Posts Tagged ‘TaxOffenderOfTheYear’

Former Mayor (and Current CPA) Learns of Tax Fraud, Joins the Conspiracy

Friday, January 16th, 2015

This is for the don’t do this at home file for tax professionals. Kenneth Harycki is the former mayor of Stillwater, Minnesota. He’s also a licensed CPA in Minnesota (but probably not for much longer). Mr. Harycki will provide an interesting lesson the next time I teach ethics.

Mr. Harycki provided accounting, tax, payroll, and bookkeeping services to clients. Back in 2007, he provided services to Model Health Care. From the Department of Justice press release:

Within the first few payroll cycles for Model Health Care (Model), a company controlled by the two separately charged co-conspirators, the defendant concluded that while payroll taxes were being withheld from the wages of employees, those taxes were not being paid over to the government. The defendant learned that these co-conspirators had directed that the withheld taxes not be paid to the government and, instead, the taxes would be used for other purposes, including compensating the co-conspirators and their family members and funding other businesses operated by the co-conspirators.

Now, let’s assume you’re a tax professional and you learn that a company is withholding payroll taxes and not paying them to the IRS. Would you:
(a) Tell them that the taxes aren’t being paid, that’s violating the law, and you need to fix this (which could include setting up payment plans with the IRS and Minnesota, or just paying the withheld funds);
(b) Tell them that if they don’t start remitting the withheld funds that he would need to quit the engagement; or
(c) Join the conspiracy.

Choice (c) is not one that most of us would consider. It is, though, the one that Mr. Harycki not only considered but did:

According to the defendant’s guilty plea, on February 18, 2010, HARYCKI created the entity MKH Holdings, Inc., to assume control over bank accounts used to fund businesses operated by the co-conspirators. The entity was used to cause funds falsely reported on income tax returns to be paid to the co-conspirators and others. During the course of the conspiracy, HARYCKI also incorporated other businesses, obtained employer identification numbers, paid for personal expenses, filed false tax returns, and opened and used numerous bank accounts for the benefit of the separately charged co-conspirators in order to avoid payment of taxes.

Given that the tax loss is between $1 million and $2.5 million, Mr. Harycki will be heading to ClubFed.

There’s not much to add to the press release. If I discover a defalcation while preparing a return, it’s my responsibility to tell the client. And if my client tells me he’s going to continue the actions, I’m required to quit the engagement. I’ve had to do this once in my career; if I discovered such a fraud I’d make the easy decision to get out the engagement. Apparently Mr. Harycki’s ethics were a bit different than most CPAs and EAs. My. Harycki has received a nomination for the 2015 Tax Offender of the Year, though.

2014 Tax Offender of the Year

Wednesday, December 31st, 2014

It’s time again for that most prestigious of prestigious awards, the 2014 Tax Offender of the Year. The winner of this award must do more than just cheat on his or her taxes. It has to be special; it really needs to be a Bozo-like action or actions. Once again, there were plenty of nominees.

The Miccosukee tribe is still having its battles with the IRS. The tribe is exempt from taxes but its members are not. The tribe has refused to send financial documents to the IRS. The tribe appealed the most recent order that they do provide the data; a ruling is expected soon from the 11th Circuit Court of Appeals. If the tribe loses this round, the battle will likely be over.

Another nominee was John Koskinen. If that name sounds familiar to you, it should; he’s the IRS Commissioner. Mr. Koskinen testified to Congress that, “I’ve tried to tell you the truth every time I’ve been here.” I had a simple question for Mr. Koskinen: Why doesn’t that quote read I’ve told you the truth every time I’ve been here? The obfuscation by the IRS on the current scandal has led directly to the IRS’s budget being cut.

Charles Waldo received a nomination for allegedly emulating Steven Martinez. (Mr. Martinez won the 2012 Tax Offender of the Year award for hiring a hit man to eliminate witnesses against him in a tax fraud case.) Mr. Waldo was arrested on a 50-count indictment for insurance fraud, tax evasion, felony vandalism, and a high speed chase in California. While awaiting trial, Mr. Waldo allegedly hired a hit man to kill witnesses against him. He’s had ten additional counts added to his indictment. At this point, though, these are just allegations; we’ll have to wait until 2015 to see if Mr. Waldo can truly be nominated.

Finally, Rashia Wilson received a nomination. Ms. Wilson received 21 years at ClubFed for tax fraud. Now, she was indicted in 2012 and convicted in 2013. For those who don’t remember her, there’s this from the Tampa Bay Times:

“I’m Rashia, the queen of IRS tax fraud,” Wilson said May 22 on her Facebook page, according to investigators. “I’m a millionaire for the record. So if you think that indicting me will be easy, it won’t. I promise you. I won’t do no time, dumb b——.”

Ms. Wilson also posted this wonderful picture:

Rashia Wilson (Image Credit: Tampa Police Department)

In any case, Ms. Wilson, who now resides at a federal prison in Aliceville, Alabama, was ordered to pay $25 each quarter toward the $3.1 million in restitution she owes the IRS. She has asked a US District Court to suspend the payments because she is only making $5.25 each month and must buy vitamins and hygiene items. Ms. Wilson is a reminder to all that bragging about illegal activities on Facebook isn’t a brilliant idea.


Back in 2012 I wrote a post titled, “A Modest Proposal on Tax-Related Identity Theft.” The IRS admits that this is a huge issue. Unfortunately, the IRS is still mostly reactive rather than proactive on this front.

This year, I’ve decided to spotlight an identity thief as the Tax Offender of the Year. I deliberately chose this kind of tax offense because, as the IRS states, “We know identity theft is a frustrating process for victims.” I don’t know of any tax professional with a large practice who hasn’t seen a case of identity theft. My business partner’s late stepfather was a victim of identity theft when his social security number was published on the Social Security Death Index.

Identity theft causes trauma in a victim’s life, and this trauma can last years. The problems can be psychological and actual, impacting the mundane (purchasing), filing a tax return, buying property, and a victim’s self-esteem.

I had literally hundreds of identity thieves to choose from. I naturally chose someone who committed a huge fraud, and whose actions were egregious. For the record, a Google search of the Justice Department’s website looking for “identity theft” for just December 2014 found about 140 entries.

From Smyrna, Georgia comes the story of Mauricio Warner. Mr. Warner told individuals that you could receive a “stimulus payment” or “Free Government Money.” Instead, the over 5,000 victims had a tax return filed in their names. The tax returns contained false income amounts and refundable tax credits to generate the erroneous refunds. Of course, the refunds were direct deposited into bank accounts that Mr. Warner controlled.

Mr. Warner was indicted in April, 2013. He was accused of 16 counts of wire fraud, 16 counts of aggravated identity theft, 16 counts of filing false claims, and two counts of money laundering. He was tried earlier this year, and found guilty of all the charges. He was sentenced to 20 years at ClubFed and was ordered to make restitution of $5,041,869. Partial restitution has already occurred; the court ordered forfeiture of seven bank accounts that contained $4,185,455.31. (While there have been abuses of forfeiture, this is a case where it appears to be amply justified.) For the record, Mr. Warner has filed an appeal.

While the IRS continues to spend money on its quixotic goal of regulating all tax professionals, the plague of identity theft continues. Yes, the IRS is making strides and has implemented some ideas that will stop some of this scourge. But priorities at the IRS seem a little off to me: All of the money being directed into the IRS’s Annual Filing Season Program could be redirected into fighting identity theft.


One year I’m hopeful that I’ll write, “I could not find a deserving candidate for the Tax Offender of the Year.” Unfortunately, I suspect that I’ll have plenty to choose from in 2015, too.

That’s a wrap on 2014. I wish everyone a happy, healthy, and safe New Year.

Nominations Due for 2014 Tax Offender of the Year

Tuesday, December 23rd, 2014

With just about one week prior to the end of 2014, it’s time for a final reminder to submit nominations for the Tax Offender of the Year. To be considered for the Tax Offender of the Year award, the individual (or organization) must do more than cheat on his or her taxes. It has to be special; it really needs to be a Bozo-like action or actions. Here are the past lucky recipients:

2013: U.S. Department of Justice
2012: Steven Martinez
2011: United States Congress
2010: Tony and Micaela Dutson
2009: Mark Anderson
2008: Robert Beale
2007: Gene Haas
2005: Sharon Lee Caulder

Copying Steven Martinez’s Idea Is Not a Good Choice

Sunday, October 19th, 2014

I’m on the road this weekend, but a story from the San Francisco Bay Area caught my eye. Charles Waldo was already in jail. He was arrested on a 50-count indictment for insurance fraud, tax evasion, felony vandalism, and a high speed chase through central Costa Contra County. While awaiting trial, Mr. Waldo was in the Martinez, California jail.

When you’re in prison you do have time on your hands to determine your defense. There’s plenty of time to research the law on the charges you’re facing, work on strategy with your defense counsel, and perhaps other means of helping your case. Mr. Waldo allegedly decided to follow the idea of Steven Martinez. Mr. Martinez, for those who don’t remember, won the coveted 2012 Tax Offender of the Year award for hiring a hit man to eliminate the witnesses against him. Yes, Mr. Waldo supposedly did the same thing.

Mr. Waldo was indicted on Friday on nine counts of solicitation to commit murder and one count of conspiracy to commit murder. According to the press release from the Contra Costa County District Attorney’s office,

The indictment alleges that while serving time in custody at the Martinez Detention Facility, the defendant solicited and conspired with other inmates to arrange the killing of nine different witnesses that were set to testify against him at an upcoming trial. These ten new charges will be added to the fifty charges the defendant currently faces.

There is one bright spot for Mr. Waldo if he is found guilty and spends a very lengthy term at a California penal institution: He’s a shoe-in to be nominated for Tax Offender of the Year in a future year.

Nominations Due for 2013 Tax Offender of the Year

Wednesday, December 25th, 2013

With just under a week to go before 2013 is complete, it’s time for a final reminder to submit nominations for the Tax Offender of the Year. To be considered for the Tax Offender of the Year award, the individual must do more than cheat on his or her taxes. It has to be special; it really needs to be a Bozo-like action or actions. Here are the past lucky recipients:

2012: Steven Martinez
2011: United States Congress
2010: Tony and Micaela Dutson
2009: Mark Anderson
2008: Robert Beale
2007: Gene Haas
2005: Sharon Lee Caulder

Nominations are due by Sunday night, December 29th.

Attorney Found Guilty of 28 Tax Charges, but Does Get Nomination for Tax Offender of the Year

Sunday, September 29th, 2013

Donald Wanland, Jr. is described as a “financially successful” attorney. A resident of El Dorado Hills, California (a Sacramento suburb), Mr. Wanland practices in real estate, business litigation, and construction litigation. Perhaps I should change that to practiced because a trip to ClubFed appears to be in his future.

Mr. Wanland may have earned lots of money–his tax returns from 2000 through 2003 showed income of more than $1.5 million–but he didn’t like paying taxes. Now, most of us don’t like paying taxes but we do so anyway as the consequences of not doing so can be problematic (especially for an attorney). Mr. Wanland, though, had other ideas. At least he filed those tax returns (showing tax due of $448,451); he just didn’t pay those taxes. The DOJ press release notes that Mr. Wanland didn’t pay all of his taxes in the 1990s either.

Well, what did Mr. Wanland do after 2003? He didn’t file returns (though he earned over $1 million from 2004 – 2007). When the IRS issued a levy in 2005, Mr. Wanland decided that a good strategy was to hide all of his income through nominee accounts. (Here’s a helpful hint to others considering such a strategy: Don’t do this!) Meanwhile, Mr. Wanland continued to spend money on vacations, two new cars (a Mercedes Benz and a Cadillac Escalade), gambling at Las Vegas casinos (well, as a Las Vegas resident I’m not as upset with this), and a pool at his home. These were not good ideas when he owed significant tax to the IRS. Oh, I should mention he also made false statements to the IRS.

These are felonies, something an attorney should be knowledgeable about (and want to avoid). A jury on Thursday found that Mr. Wanland was guilty of 28 tax-related charges. Given that the amount of tax involved, I suspect Mr. Wanland is looking at four years at ClubFed. There’s also a likely fine, and restitution.

Mr. Wanland does have one thing to look forward to: He did receive a nomination for my Tax Offender of the Year Award.

2012 Tax Offender of the Year

Monday, December 31st, 2012

It’s time once more for that prestigious award, the 2012 Tax Offender of the Year. To be considered for this award you must do more than cheat on your taxes. It has to be special; it really needs to be a Bozo-like action or actions.

Coming in third this year is the Miccosukee Tribe of Indians in Florida. The Miccouskees run a successful casino near Miami. While the tribe itself is exempt from taxes (they’re a sovereign nation), the members of the tribe are not. The Miccouskees allegedly decided to ignore that little aspect of the law. Their attorney apparently advised them that wasn’t a good idea. So did the Miccosukees start withholding taxes on distributions to its members? Or did they sue their attorney for malpractice? And did they also allegedly not forward federal income tax withheld from patrons’ winnings to the IRS?

The Miccosukees can’t win in 2012; these are still all allegations and nothing has been resolved. However, they are very strong contenders for the 2013 Tax Offender of the Year award.

Coming in second place is last year’s winner, the United States Congress. While I’m tempted to put them in first place–after all, there’s an excellent chance I won’t be filing any personal tax returns until late March–I can’t. There’s still a day for everyone to get on the same page, and this will have an impact in 2013, not 2012. True, the US Senate has not passed a budget in years (President Obama’s proposed 2012 budget received no votes from either the House or the Senate), and the Tax Code keeps getting more and more convoluted; however, most of the changes that are coming are the result of the passage of Obamacare. I already awarded the 2011 Tax Offender of the Year to Congress for that (and their other acts of ineptitude).


Steven Martinez used to work for the IRS. After leaving the IRS, he became a tax preparer. Mr. Martinez had a unique method of filing tax returns. He first prepared the returns, showing his clients owed money to the IRS and the Franchise Tax Board (California’s income tax agency). He then had his clients make out checks to a client trust account rather than the IRS or FTB. He also had estimated taxes made out through that account.

Of course, since I’m writing this you know where the money ended up: home improvements for himself, a beach house in Mexico, usage of a private airplane, investments (more than $2 million), and for $2 million of payments on credit cards and loans.

After preparing those returns showing clients owing money, Mr. Martinez prepared a second set of returns. These showed the clients owing either a small amount of money or no tax at all. He then submitted those returns to the IRS and FTB.

Sooner or later this fraud was bound to be discovered. A taxpayer would obtain a transcript of his return and notice the differences between what was filed with the IRS (or FTB) and what his copy of the return showed. Or perhaps some unlucky taxpayer was audited and the copy of the return that the taxpayer had and the return the IRS had would not match.

He committed Social Security fraud and identity theft by preparing false tax returns with the IRS. He mailed those returns to the IRS; that’s mail fraud. He used nominee bank accounts to conceal $2 million of income. Yes, he also prepared false tax returns for himself.

All of the above is definitely Bozo behavior. However, what I’ve written is just the beginning of the story. Mr. Martinez was indicted on April 15, 2011 for 49 counts of fraud, money laundering, and identity theft.

After being indicted, there are a number of possible strategies. Getting a good attorney would be the first thing I’d want to do. I’d look at the defense I have to the charges (if any). Perhaps a plea bargain is in order. Maybe I should hire a hit man to kill the prosecution witnesses.

Wait a second: Did I just bring up the idea of finding a hired killer to eliminate the prosecution witnesses? I did. After all, if you’re accused of 49 felonies, what’s a few more anyway? And yes, Mr. Martinez did exactly that.

Luckily for all concerned, the man that Mr. Martinez solicited to commit the murders called the FBI; a second meeting between the would-be assassin and Mr. Martinez was taped by the FBI. Mr. Martinez told the man that “he could make him rich for the rest of his life, $100,000 cash, if he eliminated the lady in Rancho Santa Fe and the lady in La Jolla.” Mr. Martinez also helpfully told the supposed hit man to use two different pistols and buy a silencer.

In the end, Mr. Martinez pleaded guilty to not only the tax fraud charges, but murder-for-hire, witness tampering involving attempted murder, and solicitation of a crime of violence. Mr. Martinez is truly deserving of the 2012 Tax Offender of the Year award.


That’s a wrap for 2012. Hopefully, 2013 will be a fruitful and prosperous year for everyone.

2011 Tax Offender of the Year

Saturday, December 31st, 2011

It’s time again to be considered for that most prestigious of awards, the Tax Offender of the Year. To be considered for the Tax Offender of the Year award, you must do more than cheat on your taxes. It has to be special; it really needs to be a Bozo-like action or actions.

Coming in second was Mark Leitner. Mr. Leitner felt that the government shouldn’t lean on him, so he filed liens against the government…to the tune of $48.489 billion from seven individuals involved in prosecuting him. Mr. Leitner is not enjoying that money (those liens were, as you would imagine, quashed); instead, he’s spending some time relaxing at ClubFed.

Coming in third was Norma Coronel. Ms. Coronel gave birth to one child in December 2002. However, she thought that she could do better on her tax return by claiming she gave birth to 19 children…all at once. That truly Bozo tax fraud got her the joy of repaying, with interest, the over $300,000 she received from the IRS.

I’m giving a dishonorable mention to the IRS Automated Underreporting Program (AUR). I’ve had several clients who have responded to notices from the AUR group, and the AUR group, when writing back, helpfully notes that they’ve reconfigured the amount that the clients allegedly owed. The trouble is that the AUR group ignores the correspondence from the client, and simply restates the amount owed. I’m going to be sending Nina Olson, the National Taxpayer Advocate, a letter on this issue; I’ll post a copy of the letter in the blog in the coming weeks.


This year’s winner has a proud history; indeed, without them we likely wouldn’t be here. I’m talking about the United States Congress, who have moved up from being runner-up the past two years. Congress, especially the Senate, forsook its duties. Consider the budget passed by the US Senate…but that would be problematic as the US Senate didn’t pass a budget in 2009 or 2010 and waited until the closing days of December to actually pass one. However, these are minor issues in comparison with the major problem: The needless and horrible complexity of the US Tax Code.

Nina Olson, the National Taxpayer Advocate, has noted the problem year after year in her reports to Congress. For example,

The National Taxpayer Advocate on numerous occasions has identified the complexity of the tax code as the most serious problem facing taxpayers and urged Congress to simplify it. In this section, we discuss the sources and impact of code complexity and the practical obstacles to simplification. In an accompanying legislative recommendation later in this report, we outline principles and proposals that we encourage Congress to consider as it explores tax reform options.

In 1986, Congress simplified the Tax Code. It’s high time again for another round of simplification. Consider one of my areas of practice, dealing with individuals with foreign financial accounts. Not only do those individuals now have to file an FBAR (Form TD F 90-22.1), they must repeat that information on Form 8938 (if they have sufficient foreign financial accounts). I don’t blame the IRS for this duplication. Rather, I blame Congress. Congress enacted the laws requiring these forms; it is Congress that needs to enact laws that would simplify the Tax Code.

I’d like to see a simple, fair Tax Code. This is likely one of the few issues where the Tea Party protesters and the Occupy Wall Street protesters would agree. Again, consider Form 8938. The instructions note that the estimated average time to complete this form is one hour, five minutes. And that’s just one form. No wonder I’m not worrying about my employment.

I’d like to be put out of a job–at least, on the tax preparation side. Realistically, I doubt that will ever happen: There will still be plenty of complex corporate and business returns that need completion.

Today, taxpayers who do not have simple situations–and that’s millions of Americans–have tremendous difficulties completing tax returns on their own. Albert Einstein stated that, “The hardest thing in the world to understand is the income tax,” and that was over 60 years ago! The situation today is far, far worse and the blame is squarely with Congress. Unfortunately, 2012 is an election year and I believe there’s zero chance of anything coming out of this Congress. Indeed, President Obama has shown no inclination at simplifying the Tax Code. We likely need new leadership in Washington to ease the pain of all Americans.


And that’s a wrap on 2011. Everyone have a safe, happy, and healthy New Year. I’m sure I’ll find plenty of other Bozos to write about in 2012.

2010 Tax Offender of the Year

Friday, December 31st, 2010

Another year, and many, many worthy candidates for the 2010 Tax Offender of the Year. To be considered for the Tax Offender of the Year award, you must do more than cheat on your taxes. It has to be special; it really needs to be a Bozo-like action or actions.

Coming in second for the second straight year was the 111th Congress. I’m trying to think of something they did right, but I’m having trouble doing so. Yes, they passed an AMT patch, and yes, they finally addressed the Bush Tax Cuts, but there was no need to wait until December and cause at least one-third of individuals to be unable to file their tax returns until late February. As for the negative actions of the 111th, they are so numerous that I’m convinced this Congress will go down in history as one of the worst ever.

Coming in third was Wesley Snipes. Last year I wrote about how he showed remorse, and was now looking at paying his tax debts. However, in 2010 he went back to the ‘old’ Wesley Snipes, and began spouting off all sorts of vitriol. In any case, for the next 35 months he’ll be enjoying a stay at ClubFed.


Several years ago, some unknown taxpayer was audited. He had used a “pure trust” and was told by the seller of the trust that it magically allowed him to avoid paying income taxes. The IRS informed the unlucky taxpayer that such was not the case; the taxpayer paid his taxes and the file went into the bureaucracy.

It stayed there until the IRS discovered that these “pure trusts” were being used by multiple taxpayers. The IRS launched an investigation, and discovered they were being peddled by Tony and Micaela Dutson. The Dutsons were doing quite well selling these shams, especially since they, too, didn’t pay any income tax on their own profits. The Dutsons were selling these instruments from at least 2002; the IRS obtained an injunction in 2006 barring the Dutsons from further selling of these fraudulent trusts. (The Dutsons began their activities in Oregon, but moved to the Phoenix area in 2003.)

Meanwhile, the Oregon Department of Revenue notified the IRS that Mrs. Dutson, an attorney, had received money from the state for helping indigent clients; somehow she failed to file a state tax return. Mrs. Dutson resigned from the Oregon Bar in 2002.

Eventually, the IRS began criminal investigations of the Dutsons. And then the Bozo activities began. (Yes, trying to peddle sham trusts is a Bozo action, but that pales with respect to what the Dutsons then tried to do.)

First, they told their clients to file lawsuits against the IRS. They charged their clients $3,500 each for filing these frivolous lawsuits. The Dutsons neglected to tell their clients that these lawsuits were frivolous after the first of them was thrown out…for being frivolous.

Next, the Dutsons filed a lien against several IRS employees in California. Now, if you were going to file a baseless lien, would you file it for a reasonable amount or would you just shoot the moon and aim for a nice, Bozo sum of $1 Trillion ($1,000,000,000,000)? Yes, the Dutsons filed that $1 Trillion lien. Needless to say, that lien was soon thrown out as completely baseless.

Well, if you don’t succeed you should try, try again. And the Dutsons did file another lien, against one John Snow for only $108 Million. If you don’t remember the name John Snow, he was Secretary of the Treasury under President George W. Bush. That’s chutzpah, but the second lien soon met the same fate as the first.

The Dutsons also believed in filing tax returns…just not their own tax returns. They managed to file 30 bogus returns seeking $185 million in refunds.

Eventually, the Dutsons were accused and indicted on numerous tax charges. They were found guilty in June on nine counts, with the charges spanning ten years. As noted in the DOJ Press Release, the Dutsons made $1 million and paid no tax. Though the Dutsons were due to be sentenced in September, it appears there sentencing has been delayed. They are looking at lengthy terms at ClubFed plus restitution.

While I always hope that next year–2011–will bring a year free of Bozo Tax Offenders, it’s far more likely that I’ll again have several worthy candidates for the Tax Offender of the Year.


That’s a wrap on 2010. I wish everyone a Happy, Healthy, and Safe New Year.

Nominations Due for 2010 Tax Offender of the Year

Friday, December 17th, 2010

It’s time once more for nominations for the Tax Offender of the Year. To be considered for the Tax Offender of the Year award, the individual must do more than cheat on his or her taxes. It has to be special; it really needs to be a Bozo-like action or actions.

For your reference, here’s a list of prior winners:
2009: Mark Anderson
2008: Robert Beale
2007: Gene Haas
2005: Sharon Lee Caulder

If you have a nominee, feel free to send me an email (use the Contact button on the right side of the page).