It’s Official, But the Details Are Lacking

California has a budget deal. That said, the devils is always in the details and those are lacking this morning. What’s known is that local governments (counties and cities) will face a $5 billion cut, the plan includes borrowing and some “speeding up of tax collections” and other one-time fixes.

Needless to say, I’d like to know more about the changes in tax collections. Estimated payments went to a 30/30/20/20 scheme this year; are they thinking of a 45/45/5/5 scheme? Or some other foolish ideas that will make California’s excellent business climate even more palatable? Supposedly the details will be available late today or tomorrow. I’ll let you know when I see them.

Posted in California | Comments Off on It’s Official, But the Details Are Lacking

Budget Deal Done

The Flash Report said this evening that a budget deal is done. “Lots of cuts, lots of borrowing, lots of gimmicks. But from the briefings I have had so far, the cuts are substantial, with mega-billions that are permanent.” The vote will supposedly be on Thursday. The budget should be available for public consumption either late tomorrow or Wednesday.

Posted in California | Comments Off on Budget Deal Done

More on FBAR

The Foreign Bank and Financial Account Reporting (FBAR) has been making the news. Today’s Wall Street Journal has an article detailing some of the issues with the filing requirements.

Additionally, the New York State Bar Association isn’t happy with the lack of guidance by the IRS and Treasury on FBAR. In a 32-page letter they detail some of the guidance they’d like the IRS to provide. While the NYSBA focuses on hedge funds (somewhat naturally) they do cover some of the other problem areas with FBAR.

A reminder: The deadline for complying with the FBAR requirements remains September 23rd.

Posted in IRS | Tagged | Comments Off on More on FBAR

I Hope He’s Not Your IRS Auditor

The headline says it all: “IRS agent arrested for threats: Treasury Department investigates Valencia man for filing false tax returns”. Yelling “I’m going to kill you” to Treasury Agents isn’t likely the best strategy in the world.

As the article notes, the capacity the IRS Agent, Albert Bront, works in wasn’t disclosed.

Hat Tip: TaxProf Blog

Posted in IRS | Comments Off on I Hope He’s Not Your IRS Auditor

Real Budget Cuts Needed

I read this story this morning and couldn’t believe it. Yet I’ve been assured it’s true. California’s DMV is returning a check because it was sent in too quickly from the time the notice was received!

There’s another few bucks down the drain for the Bronze Golden State

Posted in California | Comments Off on Real Budget Cuts Needed

California Budget Vote This Week?

Rumors are flying that a vote will occur this week on a new California budget that contains no new taxes. Of course, until the proposal is read no one knows what “user fees” and other disguised tax increases are within the budget.

The Flash Report indicated that there’s lots of borrowing from local governments…who will be forced to increase taxes or cut services. Local governments are already suing the state over this taking.

I’ll keep you informed if and when there’s a budget.

Posted in California | Comments Off on California Budget Vote This Week?

Woman Accepts Guilt in Defrauding Psychic

That’s the headline in the Rutland (Vermont) Herald. Denise Hall was employed by psychic Rosemary Altea. Ms. Hall pleaded guilty to wire fraud and filing a false tax return.

It seems that Ms. Hall was Ms. Altea’s bookkeeper. Ms. Hall needed some extra money, so she wrote checks from some of Ms. Altea’s credit cards…without letting Ms. Altea know. That’s fraud. And Ms. Hall didn’t report the extra income on her tax return; that’s filing a false tax return.

Of course, there’s an obvious question that must be asked. If Ms. Altea is a psychic, shouldn’t she have known about the fraud? Well, from reading her website it appears she’s a faith healer….

Posted in Tax Evasion | Comments Off on Woman Accepts Guilt in Defrauding Psychic

Progress on the Budget?

News reports indicate that some progress has been made on the California budget meltdown. That said, the headline notes that “the thorniest issues remain.”

Meanwhile, the liberal Los Angeles Times continues with its attacks on Proposition 13. It’s just not true. Dan Walters of the Sacramento Bee penned a column that demolishes that argument. An excerpt:

Dave Doerr, chief consultant to the California Taxpayers’ Association and a leading expert on taxation, has calculated that commercial property subject to local assessment by Ting and his colleagues in other counties is actually bearing a slightly larger share of the property tax burden than it did 30 years ago – and, interestingly enough, residential property’s share has also been rising.

I hope for a quick solution but I’d like a solution that’s real and not paper windowdressing. We’ll have to wait and see what comes from Sacramento.

Posted in California | Comments Off on Progress on the Budget?

Mailbag Time

Lots of questions have come in during the past few weeks. Here are a few that might interest you.

1. I recently settled a lawsuit for wrongful termination, and was awarded $100,000 after attorney fees of $50,000. How much of this will be taxable?

Generally, all proceeds of lawsuits are taxable. There’s an exception for physical illness or injury under Section 104(a) of the Tax code. Emotional distress is another exception. Punitive damages aren’t, though.

To add to the complexity of this issue is that you generally have to include the attorney fees in your income. If your wrongful termination is based on unlawful discrimination, you will be able to deduct the attorney fees as an itemized deduction.

This is a complex area, and I strongly advise you to seek professional tax advice.

2. I recently relocated to South Korea from California. Will I have to pay California income tax?

Probably. Generally, your domicile doesn’t change if you move outside of the United States. California will assume that you plan on returning to the Golden State. If you’re a Korean citizen returning to Korea then you won’t, of course, have to file a California tax return.

If you’re not, though, I have a second piece of bad news. On your federal tax return you’re eligible for the foreign earned income exclusion. California does not conform to this deduction; you will owe California income tax on the entirety of your income.

Again, this can be a complex tax area and you should seek professional advice.

3. I play in a [poker] home game series of tournaments. I won an entry into the $10,000 buy-in main event of the World Series of Poker. Will I have to report that on my tax return? If the entry I won for the 2010 WSOP would I have to report it on my 2009 tax return or my 2010 return?

This is actually a complex question. First, all income, including gambling income, is taxable in the United States. If you had won your entry through a satellite at the WSOP, you would have won a piece of paper. You would be required to enter the main event. In that case, your result in the tournament itself would determine whether or not you have any gambling income to report. It’s like a parlay bet; you won the first half but in order to make any money you must cash in on the second half of the bet.

However, you won the entry in a home game. And this is where it gets tricky. You could make the same argument (as above). If you have a written agreement among the participants and/or the funds were wired directly to the Rio Hotel in Las Vegas (where the WSOP is held) you’d have a better case. The IRS could try to argue that you won $10,000 in cash (less your buy-in), and that you need to report the win as gambling income. Of course, if you don’t cash in the main event of the WSOP, you will have a $10,000 gambling loss.

This gets even more complex if you win an entry into the 2010 main event, and you receive $10,000 in cash in 2009. The IRS could argue, and likely would argue, that you won $10,000 of gambling income in 2009. You would then potentially have a $10,000 gambling loss in 2010. But remember, you can only take gambling losses up to the amount of your wins.

Of course, this may be a hypothetical question, but it does illustrate a couple of important points. First, all gambling income is taxable, even amounts won in home games. Second, paperwork counts! If there’s a written agreement that pre-dates the tournament you played in you have a much better case for the parlay bet.

If your situation is complex you should seek professional assistance with your tax return.

Posted in Gambling, IRS | Comments Off on Mailbag Time

IRS, UBS In Negotiations

The Wall Street Journal is reporting that the IRS and Swiss bank UBS will jointly request a postponement of a court hearing on Monday in Miami. The Journal is also reporting that UBS and the IRS are “…deep in talks to settle a major tax-evasion case that could require the Swiss bank to reveal some — but not all — of the 52,000 or so account-holder names the U.S. has sought….”

That’s basically all the news that’s available on this. If you have a foreign bank account that you haven’t reported, there’s a limited IRS amnesty that’s ongoing. You have until September 23rd to take advantage of it.

Posted in IRS | 1 Comment