Probation for Olenicoff?!

I can’t believe this. As I reported in December, local billionaire Igor Olenicoff pleaded guilty to $52 million of tax fraud last December. In his plea agreement it appeared he would get a few months at ClubFed.

As Joe Kristan comments, “Yeah, that $3,500 fine and probation will really teach the guy worth $1,600,000,000 a lesson he won’t soon forget.” That’s what Mr. Olenicoff has gotten according to this Forbes report.

I read that and have nothing to add.

Mr. Olenicoff be sentenced on April 14th in nearby Santa Ana.

Links: TaxProf Blog, Roth Tax Updates

Posted in Tax Evasion | Tagged | Comments Off on Probation for Olenicoff?!

Bozo Tax Tip #9: Only Foreign Income Is Taxable

Today’s Bozo Tax Tip is a repeat from last year. It’s just another of the tax protester myths, that only foreign income is taxable. It’s also one that has come up again during this tax season. So, without further ado, here’s what I wrote last year:

This is definitely an issue I’m aware of because of my practice areas. I deal with plenty of individuals who earn their living while residing abroad or through foreign sources of income. “It’s tax exempt, isn’t it?” They’re not happy when I let them know that’s not the case.

The Tax Code, which is law (Title 26, U.S.C.) states that Americans are taxed on their worldwide income. Basically, everything is taxable unless Congress specifically exempts it.

Anyway, about six months ago I was approached by an individual who was about to be levied by the IRS because of failure to pay taxes. He resided in the continental U.S., but earned all his income from royalties from the Far East. So I asked him a few questions:

“Are you an American citizen?” He was.
“Was this income taxed at its source? That is, had the countries where it comes from levied a tax on it?” No, he received all of the income.
“Do you pay income tax in any of these countries?” No, he didn’t.

In summary, the individual really owed the tax. But as much as I tried to tell him that, I was talking to a brick wall. Given my dislike of talking to brick walls and of taking bozos on as clients, I suggested he try to get someone else to represent him.


But if you do earn income abroad, there are some real tax tips you can take advantage of. If you have a genuine residence overseas or meet the physical presence test (generally, being abroad 330 days out of 365), you may be eligible for the Earned Income Exclusion. If eligible, you can exclude up to $85,700 in 2007. And the time period does not have to be a calendar year; if you’re overseas from May 1, 2007 through April 15, 2008, you would likely be eligible for a prorated credit.

If you earn income abroad and it’s taxed abroad, you are likely eligible for the Foreign Tax Credit. The general principle is that income should only be taxed once, so if (say) Japan taxes your income, you should get a credit of that tax on your US tax return.

Finally, anyone who is not in the United States on April 15th gets an extra two months (until June 15th) to file his tax return. (You need to attach an explanation to your tax return.) If you’re abroad, you won’t be subject to penalties but you will be subject to interest on what you owe (interest is statutory).

There are numerous caveats and gotchas, and numerous ways to lessen your tax if you either have foreign source income or live abroad. Talk to a professional who can help you if you’re contemplating living abroad or will soon have significant income from abroad.

Posted in Tax Preparation | Tagged | Comments Off on Bozo Tax Tip #9: Only Foreign Income Is Taxable

Bozo Tax Tip #10: The Trouble With Harry

I’m a big fan of Alfred Hitchcock movies. One of my favorites is The Trouble With Harry. Another movie with a similar plot is Weekend at Bernie’s.

These movies deal with death in a light-hearted manner. Since this is a Bozo tax tip, how does this apply? Well, a few weeks ago I had a meeting with a potential client, who wanted to claim his father as a dependent. I asked him if his father lived with him; he didn’t. I then asked where his father lived, and I was told he had passed away…in 2003.

There are rules about claiming dependents, and they do have to be alive sometime during the year. I expressed my sympathy to the potential client, and suggested he find a different tax professional to prepare his return.


There are some tax benefits to those who lose their spouse during the year. They still get to file as married for the year. If a decedent was a dependent at any time during the year you can claim them as a dependent. Widows or widowers who lost their spouse within the last two tax years preceding this year and have a dependent child may be able to file as a widow or widower with a dependent child.

But please don’t try to claim your relatives who passed away years ago on your tax returns. If you do, you’re likely going to be paying a visit to ClubFed.

Posted in Tax Preparation | Tagged | Comments Off on Bozo Tax Tip #10: The Trouble With Harry

No Fooling: Light Posting for the Next Two Weeks

Other than my upcoming Bozo Tax Planning Series (which will begin later today), posting will be very light until after April 15th. I have lots of work in the in-basket, and not much time to get it all done. For it’s not fooling around to say that April 15th is just two weeks away.

Posted in Taxable Talk | Comments Off on No Fooling: Light Posting for the Next Two Weeks

No Pole Tax in Texas

I’m not talking about a poll tax, but a pole tax as in strip clubs. Travis County (Texas) Judge Scott Jenkins ruled that the $5 admissions tax to Texas strip clubs was unconstitutional as a violation of freedom of expression under the First Amendment.

The sponsor of the legislation, State Representative Ellen Cohen (D-Houston) plans on reviving this “cutting-edge legislation.” As Joe Kristan noted on Roth Tax Updates given that the goal of this program was to tax an enterprise with a higher ratio of women who work in it, I’m sure that Rep. Cohen will look to add additional taxes to nursing, day care, teachers, and manicurists. Yeah, right….

Posted in Texas | Comments Off on No Pole Tax in Texas

A Bit of Fraud

Another light week on the tax fraud front. But while it lacks depth, some of the cases are definitely amusing.

Three women in Maryland allegedly had a Bozo idea on how to make some money. Let’s get some inmates at the local prisons to give us their social security numbers, and then we’ll file phony returns on their behalf. What can go wrong?

Well, I can think of several felonies that the three committed. Unfortunately for our Bozo preparers the Postal Inspection Service, the IRS, and the FBI were not as amused by the scheme as I was. And since the Bozo preparers allegedly filed 101 claims totaling $365,599.41, the three are looking at lengthy terms at ClubFed if convicted on charges of mail fraud, conspiracy to defraud the US, and identity theft charges. You can read the press release on the indictment here.

Unfortunately, the three ladies in Maryland aren’t the only Bozos in the tax profession. Trumbauersville, Pennsylvania is a tiny town—less than 1,000 people reside in the borough. The town got some notoriety this week, though.

Eugene DiNatale, a councilman, runs an accounting business in nearby Rockledge. Mr. DinNatale and an associate, Chakawarn Sirirathasuk, found the old fashioned way to allegedly deprive the government of tax revenues. They allegedly collected employment taxes on behalf of their clients and kept the money rather than remitting it to the IRS. This is a scheme that almost never works, and one where the IRS and the Department of Justice go after every time it occurs. And the amount of the alleged money they kept wasn’t small: $4.9 million. Just for good measure the pair is also accused of overstating clients’ business expense deductions. Mr. DiNatale is looking at a very long term at ClubFed if convicted.

The final story comes from Saginaw, Michigan. Two brothers and a bank manager are accused of structuring transactions and tax evasion. The brothers filed tax returns from 2001 through 2005 showing incomes under $55,000 a year according to this news story but somehow managed to make “extravagant” purchases. And when their homes were raided in January 2006 the IRS found over $1.3 million. The bank manager is accused of aiding and abetting structuring. The brothers face multiple structuring and tax evasion charges. All are looking at relocating to ClubFed if found guilty.

My suggestion to everyone is if you think you’ve found a foolproof scheme to cheat Uncle Sam think again. Most schemes have been tried before and failed.

Posted in Tax Fraud | Comments Off on A Bit of Fraud

Democrats Unhappy With Nevada Advertisements

Earlier this week I posted an advertisement from the Nevada Development Authority. The Los Angeles Times had an article today noting that Democrats in Sacramento are unhappy with the advertisements that portray California as a tax-happy state. Of course, Democrats in Sacramento are arguing for more taxes.

Somer Hollingsworth, President of the Authority, told the Times, “We can see what is going on in California as far as businesses are concerned…They’ve got workers’ comp issues, a $16.5-billion deficit, employee retirement funds that are out of whack.”

State Senator Mark Ridley-Thomas (D-Los Angeles) told the Times, “Businesses are here because they appreciate the powers of this economy…I suspect Nevada wishes it could be ranked as among one of the top economies in the world.”

Perhaps the Democrats in the Legislature would like to talk with some of my corporate clients who are again contemplating leaving the Bronze Golden State because of high taxes and too many regulations. Maybe Nevada won’t be the destination, but if California tries to close the deficit on the back of businesses other states will benefit. State Senator Ridley-Thomas is naive if he believes that taxes can increase forever without businesses reacting.

Posted in California, Nevada | Comments Off on Democrats Unhappy With Nevada Advertisements

Sometimes There Really Is A Free Lunch

Nevada’s constitution exempts food for human consumption. The Nevada Department of Taxation believed that Use Tax was owed on meals that were given out free of charge (either to employees or as complimentary meals to patrons); the Nugget Hotel in Sparks, Nevada thought that the plain language of the Nevada Constitution exempted such food from tax. The Nevada Supreme Court gave the answer earlier this week.

Use Tax is the equivalent of sales tax on items purchased from out-of-state where no sales tax is charged. For example, if you purchase a book on Amazon.com and are not charged sales tax and live in California, you are supposed to remit Use Tax to the Board of Equalization. The Nevada Department of Taxation believed that there’s no such thing as a free lunch, and that the Nugget owed Use Tax on the free food.

The Nevada Supreme Court disagreed.

“…[T]he Nugget’s initial purchases of unprepared food did not “escape” sales tax liability since Nevada’s constitution exempts such purchases from sales and use taxation. Indeed, Nevada’s constitutionally mandated food exemption applies to all “food for human consumption,” unless that food is “prepared food intended for immediate consumption.” Because the food at issue in this case was not “prepared food intended for immediate consumption” at the time it was purchased by the Nugget, the Nugget’s initial purchase was exempt from sales taxation. Furthermore, the Nugget’s later “use” of that food to prepare complimentary meals was not subject to use taxation since the Nugget’s “use” did not follow an otherwise taxable purchase that had “escaped” sales tax liability.”

So many Nevada casinos may be requesting tax refunds from the Nevada Department of Taxation. Nevada, too, has a state budget crisis. This ruling may exacerbate that a bit, but it does prove that sometimes there really is such a thing as a free lunch.

Hat Tip: TaxProf Blog

Posted in Nevada | Comments Off on Sometimes There Really Is A Free Lunch

The Wesley Snipes Tax Blog

Courtesy of the TaxProf Blog and Roth Tax Updates, I discover that NewsGroper.com has created a tongue-in-cheek Wesley Snipes Tax Blog. From that blog:

“n fact, we have a philosophy that separates us from all those other tax advisement companies who will just jerk you around… know full well, I don’t owe anybody any money. Ever.”

We’ll be starting our own series of Bozo tax tips on April 1st, but until then this parody blog should suffice. One note, though: The Wesley Snipes Tax Blog is definitely R-rated.

Posted in Tax Evasion | Tagged | Comments Off on The Wesley Snipes Tax Blog

We’re Number 4

Congratulations, California. The Tax Foundation released its list of when each state celebrates Tax Freedom Day. On average, it’s April 23rd. But not here in the Bronze Golden State. For us, it’s April 30th. What that means is from January 1st to April 30th you’re not really working for yourself; rather, you’ve been working for the government. On average, one-third of Californians income goes towards taxes.

Somehow California doesn’t rank #1. Yes, there are worse states for taxes:

1. Connecticut (May 8th)
2. New Jersey (May 7th)
3. New York (May 5th)
3A. District of Columbia (May 3rd)
4. California (April 30th)
5. Washington (April 29th)
6. Massachusetts (April 28th)
7. Maryland (April 28th)
8. Minnesota (April 27th)
9. Florida (April 26th)
10. Hawaii (April 26th)

There are a couple of surprises on this list: Florida and Washington, states without an income tax. The Tax Foundation looked at all taxes, including sales tax, property tax, and Washington state’s business tax.

There are some states where you’re almost working for yourself. Here are the top ten states in tax freedom:

50. Alaska (March 29th)
49. Mississippi (April 7th)
48. Montana (April 8th)
47. West Virginia (April 8th)
46. Alabama (April 9th)
45. Kentucky (April 10th)
44. Tennessee (April 11th)
43. Oklahoma (April 11th)
42. New Mexico (April 12th)
41. South Dakota (April 12th)

The press release for the Tax Foundation study is here. The only good news that I can see in the study is that Tax Freedom Day does come three days earlier in 2008 than in 2007…except in California.

Posted in California | Comments Off on We’re Number 4