Bozo Tax Tip #8: Use Consecutive SSN’s When Cheating the IRS

Let’s thank Michael Graham of Queens, New York for coming up with this gem. Mr. Graham decided to file phony tax returns with the IRS. He used consecutive social security numbers on his tax returns.

He did get one tax refund through the system and collected $900. However, the other 1,799 returns were caught by the IRS and he didn’t get the $1.6 million he attempted to collect. He did find his way to court, though….


I strongly suggest that you do not try anything like this. The IRS and state tax agencies do have systems in place to catch bozos who attempt crimes like this. Instead of trying to bilk the system, ask your tax preparer about legitimate deductions that are available for you to take. The regular IRA allows you to deduct $4000 ($5000 if you’re 50 or older) from your income (if you’re eligible). You have until April 17th to make your contributions.

And if you’re self-employed, you may be able to contribute to a SEP IRA. You have until your return is timely filed, including extensions, to contribute to a SEP IRA. You can contribute 25% of your net income up to a maximum of $44,000 to a SEP.

Phony tax returns will likely lead you to a stint at ClubFed (where Mr. Graham went). We recommend the IRA or SEP IRA over ClubFed….

Posted in Tax Preparation | Tagged | Comments Off on Bozo Tax Tip #8: Use Consecutive SSN’s When Cheating the IRS

New York Loves Gamblers

New York is known as a high-tax state. Those who live in New York City or Yonkers must pay state and city income tax. That’s bad. The amateur gambler is in for a surprise, too. While New York allows itemized deductions for gambling losses, New York’s tax rules give a very rude surprise for the gambler.

Let’s take a typical case. John Smith makes $90,000 working in New York City. He also gambles, and nets $50,000. As I’ve written before, the amateur gambler cannot net his wins and losses. Wins are other income (line 21) while losses are an itemized deduction that is not subject to the 2% AGI restriction on miscellaneous itemized deductions.

Joe won $500,000 and lost $450,000. Those kinds of totals aren’t atypical for the successful amateur. Joe discovers that when he substitutes his true totals for his net number, his federal tax has increased by $2600. He’s shocked to find that his state tax jumps by $27,000!

If your Adjusted Gross Income (AGI) is over $500,000, you lose 50% of your itemized deductions on your New York tax return. You keep all of your itemized deductions when your AGI is $100,000 or less. There’s a sliding scale between $100,000 and $500,000.

So New York joins my list of states for gamblers to avoid. For the record, here’s the complete list:

Connecticut
Illinois
Indiana
Massachusetts
Michigan
Minnesota (because of its AMT)
Mississippi (Only MS gambling deductions are allowed)
New York
Ohio
West Virginia
Wisconsin

So New York may be the city that never sleeps, but New Jersey never looked so good for the amateur gambler.

Posted in Gambling, New York | Comments Off on New York Loves Gamblers

Bozo Tax Tip #9: Only Income Earned in the US Is Taxable

This is definitely an issue I’m aware of because of my practice areas. I deal with plenty of individuals who earn their living while residing abroad or through foreign sources of income. “It’s tax exempt, isn’t it?” They’re not happy when I let them know that’s not the case.

The Tax Code, which is law (Title 26, U.S.C.) states that Americans are taxed on their worldwide income. Basically, everything is taxable unless Congress specifically exempts it.

Anyway, about six months ago I was approached by an individual who was about to be levied by the IRS because of failure to pay taxes. He resided in the continental U.S., but earned all his income from royalties from the Far East. So I asked him a few questions:

“Are you an American citizen?” He was.
“Was this income taxed at its source? That is, had the countries where it comes from levied a tax on it?” No, he received all of the income.
“Do you pay income tax in any of these countries?” No, he didn’t.

In summary, the individual really owed the tax. But as much as I tried to tell him that, I was talking to a brick wall. Given my dislike of talking to brick walls and of taking bozos on as clients, I suggested he try to get someone else to represent him.


But if you do earn income abroad, there are some real tax tips you can take advantage of. If you have a genuine residence overseas or meet the physical presence test (generally, being abroad 330 days out of 365), you may be eligible for the Earned Income Exclusion. If eligible, you can exclude up to $84,400 in 2006. And the time period does not have to be a calendar year; if you’re overseas from May 1, 2006 through April 15, 2007, you would likely be eligible for a prorated credit.

If you earn income abroad and it’s taxed abroad, you are likely eligible for the Foreign Tax Credit. The general principle is that income should only be taxed once, so if (say) Japan taxes your income, you should get a credit of that tax on your US tax return.

Finally, anyone who is not in the United States on April 15th (April 17th this year) gets an extra two months (until June 15th) to file his tax return. (You need to attach an explanation to your tax return.) If you’re abroad, you won’t be subject to penalties but you will be subject to interest on what you owe (interest is statutory).

There are numerous caveats and gotchas, and numerous ways to lessen your tax if you either have foreign source income or live abroad. Talk to a professional who can help you if you’re contemplating living abroad or will soon have significant income from abroad.

Posted in Tax Preparation | Tagged | Comments Off on Bozo Tax Tip #9: Only Income Earned in the US Is Taxable

Problems at Jackson Hewitt

Many taxpayers use chains such as H&R Block or Jackson Hewitt to prepare their returns. One Jackson Hewitt franchisee is in trouble having been accused of multiple charges of tax fraud.

The IRS alleges that 125 Jackson Hewitt stores in four states (Illinois, Michigan, North Carolina and Georgia), owned in full or in part by Farrukh Sohail, engaged in systematic tax fraud. The franchised stores allegedly created phony deductions, artificial earned income credits, fake W-2’s, and false fuel credit claims. The IRS is asking for these stores to be closed.

According to the lawsuits filed on behalf of the IRS, a sample showed that 31% of the returns prepared in the impacted stores had major problems. The IRS also alleges that managers in the impacted stores received kickbacks for filing false returns.

Needless to say, you should always review your tax return whether you use a professional or you do it yourself. You are responsible for what’s on it.

I don’t like to see any portion of the tax preparation industry getting a black eye. This case reminds me of the Western Tax Service case of a few years ago. That one was local; this appears to be centered in Chicago. If these charges are proved correct, I’d expect criminal indictments in the future.

News Story: AP via the Naperville Sun

Posted in Tax Preparation | Comments Off on Problems at Jackson Hewitt

Bozo Tax Tip #10: Deduct the Dog

With just twelve days until Tax Day, it’s time to present our annual list of things not to do. All of the items on this list have been done by bozo taxpayers. Some have been successful while others have had, shall we say, a not-so-positive outcome. I’ll be presenting a Bozo Tax Tip each day until April 14th. By the way, for a very good list of some excellent tax tips, see Joe Kristan’s list at Roth Tax Updates. So on with Tip #10.

Everyone is looking for that extra deduction. One of the benefits of having children is that they you do get an exemption for each of them. An enterprising disk jockey in Wyoming thought, “Hmmmm, if I can get an exemption for my son, why not get an exemption for my dog Red.” And so he added a dependent on his Form 1040.

At that time, you didn’t have to put the social security number of your dependents on your tax return, and the IRS never noticed. However, the law changed and the disk jockey was faced with putting down a social security number for a dog. Not having one (of course), he noted on the next return that Red was deceased.

Tip: Dogs are wonderful companions, but they’re not deductible. Making up social security numbers is not a good idea either. So this Bozo scheme is gone forever, unless you want to commit multiple felonies.

Posted in Tax Preparation | Tagged | Comments Off on Bozo Tax Tip #10: Deduct the Dog

Weekend Crime Report

A lot has been posted this weekend in the annals of tax crime. We’ll venture from New York to the Gulf Coast to see if the government took a bite out of [tax] crime.

Another of the Ozbay clan has been sentenced. On Wednesday, Birol Ozbay of Schenectady, New York, found that he would receive 121 months (10 years) in prison and must forfeit $6.8 million. That’s basically the same sentence that Ziya Ozbay received in mid-March. The Ozbays didn’t pay their taxes, they structured their transactions, and they didn’t remit withholding tax that was withheld from employees to the government. They scored the rare trifecta of three different kinds of tax fraud. Two more Ozbays await sentencing: Yalcin Ozbay (who was found guilty at trial) and Mustafa Ozbay (who pleaded guilty during the trial).

Meanwhile, a doctor in Louisiana allegedly kept two sets of books. It’s a wonderful way to save on taxes…until you get caught. Garland Miller of Zwolle, Louisiana, was indicted on two counts of income tax evasion. Mr. Miller is also under indictment for theft in state court; he allegedly bilked “tens of thousands of dollars” from a local hospital. Mr. Miller faces up to ten years at ClubFed and up to $500,000 in fines if convicted in federal court for tax evasion.

A woman in Mississippi allegedly found an interesting way to profit from a corporate merger. Instead of closing the old bank accounts (as she was told to do), she allegedly kept them open, and transferred funds into them. She then allegedly moved them to her personal account. Donna Hardy has been charged with twelve counts of bank fraud and five counts of tax evasion. Oh yes, she didn’t report the tax on the stolen money….

Three interesting ways to try to turn an illegal buck. The trouble is that not only can you get in trouble turning the illegal buck, you have to pay tax on it.

Posted in Tax Evasion | Comments Off on Weekend Crime Report

Minnesota Tries for Number 1!

Congratulations to Minnesota! No, they’re not in basketball’s Final Four. Rather, Minnesota’s State Senate passed a bill on Saturday to increase the top tax bracket in the state to 9.7%, the highest regular tax bracket in the country. You would need to make over $250,000 to be impacted by the new bracket ($141,250 if single).

The legislation was led by Minnesota’s Democrat-Farm Labor Party (DFL). Luckily for Minnesotans, Governor Tim Pawlenty promises a veto. And it appears that the DFL doesn’t have the votes to override it.

Hat Tip: Tax Prof Blog
News Story: AP

Posted in Minnesota | Comments Off on Minnesota Tries for Number 1!

The Deadline Counts

Recently I assisted a client in preparing his paperwork to file a petition at the U.S. Tax Court. In my emails and letters to him, I emphasized,

Make sure you mail the petition and accompanying documents by the deadline using certified mail, return receipt requested.

He did, and even if somehow his petition gets lost, he will have a valid Tax Court petition.

The TaxProf Blog has another story of a taxpayers who was a day late and a dollar (or, in this case, potentially $50,000) short. The taxpayer had a deadline for his Tax Court filing of October 5th. He used UPS to send his petition, but the tracking receipt shows he sent it on October 6th. The petition is dated October 6th.

The IRS petitioned the Tax Court to dismiss the case for lack of jurisdiction. The taxpayer contended that he dropped the petition off at a mail store on the evening of October 5th. The Tax Court noted that it doesn’t matter; it didn’t enter the UPS system until the 6th, and the Tax Court no longer has jurisdiction.

So if you’re approaching the deadline and you’re going to be after the post office closing hours, find a post office that’s open late (in the Los Angeles area, the LAX branch is open late) or find a FedEx office that’s open late (various offices are open to 6:30pm in the L.A. area). But whatever you do, make sure it gets picked up by the deadline or you have just lost your case.

Hat Tip: TaxProfBlog

Case: Raczkowski v. Commissioner, T.C. Memo 2007-72

Posted in Tax Court | Comments Off on The Deadline Counts

$2 Million in Fruad Brings 15 Months and Restitution

Superior Electric Company of Ohio had an interesting way to make a profit: they cooked the books. Back in November, two former executives pleaded guilty to defrauding the IRS. Yesterday, John McShane, the former CFO, was sentenced.

Mr. McShane was sentenced to 15 months and ordered to make restitution of $1.62 million.

What did Mr. McShane and the former CEO and co-owner of Superior, Jerry Gemeinhardt, do? They put some of Mr. Gemeinhardt’s personal expenses as company expenses. Things like his yacht and landscaping expenses are some of what they allegedly did.

Mr. Gemeinhardt hasn’t been sentenced yet. I suspect his yacht will soon have a “for sale” sign on it.

Posted in Tax Fraud | Comments Off on $2 Million in Fruad Brings 15 Months and Restitution

Wisconsin Is No Place to Gamble

I grew up in Chicago, and I remember vacationing at Wisconsin Dells as a child. Now Wisconsin, like many states, sports Indian casinos. Gamblers who patronize such casinos are in for a rude surprise when they complete their tax returns.

Wisconsin is one of 10 states that does not allow gamblers to deduct losses on their state tax returns. Daniel Dettwiler had gambling winnings of $99,252.60 which he duly reported on his 2002 federal tax return. He also deducted as a miscellaneous itemized deduction his gambling losses of $41,637.00 on his federal tax return. He did the same thing on his Wisconsin tax return even though Wisconsin doesn’t allow that deduction.

His case went before the Wisconsin Tax Appeals Commission, where he lost. He then appealed to a state court and lost. On Tuesday the First District Wisconsin Court of Appeals ruled on his appeal.

The Court noted,

“Effective January 1, 2000, gambling losses were no longer offset against gambling winnings under the Wisconsin tax code because, effective on that date, Wisconsin no longer permitted as a deduction from Wisconsin taxable income “[m]iscellaneous itemized deductions under the Internal Revenue Code,” see Wis. Stat. § 71.07(5)(a)7 (2003–04), one of which, the Department contends and Dettwiler does not dispute, was the deduction for “wagering losses,” under section 165(d) of the Internal Revenue Code…His contention that he should nevertheless be permitted to subtract from his Wisconsin taxable income the offset permitted by section 165(d) of the Internal Revenue Code is not only circular and without merit, but is wholly contrary to the legislature’s decision to eliminate such offsets effective January 1, 2000.

“The Tax Appeals Commission decision is perfectly logical, appropriate, and correct. Accordingly, we affirm.”

Had Mr. Dettwiler been a professional gambler, he wouldn’t have had a problem; his losses would have been deducted on Schedule C, and his net income would have been reported on his federal (and Wisconsin) tax returns. Of course, he would have been liable for the self-employment tax.

So if you’re going to gamble, you may want to avoid Wisconsin. For the record, here are the other states where gambling is much more of a gamble:

  • Connecticut
  • Illinois
  • Indiana
  • Massachusetts
  • Michigan (first $300 exempt)
  • Minnesota (because of its AMT)
  • Mississippi
  • Ohio
  • West Virginia
  • Wisconsin

Case: Dettwiler v. Wisconsin Department of Revenue

Posted in Gambling, Wisconsin | Comments Off on Wisconsin Is No Place to Gamble