The Real Winners of the World Series of Poker 2026

Thousands of poker players (9,208 to be exact) came to Las Vegas over the Fourth of July weekend to enter the main event of the World Series of Poker (WSOP) all looking for the $10 million first prize. But that tells just part of the story–here, we look at how much each of the final table participants actually got to keep.  There was a three week break before the final nine players competed to crown a champion earlier this week.  Who would win–and how much would he lose in taxes?

One important note: I do need to point out that many of the players in the tournament were “backed.” Poker tournaments have a high variance (luck factor). Thus, many tournament players sell portions of their action to investors to lower their risk (and/or “swap” action with other entrants). It is quite likely that most (if not all) of the winners were backed (or had swaps) and will, in the end, only enjoy a portion of their winnings. I ignore backing and swaps in this analysis (because the full details are rarely publicized). Now, on to the winners.

Congratulations to Lucas Jumalon, this year’s winner. The 22-year old native of Spokane, Washington is a professional gambler; his King-six beat the runner-up’s Ace-seven when he flopped a six and turned a second six.  Mr. Jumalon resides in the Evergreen state. As of today, Washington state does not have an income tax (they may have an income tax beginning in 2028) so Mr. Jumalon owes just federal income tax and self-employment tax.  He faces an estimated tax bite of $3,990,826 (39.91%) on his winnings.

(The Washington state income tax was approved by the Washington legislature earlier this year. An initiative challenging that measure is on the November ballot.  Additionally, the measure faces legal challenges if it’s not overturned by the result of the initiative.  But I digress….)

In second place is Lauri Saaskilahti. The native of Finland (now residing in Barcelona, Spain) is a sales manager. This is, by far, his largest cash in a tournament (his previous largest prize was €70,900 for an event on the European Poker Tour).  Spain, like the United States, has progressive income tax rates with a maximum rate of 47%.  The US-Spain Tax Treaty exempts Mr. Saaskilahti’s income from US tax; however, he’ll owe an approximate $2,773,000 (€2,412,510) to Spain’s Agencia Tributaria.

Greg Mueller of White Rock, British Columbia, Canada finished third winning $3,750,000.  Mr. Mueller, a former professional hockey player is a professional poker player who has had a lot of success in the past (he has won three “bracelets” for winning WSOP events). The tax situation for Canadians is, unfortunately, unsettled.  The Quebec Tax Agency, Revenu Quebec, believes that professional poker players owe Canadian income tax; Canada Revenue Agency (which administers Canadian income tax in all other provinces) is far less aggressive toward professional poker players.  Press reports say Mr. Mueller is “semi-retired.” If that’s the case and he isn’t a professional poker player, the only tax he owes is the mandatory 30% withholding ($1,122,000) to the IRS.

Professional poker player Michael Gagliano won $2,750,000 by finishing fourth.  Mr. Gagliano, who has been playing poker professionally for over 15 years, is a resident of New Jersey.  Like Mr. Jumalon, he must pay federal income tax and self-employment tax; he also must pay New Jersey income tax.  Overall, he’s looking at paying about $1,058,348 to the IRS and $272,335 to New Jersey–a tax bite of 48.39%.  And that’s not the worst tax bite for the final nine.

Han Feng of Houston finished fifth in the most brutal of ways.  He was dealt the best possible pre-flop hand, pocket aces, and was all-in against pocket nines.  Before the cards were dealt he had about an 80% chance of winning the hand. After the flop of ten-eight-three (all diamonds, and Mr. Feng held the ace of diamonds), he had a 93% chance of winning the hand. The turn jack did decrease his chance of winning to 85% (what we in poker would still call a great situation). Unfortunately for Mr. Feng, the river queen of spades gave his opponent the win. Still, the $2,250,000 he won will provide some solace.  A professional poker player, he avoids state income tax by residing in Texas.  I estimate he’ll lose $889,753 (39.54%) to tax.

Rami Hammoud, an analytics manager from Montreal, finished sixth for $1,750,000.  An amateur poker player, he does not owe Canadian income tax on his winnings. However, he’ll face the mandatory 30% withholding ($522,000) to the IRS.

Jamie Shaevel, a professional poker player from Santa Monica, California, finished seventh for $1,500,000.  Mr. Shaevel, who plays cash games in the Los Angeles area casinos, has made deep runs in the Main Event in the past (he finished 100th in 2011). California is not a low-tax state, and Mr. Shaevel faces the highest tax burden of any final table participant. He’ll lose an estimated $598,373 to the IRS and $157,127 to California, an overall tax rate of 50.37%.  Ouch.

Mario Boos, a French professional poker player, finished eighth when his pocket eights fell to the King-nine of Lauri Saaskilahti.  While Mr. Boos escapes paying anything to the IRS (the US-France Tax Treaty exempts gambling winnings), France is anything but a low-tax environment.  The maximum marginal tax rate is 45%, and there’s an additional 3% surtax on income in excess of €250,000.  The $1,250,000 Mr. Boos won is, by far, his largest ‘score.’  Mr. Boos, though, will end up paying an estimated $543,701 to the Direction Générale des Finances Publiques (DGFiP)–leaving him with just $706,299 after taxes.

Evagoras Evagorou is the first player from Cyprus to make the final nine of the main event.  An amateur gambler, his run in the main event turned him into a celebrity on the small Mediterranean island.  Cyprus’s tax system is similar to the United States, with residents being taxed on their worldwide income up to a maximum marginal rate of 35%.  The US and Cyprus do not have a tax treaty, so 30% will be withheld off the top to the IRS.  He should be able to claim a foreign tax credit for the withholding on his $1 million winnings ($990,000 effective), so his 35% tax bite  to the Tax Department of Cyprus will be just 5% ($49,500).

Here’s a table summarizing the tax bite:

Amount won at Final Table $30,250,000
Tax to IRS $8,478,300
Tax to Agencia Tributeria (Spain) $2,773,000
Tax to DGFiP (France) $543,701
Tax to New Jersey Division of Taxation $272,335
Tax to Franchise Tax Board (California) $157,127
Tax to Tax Department of Cyprus $49,500
Total Tax $12,273,963

That means 40.58% of the winnings at the final table goes toward taxes.

Here’s a second table with the winners sorted by their estimated take-home winnings:

Winner Before-Tax Prize After-Tax Prize
1. Lucas Jumalon $10,000,000 $6,009,174
2. Lauri Saaskilahti $6,000,000 $3,227,000
3. Greg Mueller $3,750,000 $2,628,000
4. Michael Gagliano $2,750,000 $1,419,317
5. Han Feng $2,250,000 $1,360,247
6. Rami Hammoud $1,750,000 $1,228,000
7. Jamie Shaevel $1,500,000 $744,500
8. Mario Boos $1,250,000 $706,299
9. Evagoras Evagorou $1,000,000 $653,500
Totals $30,250,000 $17,976,037

Taxes matter.  Last year, we had final table participants from countries with tax treaties with the US (exempting their winnings from US tax) whose residence countries did not tax gambling. A zero percent tax rate sure beats Spain’s 47% and France’s 48%.  On the state level, residing in Texas or Washington state (where there is no income tax) saves quite a bit of money over living on the coast in California or New Jersey.  As my mother said, “Location, location, location.”

This was another year where the Internal Revenue Service missed out on earning more at the final table than first place with just $8,478,300. Still, you can’t say that the IRS didn’t do poorly because the house always wins.

Posted in Gambling | Tagged | Leave a comment

Goldstein Gets Six Years at ClubFed

The saga of former Supreme Court litigator Tom Goldstein concluded on Friday in Greenbelt, Maryland.  Mr. Goldstein was sentenced to six years at ClubFed and must make restitution of $3,103,427.  His bond was revoked at sentencing, and he was taken into custody.

The saga, beginning with his indictment in January 2025 to his sentencing last week, reads more like the plot of a novel than true life.  Mr. Goldstein enjoyed poker.  As a poker player myself, there’s nothing wrong with that.  However, he played at slightly larger stakes than I do…well, far, far, far larger stakes.  He won and lost millions in a session (while I might win or lose a few hundred dollars in the largest games I play).

Still, there’s nothing illegal about that.  However, there’s a lot illegal about not putting your gambling wins and losses on your tax returns.  There’s a lot illegal about paying for your losses as a business expense from your law firm and calling those a business expense.  And it remains illegal to lie on a mortgage application.

The DOJ news release has a good summary of his actions:

Between 2016 and 2024, Goldstein repeatedly chose not to pay taxes on time, as required by law. He also assisted in the preparation of false tax returns for himself and his law firm, and he engaged in a scheme to evade taxes for 2016. Goldstein carried out the scheme by hiding millions of dollars in poker winning from the government and his accountants, diverting legal fees to his personal bank account to satisfy poker-related debts, directing people to pay his creditors instead of sending payments directly to him, channeling gambling winnings through foreign bank accounts and causing personal payments for poker debts to be falsely classified as “legal-fee” expenses on the firm’s books and records. As a result, Goldstein underreported his income and did not pay much of the taxes that he owed, while spending millions on personal expenses such as poker, travel, and luxury goods.

And that doesn’t include the mortgage fraud.

As I’ve said time and time again, it’s far, far easier to simply pay your taxes than to engage in this kind of conduct.  Human nature being what it is, I expect to write about conduct like this for years and years to come.

Posted in Gambling, Tax Fraud | Tagged | Leave a comment

The Two-Page Schedule A

Yesterday, I picked up a copy of the very first income tax form: the 1913 Form 1040.  It’s four pages (including instructions).  We’re going to display it in our office.

Back in 2018 (during the first Trump Administration), the IRS bragged about how the new tax forms were basically postcards!  Well, that was a lie then and is even more of a lie today.

The IRS has begun releasing draft tax forms for 2026.  With the OBBBA, there are a lot of changes.  For example, gambling losses are limited to 90% of what’s incurred.  I was curious to see how the IRS will handle this on the tax form.

The IRS has done what they did with Schedule 1: expanded the form.  Years ago, items of “Other Income” were simply reported on line 21 of Form 1040; today, they’re broken out onto Schedule 1.  The draft Schedule A is now two pages and features a number of ‘check-boxes.’  Other Itemized Deductions are now broken out, and the IRS changed the language on gambling losses to “Deductible gambling losses.” They also added a box so they can check to see if you’re a professional gambler (an issue the IRS computers have a problem with).  (See below for a picture of the form.)

Do note that this is a draft form, and things can (and likely will) change.  Still, if you (like me) long for tax simplification, Waiting for Godot might take less time!

Posted in IRS, Tax Preparation | Tagged | Leave a comment

2025 Wage & Income Transcripts Finally (Mostly) Available

One of the tools tax professionals (and savvy taxpayers) use are IRS Wage & Income Transcripts.  These show the items that the IRS has on file: things like W-2s, W-2Gs, K-1s, and 1099s.  Normally, these are available around Memorial Day for the previous year.  (They’re not guaranteed to be correct until the following February–yes, February 2027 for the 2025 tax year.)

This year, Wage & Income Transcripts were not working around Memorial Day.  For example, my transcript did not show any of my brokerage 1099s (yet these were timely filed with the IRS).  As of today, the transcripts appear to be accurate.

Do note that if you’re still waiting on a K-1 that it won’t show on your transcript until the issuer files the tax return.  If that partnership (or S-Corporation) doesn’t file until September 15th, the transcript isn’t going to reflect the K-1 until after September 15th!

Also remember that even if an item of income doesn’t show on the transcript does not mean that you can leave it off your tax return.  There’s no such thing as “no tax paperwork, no tax.”  All items of income must be reported on your return.

Posted in IRS, Tax Preparation | Tagged | Comments Off on 2025 Wage & Income Transcripts Finally (Mostly) Available

The 43rd Try Was a One-Third Success

Yesterday, I noted that I had made 41 tries to reach the IRS’s Practitioner Priority Service and received a “courtesy disconnect” each time.  Try 42 met the same fate, but to my surprise the 43rd try got me into the queue with a 15 to 30-minute hold time (it ended up being 24 minutes).

My first issue was why clients were receiving a refund of about $7,000 and the agent I spoke was able to determine the reason.  Their 2024 return had a refund, but for whatever reason–and without notifying the taxpayers–the refund was applied to their 2025 return.  (The return did not select this option.)  At least it wasn’t a misapplied payment [1].  The agent was helpful and got this issue resolved.

The second issue was the processing of a client’s tax return that had been selected for identity verification.  The client was unable to verify his identity with the Identity Protection Unit on a phone call, so he made an appointment at his local IRS office last October. He successfully verified his identity at that appointment and was told his return would be processed in about nine weeks. Well, it’s been far more than nine weeks and the return is still stuck somewhere.

From past experience I know that the first step to resolve this is to put a referral into the Identity Protection Unit to move the return into processing.  Unfortunately, the agent I spoke to refused to do that (even when I suggested it) stating that my client had not filed a return and needed to [2].  This is just a symptom of another major issue in dealing with the IRS today: many employees have little experience.

The lack of experience (overall) resulted from what happened last year with government buyouts.  The individuals closest to retirement took the buyouts; the employees left at the IRS (generally) have less experience.  The agent wouldn’t listen to my idea (perhaps he didn’t know how to make a referral).  Instead, I will be submitting a referral to the Taxpayer Advocate on this matter [3].

The remaining issues were for business returns, and I asked the agent to transfer me (he did).  You can guess what I heard when I was transferred: a courtesy disconnect!  I’ll be trying the business line tomorrow.  One out of three ain’t bad, right?


[1] If you accept a refund based on a payment that wasn’t yours, you have committed theft. I’ve had clients receive erroneous refunds; there’s a procedure to return such refunds.

[2] Having my client refile his return would cause another issue–there would now be two returns for the same tax year for this client.  He filed; we have proof he filed; we have proof the IRS received his return; and we have proof his identity verification went through.  This is an IRS processing issue, not a nonfiling issue.

[3] My client is in for a long wait. My understanding is there is a four-month backlog at the Taxpayer Advocate before his case will even be looked at.

Posted in IRS | Comments Off on The 43rd Try Was a One-Third Success

Don’t Call Us

I need to speak to the IRS’s Practitioner Priority Service regarding (as of today) ten client matters.  I have been calling since May 4th–and calling the moment the phone lines open (7am local time).  It’s illegal for me to record the response, but here’s an accurate transcription of what the IRS said on my 39th attempt (and my first through 38th attempts):

We’re sorry, but due to extremely high call volume in the topic you requested we’re unable to answer your call at this time.  Please try your call again later or the next business day…  Goodbye.

Some of the matters I’m dealing with our time-sensitive, and I really do need to speak with a human.  But it appears that IRS staffing of their phone lines is very limited, and that leaves few options for practitioners.

I can keep calling, but due to hold times (if I ever get through) I need to allow at least two hours for the call.  I do have appointments scheduled most days, and that limits the number of attempts I can make.

(While I was typing this I made my 40th attempt. I received the same “courtesy disconnect” message.)

Another option–and one that I will have to choose soon with at least two of these issues–is to write letters to the IRS and send them via certified mail.  That preserves my client’s rights.  Of course, the National Taxpayer Advocate has noted that the IRS can’t timely process much correspondence, but two of these items have a firm 60-day deadline to fix so my choice is phone (and I am certain these can be resolved on the phone), mail, or for my clients’ issues to be conceded.  Sure, it may take months for this to get resolved (once I mail letters) but what choice do I have?  There isn’t one.

Meanwhile, the proposed IRS budget features a $1.4 billion cut.  IRS staffing is down by about one-third from early 2025.  As much as I like small government (and I do), the IRS needs to be correctly funded and that means a budget increase, not a cut.  Perhaps one day online services can fully replace humans, but that day isn’t today.  If you’re a taxpayer–and everyone reading this is–complain to your Representatives and Senators.  There are almost certainly areas of the federal budget that can be cut (given the reports of fraud); however, the IRS isn’t one of those today.

And my 41st attempt fared no better than my 40th….

Posted in IRS, Legislation | Comments Off on Don’t Call Us

Bakumen Aoys!

There are no typographical errors in the headline of this post.

A couple of recent news stories  out of California bring home that it’s time for anyone residing in the Golden Bronze State to seriously consider moving. First, the “Train to Nowhere,” a past winner of the Tax Offender of the Year award, will likely never get completed.  The price tag of this alleged high speed rail project is now $231 Billion!  Back in 2008, the price tag (when the ballot measure authorizing the project passed) was just $33 Billion.  That’s a 700% increase!

My personal view is this project will never get completed.  But if it does, California taxpayers are going to pay for it–and with a $35 Billion budget deficit there’s only one way taxes can go as far as Democratic politicians are concerned (up).  California already ranks near the bottom of states on tax policy, and things are likely to get worse.

Second, the so-called California “Billionaire” (Wealth) Tax appears to have made the November ballot.  The measure has already cost the state–many billionaires have voted with their feet, establishing residences in other states–and Chamath Palihapitya (a venture capitalist) noted that if the measure passes in November the state legislature could covert the tax to a tax on everyone.

(There are a couple of other certainties if the measure passes.  First, it will be tied up in the courts for some time, as whether or not it is constitutional is iffy.  The US Constitution authorizes income taxes, but it might or might not allow a wealth tax.  This measure would likely go to the Supreme Court.)

If you are a California resident, and your job and family situation allow you to consider relocation, I think it’s time for you to do so.

Posted in California | Comments Off on Bakumen Aoys!

Hurry Up and Wait

Every year clients ask us this question:

I paid my tax via IRS Direct Pay (or you had my account debited).  Why hasn’t my payment come out yet?

The answer to this question is simple, and there’s nothing your tax professional can do about it.  The IRS can only handle so many debits a day, so many payments made for April 15th will happen in the days following April 15th.  Taxpayers need to allow up to ten business days for their payment to post.  It’s usually much less, but we’ve seen it take that long.

We also get this question:

Why hasn’t my New Jersey payment gone through?  You filed my return on April 15, and the IRS debited my account but New Jersey has not.

For whatever reason, New Jersey is by far the slowest state in the country to accept tax returns and extensions.  This morning, I have a list of eight New Jersey returns and extensions filed on April 15th that were accepted!  Some of these include payments initiated by us; others are returns with refunds or zero balances.  Yet these returns were not accepted until–at the earliest–Saturday, four days after being filed.  There’s nothing we or any other tax professional can do about New Jersey’s slow as molasses system.

The good news here is that a payment initiated on April 15th is considered made on April 15th even if it is accepted days later (this is true for the IRS and New Jersey).

Posted in IRS, New Jersey | Comments Off on Hurry Up and Wait

Bozo Tax Tip #1: If It Sounds too Good to be True…

…it probably is.  That’s how the cliche goes, and it’s generally accurate.  If someone tells you:

  • If you invest $10,000 in [whatever], you magically get a $50,000 deduction;
  • If you buy $20,000 of Brazilian accounts receivable, you can get a $120,000 deduction;
  • Your home in the middle of the city is eligible for a conservation easement, and you can get a $100,000 deduction;
  • You can get a tax credit on undistributed long-term capital gains by using Form 2439; or
  • You automatically qualify for a self-employment tax credit;

Ask yourself a question, “Does this sound too good to be true?”

If you invest in something and it loses money, there is likely a loss available.  But (a) passive losses are limited to passive income (until you dispose of the investment) and (b) losses are limited to the amount of your basis (your basis begins with the investment amount). Here, a $10,000 investment likely limits your loss to $10,000.

If you purchase $20,000 of Brazilian accounts receivable, there’s no way you can get a $120,000 deduction.

Conservation easements are real, but (a) your house in the middle of Las Vegas or Chicago is almost certainly not eligible for one, (b) you need a reputable appraiser, and (c) this is a very high audit area where you need bulletproof records.

There really is a Form 2439, but it’s not a magic deduction or credit. It’s simply a notice of the capital gains that a mutual fund has not distributed but paid tax on.  You have to report the capital gain (and you do get a credit for the taxes the mutual fund paid). Generally, they’ll offset. (I’ve seen this form just twice during my 27 years of tax preparation work.)

Half the self-employment tax you pay is a deduction, and there were some tax credits (during the pandemic) for self-employed individuals.  But (a) you need to be self-employed, and (b) there is no magic credit today.  The 50% deduction of self-employed tax for the self-employed still exists, though.

I have had a client talk to me about every item I mentioned above.  And the cliche held: these were too good to be true, and other than the self-employment tax deduction and the two clients who really did need to file Form 2439, there was no magic bullet for my clients.

If something fails the ‘smell test,’ it likely is too good to be true (and is, thus, false).


That’s a wrap on our Bozo Tax Tips for 2026!  Please, please don’t do these.  Instead, be smart and remember it’s almost always a whole lot easier to just pay your taxes correctly.

Posted in IRS, Tax Fraud | Tagged | Comments Off on Bozo Tax Tip #1: If It Sounds too Good to be True…

Bozo Tax Tip #2: Use a Bozo Tax Professional

The IRS recently highlighted that taxpayers should choose tax professionals wisely; I agree.  I’ve had this as a Bozo Tax Tip in the past, but a new client highlighted this issue for me.  In the previous iteration of this “tip,” I noted:

Here’s another Bozo Tax Tip that keeps coming around. The problem is, the Bozos don’t change their stripes. In any case, here are some signs your accountant might be a Bozo:

– He’s never met a deduction that doesn’t fit everyone. There’s no reason why a renter can’t take a mortgage interest deduction, right? And everyone’s entitled to $20,000 of employee business expenses…even if their salary is just $40,000 a year. Ask the proprietors of Western Tax Service about that.

– He believes that the income tax is voluntary. After all, we live in a democracy, so we don’t have to pay taxes, right?

– Besides preparing tax returns, he sells courses on why the Income Tax is Unconstitutional or how by filing the magical $2,295 papers he sells you will be able to avoid the income tax.

– He wants you to sign over that tax refund to him. After all, he’ll make sure you get your share of it after he takes out his 50% of the refund.

– He believes every return needs at least three dependents, no matter whether you have any children or not.

If your tax professional exhibits any of these behaviors, it’s time to get a new tax professional.

Well, it’s apparent there are some new strategies in this area (well, at least new to me).  Julie (not her name) came to me two years ago because something struck her wrong about her former tax professional.  She was in that preparer’s waiting room and overheard the following:

“Yes, we guarantee that every client will get a refund of at least $2,000.”

Bluntly, that’s impossible.  Our job as tax professionals is to make sure your return is complete and accurate, and that your tax is the least that’s legally possible.  For most, a refund means your withholding and/or estimated payments exceeded your tax.  (Various tax credits–the Earned Income Credit and certain energy efficiency credits among them–can also cause tax refunds.)  A refund might not be a great thing; most of the time, it means you’ve given an interest-free loan to the government.  But Julie’s former tax professional wasn’t done.

“My clients never get audited–it’s a near guarantee.”

Julie knew that was wrong because her parents were randomly selected for an IRS research examination (audit).  The IRS conducts 5,000 to 10,000 of these each year; everyone has a chance of being selected.  (Over my 25-year career as a tax professional, I’ve had four clients selected for these kinds of audits.)  The IRS also conducts research audits into various professions; for example, they recently looked at employees in Las Vegas who worked at the clubs located in the major casinos.  (And given that tax professional’s guarantees, I suspect many of his clients will be audited in the future not on a random basis.)

Julie had enough and left–but there was one other thing she didn’t know (until I showed her this on her return from the previous year): She had used a “ghost” tax professional.  At the bottom of page two of Form 1040 is a place for a tax professional’s information (his or her firm name, address, phone number, Employer Identification Number (EIN), and the tax professional’s PTIN–the Preparer Tax Identification Number); on her return, that information was blank.

Don’t be a bozo.  If you use a tax professional, use an ethical preparer.  You may pay more for your return preparation and get a lesser refund (though the refund amount should be accurate), but you will rest a lot easier.

Posted in Tax Preparation | Tagged | Comments Off on Bozo Tax Tip #2: Use a Bozo Tax Professional