Not So Brilliant Ideas…

A man in Cincinnati, OH came up with a great idea (or so he thought). He decided to sell income tax evasion kits. Somehow the IRS and the Department of Justice didn’t think it was a great idea. Yeah, they’re a bunch of sore losers.

The Department of Justice took the man, Dana Ewell, to civil court (he did avoid criminal court, so he won one battle). According to this story in the Cincinnati Enquirer, a permanent injunction has been entered into. So the world will have to do without the Liberty Pure Trust, the Liberty Action Pack, the Organic Sovereign Freeman Compendium and the Onshore, Offshore, International Investment Opportunity.

Posted in Tax Evasion | Comments Off on Not So Brilliant Ideas…

Firemen 1, Police 0

Orange County Firefighters won their first court battle over an initiative (assuming no court losses, it will be on the June 2006 ballot) that would distribute about $80 million in taxes to firefighters that currently go to the Orange County Sheriff and the Orange County District Attorney’s office. According to this story in the Orange County Register (one-time registration required), the sheriff’s union will appeal. As an aside, firefighters for the Orange County Fire Authority are some of the best paid in the country. It doesn’t take much thought to figure out why the firefighters want to pass this measure….

Posted in California | Comments Off on Firemen 1, Police 0

“I Say Yes, You Say No…”

The IRS recently ruled that bonds, in order to be tax free, must be for “essential government functions” only. Bonds to help in the building of an Indian casino resort (at Fantasy Springs Casino near Palm Springs) didn’t make the cut. The IRS is going to be going after the bondholders for taxes.

So what does our state legislature do? It passes, out of the Senate Revenue and Taxation Committee, SB995. This bill would grant Indian casinos tax exemption (for California tax returns) on such bonds.

Posted in California | Comments Off on “I Say Yes, You Say No…”

IRS Flunks Audit

>From the TaxProf Blog, a Washington Post story shows that the IRS spends 60% of its funds for a tuition reimbursement program on administrative expenses. That’s 40% for tuition reimbursement. The IRS, of course, reminds us taxpayers that “Charities scams are high on 2005 dirty dozen tax list.” Hmmm, maybe the IRS can add its own name to the list and we’ll have a baker’s dozen on the 2005 list.

Hat tip: TaxProf Blog

Posted in IRS | Comments Off on IRS Flunks Audit

San Diego’s Mayor Resigns

Dick Murphy, mayor of San Diego, announced that he is resigning effective July 15th. His resignation is a direct result of San Diego’s abysmal financial condition, as I noted earlier.

Posted in California | Comments Off on San Diego’s Mayor Resigns

The IRS Can Tell The Difference Between $14,885 and $200,000

Suppose you’re in court testifying in a civil case. You’re asked what your income is. You tell the truth (of course, you’re under oath) that you make $200,000. No problem, right?

Unless your tax return says you made $14,885. And the IRS discovers your testimony. Even I could probably get a conviction for tax fraud (and I’m not an attorney). And, to make matters worse, you’re a “juicy” target, a former politician.

So it goes for the former mayor of Azusa, a Los Angeles suburb. Stephen Alexander was convicted on Friday of tax fraud and faces up to three years in federal prison when he’s sentenced in June. The story appears in the Los Angeles Times (one-time registration required).

Posted in Tax Fraud | Comments Off on The IRS Can Tell The Difference Between $14,885 and $200,000

“Ex-Oakland Voodoo Chief Indicted for Tax Evasion”

Yet another headline that says it all. Apparently (and allegedly), the ex-voodoo chief failed to pay $1.7 million in taxes related to her practice from 1998-2003. I didn’t realize that profession was so lucrative….

Posted in Tax Evasion | 6 Comments

Let’s Increase Taxes (Part n + 1)

No, that’s not my wish; rather, it’s director Rob Reiner’s. Today he announced a proposal to increase the normal maximum California tax bracket from 9.3% to 11% (anyone earning more than $1 million would pay an additional 1%). The new tax bracket would begin at $400,000 for individuals and $800,000 for couples. The money would be earmarked for mandatory preschools for every four-year old. A brief synopsis of the story can be found here (one-time registration required).

While pre-school, according to a Rand study, does increase the likelihood of a child being held back a grade, would decrease child abuse, and would increase high school graduates, this proposal would cause (1) small companies to have yet another reason to leave California; (2) more large companies would choose not to locate new operations in the state; and (3) more high-worth retirees would leave. I won’t argue the benefits from pre-school. However, I know what the costs of the plan will be. It’s likely that the voters will decide this in June 2006.

Posted in California | 2 Comments

Future Deficit in Orange County?

As reported by the Orange County Register in this story (free registration required), Orange County faces a potential $80 million deficit if a firefighters union sponsored proposal passes on next year’s ballot.

Much of the problem has to do with local pensions, a problem that is plaguing the City of San Diego. Several articles have been written (here, here and here) about their pension problems, which threaten to drive the City of San Diego towards bankruptcy.

To say that government pensions are generous is an understatement. A friend of mine worked for 25 years in a neighboring county. She retired and now receives about 60% of her final salary, every year. Assume you work for 25 years in private industry. Will you receive a pension at 60% of your final salary? Will you receive health care while you’re retired?

The only defense I can make for the pensions is that government workers do not make as much while working as people in private industry. But that’s the only defense I can make. Meanwhile, county supervisors (and city councils) tend to sign pension agreements that later generations can’t afford.

Posted in California | Comments Off on Future Deficit in Orange County?

How Long Should You Keep Your Tax Returns?

Forever.

That may not seem reasonable, but California has no statute of limitations on collections of tax-related debt. That means that 30 years from now you could receive a letter from the state saying, “You didn’t file so pay us $25,000.”

Indeed, during the recent amnesty, California sent several such letters, as detailed in this article. Do you know where your 1984 tax return is?

While the state has four years to challenge anything on the return (the IRS has three; these dates being from due date of the return or date of filing, whichever is later), the Franchise Tax Board is extremely aggressive. Too aggressive. The solution, unfortunately, is to keep everything forever. At least until the law changes.

Posted in California | Comments Off on How Long Should You Keep Your Tax Returns?