they don’t spend 85% (or more) of premiums on clinical services.

18. Excise Tax on Cosmetic Medical Procedures. A new 5% excise tax on these procedures.

18. Tax on Indoor Tanning. A new 10% excise tax on indoor tanning salons.


This is bad legislation, unwieldy, probably unconstitutional, and will hurt us all. So of course there’s a rush to pass it….

Health Care Legislation: We’ll be Paying for This

Sunday, December 20th, 2009

There is no free lunch. If the government provides us a benefit, it’s really we who provide that benefit. It’s our government, and the money that it’s giving us is our own, whether that money is borrowed or comes from tax receipts.

The health care legislation that appears likely to pass the Senate is such a bill. The legislation, which runs at least 2000 pages, contains numerous tax components. The latest change eliminates a tax on cosmetic surgery but adds a tax on indoor tanning. Medicare taxes will be increased on individuals earning more than $200,000 by 0.9%. Those are just two of the taxes in this legislation.

And there are numerous carve-outs and special deals so that the bill could make its way through the Senate. Nebraska won’t have to pay for Medicare; the other states will under this legislation. That deal was so that Ben Nelson, a Democrat who represents a relatively conservative state (Nebraska), would vote for the bill. There are provisions in the legislation that aid Louisiana and Indiana, states that are also relatively conservative and have Democratic Senators.

And what do we get for this? I’m still unsure; it appears to be some sort of mandatory health insurance program. What it will likely be is a lot more work for people like me, and a lot more bureaucracy. And a lot higher taxes. The bill, if it passes, will be passed on a straight party-line vote.

“Cutting Spending” Isn’t In Congress’ Vocabulary

Sunday, December 13th, 2009

When you or I run into cash flow problems, what do we do? We’re forced to cut spending, of course. It’s not as if we have a choice: We can’t print money, and robbing banks is usually not a good idea.

Congress, though, can spend money even if they don’t have any: It’s called deficit spending. But when the voting public starts complaining even Congress knows they have to do something. Of course, we we have Democrats in control of Congress so the idea of cutting programs is anathema to them.

The New York Times brings up the idea of the Value Added Tax (VAT). The VAT, popular in Europe, taxes at every step of the distribution process. The government doesn’t collect once; rather it gets to collect each time a product changes hands.

President Obama promised not to raise taxes on 95% of Americans. Of course, most of his proposals, including the health care plans being debated in Congress, will either directly or indirectly increase taxes. What Congress should do is cut programs, cut regulations, and cut the bureaucracy. Instead, expect the VAT to be championed by the Democrats in Congress.

Hat Tip: Hot Air

18 Tax Changes in Senate Healthcare Bill

Friday, November 20th, 2009

Senator Harry Reid’s (D-NV) healthcare legislation has 18 tax changes according to Americans for Tax Reform. Here’s a list of the taxes and their impacts (note: Dollar figures are single/single 2+ (S2) or MFJ):

1. Individual Mandate Tax. For those who don’t purchase health insurance, this will start at $95/$285 (S2) in 2014 and rise in 2016 and future years to $750/$2250.

2. Employer Mandate Tax. On businesses with 50+ employees that do not offer health care, and at least one employee qualifies for a tax credit, $750/employee. This will cause many small businesses to stop growing once they reach 49 employees.

3. Excise Tax on Health Insurance Plans. Beginning in 2013, 40% tax on plans costing $8500/$23,000. Is indexed to CPI. In high premium states such as California, many plans would pay this tax. My health insurance would likely pay this tax…and it’s not a Cadillac plan.

4. Health Insurance would be reported on W-2s. Another mandate that increases costs for business.

5. “Medicine Cabinet Tax.” Limitation on HSAs, FSAs, and MSAs to purchase non-prescription medication except insulin. Note that this is also in the House healthcare bill.

6. HSA Withdrawal Tax Increased. The tax would increase to 20% from 10%. This is also in the House legislation.

7. FSAs capped at a maximum of $2500. They are now uncapped.

8. 1099 Reporting for corporations. Requires businesses to send 1099-MISCs to corporations. This is another cost for businesses.

9. Tax on Charitable Hospitals. This excise tax of $50,000 per hospital impacts hospitals that don’t meet new Department of Health and Human Services regulations.

10. Tax on Drug Companies. The tax would be $2.3 billion based on sales percentage.

11. Tax on Medical Device Manufacturers. The $2 billion tax is also based on sales percentage.

12. Tax on Health Insurers. A $6.7 billion tax based on percentage of health insurance premiums collected.

13. Elimination of tax deduction for employer provided retirement prescription drug coverage.

14. Increase of percentage of AGI required to deduct medical expenses from 7.5% to 10%. Few can deduct medical expenses today; fewer will be able to deduct them tomorrow.

15. Compensation Limitation for Health Insurance Executives. If you work in that industry, you will be limited to a salary of $500,000.

16. Medicare Payroll Tax Hikes. Once your income exceeds $200,000/$250,000 (MFJ), you will pay an additonal 0.5% tax. Note that the employer will only collect (and be responsible for this tax) if you earn $200,000/$250,000 or more. This also impacts the self-employed. And the law is written so that the self-employed cannot deduct half of the new tax as a deduction to income tax.

17. Blue Cross Tax. There is a tax deduction available today for Blue Cross and Blue Shield companies; this tax deduction will vanish if they don’t spend 85% (or more) of premiums on clinical services.

18. Excise Tax on Cosmetic Medical Procedures. A new 5% excise tax on these procedures.


Remember, all tax increases are passed to consumers. There is no free lunch. If this legislation passes, you and I will be paying more for less.

Additionally, when government takes more, businesses either have to increase prices, cut wages, or do something else to still make a profit. If this legislation passes businesses will cut staffing. That’s basic economics, something sorely lacking in Washington.

Businesses will increase prices, but the law of supply and demand dictates that their revenues will likely decrease because of the higher prices.

I haven’t seen a tax professional speak in favor of this legislation. And I doubt I will; this measure will increase costs for businesses, lead to higher cots for consumers, and will almost certainly lead to a single-payer system. Peversely, this measure would likely lead to more business for me…for all the wrong reasons. As Joe Kristan says, “It’s unpopular, unworkable, and insane, so naturally they’re in a hurry to pass it.” Truer words have never been spoken.

Other coverage:
Roth Tax Updates
Don’t Mess With Taxes
Tax Lawyer’s Blog

Senator Reid Looking at Increasing Social Security, Medicare Taxes for the Wealthy

Sunday, November 15th, 2009

Senator Harry Reid (D-NV) is looking at increasing the Social Security and Medicare taxes for the wealthy per published reports from last week. Since President Obama has said he won’t increase taxes on those making less than $250,000, this would create the “doughnut” hole for the wealthy and the self-employed.

Consider, though, how stifling such taxes are on economic development. Small businesses are the driver of the economy. Studies show that over 80% of new jobs come from small businesses. Why would a small business expand when the government will just take more money?

The stated reason for the tax would be for health care. Frankly, the current Administration and the current Congressional leadership has little clue about economic development. The best result for the current health care legislation is the circular file. That said, I expect something to pass just so that the Administration can say they passed something.

Homebuyer’s Credit Extended; NOL Loss Changes

Monday, November 9th, 2009

The Senate passed an extension of the Homebuyer’s credit unanimously, and the House passed it nearly unanimously. So the credit (up to $8,000) has been extended on home purchases until April 30, 2010.

There are some changes in the legislation. The allowable AGI for the full credit has been increased from $75,000 to $125,000 (single; the new limit for Married Filing Jointly is $225,000); the credit fully phases out at an AGI of $145,000 (single) or $245,000 (married). A few of my clients have inquired about this credit, and I based my answers on the old AGI numbers. When I return to Irvine next week I’ll send you revised information.

There was also a change to Net Operating Losses in this legislation. For 2008 and 2009 NOLs, you can carryback the losses for five years rather than the normal two years.

So how does Congress pass this bill–a bill that costs $1 Billion a month–and say that it’s revenue neutral? Joe Kristan noted that Congress used its normal accounting techniques. Those techniques would get you and I a fraud conviction but Congress writes the laws. But I digress….

What it means in English is that calendar-year corporations with $1 billion or more of assets have to overpay third quarter 2014 estimated taxes by 33.25%. They will recover it with a lower fourth quarter payment in December 2014, but that’s after the current five-year Senate budget window ends, so as far as Congressional accounting is concerned, it never happens.

I hope no one wonders why Congress gets such low approval ratings….

Other coverage:
Tax Lawyer’s Blog
Stacie More’s Tax Tips
Roth Tax Updates
Tax Girl

Why Gamblers Should Dislike PelosiCare

Wednesday, November 4th, 2009

Suppose you’re an amateur gambler. Say you’re a college student. You net $45,000 playing poker tournaments. When you determine your annual wins and losses you find that your gross winnings are $800,000 and your gross losses are $755,000. You take the losses as an itemized deduction, and you pay tax based on the $45,000 of income (less your exemption and any other itemized deductions).

Under the House Health Care Plan (aka PelosiCare), the hypothetical gambler would be hit with a 5.4% surtax on his $800,000 of Adjusted Gross Income, or $43,200. Ouch.

So let’s see what the taxes would be (using 2008 rates, except for PelosiCare):

Federal Income Tax: $6,113
California Income Tax: $1,907
PelosiCare Surtax: $43,200

Total Taxes: $51,220

Yes, an individual would owe $51,220 of tax on $45,000 of income; he would actually lose $6,220 by earning $45,000! Ignoring the substantive issues with health care reform, the tax portion of the legislation is mind-boggling. It would also lead to more amateur gamblers not reporting their true income (e.g. more tax evasion) and would lead to lower tax collections in the United States.

Hopefully this proposal (which apparently is now 43 pages longer–up to 2,033 pages!) will die and something that’s a lot more reasonable will take its place.

House Health Care Bill Adds Taxes for All and Work for Tax Preparers

Sunday, November 1st, 2009

The 1990-page health care bill that the House will consider has numerous tax provisions. Americans for Tax Reform published a list of some of the changes:

– Employer Mandate Excise Tax of 0 to 8% of wages (depends on size of business);
– Individual Mandate Surtax of 2.5%;
– Flexible Spending Accounts (FSAs) limited to $2500/year;
– Non-qualified HSA Distributions would be taxed at 20% versus 10% currently;
– Income tax surtax of 5.4% on Modified AGIs over $500,000 single/$1 million MFJ (margin loan interest is not deductible for purposes of this calculation);
– 2.5% excise tax on medical devices;
– 1099s would be required for corporations; and
– “Empowers the IRS to disallow a perfectly legal tax deduction or other tax relief merely because the IRS deems that the motive of the taxpayer was not primarily business-related”.

These are just some of the tax changes in this measure.

It’s important to realize that this legislation will not be signed into law as currently drafted. It’s quite possible there will be no health care legislation passed (Americans are not in favor of the legislation), though I suspect something will be passed. Additionally, it is certain that if the Senate passes legislation it will be very different from the House bill.

This measure would lead to higher taxes on the wealthy. This would lead to more strategies by the wealthy to shelter income, which means more work for tax professionals. Additionally, the requirement that 1099s be issued to corporations would mean a lot more work for tax professionals. As I keep telling my brother, I’m convinced I have lifetime employment.