Gamblers, Keep Those Logs

The Tax Court looked at another gambler’s attempt to write off substantial gambling losses. She claimed a losing year, but the IRS felt otherwise. Did she really have gambling losses, or were they a mirage?

Gamblers, both professional or amateur, must keep a contemporaneous written log. If you do keep such a log, you’ll be able to substantiate your wins and losses. In today’s case, however, the gambler didn’t keep a log. She claimed $244,744 in losses, but the IRS only allowed $127,165 (after the gambler found casino ATM receipts, canceled checks made payable to casinos, carbon copies of checks made payable to casinos, and credit card statements stating that cash was advanced at the casinos). What about the remaining $117,579?

The court summarized the problem most ably:

“In order to establish entitlement to a deduction for gambling losses in this Court, the taxpayer must prove the losses sustained during the taxable year…Petitioner failed to present credible evidence of gambling losses beyond those respondent conceded. Petitioner did not maintain a diary or any other contemporaneous record reflecting either her winnings or her losses from gambling during 2002. Further, petitioner’s gambling income of $265,795 for 2002 was established only by an examination of her Forms W-2G, Certain Gambling Winnings, and petitioner appeared unaware of the specific figure until confronted by respondent. At trial, petitioner submitted no evidence to validate her claimed gambling losses, relying only on the theory that her losses must have equaled her earnings because she found herself in debt at the end of the year. We conclude that petitioner has failed to satisfy her burden of substantiating her losses.”

There are two problems. First, the Court is very suspicious of a gambler whose only winnings are those reported on the W-2Gs. It’s almost certain that the petitioner had other slot winnings which didn’t result in the issuance of a Form W-2G.

Second, and most importantly, she had no documentation to prove her losses. Telling the Court, “I’m broke, so I must have lost,” may be logical (and may indeed by factual), but it doesn’t show proof of the facts. She had no proof, and the petitioner got three lemons for her decision.

Case: Jackson v. Commissioner, T.C. Memo 2007-373

Posted in Gambling | Comments Off on Gamblers, Keep Those Logs

Lumps of Coal for Christmas Tax Evaders

There’s been lots of fraud over the past few days. People seem to be forgetting that cash sales are just as taxable as other sales.

Let’s start in New York City. The New York Yankees may be one of baseball’s most successful franchises, but one former employee has learned the hard way that tips are taxable income. David Szen is the Yankees’ former Traveling Secretary (he arranged for charter buses, hotel rooms, etc.), and, as is customary in baseball, received tips from players and coaches. All fine and good, until he forgot to note the tips on his tax return. Oops. He admitted his wrong-doing last week and pleaded guilty to tax evasion. He’ll make restitution of just over $10,000 and may face a short stay at ClubFed or a fine.

Staying in the Big Apple, an art gallery owner found out the hard way that sales tax laws apply to big ticket items, too. Michael Weisbrod owns the Weisbrod Chinese Art Gallery. They feature Chinese objects, such as the beautiful jade horse:

Unfortunately, the gallery forgot to collect sales tax on its purchases, and the owner pleaded guilty to both personal and corporate state tax fraud. The amount of the fraud could be as high as $1.1 million, so that’s a lot of fraud. Sentencing is scheduled for April.

Next, from Lansing, Michigan comes the story of a former nightclub owner who decided to double his work on how he kept his books. One set of books wasn’t enough for Thomas Donall—he kept two. One was accurate; the other didn’t show the cash that he skimmed off the top. He provided the inaccurate one to his tax preparer. All was fine until the IRS discovered the double books. Mr. Donall was sentenced to a fine of $25,000 and two years probation. He must also make restitution of $180,000.

Finally, we head south to Dawsonville, Georgia. Robert Merickle ran East Coast Marketing (aka Blue Haven Pools). He used to methods to lower his tax bill: cash sales didn’t make it onto the books and personal expenses did. Neither of those methods is legal, and when the government found out, trouble ensued. Mr. Merickle pleaded guilty to tax evasion, and faces up to three years at ClubFed plus restitution. As U.S. Attorney David Nahmias said, “Those who choose this criminal course of action [tax evasion] face federal prison time, which is far worse than paying the tax that was owed.”

Posted in Tax Evasion | Comments Off on Lumps of Coal for Christmas Tax Evaders

Wash Sales Go To IRAs, Too

Last week the IRS announced in Revenue Rule 2008-05 that wash sale rules impact transactions into an IRA. This could have a major impact to the unaware.

A “wash sale” is when you sell shares of stock at a loss, and in the thirty day period before or after the sale you buy replacement shares. When that happens your capital loss is postponed; the disallowed loss increases your basis in the replacement shares (assuming the replacement shares are not purchased in an IRA).

In the ruling announced last week, the IRS determined that if one buys replacement shares in an IRA, the loss is lost forever. This ruling makes doing a wash sale into an IRA a very bad decision.

Other Coverage:
Roth Tax Update
TaxProf Blog

Posted in Tax Preparation | Tagged | Comments Off on Wash Sales Go To IRAs, Too

California Not So Golden For Residents

In California’s last fiscal year (July 1, 2006 to June 30, 2007), 89,000 more people moved out of California than moved into the state. This is according to the annual report of the California Department of Finance. The state still grew in populations, based on births and immigrants from abroad.

Why are families emigrating from the Golden State? Could it be California’s high individual income tax, which it makes it much less of a Golden State for retirees than neighboring states such as Nevada? Could it be that California’s abysmal business climate (the state ranks 47th) is driving businesses from the state? Perhaps it’s a combination of both.

The Los Angeles Times quotes Howard Roth, Chief Economist of the Department of Finance, as stating, “[The exodus] won’t be the lasting problem we had in the 1990s. It will go away.” Is he correct?

I have my doubts. The state has a $14 billion budget deficit. Democrats in the legislature are talking about cutting various tax deductions, such as the mortgage interest deduction, and are looking at other schemes to close the gap such as increased user fees and tax increases.

If and when Sacramento gets serious about cutting the state’s bureaucracy I’ll agree with Mr. Roth that the exodus is temporary. If not, it may be something that’s much longer lasting.

News Story: Los Angeles Times

Posted in California | Comments Off on California Not So Golden For Residents

70 Pages of Non-Frivolity

Heading into Christmas, I hope you’ve completed your shopping. The IRS gave out its list on Friday: A list debunking some of the most popular of the frivolous arguments used by tax protesters.

For example, some have contended that only foreign income is taxable. The IRS debunks this on page 19, noting that Section 61 of the Internal Revenue Code (which is a law, Title 26, U.S.C.) states, “‘Gross income’ means all income from whatever source derived and includes compensation for services.”

So while Santa may be checking his list to see if you’ve been naughty or nice the IRS will check its list to see if your argument is reasonable or not. It’s a shame that Richard Hatch and Wesley Snipes didn’t peruse the list before they got themselves in trouble.

Hat Tip: TaxProf Blog

Posted in IRS | 1 Comment

Domecq Gets 10 Years

When we last saw Michael Domecq, former president and co-owner of Domecq Importers, he had just pleaded guilty to tax fraud and knew he would spend 10 years at ClubFed. However, he had to prepare 17 years of revised, accurate tax returns to determine what he owed the Treasury.

Well, the returns have been filed and the numbers have been added up, and the total is $4.5 million in restitution (tax, penalties, and interest). That’s a lot of bottles of liquor.

The moral is the same as what we said back in July: “It would have been much simpler to just pay the tax in the first place…but somehow that thought never enters the mind of the tax evader.”

Posted in Tax Fraud | Comments Off on Domecq Gets 10 Years

Wednesday the Rabbi Was Arrested

Back in the 1960s Harry Kemelman began writing books about Rabbi David Small, including several bestsellers such as Friday the Rabbi Slept Late and Saturday the Rabbi Went Hungry. They’re cozy mysteries, and are worth your perusal.

However, that’s not what I’m writing about this evening. Naftali Tzi Weisz, head of an Orthodox Jewish group (he is “The Grand Rabbi of Spinka”), was indicted on charges of conspiracy to defraud the IRS, mail fraud, money laundering, and operating an illegal money remitting business. Weisz and other associates are accused of soliciting charitable contributions to Spinka charitable groups totaling in the millions by promising donors that they could take the tax deduction and that the charity allegedly would refund 95% of the donation. And that scheme is, if proved, definitely not kosher.

Weisz and his alleged co-conspirators are looking at several years at ClubFed if convicted on all counts.

CBS Story, San Jose Mercury Story

Posted in Tax Fraud | 1 Comment

AMT Bill Passes; Tax Season to Start on February 29th?

In the no surprise department, the House passed the AMT patch bill that did not contain any offsets. It now goes to President Bush who will likely sign it tomorrow or Friday.

The IRS previously said that it would take ten weeks for their computers to be reprogrammed with the new AMT exemption amounts ($66,250 for joint filers and $44,350 for single filers). Assuming that’s the case, the IRS computers will be ready to process returns on February 29, 2008.

If your refund gets delayed, you will know who to blame: Congress—specifically the Democratic leaders in the House and the Senate. They waited to bring this measure up until late November knowing full well what the impact would be.

Finally, Joe Kristan ended his post on this with a wonderful thought: “As the patch only covers 2007, it kicks the problem into 2008 – an election year. More fun awaits.” Thanks, Joe. It’s the Holiday Season, a time for good cheer, not reasons for the rest of my hair turn to gray.

TaxProf Blog linkfest on the AMT patch passage
Roth Tax Update post

Posted in IRS, Legislation | Comments Off on AMT Bill Passes; Tax Season to Start on February 29th?

AMT Bill to Likely Pass the House Today

News reports state that the House will consider an AMT patch bill that has already passed the Senate. The Senate version of the AMT bill does not contain any tax offsets (or “paygo”) provisions. Earlier, the House had passed an AMT patch that contained such offsets.

Last night the Senate again considered the House bill and it again failed (48 – 46, with 60 votes needed). All but one of the Republicans present voted against the bill while all Democrats present voted for the measure.

Thus, the House was left with no option but to consider the Senate version of the AMT patch, or the Democrats would end up being blamed for a tax increase on the middle class. Unfortunately, due to the lateness of the bill, the IRS forms that millions of taxpayers will receive will have incorrect information, and it’s probable that the IRS will be unable to process individuals’ tax returns until sometime in March.

Posted in IRS, Legislation | Comments Off on AMT Bill to Likely Pass the House Today

Tax Myths for the Poker Player

I have had several individuals request that I repost an article that originally appeared on TwoPlusTwo.com’s Internet Magazine. Without further ado, here is the article that first appeared in the February 2007 TwoPlusTwo Internet Magazine.


TAX MYTHS FOR THE POKER PLAYER
By Russell Fox, E.A.

Note: This opinion is limited to the one or more Federal tax issues addressed in the opinion. Additional issues may exist that could affect the Federal tax treatment of the transaction or matter that is the subject of this opinion and the opinion does not consider or provide a conclusion with respect to any additional issues. With respect to any significant Federal tax issues outside the limited scope of this opinion, the article was not written, and cannot be used by the taxpayer for the purpose of avoiding penalties that may be imposed on the taxpayer.

When I read a post on a poker site such as Two Plus Two or rec.gambling.poker that deals with U.S. taxes, it’s usually with fear and trepidation. Much of the time, the information presented is either wrong or only partially correct. In this article I will examine some of the major tax myths that I’ve seen and hopefully steer you in the right direction.

Myth #1. I’m a U.S. citizen, but I now live in Costa Rica. I don’t have to pay U.S. income tax. The United States taxes citizens on their worldwide income. If you’re a U.S. citizen, you must pay income tax on your income no matter where you reside, be it Moscow, Idaho or Moscow, Russia. You do, though, generally receive an extra two months (until June 15th) to both file and pay your income taxes if you’re outside of the U.S. on April 15th, but you will owe interest on the tax due.

Myth #2. I can renounce my U.S. citizenship, and then I won’t owe any tax. Well, that may be true, or it might not be. The United States has an Expatriation Tax (Section 877 of the Internal Revenue Code). From the ten years following your expatriation, you must file information returns. If you are in the U.S. for thirty days you will owe U.S. income tax for that year. Additionally, if you are considered a high-income individual under this section of the Code, you can owe tax. There are notification rules under this section of the Code, too. Warning: This is a complex area and you absolutely need to consult a tax professional and an attorney before renouncing your U.S. citizenship.

Myth #3. Online poker winnings aren’t taxable because the sites are overseas and/or it’s illegal and illegal income isn’t taxed. Not only does the United States impose an income tax on your worldwide legal income, illegal income is also taxable (see James v. United States, 366 U.S. 213, 218 (1961)). Early in 2006, a woman in Tullahoma, Tennessee pled guilty to four counts of tax evasion for not paying tax on $500,000 she embezzled. She will likely receive 18 to 24 months in prison. Internet gambling winnings are taxable income.

Myth #4. I won $2,000 at the Grand Casino in Tunica, MS. They withheld $500. I can claim that $500 in tax on my state tax return. This is only a partial myth. Generally, you can only pay tax to one state for any specific income. On your state income tax return, you can receive a credit for tax paid to other states. For example, you’re a resident of California, and you get a W-2G from a casino in Mississippi for $500. You will have to file a Mississippi tax return, attach a copy of that return to your California return, and you can claim a credit for the tax paid on line 28 of Form 540. Warning: The treatment of credits for other states’ taxes varies depending on the states involved. Sometimes the credit will be taken on the other state’s tax return. Consult a professional tax advisor for the correct treatment in your situation.

Myth #5. I work in a salaried, full-time position. I can also file as a professional gambler. This is almost certainly not true. In Commissioner v. Groetzinger (480 U.S. 23), the Supreme Court noted, “…[W]e conclude that if one’s gambling activity is pursued full time, in good faith, and with regularity, to the production of income for a livelihood, and is not a mere hobby, it is a trade or business within the meaning of the statutes with which we are here concerned.” The key terms herein are full time, good faith, regularity, and livelihood. If you have a full-time job, it’s unlikely you can file as a professional gambler.

Myth #6. I can net my wins and my losses. Unless you’re a professional, the sum of your winning sessions are Other Income (line 21, Form 1040); your losing sessions, up to the amount of your winning sessions, are an itemized deduction taken on Schedule A. Professionals do get to net their results and file using Schedule C (Profit or Loss >From Business). Professionals, though, must pay self-employment tax on their net income, at 15.3% of the first $94,000 of net income, and 2.9% above this (2006 numbers). While half of the self-employment tax is a deduction (line 27 of Form 1040), unless the professional earns a substantial six-figure income, he can pay more in tax.

Myth #7. I can lump my play on the Internet for a full day (or week, month, or year) as a session. Unless there are specific rules stating otherwise, the tax treatment of the virtual world is the same as the brick and mortar world. I have previously written on the definition of a session. There’s no way that play for a year, month, or week will pass the IRS’ smell test. Indeed, I do not believe that defining a session as a day will be accepted unless you’re playing for a full, continual 24-hour period.

Myth #8. All states treat gamblers identically. This is definitely not the case. Some states don’t have an income tax or only tax interest and dividends (Alaska, Florida, Nevada, New Hampshire, South Dakota, Tennessee, Texas, Washington, and Wyoming). However, some states do not allow gambling losses as an itemized deduction. (Professionals can still take losses, as they would net their wins and losses on Schedule C or the state equivalent.) The states that gamblers should avoid residing in are Connecticut, Illinois, Indiana, Massachusetts, Michigan, Minnesota, Mississippi, New York, Ohio, West Virginia, and Wisconsin. Two states are today at the top of the “Don’t reside here list”: Washington and Ohio. I’m sure everyone is aware that Washington state made Internet gambling a felony. What you may not know is that Washington also has a Business & Occupation tax that a sole proprietorship, including a professional gambler, must pay. Ohio has a law that makes being a professional gambler a crime (Section 2915.02(A)(4), Ohio Revised Code). I’m not an attorney, and have no idea if this law is being enforced, but given how Ohio treats gamblers, I’d consider relocating if I were an Ohioan.

Myth #9. The IRS doesn’t share information with state tax agencies. Absolutely false. The IRS and state tax agencies actively share information. As far as I know the only state that does not share information with the IRS is Nevada. You can find a description of the information sharing program here.

Myth #10. I just won’t file. I’ll do everything with cash, and the IRS will never know. If you spend $10,000 or more, a currency transaction report is required to be generated and is sent to the IRS. Banking transactions of $10,000 or more in cash must be reported. So just keep everything small, right? Wrong. If you deliberately attempt to evade transaction reporting by engaging in a series of smaller transactions, you may be found guilty of the crime of “structuring,” which is a felony. Finally, banks and other financial institutions (casinos are considered a financial institution) are encouraged to report smaller transactions—anything that makes them suspicious.

Myth #11. The IRS can never catch me. On the contrary, they can, and probably will if you’re not paying your taxes and you owe an appreciable amount. First, the IRS has a reward program. The IRS’ largest source of tips are ex-spouses and girlfriends/boyfriends, so make sure your significant other is happy. Second, if you use a Neteller debit/credit card to avoid IRS scrutiny, think again. Neteller has cooperated with US government investigations in the past and undoubtedly will in the future. Indeed, Neteller obeys a Maryland state law and does not accept Maryland residents as customers. Additionally, all of the debit card networks (Stars, Cirrus, etc.) are owned and operated by U.S. entities and will cooperate with an IRS subpoena. The major credit card networks (Visa, MasterCard, and American Express) are also U.S. owned and operated and will cooperate with the IRS. If the IRS finds out about you, or you get audited and the IRS suspects something (e.g. you report income of $25,000 but you drive a Mercedes), the IRS will examine your financial records in depth. Tax evasion is a serious crime and you can find yourself in prison if you commit it (ask Richard Hatch about that). Note: Since this article first appeared, Neteller’s founders were arrested, and Neteller settled various federal charges with the US Department of Justice. It is believed that Neteller turned over all of its records on all of its US customers to the Department of Justice.

Myth #12. The IRS can’t share information from my tax return with other government agencies because of the “Silver Platter” doctrine. Another falsehood. As noted above, the IRS routinely shares information with state tax agencies. In Garner v. United States (424 U.S. 648 (1976)) the Court held that the occupation listed on a tax return can be shared. If you are foolish enough to list your occupation on your tax return as “illegal drug dealer,” the IRS can forward your name to other law enforcement agencies.

Myth #13. The IRS will never go after a poker professional because we’re small potatoes. This may have been true a few years ago. Unfortunately, it’s no longer the case. The IRS announced in both its 2006-2007 and 2005-2006 Priority Guidance Plans that they wished to implement, “Legal requirements to withhold on the winner’s prizes at poker tournaments.” (To date such regulations have not been written.) Like it or not, poker players are celebrities. Prosecuting a high-profile poker player for tax evasion would likely have a deterrence effect on other gamblers. I think it’s only a question of when, not if. The IRS is looking at PayPal records from the time that PayPal was used to fund Internet gambling. It may take a year or two, but I think some gambler will be prosecuted because of this.

The U.S. Tax Code is complex. It’s unfair to gamblers. Parts of it are just plain stupid. But it’s the law. And when you break the law, there are consequences. It’s a whole lot easier to pay your taxes now than to wait for the IRS to find you and pay taxes, interest, penalties, and possibly find your way to prison.

© 2006, 2007 by Russell Fox, All Rights Reserved.

Russell Fox, E.A. is a tax practitioner enrolled to practice before the Internal Revenue Service. He is also a poker player and is the co-author of Why You Lose at Poker.

Posted in Gambling | 1 Comment