Archive for the ‘Tax Fraud’ Category

The Family That Defrauds Together…

Wednesday, January 21st, 2009

My writing partner and I have been trying to figure out the subject of our next book. We’re thinking about a mystery, and it appears we’ve just had a plot handed to us.

We’re going to open a home study program, catering to low income families. We’ll tell our clients that as a bonus for using our services we’ll prepare their tax returns. All we ask in return is that they assign their Minnesota Education Tax Credits to us. (That credit can’t be assigned, and could only be applied for after the money has been spent.) What could possibly go wrong? Oh, we’re violating a few laws but who will catch us? Anyway, it might make a good plot for a mystery.

I didn’t make this up, though, as the Department of Justice alleges that’s exactly what a Minnesota mother and son did. Carolyn Louper-Morris and William J. Morris, Jr., both of Minneapolis face a 22-count indictment. They’re charged with mail fraud, wire fraud, money laundering, and wire fraud conspiracy. The DOJ alleges that 1,800 took advantage of CyberSutdy 101’s program, and the couple supposedly received $2.4 million from the Minnesota Department of Revenue.

What did the couple do with the money? Well, they did provide over 2000 computers to low-income students…but they apparently forgot to pay K-Mart for the computers. The indictment alleges that the money was partially used for “…$300,000 payment on a home, $74,000 for a new Mercedes SUV and $8,600 for a mink coat, a cashmere and rabbit scarf, and a chinchilla-trimmed hat.” The Minnesota DOR canceled the tax credit for CyberStudy 101 in 2002.

The couple also is alleged to have lied to the Minnesota DOR; the Minnesota DOR asked where the $2.4 million came from and was supposedly told that it was “loan proceeds.”

There is one surprise for me: That this is a case in federal court rather than state court. I would think that if the allegations are true that fraud charges could certainly be filed in state court. But the defendants, like all defendants, are innocent until proven guilty.

By the way, CyberStudy’s website is still open. If you’re interested in their programs you’d better hurry; I suspect they won’t be available soon.

News Story: Pioneer Press, KARE

Selling Dependents?

Monday, January 19th, 2009

If you’re a tax preparer and you want to help your clients save money, one way would be to invent a dependent or two for them. Sure, you’re violating a law (or two), but your clients will save money. Not only will they get the extra exemption, they may get some education deductions or credits.

Yes, there’s a problem with this scheme (actually, several, but I’ll focus on the biggest). The Social Security Number of dependents is reported on tax returns. The IRS isn’t perfect, but they do a good job of matching information such as SSNs. Sooner or later—probably sooner—this scheme would be doomed.

So did someone actually do this? Well, since I’m writing about it here you already know the answer. Four women in Rocky Mount, North Carolina did just that. They also inflated wages of their clients to help them qualify for the Earned Income Credit.

All of this occurred in early 2004. Last March the women were indicted. They pleaded guilty in September and they were sentenced last week. The women received terms ranging from 180 days of house arrest to 15 months at ClubFed. All must make restitution of between $1,883 and $40,041 to the government.

This was truly yet another Bozo scheme due to fail. If your tax preparer offers to sell you a dependent, find another tax preparer fast.

Western Tax Service Rears Its Head…But in a Good Way

Tuesday, January 6th, 2009

Every so often I think that the saga of Western Tax Service has come to an end. Western, as you may remember, was the Anaheim-based tax preparation firm that thought that no deduction was too trivial to take for its clients, even if they didn’t qualify for them. They charged a lot, mind you, but the refunds they got for their clients were very good. And very illegal; the proprietors are now at ClubFed and the unlucky customers had to give back the refunds and pay what they really owed.

A class action suit was filed, and it was settled for $500,000. Clients of Western can apply for a piece of the settlement and receive up to $5000 per year they were a client of Western. The Irvine law firm of Lanza & Goolsby represented the plaintiffs; their website has links to the trial documentation (including the settlement) and to the claim form.

The settlement money comes from $596,010 that the government seized at Western’s offices. So at least some good has come from Western Tax Service. This should remind everyone that if your tax advisor tells you that you can get, for example, a $10,000 charitable deduction without any receipts, make sure to go elsewhere…fast.

The End of the Line for the Tulsa Nine

Sunday, January 4th, 2009

Diana Joubert (aka Diana Brice) of Tulsa, Oklahoma had the not-so-bright idea that submitting phony tax returns would be a good way to make a living. She worked with eight others, including Samuel Willis (owner of Willis Tax & Financial Services) to implement her scheme.

Unfortunately for her, somehow the investigation of an unrelated drug dealer that led to a corruption investigation at the Tulsa Police Department uncovered the scheme. The investigation discovered that Ms. Joubert’s mother, an employee of the Tulsa Police, stole records from the department. That information was apparently used in the tax fraud scheme. And it was a long-standing scheme—the fraud started in 2001.

Ms. Joubert was sentenced last August after being convicted of tax fraud to 37 months at ClubFed and has to make restitution of $133,571. Samuel Willis was also convicted and was also sentenced last August; he received six months of home detention and had to make $47,000 in restitution.

The final two defendants were sentenced last week. Larry Brice was ordered last week to make restitution of $11,551 and will serve five years’ probation after pleading guilty. James Joubert received five months at ClubFed and must make $5,543 in restitution.

2008 Tax Offender of the Year

Tuesday, December 30th, 2008

There are all sorts of awards given, but the award I give is special. To be considered for the Tax Offender of the Year award, you must do more than cheat on your taxes. It has to be special; it really needs to be a Bozo-like action or actions.

There were several worthy nominations who just missed the cut. The Orange County Great Park Board for wasting nearly all of the nearly $200 million they received to fund the Great Park. Yet the Great Park Board hasn’t violated any laws; they’re just acting like many governmental entities.

Another government nominee was the legislature and the governor of California. Revenues into the Bronze Golden State have increased since 2000 yet California faces a $15 – $20 billion budget deficit. They have “balanced” recent budgets solely by accounting gimmicks. The day of reckoning has arrived but both the Democrats and Republicans refuse to compromise. This is another deserving nominee yet there’s the same problem as with the Great Park. They’re acting like Bozos, but they haven’t violated any laws.

Coming in just out of the money for this year’s prize is Randy Nowak of Tampa, Florida. Mr. Nowak was facing an IRS audit and it wasn’t going well. So he hired a hit man. Of course, assuming the unlucky IRS auditor died the IRS would just assign another Revenue Agent to the case. Mr. Nowak will likely spend several years at ClubFed (and pay the tax, penalties, and interest). This was truly Bozo.

Yet Mr. Nowak’s case falls just a little short of this year’s winner. For that, we must head to Maple Grove, Minnesota, a suburb of the Twin Cities. Robert Beale founded a company that became Comtrol Corporation in 1982. Comtrol specializes in computer connectivity products. Mr. Beale, as CEO, earned a respectable $700,000 salary. But Mr. Beale had different ideas than most of us about income taxes.

He became a member of the tax protester movement, arguing one of the numerous schemes (all of which have been thrown out by the courts) that you don’t have to pay income taxes. Mr. Beale became a follower of Irwin Schiff. Mr. Schiff claimed that no one had to pay income taxes. Mr. Schiff is now serving a 13-year sentence for following his own advice. (Hint: You do have to pay income taxes.)

Mr. Beale directed the bookkeeper at his company to first not withhold taxes on the $700,000 and then to pay him through an offshore shell company. He began to file statements with the IRS claiming he didn’t have to pay income taxes. In January 2006 he was indicted for tax evasion. Now, if you were indicted for tax evasion you’d get a good attorney, perhaps talk settlement with the IRS, and you’d certainly start planning your defense.

Not Mr. Beale. When his case was called for trial in August 2006 Mr. Beale was nowhere to be found. Mr. Beale told the Minneapolis Star-Tribune that he resided with friends during his fourteen months of being a fugitive. He went to Orlando and made the “dumb mistake” of using the same cellphone for eleven months to call his wife. He was arrested in November 2007 in Orlando.

His case finally came to trial this past April. Again, if you’re facing tax evasion and unlawful flight charges it’s time to hire a good attorney. Not Mr. Beale. He represented himself during his trial. But there’s more, and now we get to the truly Bozo aspect of this case.

Mr. Beale and three confederates decide to arrest the judge. No, I’m not making this up. As Joe Kristan noted (quoting TwinCities.com),

Robert Beale, 65, was charged Monday in federal court with one count of conspiracy to impede an officer and one count of obstruction of justice. Also indicted on the same charges were Frederick Bond, 62, of Champlin; John Pelton, 67, of Stillwater; and Norman Pool, 43, of Blaine.

“God wants me to destroy the judge,” Beale is accused of saying in court records…

The men issued fake warrants for Montgomery’s arrest, filed fraudulent liens, planned to disrupt court proceedings and planned to arrest Montgomery. The plans were concocted at meetings of their “common law court” in Little Canada and in phone calls from Beale, after he was jailed.

Going after a federal judge is an excellent way to make sure that you reside in ClubFed for a long, long time. And using prison telephones to threaten a judge is really Bozo given that calls are routinely monitored.

Meanwhile, the trial of Mr. Beale on tax evasion charges moved forward. The trial took eight days but the jury needed only two hours to convict Mr. Beale on all five tax evasion charges and the count of unlawful flight. Mr. Beale, in closing arguments, apparently recognized the futility of his case, noting, “[the trial was] such a waste of time and resources because of my beliefs.”

Mr. Beale received 11 years at ClubFed for these convictions. When sentenced, he told Judge Ann Montgomery, “I do not consent to incarceration, fine or supervised release…I have not committed a crime.” No matter, he’ll still be spending the time at ClubFed.

In October Mr. Beale was found guilty of conspiracy to impede an officer and obstruction of justice for his attempt to arrest the judge. He’s still awaiting sentencing on those charges.

All-in-all Mr. Beale is a worthy winner. He joins our two prior winners: Sharon Lee Caulder, a voodoo priestess, won in 2005 and Gene Haas, a businessman who decided to get back at the government after he lost a patent case by committing tax fraud, the 2007 winner.

What will 2009 bring? I’m always hopeful that I’ll be able to say that no one rose to the heights necessary to win this award. Based on past history that’s very, very unlikely to be the case.

Very Light Week on the Fraud Front

Sunday, December 28th, 2008

It must be the Christmas season; I could only find a couple of stories on tax fraud from the long weekend.

Keith Kuchenbecker of Neenah, Wisconsin was president of his own construction company from 2000 to 2007. He made a mistake that is guaranteed to get you in trouble with the IRS. Mr. Kuchenbecker didn’t forward his trust fund taxes to the IRS. He plead guilty to one count of income tax fraud and has agreed to make restitution of $288,000. He’ll be sentenced in March.

I would love to see all 52 weeks of the year with as little tax crime as this past week. I’d also like to see the Cubs in the World Series. I think the Cubs have the better chance in 2009.

Pre-Holiday Fraud

Sunday, December 21st, 2008

Lots of new tax evasion reported this week. I’m going to focus on a psychologist, contractors, a restaurant owner, a skydiver, and instant cameras.

A psychologist finds herself in trouble rather than her patients. Dr. Linda Luther-Starbird is a psychologist in Grand Junction, Colorado. The Colorado Department of Revenue alleges that she owes nearly $27,000 in tax, penalties, and interest. Ms. Luther-Starbird wrote to Colorado and told the state, according to the affidavit obtained by the Colorado DOR and printed in the Grand Junction Free Press, “American citizens have absolutely no obligation to file individual income tax returns…I am not willfully ‘failing to file’ as the IRS likes to call it, but that I have a reasonable and ethical responsibility NOT to file because there is no constitutional and legitimate reason to do so.” Hint: If you have income and don’t file a tax return it’s called tax evasion, and there’s no judge in the United States who will accept tax protester arguments.

It was a bad week for contractors. Jeffrey Sarris, a Bethesda, Maryland contractor will spend 366 days at ClubFed. Mr. Sarris owned Bethesda Home Improvement Corporation. Instead of showing his revenues on his income statement he cashed the checks at a restaurant, put the proceeds in a safe deposit box, and paid his contractors and employees using cash. What could go wrong? Mr. Sarris pleaded guilty for evading tax on $1.4 million of income. There’s no word in the article about whether Mr. Sarris will have to make restitution of $981,549.

Meanwhile, just up the road in Philadelphia comes the story of Donald Dougherty, Jr. Mr. Dougherty may have done a lot of good deeds in his neighborhood but a judge thought that 99 guilty pleas meant a trip to ClubFed was warranted. Mr. Dougherty’s crimes started by doing free electrical work for the head of Local 98 of the International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers, John Dougherty (no relation). He compounded this by deliberately paying his employees in cash to avoid paying taxes. Besides the time at ClubFed Mr. Dougherty must make restitution to the IRS of $1.6 million and pay the union $673,070 for its health and welfare fund.

Next, we head to North Chicago, Illinois. John Psihos allegedly used one of the oldest methods around to hide income. The IRS alleges he kept two sets of books for Flanagan’s Restaurant. And we’re not talking peanuts as far as the amount of the alleged evasion; Mr. Psihos allegedly he didn’t pay $1.18 million of tax on $3.19 million of unreported income.

I’ve never been skydiving (and I probably never will), but I have a friend who loves it. Richard Davis owned Skydive Houston. He told the IRS that the ownership was through various partnerships. Madison Oden was an automobile salesman in Houston who used Mr. Davis to prepare his tax returns. That wasn’t a good decision.

Mr. Oden purchased tax write-offs from Mr. Davis as “partnership investments.” Mr. Oden somehow was able to write off fraudulent skydiving partnership losses along with a fictitious auto finance business and phony losses in a family partnership. That trifecta led to both being indicted and tried on tax evasion charges. They were found guilty in June and were sentenced this past week. Mr. Oden will be spending 15 months at ClubFed and Mr. Davis got 36 months. What’s interesting is that Mr. Oden was audited back in the 1990s for doing similar things on his tax return and had to pay $73,000 then. I guess Bozos don’t learn from experience.

Finally, I remember the first camera I ever used. It was a Polaroid instant camera. I still have some pictures taken during my childhood with that camera. Polaroid eventually became a unit of Petters Group Worldwide LLC in 2005.

That wasn’t a good thing for Polaroid as the company appears to have become entrenched in a fraud case. The founder of Petters Group, Tom Petters, was arrested in October. He was indicted on 20 counts earlier this month; allegedly Mr. Petters is the mastermind of a $3.5 billion Ponzi scheme.

The government did get some help in their case against Mr. Petters this week. James Wehmhoff pleaded guilty on Friday to one count of assisting tax fraud and one count of conspiracy. US Attorney Frank Magill says Mr. Wehmhoff is responsible for $20 million in tax losses to the IRS. Although not mentioned in the article one has to assume that Mr. Wehmhoff may be testifying in any trial against Mr. Petters.

That’s a lot of fraud for just one week. Let’s hope that the fraudsters get in the Holiday spirit and take the next couple of weeks off…or at least make it a light week.

Two Fewer Bozo Tax Preparer Schemes

Sunday, December 21st, 2008

A few fewer Bozo tax preparers are on the loose. From Greenville, South Carolina comes the first story. Appropriately named Brian Bobo and his wife Latoya thought they had a foolproof scheme. Latoya would take identification information from her job at the South Carolina Department of Social Services and the Bobos and five others would create income tax returns for these individuals. They pocketed $86,000 in refunds before the IRS found out. The Bobos and the other conspirators pleaded guilty to conspiracy to file false tax returns and will be sentenced next year.

Bozo tax preparers aren’t just an American phenomenon. From Mississauga, Ontario, Canada comes the story of Ambrose Dapaah. Mr. Dapaah was the owner of ADD Accounting Services and he also was president of the CanAfrica International Foundation. Mr. Dapaah was a helpful source, and he helped his clients by taking $21 million in charitable donations to his foundation. His clients gained $6 million in tax credits, and his foundation gained some money. Did I mention that those donations were falsified, and that he sold donation receipts? Mr. Dapaah will be spending 51 months in prison.

Yes, no matter if you’re in Canada or the United States your charitable donations must be real in order for you to get a tax break. Remember, if it sounds too good to be true it probably is.

Strip Clubs and Sushi

Sunday, December 14th, 2008

Lots of fraud this week, so we’ll start with a couple favorites of mine. First, from Inver Grove Heights, Minnesota comes the story of Lawrence Kladek. Mr. Kladek owns King of Diamonds Gentlemen’s Club. Mr. Kladek had an ATM installed at his club. That’s a good idea, given the cash-driven nature of the business. Then he stocked the ATM with business receipts and didn’t put those receipts, which totaled $170,139, on the books. That’s a very bad idea, and Mr. Kladek has pleaded guilty to filing a false income tax return.

There are a few less sushi restaurants open in British Columbia. The Royal Canadian Mounted Police raided four restaurants which had purchased an interesting computer program.

Bradley Alvarez of the Canada Revenue Agency told The Province that, “Businesses are suspected of having hidden thousands of transactions and millions of dollars in sales across Canada.” The software, from InfoSpec Systems in Richmond, BC, will save an owner taxes. The RCMP noted in its application for a search warrant that an InfoSpec spokesman allegedly said that the software can be used for “deleting cash sales.” Additionally, the software vendor claimed that you can take the cash and “pay kitchen staff.” There’s no reason to stop at one felony when you can commit two, eh?

Anyway, five individuals are charged with tax fraud and could be sent away for several years. And there’s that matter of those deleted transactions and the tax owed thereon.

Bozo Preparers Running Rampant in New York

Monday, December 1st, 2008

There are good tax preparers and bad ones. There appear to be plenty of the latter in the Empire State.

The New York Department of Taxation and Finance sent some undercover inspectors to various tax professionals in New York. What they found, as reported in the Wall Street Journal, is enough to make me cringe.

One Queens, New York tax preparer allegedly told an undercover investigator, “I did not declare your full gross income from your business because you will pay a lot of taxes.” That preparer is facing a criminal complaint.

Another reported one-tenth of the taxable income: $13,188 versus $131,884. The Journal didn’t report what excuse was used for that case. And multiple preparers told investigators to shred certain documents so that they wouldn’t have to include it on their tax returns.

But it actually got worse:

In one case, a preparer told an undercover agent to step outside his office and return with a different set of records. When he returned, the preparer told him: “You know why I asked you to do that? Because if I have to swear it, I can say I swear to God that these are the papers you brought to me.”

William Comiskey, Deputy Commissioner of the New York Department of Taxation and Finance, noted that had the fraud gone undetected it would have cost $4 million in tax to federal, state, and local governments. Worse, “evidence of fraud” was found at 40% of the 85 preparers visited.

And this isn’t just a New York problem. A friend of one of my clients was told by his tax ‘professional’ that because options aren’t reported to the IRS you don’t have to claim income earned from options on your tax return. Of course, my client heard that and thought his income was going to be a lot less than he had thought. I had to give the bad news to my client—unless Congress specifically exempts income it’s taxable—and income from options is taxable.

Meanwhile, New York has sent 1,570 “Dear Valued Taxpayer” letters to individuals who used these less than professional tax preparers. Additionally, the state has opened 1,378 fraud investigations through October and had sent 329 cases to prosecutors.

Remember, there’s no free lunch. Use a reputable preparer, and know that if you earn a lot of income you’re going to owe some tax. If it sounds too good to be true it probably is.