Archive for the ‘Payroll Taxes’ Category

California’s Other $17.8 Billion Deficit

Thursday, June 4th, 2009

California currently has a $24 billion budget deficit. Would you be surprised to learn that there’s another $17.8 billion budget deficit on top of the current budget fiasco?

It’s true.

California has had a major problem with the funding of unemployment insurance for years. Unemployment benefits are paid for through taxes on employers: the FUTA, SUI, and ETT taxes. FUTA is the Federal Unemployment Tax; SUI is the State Unemployment Insurance Tax; and ETT is the California Employment and Training Tax. FUTA is generally $56 a year per employee while SUI and ETT totals $160 to $350 a year per employee. At the end of 2008 the fund had a slight surplus, but had been in deficit funding in prior years.

It was in poor shape because Democrats in California’s legislature increased benefits (which they could do with a majority vote) but didn’t increase taxes (which takes a 2/3 vote). Increased spending led to the usual result: an increase in the deficit of the unemployment insurance fund.

The problem has ballooned in 2009 with the increase in unemployment. The San Francisco Chronicle is reporting that the fund is solvent only because of borrowing $17.8 billion from the federal government. Unfortunately, the federal government wants to be repaid and if the fund doesn’t become solvent that’s impossible. Governor Schwarzenegger proposed an increase in the SUI tax along with a decrease in benefits. The measure has not been heard; frankly, there’s no chance of any tax increase passing in the legislature this year.

So California continues to drift towards fiscal Armageddon. Given the likelihood of even more unemployment in coming months this is a problem that will have to be resolved sooner than later. If California does nothing, the federal government can impose higher FUTA taxes on California employers. If that happens employers will certainly choose to increase employment in other states if they have that option.

Sweet for Me, But Not for You

Thursday, May 14th, 2009

With a name like Sweeties you can probably guess what the business was in. If the government is correct, your first instinct would be right.

The Department of Justice is accusing Douglas Ketcher and Christina Wypych of Oakland Park, Florida of running a prostitution ring. That in itself is illegal. But not only did they allegedly violate those laws, the 58-count indictment also alleges that the owners did not pay their staff their full wages and, more importantly, didn’t remit their trust fund taxes to the IRS.

As I’ve said repeatedly, a sure-fire way of getting in trouble with the government is to not remit trust fund taxes or somehow get the accounting of those taxes wrong. The IRS investigates nearly 100% of these cases, and if you’re underlying business is shady the last thing you want is to have government investigators knocking on your door.

The indictment of Mr. Ketcher and Ms. Wypych alleges that their business, Sweeties, charged $300 an hour for customers to be “entertained” by their employees. Had they remitted their trust fund taxes they’d likely not be facing money laundering, tax fraud, and prostitution charges.

But Did They Remember the 46th Quarter?

Friday, May 8th, 2009

The Pruzan Law Firm began in 1938 in Brooklyn, New York. That’s about the only thing you’ll find on their web page.

Even that may be a thing of the past soon. The Department of Justice has filed a lawsuit to compel the Pruzan Law Firm to pay their back taxes…all 45 quarters they’ve skipped. That takes them back to 1997. As I’ve said many times in the past, a sure way to get yourself in trouble is to not pay your Trust Fund Taxes.

Joe Kristan has more.

Methods Gauranteed to Get You in Trouble

Sunday, April 26th, 2009

Below I present a trifecta of guaranteed methods to get you in very deep trouble with the IRS and your state tax agency. If you follow one of these methods you will likely find yourself on your way to ClubFed. Follow all of them, and a lengthy stay is almost guaranteed.

Let’s head first to Niles, Ohio. Niles is near Youngstown, and happens to be the home of the William McKinley Memorial and Library. I visited it two years ago, and it’s well worth the trip. But I digress….

John Matuszwski used to operate Matuszwski Roofing and Siding. He allegedly liked to pay his employees partially in cash. That’s not illegal. He also allegedly only included the portion of the money he paid his employees by check on their reporting forms. If true, that’s a crime. He also allegedly didn’t pay the trust fund (FICA) taxes to the government. As I’ve said before, not remitting those taxes is a sure-fire way to get in trouble. Mr. Matuszwski faces one charge of attempting to evade employment taxes totaling over $165,000.

Our second method of getting in trouble is one that has been tried many times. Just skim some of the revenue off the top from a business, and not report it on your tax returns. Mohammed Arif, Mohammed Memeon, Haji Memon, Mohammed Naemm, andd Mohammed Jaweed pleaded guilty earlier this week to tax evasion. The five, who are brothers, skimmed “significant” amount of revenue from their Dollar Dreams stores. They had their store managers keep good records of the skimming. That probably wasn’t a brilliant idea, as it gave the government good records of the skim, too. The five have agreed to make $1.2 million of restitution (in total) and will be sentenced in September.

Our third method comes straight from the Tax Protester FAQ. If you try to argue that there is no such thing as an income tax, or that it doesn’t apply to you, or that it has never been ratified, or that it’s unconstitutional, I guarantee bad things will happen to you.

And if you’re an attorney, you definitely should know better. Bernard Bagdis of Norristown, Pennsylvania, believed that neither he nor his clients had to file tax returns because of various business losses. (Hint: He’s wrong.) We’ve written about Mr. Bagdis before.

Mr. Bagdis boasted he was going to write Federal Tax Fraud: The User’s Guide. Instead of writing a book, he may have the book thrown at him. He was convicted last week of helping clients evade over $5 million in taxes on $24 million of income.

As I’ve said before, there is an income tax. There are also laws on withholding of income from employees’ checks. If you follow one of the methods outlined above your new home could be ClubFed.

Trust Fund Taxes Not Paid Lead to the Expected Result

Sunday, February 15th, 2009

Let’s head to Corpus Christi, Texas. Stephen and Bryan Lyons operated B&T Rents. The store was profitable. Of course it helps when you don’t send your trust fund taxes to the IRS. As I’ve said before, if you do that you’re guaranteed to face an IRS investigation. They did. The owners had hoped that front companies would hide where the money was from the IRS. That wasn’t successful, and the two owners pleaded guilty to tax fraud. Stephen Lyons received a year and a day at ClubFed; Bryan Lyons received 18 months. Both had to pay $10,000 fines. The two have already made full restitution to the IRS.

If your business is having trouble paying trust fund taxes, get legal and/or tax advice now. This is one area where malfeasance will almost always be discovered and where tax fraud will almost always be prosecuted.

When Cash Isn’t King

Sunday, December 7th, 2008

I’ve heard many times that cash is king. Well, that’s not always the case as Leroy Felt, Jr. discovered.

Mr. Felt was the owner of Woody’s Construction in Margate, Florida. He decided to pay his employees in cash. That’s absolutely legal…as long as you make all the necessary payroll deductions. Mr. Felt had a better idea.

He wrote corporate checks to various companies and individuals. They, in turn, gave Mr. Felt the cash (less a small fee kept for the service). Mr. Felt then used the cash to pay his employees. Mr. Felt thought he didn’t need to worry about those pesky payroll taxes.

The government doesn’t like it when you violate trust fund taxes. People who do so end up in prison when they’re caught and they end up paying the tax plus penalties and interest. Mr. Felt got caught, pleaded guilty, and was sentenced to ClubFed for four years.

Paying people under the table is a bad idea. If you get caught it’s almost a certainty that ClubFed is in your future.

They Should Have Known Better

Sunday, September 28th, 2008

This week’s tax evasion stories share a common theme: the alleged evaders (and those convicted) should have known better.

Let’s start in Sin City, where a personal injury attorney liked cash as a way to conduct his business. There’s nothing wrong with that, but when you don’t declare the cash income and you purchase assets and hide them in others’ names, problems can arise. When the total amount involved is $2 million over six years and there’s a sham child support agreement, it’s trouble with a capital t. Edmund C. Botha was found guilty last week of one count of tax evasion. Based on federal sentencing guidelines, Mr. Botha is looking at about three years at ClubFed plus probable restitution when he’s sentenced in early 2009.

Moving east, Danny Gladden is the former tax collector of Crawford County, Missouri. He was elected in 1991 and soon after discovered a lucrative side job: He embezzled from the county. A state audit discovered the missing funds in 2005, and he was later convicted of theft and sentenced to seven years in state prison. This past week he was convicted of tax evasion. Mr. Gladden forgot that tax must be paid even when the source of your income is stealing. Given that he owed about $82,000 in tax he’s looking at about two years at ClubFed based on sentencing guidelines.

Next, let’s look at two stories that both feature payroll taxes. First, the US Department of Justice calls this “the largest cash wage scheme in Massachusetts history.” Now, there’s nothing wrong with paying employees in cash—it’s completely legal. But you still must withhold payroll taxes, and you still must report them accurately to the government, and you do have to remit them to the appropriate agencies. What happens when you don’t do any of those things? Well, if you get caught, tried, and convicted, and the amount involved is over $43 million, you’ll likely find yourself at ClubFed for a long time.

And that’s exactly what happened to husband and wife Daniel and Aimee King McElroy. About $43 million in payroll was paid under-the-table, with the loss to the IRS being around $10 million and the loss to workers compensation companies was $7 million. In total the husband and wife were each found guilty of 19 counts. The husband was previously sentenced to 108 months at ClubFed; last week the wife received 78 months. They were also ordered to make restitution of $9.1 million.

Our final story comes from Worcester, Massachusetts. Attorney Christopher Uhl allegedly withheld money from his employees’ wages for payroll taxes. That’s good. He also allegedly didn’t remit that money to the federal government. That’s not good. He’s been indicted on six counts of tax evasion and six counts of willful failure to pay taxes.

If you have employees make sure you’re in compliance with payroll taxes. This is not an area to skimp on. Those taxes are called “trust fund taxes,” and the federal government and state governments almost always vigorously go after individuals who withhold but don’t remit. Committing this sort of tax evasion is a losing proposition.

Labor Day Payroll Tax Fraud

Monday, September 1st, 2008

I’ve said this before but it bears repeating—especially on Labor Day. If you want to get in trouble with the IRS either withhold payroll taxes and don’t remit them to the IRS or pay your employees under the table (thus not being in compliance with trust fund taxes). Either method starts you quickly on the road to ClubFed.

Thomas Carbo of Wayne, Pennsylvania did the latter. He decided to improve his business’ profitability by paying his employees under the table. He did temporarily save on his payroll tax expense…until he was caught. He ended up defrauding the government out of $168,000.

He was apparently caught as a result of a kickback scheme in nearby Norristown. His business appears to have been a Norristown vendor. The government subpoenaed his records but he didn’t comply with the subpoena; he’s accused of destroying the records instead. The government then investigated, looked at his bank records, and then discovered the tax fraud.

Mr. Carbo has pleaded guilty to one count of conspiracy to defraud and 17 counts of failing to collect and submit the payroll taxes. While he faces up to 90 years in prison and a fine of up to $4.5 million, federal sentencing guidelines suggest he’ll receive a little over two years at ClubFed.

Yet Another Payroll Service In Trouble

Sunday, June 8th, 2008

What happens if you use a payroll service and they don’t forward the deposits to the IRS and your state tax department? The payroll company will be in trouble, but the employer is still liable for the deposits. That’s why you should only use reputable companies.

Premier Data Solutions doesn’t sound like a payroll company, but that’s one of the services they offered. The company, located in Kankakee, Illinois, served a variety of employers, including the Kankakee Valley Park District, a local high school, and a pizza parlor. When the IRS notified these companies that their payroll deposits haven’t been made, they contacted the Kankakee Police. Currently both local and federal investigators are looking into Premier.

Complicating the matter is that Premier was sold earlier this year and, remarkably, the payroll deposit problems apparently weren’t noticed.

Joe Kristan recommended last week
that employers should check with the IRS to make sure that their payroll deposits are being received. That’s excellent advice. In any case I suspect lots of people are looking into whatever happened with the money Premier received but didn’t remit to the government.

News Story: The Daily Journal

Out Like a Lamb

Wednesday, June 4th, 2008

One of the surest methods I know to get the IRS upset with you is to withhold payroll taxes and not remit them. Payroll taxes are called trust fund taxes; I’ve yet to know of a time when the IRS hasn’t gone after a business that failed to remit those taxes. I’m also unaware of any case where the IRS hasn’t pursued a payroll service who failed to remit trust fund taxed on behalf of employers it serviced.

James McLamb, of Raleigh, North Carolina, was CFO of the Castleton Group. Castleton serviced about 100 employers in the Research Triangle area of North Carolina. Serviced, though, may be the wrong word to use for Castleton; scammed appears to be more apropos.

McLamb had a unique method of handling trust fund taxes. He’d calculate the correct amount of taxes, accept those remittances, and then change the numbers to much lower figures. He’d use the lower numbers to report payroll to the IRS and the North Carolina Department of Revenue. It’s unclear from the news story where the $8 million that was supposed to go to the IRS ended up; suffice to say it didn’t end up in the U.S. Treasury and likely lined McLamb’s pockets.

The fallout from this mess is what you’d expect. McLamb has pleaded guilty to defrauding the United States; he’ll likely be sentenced to a lengthy term at ClubFed later this year. Castleton is bankrupt; it’s owner blames McLamb for the company’s problems. The employers who trusted Castleton still have to remit the taxes to the IRS & North Carolina.

I strongly advise my corporate clients to use a reputable payroll service. This is not an area to skimp on—the penalties are high for mistakes and owners can and are held personally liable when mistakes occur. Finally, if you think that an idea like McLamb’s will work over the long term you’re badly mistaken. Trust fund taxes are heavily scrutinized and the government will come after you.