No, Please No

A brief story in today’s Wall Street Journal (Pay$ Link) states that Secretary of the Treasury Mnuchin may consider extending the July 15th tax deadline (which was, of course, originally April 15th) again. Quoting the Journal,

Asked in an interview at a virtual Bloomberg event if he was considering another delay to Sept. 15, Mr. Mnuchin said it is possible.

“As of now we’re not intending on doing that, but it is something we may consider,” he said.

My reaction is what I titled this article: No, please No. I and every other tax professional would like this Tax Season to end.

The article also notes that another stimulus program is now being considered, but Republicans would want it to be very targeted. Given that Democrats want everything under the sun, it will be quite interesting to see what (if anything) comes out of Congress this Summer.

Posted in IRS | Tagged | Comments Off on No, Please No

If the Lawyers Had Followed the Rules…

Two marijuana dispensaries were audited by the IRS. Because of Internal Revenue Code § 280E (which prohibits all deductions for carrying on a business of trafficking in a controlled substance, which marijuana is), the first dispensary was looking at a tax bill of $1,129,276 with penalties of $225,855; the second was “only” faced with additional taxes of $531,707 and penalties of $106,341. The dispensaries received Notices of Deficiency, and they petitioned the Tax Court. The attorneys sent the petitions by Federal Express First Overnight. But they made mistakes:

The petitions were received, but the IRS filed motions to have them dismissed for “Lack of Jurisdiction.” This happens when you file late–the Tax Court is a court of limited jurisdiction, and you must follow the rules in order to have a case heard there. The IRS prevailed at the Tax Court (the case was dismissed for lack of jurisdiction), and the dispensaries appealed to the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals.

In today’s ruling of the Ninth Circuit in Organic Cannabis Foundation, LLC v. Commissioner, the Court begins:

This unhappy case presents a cautionary tale about the need for lawyers to ensure that they have done exactly what is statutorily required to invoke a court’s jurisdiction. The unusual Internal Revenue Code (“I.R.C.”) provision at issue here allows taxpayers to benefit from a “mailbox” rule—i.e., that a document will be deemed filed when dispatched—only if the taxpayer uses one of the particular delivery services that the Internal Revenue Service (“IRS”) has specifically designated for that purpose in a published notice.

Read the rules! It’s not hard; the IRS maintains a list of such services. The attorneys used a faster service than what was then on the list. The problem is the plain language of the statute, as the Court notes:

Unlike Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 25(a)(2)(ii), which applies a mailbox rule to the timely delivery of a brief to “a third-party commercial carrier,” § 7502 does not allow taxpayers to use the services of any bona fide commercial courier. Instead, the statute specifies that a particular “delivery service provided by a trade or business” will count as a “designated delivery service” only “if such service is designated by the Secretary for purposes of this section.” I.R.C. § 7502(f)(2). The term “Secretary” means “the Secretary of the Treasury or his delegate,” id. § 7701(a)(11)(B), and here that delegate is the Commissioner (or his further delegate). In addition to requiring a formal designation, the statute states that the IRS may designate a delivery service “only if [it] determines that such service” meets four enumerated statutory criteria designed to ensure that the delivery service is at least as adequate as the U.S. mail…

Congress did not merely require that a private delivery service meet certain functional criteria concerning the operation of that delivery service; it also pointedly insisted that the service must be “designated by the Secretary for purposes of this section.” I.R.C. § 7502(f)(2) (emphasis added). Given the wide range of documents that are eligible for § 7502(f)’s mailbox rule and the need for clear-cut rules on questions of timeliness, Congress understandably elected to establish a quality-control regime in which the IRS would vet each such service in advance and then issue bright-line designations as to which services are subject to the mailbox rule and which are not. The statutory language also makes clear that there must be separate designations for each “service” offered by a private courier—and not merely a designation of the courier itself—because § 7502(f) expressly distinguishes between the “trade or business” that engages in delivery of packages (e.g., FedEx) and the various “delivery service[s]” by which it does so (e.g., FedEx Priority Overnight).

So what can Organic Cannabis Foundation do? They can appeal this decision, though their chance of success is near zero. (They can try for either an en banc ruling of the Ninth Circuit or petition the Supreme Court.) They can pay the tax, file a claim for refund, and then after six months file a lawsuit in District Court. And given that every court that has looked at § 280E has come to the same conclusion (that Congress must act to change the law and that the IRS is correctly interpreting current law), their chance of success isn’t good. But that’s what they’re left with.

Sometimes faster isn’t better. Had the petitions been mailed certified mail at the post office, they would have been considered timely filed even if it took a month to reach the Tax Court. Had the petitions been sent with a slightly slower service (FedEx Priority Overnight), they would have been considered timely filed. Had they been sent three days earlier, they would have been received by the deadline and been timely filed. This is a Tax Court case where $1,993,179 is in dispute and the rules weren’t followed. Needless to say, it pays to follow the rules.

Hat Tip: How Appealing

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on If the Lawyers Had Followed the Rules…

2020 Best States for Business: Bring Me (mostly) the Usual Suspects

Chief Executive magazine does a survey every year of the best and worst states for business. This isn’t just a list about taxes, but includes other factors; still, it’s a good survey of what business executives look at. The top ten includes my home:

  1. Texas
  2. Florida
  3. Nevada
  4. Tennessee
  5. Indiana
  6. North Carolina
  7. Arizona
  8. South Carolina
  9. Ohio
  10. Utah

The bottom ten has a couple of surprises (for me):

41. Alaska

42. Hawaii

43. Oregon

44. Washington

45. Massachusetts

46. Connecticut

47. New Jersey

48. Illinois

49. New York

50. California

That Texas is at the top isn’t a surprise. “Employers continue to be attracted by the state’s lack of an individual income tax, low business taxes, friendly regulators, a reasonable cost of living, and diverse and growing labor force.” [emphasis added]. Contrast that with California: ” Business owners—especially companies that make things— continue to abandon the state as fast as they can.”

I was surprised by Alaska and Washington. Neither state has a state income tax. Alaska, of course, is hard to get to, and the cost of living is a big issue. In Washington state, it appears that the cost of living and regulations lower the ranking.

I wanted to emphasize the impact of regulations. Regulations are hidden costs for businesses. It’s not that all regulations are bad (that’s absolutely not the case); rather, over-regulations cost business money. Consider a widget manufacturer in Los Angeles. He’ll face California’s burdensome regulations at the state, county, city, and regional level (the air quality district regulates). Here in Nevada, there are state and local regulations, but they’re integrated without the quadruple level of regulations. I read years ago it took Carl’s Jr. (a fast food chain) over a year to get regulatory approval to build a new location in California; it took less than two months in Texas.

In good times, California has prospered because of the entertainment industry and Silicon Valley. We’re not in good times right now, and the budget hit to the Golden State is severe (they’re projecting a $54 billion deficit). Sure, Covid isn’t the fault of California (or any other state). But the reaction of the legislature demonstrates that they’re not learning anything: Increase taxes and hope for a federal bailout (one that I doubt is coming).

For those who think that state policies don’t matter, this survey tells you otherwise. The states at the top (run by Democrats or Republicans get this). The states at the bottom mostly don’t.

Posted in California, Nevada, Texas | Comments Off on 2020 Best States for Business: Bring Me (mostly) the Usual Suspects

Not Only Incoming Mail is Backlogged at the IRS

This morning, our IRS Stakeholder Liaison held a conference call on the current IRS situation. One unfortunate piece of information that was noted is that not only does the IRS have a backlog of incoming mail (estimated at well over 10 million pieces), there is a very large backlog of outgoing mail. As of early this week, the IRS has a backlog of 23.5 million notices.

With the IRS gradually reopening, this is a backlog that’s going to take months to resolve. The IRS has the capability of mailing 1.5 million notices per week. That means there’s nearly a four month backlog. This week, I received an IRS notice for a client for the first time in months, so the IRS is starting on this. Per today’s call, the IRS is concentrating on notices that are time sensitive (such as Notices of Deficiency).

There are also going to be issues with the notices. These notices are computer generated, so the deadlines in the notices will be wrong. The IRS is including a flyer explaining this along with the new deadlines, but how many taxpayers actually read an insert?

The 23.5 million notices does not include notices that will be generated based on returns as they are processed, and the backlog of correspondence that must be processed. I’m telling clients that have responded to IRS notices to think that it will likely be several months before they hear anything.

Unfortunately, there’s nothing the IRS can do at this point but to start on the process and let practitioners know of the issues. This is a year to be patient with the IRS.

Posted in IRS | Tagged | Comments Off on Not Only Incoming Mail is Backlogged at the IRS

IRS Reopening More Offices in June

On June 1st the IRS opened offices in Kentucky, Texas, and Utah. That’s important for those of us in the tax professional community as two of the major IRS Service Centers for processing returns are in those states (Austin and Ogden). Austin also includes the unit that processes ITIN applications (a news report said there’s a backlog 250,000 applications). Ogden has one of the three CAF units (the unit that processes power of attorney and tax information authorization forms); that was backlogged even before the shutdown.

The IRS is opening more offices later this month:

  • Georgia and Tennessee: June 15th
  • Missouri and Michigan: June 15th
  • Indiana and Ohio: June 29th
  • California, Oregon, and Puerto Rico: June 29th

This includes the Atlanta and Memphis Service Centers on June 15th and the Fresno Service Center on June 29th. Atlanta and Memphis are not used for processing returns but are used for numerous other IRS operations including correspondence audits, offers in compromise, and automated underreporting unit notices. Fresno is a major processing center for returns.

This is good news for everyone (taxpayers, tax professionals, and IRS employees). Unfortunately, it is going to take many months for the paper backlog to be resolved.

Posted in IRS | Tagged | Comments Off on IRS Reopening More Offices in June

IRS Interest Rates Decrease for the Third Quarter of 2020

The IRS announced today that IRS interest rates will decrease for the third quarter of 2020 to 3% for most from 5%:

  • three (3) percent for overpayments [two (2) percent in the case of a corporation];
  • one-half (0.5) percent for the portion of a corporate overpayment exceeding $10,000;
  • three (3) percent for underpayments; and
  • five (5) percent for large corporate underpayments.

The IRS press release is here; the official Revenue Ruling is here.

Posted in IRS | Tagged | Comments Off on IRS Interest Rates Decrease for the Third Quarter of 2020

IRS to Allow E-Filing of Amended Tax Returns But…

This morning I received an announcement (below) that the IRS will, sometime this summer, allow electronic filing of amended personal tax returns (Form 1040X). Unfortunately, there’s a major “but” included:

When the electronic filing option becomes available, only tax year 2019 Forms 1040 and 1040-SR returns can be amended electronically. In general, taxpayers will still have the option to submit a paper version of the Form 1040-X and should follow the instructions for preparing and submitting the paper form. Additional enhancements are planned for the future. [Emphasis Added]

This will definitely help for the future; however, most amended returns are not the current-year tax returns. For example, I prepared three 2018 amended returns today.

This isn’t to say this is a bad thing. On the contrary, over time this is a very, very good thing. In the best of times it takes the IRS four months to process an amended return filed by paper. (I suspect the amended returns I prepared today will take at least six months to be processed given the IRS’s current backlog.) Being able to have an amended return quickly sent, without risk of it being lost, is a wonderful improvement over what must be done today and will undoubtedly lead to faster processing of amended returns.

Here is the IRS announcement in full:

WASHINGTON — The Internal Revenue Service announced today that later this summer taxpayers will for the first time be able to file their Form 1040-X, Amended U.S Individual Income Tax Return, electronically using available tax software products.

Making the 1040-X an electronically filed form has been a goal of the IRS for a number of years. It’s also been an ongoing request from the nation’s tax professional community and has been a continuing recommendation from the Internal Revenue Service Advisory Council (IRSAC) and Electronic Tax Administration Advisory Committee (ETAAC).

Currently, taxpayers must mail a completed Form 1040-X to the IRS for processing. The new electronic option allows the IRS to receive amended returns faster while minimizing errors normally associated with manually completing the form.

“This new process is a major milestone for the IRS, and it follows hard work by people across the agency,” said IRS Commissioner Chuck Rettig. “E-filing has been one of the great success stories of the IRS, and more than 90 percent of taxpayers use it routinely. But the big hurdle that’s been remaining for years is to convert amended returns into this electronic process. Our teams have worked diligently to overcome the unique challenges related to the 1040-X, and we look forward to offering this new service this summer.”

About 3 million Forms 1040-X are filed by taxpayers each year.

The new electronic filing option will provide the IRS with more complete and accurate data in an easily readable format to enable customer service representatives to answer taxpayers’ questions. Taxpayers can still use the “Where’s My Amended Return?” online tool to check the status of their electronically-filed 1040-X.

When the electronic filing option becomes available, only tax year 2019 Forms 1040 and 1040-SR returns can be amended electronically. In general, taxpayers will still have the option to submit a paper version of the Form 1040-X and should follow the instructions for preparing and submitting the paper form. Additional enhancements are planned for the future.

“Adding amended returns to the electronic family also complements our partnership with the tax software industry, which continues to work with us to provide better ways to help taxpayers,” said Ken Corbin, Commissioner of the IRS Wage and Investment division.

Posted in IRS | Tagged | Comments Off on IRS to Allow E-Filing of Amended Tax Returns But…

Patiently

Two clients asked me about their tax refunds this week. Both had filed several weeks ago, and each had received their state refunds. Neither had received their federal refunds. With the IRS phone lines for practitioners now working (albeit with a reduced staff), I called the IRS for both clients.

The first client’s return was filed at the end of March. The helpful IRS phone agent told me there was a ‘processing error’ with her return, and the problem is normally resolved within one to four days by the “Error Resolution Department.” Unfortunately, that departments isn’t working right now, so her return (and likely hundreds or thousands of others) is waiting for the IRS Service Centers that process returns to reopen.

The second client filed just one week later; their return simply hasn’t been processed. Yes, it was electronically filed, but for some unknown reason it’s sitting in a queue (virtually, I suppose) waiting for some IRS employee to hit “Run.” Again, with no IRS employees working in the Service Centers right now that return could be processed today or a month from today or months from today.

My suspicion is that IRS Service Centers will reopen in June, and that the unprocessed returns and returns waiting for error resolution will be resolved then. On the other hand, if you have to mail a tax return that return will be processed sometime. I have a couple of 2016 returns that had to be mailed, and I told my clients I expect they’ll be processed by year-end.

I’m not optimistic about correspondence sent to the IRS. I have two correspondence audits and several other open issues with the IRS. In good times the IRS can takes many weeks to answer the mail; I’ll be thrilled if I receive responses by October.

Everyone needs to have some patience. This isn’t the choice of the IRS, and they want to resolve all the issues, too.

Posted in IRS | Tagged | Comments Off on Patiently

When the IRS “Helpfully” Changes Your EIN…

Your personal tax records are noted under your Social Security Number. That won’t work for businesses, so years and years ago the IRS came up with Employer Identification Numbers (EIN) to track business accounts. If you form a new business entity, you can obtain an EIN online. The system works well most of the time.

One of our clients, call him James Smith, formed an LLC back in 2007 in Arkansas: James Smith LLC. The LLC made a timely election to be treated as an S-Corporation, and all was well.

In 2010 Mr. Smith got married and moved south to Texas. He closed the first LLC and formed a new LLC, James Smith LLC. Yes, he used the same name. This LLC had two owners (Mr. & Mrs. Smith), and all was well. It was assigned a different EIN—as it should, given it was a different legal entity. This LLC, too, made an election to be treated as an S-Corporation.

Unfortunately, the marriage didn’t last, and Mr. & Mrs. Smith divorced in 2011. They agreed to close the LLC, and they did so, filing final tax returns in 2011. Mr. Smith, though, decided to continue his business and moved back to Arkansas. He formed a new LLC, and, yes, you’re already a step ahead of me, it was called James Smith LLC. He received a new EIN. This LLC also made an election to be taxed as an S-Corporation.

All was well until mid-2017. James Smith LLC was doing well, tax returns were all filed, and all taxes paid. In July 2017 the IRS made an inquiry regarding a payroll tax filing. My client uses one of the large payroll services for payroll, but somehow on a filing the information on one item got garbled in transmission. We replied, the IRS responded a few weeks later saying, “Thank you. We’ve closed our investigation into this matter.”

What we didn’t know is that the IRS employee who received the paperwork decided to help my client. He saw that there were previous EINs issued to James Smith LLC and changed the EIN within the IRS computer system back to the EIN of the Texas entity. Adding to the helpfulness, we were not notified of the change.

We discovered there was a problem when I attempted to efile the 2017 tax return (in 2018). The return would not be accepted. I called the IRS’s efile help desk and was told only what was on the IRS rejection notice was, “There’s a name/EIN mismatch.” Of course, neither I nor my client could figure that out, so we paper-filed the returns (federal and Arkansas).

A few months later we received a letter from the IRS saying we filed the tax return with the wrong EIN, and the EIN we should use is the Texas EIN. We wrote back protesting this, noting that EIN referred to a closed entity in a different state, and the new EIN is what should be used. The IRS’s response? “Use the old EIN.”

This has caused multiple issues with the IRS. We have multiple prior (to 2018) payroll tax mismatches. We were just notified this week by an IRS Revenue Officer that my clients Form 941 for the fourth quarter 2018 wasn’t filed. It was filed–timely—by one of the large payroll firms…but not under the Texas EIN. I explained everything to the Revenue Officer, but we still had to prepare a new Form 941.

There are multiple lessons here. First, if you close an entity and start a new one, change the name slightly. If my client had used James Smith & Associates, LLC for the Texas entity and James L Smith LLC for the new Arkansas entity, it’s probable none of this would have happened.

Second, the IRS absolutely should ask taxpayers before changing an EIN. Had that IRS employee asked us we would have explained why the old EIN couldn’t be used.

Finally, when a mess like this happens it will tend to linger for years. We still have four unresolved issues with the IRS all stemming from this helpfulness. While I do expect them to all be successfully resolved, this has added costs and stress for my client for no good reasons. And if you are reading some sarcasm in what I’m saying in this post, you’re right.

Posted in Entity Formation, IRS | Comments Off on When the IRS “Helpfully” Changes Your EIN…

Ten Days (More Kudos to the IRS)

We owe tax almost every year. Yes, I make estimated payments, but my business has been growing, investments are making money, so my tax bill goes up every year. That means when I initially looked to see when our stimulus payment (aka “Recovery Rebate” payment) would come on the IRS’s “Get My Payment” website, nothing showed for us.

Additionally, we always file an extension as we wait for a K-1 that shows up in late July or early August every year. The IRS’s website was designed for 2019 filers; the IRS later added 2018 information. That was another reason it didn’t work for us.

On the weekend of April 25th, the IRS added 2018 capability and the ability for those who file $0 returns to use the Get My Payment website. (Zero dollar returns are common for individuals who file extensions, paying the tax they owe, and then later file the actual tax return.) On April 25th, I entered the required information.

On Monday, May 4th, the website noted that the stimulus payment would be direct deposited on Wednesday (May 6th). The IRS was wrong: the money was in the account on Tuesday (May 5th). That’s ten days, and the IRS deserves kudos for this. Indeed, given the constraints the IRS is operating under, this is a superb performance.

Yes, more work is needed for the Get My Payment website. It doesn’t work for expatriates (individuals residing outside the United States), many of whom do qualify for the payments. But overall the IRS deserves praise for getting this done and being able to serve most Americans within 30 days of the legislation passing.

Posted in IRS | Tagged | Comments Off on Ten Days (More Kudos to the IRS)