Categories
- Alabama
- Alaska
- Arizona
- Arkansas
- BEA
- Books
- California
- Canada
- Colorado
- Connecticut
- Cryptocurrencies
- Delaware
- District of Columbia
- Entity Formation
- Estate Tax
- Federal Budgeting
- FINCEN
- Florida
- Gambling
- Georgia
- Gift Tax
- Hawaii
- Illinois
- Indiana
- Information Returns
- International
- Iowa
- IRS
- Irvine
- Kansas
- Katrina
- Kentucky
- Las Vegas
- Legislation
- Louisiana
- Maine
- Maryland
- Massachusetts
- Michigan
- Minnesota
- Mississippi
- Missouri
- Montana
- Nevada
- New Hampshire
- New Jersey
- New Mexico
- New York
- North Carolina
- North Dakota
- Ohio
- Oklahoma
- Orange County
- Oregon
- Payroll
- Payroll Taxes
- Pennsylvania
- Pensions
- Property Taxes
- Recordkeeping
- Rhode Island
- S Corporation
- Sales Tax
- SBA
- Scams
- Self Employment Tax
- South Carolina
- South Dakota
- Supreme Court
- Tax Court
- Tax Evasion
- Tax Fraud
- Tax Gifts
- Tax Preparation
- Taxable Talk
- Tennessee
- Texas
- Uncategorized
- Utah
- Vermont
- Virginia
- Washington State
- West Virginia
- Wisconsin
- Wyoming
Contact
Archives
Tax Blogs
- Dinesen Tax Times
- Don't Mess with Taxes
- EideBailly Tax News & Views
- Federal Tax Crimes
- Kelly Phillips Erb (Taxgirl)
- MauledAgain
- Peter Reilly
- Phil Hodgen Tax Law Blog
- Procedurally Taxing
- Tax Analysts Blog
- Tax Policy Blog (Tax Foundation)
- TaxProf Blog
- TaxVox Blog
- The Tax Guru
- The Wandering Tax Pro
- Tony Nitti on Forbes
Political Blogs
Tax Agencies
- California Department of Taxes and Fee Administration
- California Employment Development Dept.
- California Franchise Tax Board
- City of Las Vegas Business Licenses
- Clark County Business Licenses
- Henderson Business Licenses
- IRS
- Nevada Department of Employment, Training and Rehabilitation
- Nevada Department of Taxation
- North Las Vegas Business Licenses
Memberships
Other Links
Meta
-
Note: All Content is Copyright © 2005 – 2026 by Clayton Financial and Tax LLC.
Monthly Archives: August 2005
It’s Renewal Time, So Here Comes the Scam
My corporation’s annual renewal fee (mandatory fee of $25 to the Secretary of State of California) is due in September. So what comes in my mail today? A request from “State Corporate Compliance” so that I can pay an additional … Continue reading
Posted in Scams
2 Comments
The Bronze State?
California continues to lose some of its luster. As reported by the TaxProf Blog, California athletes leave for brighter, er, cheaper (on a tax basis) pastures. For those who don’t remember, Californians passed Proposition 63 last November. This proposition added … Continue reading
Posted in California
Comments Off on The Bronze State?
Taxes and Online Gambling, Part 2: Repatriation and Income Recognition
I recently read a blog where a very successful online poker player wrote, There really aren’t IRS regulations on online gambling. It exists in a grey area. As fun160 pointed out “In the financial markets money earned off-shore is not … Continue reading
Posted in Gambling
4 Comments
IRS Issues Priority Guidance Plan; Targets Include Poker Tournaments
The IRS and the US Department of the Treasury issued their “Priority Guidance Plan”. A total of 254 projects are mentioned. The ones that the IRS has highlighted are: —Additional legal requirements for tax shelters; —Guidance on how to report … Continue reading
Deadline Day 2
Today, August 15th, is the deadline for individuals who filed extensions to actually file their 2004 Federal tax returns. A second extension is available (until October 17th), but you need to have a reason (and have the IRS accept the … Continue reading
Posted in IRS
Comments Off on Deadline Day 2
Taxes and Online Gambling, Part I
I’m a poker player. I’ve been playing competitive poker, including tournaments, for several years, quite successfully. And yes, I claim my winnings on my tax return. I’m also co-author of a poker book. I’ve had a natural fascination with gambling … Continue reading
Posted in Gambling
4 Comments
“Doctored Receipts and Implausible Testimony”
It’s not a good thing for you when the Tax Court begins its opinion with “…[the petitioner] seeks to deduct expenses by relying mostly — if not quite entirely — on doctored receipts and implausible testimony.” The opinion includes such … Continue reading
Posted in Tax Court
Comments Off on “Doctored Receipts and Implausible Testimony”