Another FATCA Consequence: Sending 1042-S’s With No Withholding

One of my clients who played in the World Series of Poker asked me to prepare his Form 1042-S’s to show the required withholding for some of his backers. The 2012 form is available, and it looks identical to the 2011 form. I always look at the instructions just to make sure that nothing has changed. Well, I noticed this instruction:

You must file a Form 1042-S even if you did not withhold tax because the income was exempt from tax under a U.S. tax treaty or the [Tax] Code, including the exemption for income that is effectively connected with the conduct of a trade or business in the United States, or you released the tax withheld to the recipient.

While there are exceptions for reporting, gambling proceeds subject to a treaty exemption is not one of the exceptions.

Let’s look at how this plays out. Suppose Russ is backed by Jon in a poker tournament. Jon is a resident of the United Kingdom, has an ITIN, and has provided me with a correctly completed Form W-8BEN. I play in the poker tournament and do well; Jon’s share of my winnings is, say, $100,000. While there is no withholding required under the US-UK Tax Treaty, I must still complete a Form 1042-S and submit that to the IRS. The 1042-S is due by March 15, 2013. It must be submitted with a Form 1042-T (Annual Summary and Transmittal of Forms 1042-S); the 2012 Form 1042-T is not yet available.

This appears to be yet another consequence of FATCA. Under FATCA, the IRS wants international banks and tax agencies to send information to the IRS on Americans. Well, turnabout is fair game; other countries want data on their taxpayers, too.

This is yet more paperwork being sent for no particularly good reason, and yet more work for tax professionals. Well, I keep telling my friends I have lifetime employment–this is yet another example of why.

Posted in Gambling, International, IRS | 1 Comment

Sigel Gets Two Years

Philadelphia rapper Beanie Sigel pleaded guilty to tax evasion last year. He was sentenced to two years at ClubFed, and must make full restitution to the IRS. He must report to prison in September.

Posted in Tax Evasion | Tagged | Comments Off on Sigel Gets Two Years

The Tax War Against Medical Marijuana

Think what you may about medical marijuana (legal in about 17 states), there is a certainty for federal income tax purposes: Marijuana is a Class I narcotic so deducting expenses on a tax return for a marijuana dispensary is a violation of Section 280E of the Tax Code. This poses obvious difficulties for operators of dispensaries. And the federal government has targeted California dispensaries on two fronts: the IRS and landlords.

I’ve reported on this issue before. In early 2011, I noted it would take a while for the cases to get to the Tax Court. In Janet Novack’s excellent summary of the situation, Ms. Novack notes that two dispensaries have filed Tax Court cases. They’ll likely be heard late this year, with decisions coming in 2013.

The problem for the dispensaries is that the law is very clear here, and the IRS is likely correct in assessing the tax. It doesn’t matter that medical marijuana is legal in California–federal tax law is black and white on this issue. While I expect the probable losses in Tax Court to be appealed to the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals, the dispensaries appear to me to be in a losing battle.

Posted in California, IRS, Tax Court | Tagged | Comments Off on The Tax War Against Medical Marijuana

In the Battle Between the Board of Equalization and the Humble Taco Truck…

Entrepreneurs look for niches: Opportunities that aren’t being served well by current businesses. Enter the humble taco truck. These food kitchens on wheels tend to serve business workers looking for a quick and reasonably priced meal. I saw them daily when I was living in Orange County.

What’s the biggest enemy of the entrepreneur? That’s easy: Government. It stifles businesses by adding regulations and taxes. And out of my old stomping grounds of Orange County comes a story about 12 taco truck owners who say that they now must fight the BOE.

One issue is that some items sold by these entrepreneurs are taxable while some are not. Thus, estimates are used to determine the sales tax owed to the state. Apparently, these estimates have now become unreasonable.

In this article in the Orange County Register, Steven Greenhut comes to the same conclusion that I did:

The state Capitol is controlled by liberal Democrats, who frequently invoke concern for the poor, working-class people and immigrants to justify spending schemes. Yet here is another example of how these officials, lawmakers and bureaucrats, put the demands of the well-paid and powerful public-employee unions over the needs of cash-strapped immigrants and working people.

State officials refuse to tackle solutions for the pension debt or rein in public spending. Indeed, they are busy approving fanciful projects such as high-speed rail. Yet, the state has no money. This is the end result of an infantile progressive movement that refuses to make hard choices, always blames the private sector and figures that higher taxes will solve every problem.

Read the entire piece and you’ll understand that California is doing everything it can to drive all business out of state.

Posted in California, Sales Tax | Tagged | 1 Comment

Did a Maryland Tax Increase Cause Taxpayers to Flee the State?

An organization called ChangeMaryland has a new study that states that 31,000 individuals left the state from 2007 to 2010. ChangeMaryland believes that it’s the tax hikes in the state that have caused the exodus.

Maryland is a decidedly liberal (“blue”) state with relatively high taxes. The study states that the millionaire’s tax, which ran from 2007 to 2010, cost the state $1.7 billion in tax revenues: Individuals impacted by the tax fled to low-tax states (primarily Florida). As I noted last December, California lost over 720,000 taxpayers and $48 billion of AGI from 1993 to 2008 while the population of the state increased.

There is an obvious conclusion: Tax rates matter, and individuals will move to avoid higher taxes. I’m an example of that, and it appears that many former residents of Maryland are, too.

Posted in California, Maryland | 2 Comments

If Only He Had Driven a Yugo Instead of a Ferrari

Sometimes it’s best to be inconspicuous. That’s definitely the case if you’re doing something that’s illegal. From Bergamo, Italy comes the story of an unidentified Italian man who loved his Ferrari F131. Even in Italy that’s a car that will get you noticed. Unfortunately for that Italian, members of La Guardia di Finanza (the Italian Finance Police) happen to see the car one day this past January. They traced the license to the man and pulled up his tax return.

It was all zeroes.

Needless to say, the Finance Police wondered where he got the money for such an expensive car. It turned out the man was a director and legal representative for various companies. And those companies had very high costs and very low revenues from 2007 to 2010. That allegedly cost the Italian government something like €3 million.

The man, who also piloted high-speed racing boats, had two other expensive cars that he leased: a Hummer and a Dodge luxury vehicle. All-in-all it was a lot of conspicuous consumption without paying taxes. He’s been arrested. If the allegations against him are proven, he’s looking at spending some time in prison, fines, and paying the back taxes.

Sometimes it’s best not to flaunt it.

News Story: English (UPI), Italian

Posted in International, Tax Evasion | 2 Comments

When an Agent’s Fees Are Not Deductible

Suppose you are a professional athlete and you hire a sports agent to negotiate with you. Those fees are, in the United States, generally deductible as an “ordinary and necessary” business expense. However, the same is not true in Canada.

The Canada Revenue Agency ruled several years ago that agent’s commissions are not deductible. Given that most athletes hire agents (who typically receive 3% to 5% of a player’s salary), this can be a significant issue. This impacts all four major sports leagues (there are several hockey teams in Canada, along with the Toronto Blue Jays of Major League Baseball and the Toronto Raptors of the NBA; additionally, the NFL’s Buffalo Bills play three home games a year in Toronto), and sooner or later some “lucky” athlete was going to be audited by the CRA.

That happened when Michael Caruso, a defenseman with the Florida Panthers, was audited. He lost, so he appealed his decision to the Tax Court of Canada. In Caruso v. Queen, Canada’s Tax Court ruled against Mr. Caruso.

Canadian tax law is similar to, but not identical to, American tax law. In the US, any business expense that is both “ordinary and necessary” is generally allowed. However, Canada’s Income Tax Act states, “Except as permitted by this section, no deductions shall be made in computing a taxpayer’s income for a taxation year from an office or employment.” It would seem that an agent’s fee would be deductible, given that Paragraph (8)(1)(b) states a deduction can be taken for, “(b) amounts paid by the taxpayer in the year as or on account of legal expenses incurred by the taxpayer to collect or establish a right to salary or wages owed to the taxpayer by the employer or former employer of the taxpayer;”

So are an agent’s fees legal expenses? Not in Canada:

In this case the services rendered by the agent were the services in negotiating the contract that was entered into between the Appellant and the Florida Panthers. When the Appellant was asked about the services provided by the agent, he referred to the additional $60,000 in signing bonuses that the agent was able to obtain for him…

To the extent that any of the services provided by AKT Sports Management Consultants Inc. (or MFIVE SPORTS) could be regarded as legal services, the services were not to collect salary or wages owed to the Appellant (the services were rendered before any contract was signed) nor were such services rendered to establish a right to salary or wages. The services were rendered to negotiate the contract. There was no right to any salary or wages until after the agreement was signed, which was after the services in question were rendered by the Appellant’s agent.

While there is a proposed amendment to this part of Canada’s Income Tax Act that would change the law, the judge in the case stated it would still not apply to agent’s fees:

As well, not all legal services will qualify. Only amounts paid for those legal services provided to collect amounts owed to the taxpayer or to establish a right to such amount will qualify for the deduction under this paragraph. Therefore even if such amendments were now effective the proposed changes would not result in the amount that was paid to the Appellant’s agent being deductible.

Now, decisions of this court can be appealed; however, based on this news story it appears that won’t be happening in this case. That said, this decision impacts every hockey player and many other athletes. Mr. Caruso did not earn a huge salary; I suspect some highly salaried player, such as Roberto Luongo of the Vancouver Canucks, will end up fighting this issue if he gets audited. (As an aside, Mr. Luongo will be competing in the main event of the World Series of Poker which begins on Saturday. Mr. Luongo’s $10,000 buy-in is being paid for by the British Columbia Lottery Corporation.)

Hat Tip: Robert Raiola

Posted in Canada, Gambling, International | Tagged , , , | Comments Off on When an Agent’s Fees Are Not Deductible

It’s a Tax: What ObamaCare Means for You

Unless you were shipwrecked on a deserted island you know that the Supreme Court ruled that the Affordable Care Act, aka ObamaCare, is a legal “tax.” Back in February 2010 I wrote about the taxes in ObamaCare. Let’s run down the entire list (now that we know what’s in the bill) and see how this impacts you. The italicized text is from February 2010 (the proposal). Numbers refer to [individuals]/[families].

1. Individual Mandate Tax. For those who don’t purchase health insurance, this income tax surcharge continues to exist in this plan. I couldn’t determine the exact rate. This begins on January 1, 2014. The penalty is $95 (at first) but increases to the greater of $695 or 2.5% of modified adjusted gross income (MAGI) in 2016. (Families pay three times the individual number for the minimum tax.) The tax is indexed to the Consumer Price Index (CPI) for future years.

Something to realize is that most of the taxes in the measure are based on MAGI. This means your income before itemized deductions. For individuals who are, say, amateur gamblers who have $100,000 of wins and $100,000 or losses, you will pay taxes based on your winnings but not your losses. This is not a good thing (unless you like paying lots of taxes).

2. Employer Mandate Tax. On businesses with 50+ employees that do not offer health care, and at least one employee qualifies for a tax credit, $750/employee. This will cause many small businesses to stop growing once they reach 49 employees. Those figures come from the prior version.

In the final version of the law, the Employer Mandate Tax is $2,000/employee with it going into effect on January 1, 2014. There is also a $3,000/employee penalty if the government finds they provide workers with “unaffordable” health insurance. There ‘s an obvious solution to small employers: Don’t hire employee #50. And for those who have 51 or 52 employees, let those “excess” employees go. And that’s exactly what is guaranteed to happen.

This tax is guaranteed to hurt the economy in numerous ways. It will cause employers to cut employees. It will cost employees health insurance; if the $3,000/employee penalty applies to health insurance that’s unaffordable and you have just 30 employees, the solution is simple–don’t offer health insurance. The title of my previous post was, “It’s unpopular, unworkable, and insane, so naturally they’re in a hurry to pass it.” It remains an insane plan.

3. Excise Tax on Health Insurance Plans. Beginning in 2018, 40% tax (the percentage may be wrong) on plans costing $10,200/$27,500. Is indexed to CPI. This is in the law at the percentages and dollar amounts noted; it goes into effect in 2018.

4. Health Insurance would be reported on W-2s. Another mandate that increases costs for business. It’s unclear whether this mandate survived. However, the White House release states that loopholes will be closed which implies this remains. It survived and is in the law.

5. “Medicine Cabinet Tax.” Limitation on HSAs, FSAs, and MSAs to purchase non-prescription medication except insulin. This is in the law and is already in effect (as of 2011).

6. HSA Withdrawal Tax Increased. The tax would increase to 20% from 10%. It’s in the law and went into effect in 2011.

7. FSAs capped at a maximum of $2500. They are now uncapped. This goes into effect in 2013 (it is indexed to CPI after 2013). This will especially hurt parents of special needs children who have utilized FSA dollars for special needs education. That kind of education can easily run over $10,000 per year.

8. 1099 Reporting for corporations. Requires businesses to send 1099-MISCs to corporations. This is another cost for businesses. This will begin in 2011 and will definitely increase my income. This is definitely in the proposal, but it’s unclear if this starts in 2011. While this was in the law, Congress repealed this section of the law after outcries from almost every business in the country.

8. Tax on Charitable Hospitals. This excise tax of $50,000 per hospital impacts hospitals that don’t meet new Department of Health and Human Services regulations. It’s unclear whether this is in the proposal. This went into law in 2010 and impacts hopspitals that do not meet “community health assessment needs,” “financial assistance,” and “billing and collection rules” set by the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS).

9. Tax on Drug Companies. There’s definitely a tax on drug companies, but the size and timing of the tax is unclear. This went into effect in 2010 as a $2.3 billion annual tax based on the share of sales made in a year.

10. Tax on Medical Device Manufacturers. This tax is in the bill, but the size and timing of the tax is not clear. This goes into effect in 2013, and is a 2.3% excise tax. How many medical device manufacturers will now establish overseas subsidiaries not subject to US taxation? I’d expect many to do so. Given that there are 360,000 people employed in the US in this industry, there will be layoffs in this industry caused by this tax.

11. Tax on Health Insurers. This tax is definitely in the bill, but the size and timing of the tax is unclear. This tax goes into effect in 2014, and phases in gradually until 2018. The tax immediately hits firms with $50 million in profits (or more) and is based on premiums collected.

12. Elimination of tax deduction for employer provided retirement prescription drug coverage. It is unclear whether this tax is in the measure. It’s in the law and goes into effect in 2013.

13. Increase of percentage of AGI required to deduct medical expenses from 7.5% to 10%. Few can deduct medical expenses today; fewer will be able to deduct them tomorrow. This goes into effect in 2013. However, for those 65 or older the AGI percentage will remain at 7.5% through 2016 (seniors will join everyone else at 10% in 2017).

14. Compensation Limitation for Health Insurance Executives. If you work in that industry, you will be limited to a salary of $500,000. There’s no mention of this in the measure. However, given the Obama Administration’s stance on various pay-related measures, it’s likely included. It goes into effect in 2013.

15. Medicare Payroll Tax Hikes. Once your income exceeds $200,000/$250,000 (MFJ), you will pay an additional 0.9% tax. Note that the employer will only collect (and be responsible for this tax) if you earn $200,000/$250,000 or more. This also impacts the self-employed. And the law is written so that the self-employed cannot deduct half of the new tax as a deduction to income tax. It appears this provision is dead. However, it’s been replaced with something worse (see below). Unfortunately, this tax is in the final version of the law and takes effect in 2013.

16. New Hospital Insurance Tax. “The Act will include an additional 0.9 percentage point Hospital Insurance tax for households with incomes exceeding $200,000 for singles and $250,000 for married couples filing jointly.” I remember then-candidate Obama stating that if you made under $250,000, he wouldn’t increase your taxes. Yeah, right. This tax is not in the final version of the law.

16. New Unearned Income Tax. “[The Act] would add a 2.9 percent tax for households with incomes exceeding $200,000 for singles and $250,000 for married couples filing jointly to unearned income including interest, dividends, annuities, royalties and rents (excluding income from active participation in S corporations).” This is yet another measure which will stifle the economy in the United States. For my amateur gambling clients, this is particularly bad—it means your taxes will go up based on your gambling winnings, not your gambling net income. This goes into effect in 2013. While it’s called a “Surtax on Investment Income,” it will include dividends, capital gains, interest (the things you think about), passive income (partnerships, S-Corps, and trusts), royalties, rents, and Other Income (including gambling income). It does not include active business income, distributions from retirement plans, and sales of ownership interests in pass-through entities. It also does not apply to non-resident aliens.

17. Blue Cross Tax. There is a tax deduction available today for Blue Cross and Blue Shield companies; this tax deduction will vanish if they don’t spend 85% (or more) of premiums on clinical services. There’s no mention of this in the proposal. However, it was in both the House and Senate Democratic proposals and I expect it’s in this one, too. This went into effect in 2010.

18. Tax on Indoor Tanning. A new 10% excise tax on indoor tanning salons. This one made the cut. This went into effect in 2010.

19. Paper Production and Cellulosic Biofuels. “[Close] the loophole that allows certain byproducts of paper production to be eligible for the cellulosic biofuels producer credit.” This new tax provision is in the measure. This went into effect in 2010.

20. Strengthen Economic Substance Rules. “[Help] prevent tax shelters by clarifying the definition of when activities have true “economic substance” beyond evading taxes.” While the details aren’t listed, it’s clear that this provision will strengthen the economic substance rules. This will increase costs for complex transactions, and will likely depress economic activity. This went into effect in 2010.


President Obama and his surrogates have stated that the ACA (ObamaCare) is not a tax. White House Press Secretary Jay Carney stated the following:

“It’s a penalty, because you have a choice. You don’t have a choice to pay your taxes, right?” Carney said.

Carney was initially reluctant to assign a label to the fine when pressed repeatedly by reporters Friday. “Call it what you want,” he said…“You can call it what you want,” he said. “If you read the opinion, it is not a broad-based tax. It affects one percent, by CBO estimates, of the population. It is not something that you assess like an income tax.” It was unclear which Congressional Budget Office estimate Carney was referring to. Despite being pressed on the issue, though, the spokesman would not relent.

Bluntly, this is B.S. There are twenty tax increases in ObamaCare. You can parse words any way you like, but many of these measures are labeled as “taxes” and “surtaxes”. If you can read what I wrote above about the twenty tax increases in ObamaCare and still state that it’s not a tax, well, I suggest you apply for a job at the White House. The Supreme Court said it’s a tax. It contains twenty tax increases. President Obama’s argument that it’s not a tax is clearly wrong.

For the rest of us, this gives a clear choice in the election this November. Mitt Romney has pledged that his first job if he takes office will be the repeal of ObamaCare. President Obama and his administration have pledged the full implementation of ObamaCare (and the rescinding of the Bush Tax Cuts). You can’t get a much clearer choice than that.

Posted in Legislation | Tagged | 2 Comments

Lauryn Hill Pleads Guilty to Tax Evasion Charges

Yet another music star has tax troubles. Singer Lauryn Hill pleaded guilty to failing to file tax returns on more than $1.5 million she had earned from 2005 through 2007. Ms. Hill’s attorney indicated that she plans on paying the back taxes (plus interest and penalties) prior to her sentencing in November.

Ms. Hill stated she didn’t pay her taxes “…since she withdrew from society to guarantee the safety and well-being of herself and her family.” What? I’m sorry, but that’s nonsensical. Just pay your taxes–it’s a whole lot easier than not doing so.

If you’re a celebrity, you should realize you’re a potential target of the IRS. There are thousands to millions of witnesses to you making money. Even the worst IRS agent could show you had income. Otherwise you will be joining Richard Hatch in the entertainment industry wing of the Bozo Taxpayers Hall of Fame.

Posted in Tax Evasion | Tagged | Comments Off on Lauryn Hill Pleads Guilty to Tax Evasion Charges

Now He Gets to Watch Paint Dry

Willard Douglas Kerr of Phoenix operated DK Coatings, LLC, a painting and wall covering company in Manassas, Virginia. Mr. Kerr had many employees, and the business was apparently successful.

Mr. Kerr also had some pressing needs at home. He needed a new car. His swimming pool needed repairs. He also wanted to put more money into his business. So he did what you should never, ever do: He didn’t remit his federal trust fund taxes.

As I’ve said over and over, if you have employees and don’t remit your trust fund taxes, the IRS will come after you. It’s only a question of when, not if. If you’re an employer make sure you sign up for EFTPS and check to make sure that your trust fund taxes are being remitted; you will be held responsible if they’re not. That’s why you absolutely positively need to use a reputable payroll company. But I digress….

In any case, Mr. Kerr’s actions were discovered. In April he pled guilty to tax fraud; on Friday he was sentenced to 24 months at ClubFed. He must also make restitution of the $1,111,352 in taxes he owes to the IRS. Now he’ll get to watch the paint he sold dry.

Posted in Payroll Taxes | Comments Off on Now He Gets to Watch Paint Dry