Categories
- Alabama
- Alaska
- Arizona
- Arkansas
- BEA
- Books
- California
- Canada
- Colorado
- Connecticut
- Cryptocurrencies
- Delaware
- District of Columbia
- Entity Formation
- Estate Tax
- Federal Budgeting
- FINCEN
- Florida
- Gambling
- Georgia
- Gift Tax
- Hawaii
- Illinois
- Indiana
- Information Returns
- International
- Iowa
- IRS
- Irvine
- Kansas
- Katrina
- Kentucky
- Las Vegas
- Legislation
- Louisiana
- Maine
- Maryland
- Massachusetts
- Michigan
- Minnesota
- Mississippi
- Missouri
- Montana
- Nevada
- New Hampshire
- New Jersey
- New Mexico
- New York
- North Carolina
- North Dakota
- Ohio
- Oklahoma
- Orange County
- Oregon
- Payroll
- Payroll Taxes
- Pennsylvania
- Pensions
- Property Taxes
- Recordkeeping
- Rhode Island
- S Corporation
- Sales Tax
- SBA
- Scams
- Self Employment Tax
- South Carolina
- South Dakota
- Supreme Court
- Tax Court
- Tax Evasion
- Tax Fraud
- Tax Gifts
- Tax Preparation
- Taxable Talk
- Tennessee
- Texas
- Uncategorized
- Utah
- Vermont
- Virginia
- Washington State
- West Virginia
- Wisconsin
- Wyoming
Contact
Archives
Tax Blogs
- Dinesen Tax Times
- Don't Mess with Taxes
- EideBailly Tax News & Views
- Federal Tax Crimes
- Kelly Phillips Erb (Taxgirl)
- MauledAgain
- Peter Reilly
- Phil Hodgen Tax Law Blog
- Procedurally Taxing
- Tax Analysts Blog
- Tax Policy Blog (Tax Foundation)
- TaxProf Blog
- TaxVox Blog
- The Tax Guru
- The Wandering Tax Pro
- Tony Nitti on Forbes
Political Blogs
Tax Agencies
- California Department of Taxes and Fee Administration
- California Employment Development Dept.
- California Franchise Tax Board
- City of Las Vegas Business Licenses
- Clark County Business Licenses
- Henderson Business Licenses
- IRS
- Nevada Department of Employment, Training and Rehabilitation
- Nevada Department of Taxation
- North Las Vegas Business Licenses
Memberships
Other Links
Meta
-
Note: All Content is Copyright © 2005 – 2024 by Clayton Financial and Tax LLC.
Tag Archives: Swart.Enterprises
Jolly Good News on the Swart Front
Let’s say you’re the managing member of an LLC headquartered in Seattle (duly registered as an LLC in Washington State). You invest in another LLC (a Delaware LLC) that invests in property throughout the United States. You own between one … Continue reading
Posted in California
Tagged CDTFA, Swart.Enterprises
Comments Off on Jolly Good News on the Swart Front
Arizona vs. California Franchise Tax Board
Legal authorities in the Grand Canyon State are not amused by California’s view that indirect interests in California LLCs mean that the entities are doing business in California. And they’re mad enough to take action, asking leave to sue California … Continue reading
Posted in Arizona, California
Tagged Swart.Enterprises
Comments Off on Arizona vs. California Franchise Tax Board
Swart Broadens
California’s Franchise Tax Board believes that any business with even a remote tie to California should pay California tax. Let’s say you own a 0.21% interest in Acme LLC. Acme invests in something in California. You have no authority to … Continue reading
FTB Not Appealing Swart Decision
Last month a California appellate court ruled that California’s Franchise Tax Board was wrong in trying to assess an Iowa corporation with a 0.2% ownership in an LLC that invested in California the California minimum Franchise Tax. It was announced … Continue reading
Swart Wins Appeal; Not Liable for California Minimum Tax
Good news for non-California businesses that are passive investors in an investment that invests in a California entity. The Franchise Tax Board (California’s income tax agency) has been ruling that business entities that have no active business in California but … Continue reading
Posted in California
Tagged Swart.Enterprises
Comments Off on Swart Wins Appeal; Not Liable for California Minimum Tax
California Goes After Flow-Throughs with Passive Investments in California
Let’s say you’re the manager of a business in Florida. Your business has some excess capital, so you decide to invest in the RussFox Fund, LLC. Your investment makes up a whopping 0.02% of the fund. (Put another way, you … Continue reading