2011 Tax Offender of the Year

It’s time again to be considered for that most prestigious of awards, the Tax Offender of the Year. To be considered for the Tax Offender of the Year award, you must do more than cheat on your taxes. It has to be special; it really needs to be a Bozo-like action or actions.

Coming in second was Mark Leitner. Mr. Leitner felt that the government shouldn’t lean on him, so he filed liens against the government…to the tune of $48.489 billion from seven individuals involved in prosecuting him. Mr. Leitner is not enjoying that money (those liens were, as you would imagine, quashed); instead, he’s spending some time relaxing at ClubFed.

Coming in third was Norma Coronel. Ms. Coronel gave birth to one child in December 2002. However, she thought that she could do better on her tax return by claiming she gave birth to 19 children…all at once. That truly Bozo tax fraud got her the joy of repaying, with interest, the over $300,000 she received from the IRS.

I’m giving a dishonorable mention to the IRS Automated Underreporting Program (AUR). I’ve had several clients who have responded to notices from the AUR group, and the AUR group, when writing back, helpfully notes that they’ve reconfigured the amount that the clients allegedly owed. The trouble is that the AUR group ignores the correspondence from the client, and simply restates the amount owed. I’m going to be sending Nina Olson, the National Taxpayer Advocate, a letter on this issue; I’ll post a copy of the letter in the blog in the coming weeks.


This year’s winner has a proud history; indeed, without them we likely wouldn’t be here. I’m talking about the United States Congress, who have moved up from being runner-up the past two years. Congress, especially the Senate, forsook its duties. Consider the budget passed by the US Senate…but that would be problematic as the US Senate didn’t pass a budget in 2009 or 2010 and waited until the closing days of December to actually pass one. However, these are minor issues in comparison with the major problem: The needless and horrible complexity of the US Tax Code.

Nina Olson, the National Taxpayer Advocate, has noted the problem year after year in her reports to Congress. For example,

The National Taxpayer Advocate on numerous occasions has identified the complexity of the tax code as the most serious problem facing taxpayers and urged Congress to simplify it. In this section, we discuss the sources and impact of code complexity and the practical obstacles to simplification. In an accompanying legislative recommendation later in this report, we outline principles and proposals that we encourage Congress to consider as it explores tax reform options.

In 1986, Congress simplified the Tax Code. It’s high time again for another round of simplification. Consider one of my areas of practice, dealing with individuals with foreign financial accounts. Not only do those individuals now have to file an FBAR (Form TD F 90-22.1), they must repeat that information on Form 8938 (if they have sufficient foreign financial accounts). I don’t blame the IRS for this duplication. Rather, I blame Congress. Congress enacted the laws requiring these forms; it is Congress that needs to enact laws that would simplify the Tax Code.

I’d like to see a simple, fair Tax Code. This is likely one of the few issues where the Tea Party protesters and the Occupy Wall Street protesters would agree. Again, consider Form 8938. The instructions note that the estimated average time to complete this form is one hour, five minutes. And that’s just one form. No wonder I’m not worrying about my employment.

I’d like to be put out of a job–at least, on the tax preparation side. Realistically, I doubt that will ever happen: There will still be plenty of complex corporate and business returns that need completion.

Today, taxpayers who do not have simple situations–and that’s millions of Americans–have tremendous difficulties completing tax returns on their own. Albert Einstein stated that, “The hardest thing in the world to understand is the income tax,” and that was over 60 years ago! The situation today is far, far worse and the blame is squarely with Congress. Unfortunately, 2012 is an election year and I believe there’s zero chance of anything coming out of this Congress. Indeed, President Obama has shown no inclination at simplifying the Tax Code. We likely need new leadership in Washington to ease the pain of all Americans.


And that’s a wrap on 2011. Everyone have a safe, happy, and healthy New Year. I’m sure I’ll find plenty of other Bozos to write about in 2012.

Posted in Legislation, Taxable Talk | Tagged | Comments Off on 2011 Tax Offender of the Year

Norway Demands $30 Million from Absolute Poker

Absolute Poker, the now more-or-less defunct company that included UltimateBet, has been hit with a 180 million Norwegian Kroner tax bill ($29.9 million) by the Norwegian tax agency, Skatteetaten. The tax agency accuses Absolute Poker of running 430 million Kroner of business through a now bankrupt alleged Norwegian subsidiary, Madeira Fjord, and owing Norway’s Value Added Tax.

While this could impact Americans seeking refunds of balances on Absolute, it’s more likely that this is symbolic. Madeira Fjord and Absolute are bankrupt, and given the ongoing negotiations with the US Department of Justice its likely (but not certain) that player balances will receive a higher priority than Skatteetaten VAT claim.

Article in Norwegian
Article in English

Posted in Gambling | Tagged | Comments Off on Norway Demands $30 Million from Absolute Poker

IRS Acquiesces to Decision in Mayo v. Commissioner

The IRS has acquiesced to the decision in Mayo v. Commissioner; this decision will be published in the January 17, 2012 issue of the Internal Revenue Bulliten according to Linda Beale. The Mayo case allows a professional gambler to deduct his business expenses in excess of his net gambling income (to create a loss).

The effects of this are minor. Had the IRS continued to fight this decision, impacted taxpayers could (and presumably would) cite this case and would eventually prevail in court.

Discussion of Decision (January 2011)

Posted in Gambling, IRS, Tax Court | Comments Off on IRS Acquiesces to Decision in Mayo v. Commissioner

Nominees Due for Tax Offender of the Year

With just one week left in 2011, it’s time again for anyone to submit a nominee for the Tax Offender of the Year. To be considered for the Tax Offender of the Year award, the individual must do more than cheat on his or her taxes. It has to be special; it really needs to be a Bozo-like action or actions. Here are the lucky past recipients:

2010: Tony and Micaela Dutson
2009: Mark Anderson
2008: Robert Beale
2007: Gene Haas
2005: Sharon Lee Caulder

Nominations are due by next Thursday night, December 29th.

Posted in Tax Evasion | Comments Off on Nominees Due for Tax Offender of the Year

Casualty Losses, Constructive Receipt and Full Tilt Poker

I’ve been asked numerous times over the past few weeks one question by poker players: “Can I take a casualty loss on the money I have tied up on Full Tilt Poker?” The answer is a definite maybe, but even if there is a casualty loss it will likely not be a 2011 event.

For those unaware, Full Tilt Poker was one of three business offering online poker to Americans before April 15, 2011. On that date, the US Department of Justice indicted Full Tilt, PokerStars, and Absolute Poker/UltimateBet. The companies were accused of bank fraud and violations of the Unlawful Internet Gambling Enforcement Act (UIGEA) and other statutes. Yesterday, Brent Beckley (one of the founders of Absolute Poker) pleaded guilty to conspiracy to commit bank fraud and wire fraud and conspiracy to violate the UIGEA. His sentencing is scheduled for April 19th.

Of the three businesses, PokerStars has fully repaid its customers. Absolute Poker/UltimateBet announced that the business is closing, with assets being sold in an attempt to repay customers. Full Tilt Poker, after being accused of being a Ponzi scheme, was sold to Group Benard Tapie (GBT). According to reports, GBT will repay non-US customers while the Department of Justice will repay Americans.

So let’s get back to the original question: Can an individual take a casualty loss on his funds at Full Tilt Poker? First, we need to determine whether there has been a casualty loss. A casualty loss is a sudden, unexpected or unusual event where an individual loses something of financial value. There is no doubt that the loss of funds from Full Tilt Poker’s collapse was “sudden and unexpected.” However, there’s a problem with this being a casualty loss. Given that the DOJ and GBT do expect to repay Americans, there’s no loss today. There may be a loss at some future date if funds aren’t fully repaid, but today the most likely possibility for Americans is full repayment sometime in late 2012. That means there is no casualty loss.

This is even true for Absolute Poker/UltimateBet. Given that AP/UB is attempting to sell their assets and repay players, we do not have certainty of what will be lost (or won’t be lost). And certainty of loss is another thing needed to claim a casualty loss. While I doubt that AP/UB will fully repay players, it’s probable players will get something. Until we know what that something is, it’s not yet time to take a casualty loss.

The other question that goes hand-in-hand with this is whether individuals need to claim money “won” on Full Tilt Poker (and Absolute Poker/UltimateBet) that they did not cash out before April 15th. Here we must look at whether individuals constructively received the funds.

The doctrine of constructive receipt governs when income is reported in the United States. If you receive a check on December 29th you can’t hold it until next year to defer the income. You had the funds in your possession (albeit as a check), and there’s no reason you couldn’t have deposited them in December. You constructively received the money and its income in this year.

The same principle holds in reverse. When there is substantial doubt as to the paying of the funds, you do not have constructive receipt. With Full Tilt Poker and Absolute Poker/UltimateBet, such doubt definitely exists. (Given that the Department of Justice has charged Full Tilt Poker as being a Ponzi scheme, even the US government sees this doubt.) I can’t see constructive receipt existing here. (Note: For anyone who received funds from Full Tilt Poker or Absolute Poker/Ultimate Bet in 2011, there is definitely constructive receipt.) Until the funds are repaid, there likely is no constructive receipt.

Finally, I’ve been asked, “Can’t I just deduct the money I had on Full Tilt Poker (or Absolute Poker/Ultimate Bet) as a gambling loss?” No. You clearly did not lose the funds in a wagering event. This isn’t a gambling loss. This may be a theft or loss of funds on deposit, but today all we know is that the funds are in limbo.

Posted in Gambling, IRS | Tagged | 8 Comments

Psychic Help Wasn’t Good for Clients, but Was Great for the Psychic…Until Caught

I’ve been told that a psychic is supposed to know and foretell the future. Nancy Marks was a psychic in Lafayette, Colorado. She had a unique–and quite illegal–method of obtaining income.

She warned her clients that there was evil lurking in the money in their bank accounts. The only way to get rid of the “bad energy” was to withdraw the money and for her to hold onto the funds. There were too many instances of the number “6” in their accounts and credit cards. Why, there at least one in ten numbers on their statements was “6”. [I made that last line up, but it goes to show the ridiculousness of this whole line of thought.]

In any case, Ms. Marks did know what to do with the money that was withdrawn and given to her: She spent it. There’s another word for spending others’ money without permission: theft. Added to that is not paying tax on that money (tax evasion). Ms. Marks was convicted last week of 14 counts of theft and two counts of tax evasion.

Of course, I do have to ask the obvious question: If Ms. Marks was truly a psychic, didn’t she know that she’d get caught in the end?

Posted in Colorado, Tax Evasion | 1 Comment

We’re Back, But Will the Sales Tax Deduction Come Back in 2012?

I’ve moved into my new office, and everything is more-or-less running correctly in my new office in Las Vegas. There’s a new fax number (yes, there’s a real fax machine in my office) for those who need to send me a fax. So I’m back in business.

However, now that I’m a Nevadan, there’s the issue of the deduction for sales tax. That’s not going to be an issue for 2011 (individuals can choose between deducting sales tax or income tax for this calendar year), but as of now the deduction for sales tax will vanish for 2012. It’s vanished before (most recently, in 2009) but was retroactively reenacted; this may happen again for 2012. We’ll have to wait and see.

Posted in Nevada, Sales Tax | Comments Off on We’re Back, But Will the Sales Tax Deduction Come Back in 2012?

Only $16,788 Per Phony Child

The saga of the woman who did not give birth to nondecuplets is complete. Via Joe Kristan comes word that Norma Coronel made a plea deal and was ordered to repay the IRS $302,186.

Though the linked story states she gave birth to 20 phony children, earlier reports indicated it was just 19 (with one of them real). I’ll use the smaller number (erring on the side of caution, I suppose) which equates to a repayment of $16,788 per phony child.

As I said when I first reported on this story,
claiming something that’s very newsworthy on your tax return that’s false is a sure way to get into trouble. This was truly Bozo.

Posted in Tax Fraud | Comments Off on Only $16,788 Per Phony Child

California Has Lost Over 720,000 Taxpayers & $48 Billion of AGI From US Migration From 1993-2008

My move to the Silver State has gotten some comments from two other tax bloggers, Joe Kristan (Roth Tax Updates) and Paul Caron (TaxProf Blog). In the TaxProf Blog post, there’s a link to statistics on migration from within the US to and from California. The numbers are quite revealing.

In the most recent year for which statistics are available (2008), California gained 3,667 tax returns from migration but lost $829 million of Adjusted Gross Income from migration. (Note that this is income, not tax dollars, and is based on federal AGI, not California AGI.) What this clearly shows is that high-earning taxpayers fled California for greener pastures: Texas, Oregon, and Nevada gained the most AGI from California. (The numbers come from the Tax Foundation, and are available here.)

Net Increase/ Net Increase/
(Decrease) of (Decrease) of
CA Returns CA AGI
[$ in 000s]
1993 (138,251) $          (7,398,356)
1994 (111,940) $          (6,320,105)
1995 (73,660) $          (4,295,887)
1996 (28,611) $          (1,611,444)
1997 (8,583) $             (524,257)
1998 (9,676) $             (735,147)
1999 (6,273) $             (458,276)
2000 7,591 $                467,012
2001 (29,959) $          (2,805,962)
2002 (27,379) $          (2,671,237)
2003 (42,672) $          (3,247,756)
2004 (71,963) $          (5,093,362)
2005 (79,589) $          (5,659,718)
2006 (68,454) $          (4,774,491)
2007 (34,379) $          (2,524,154)
2008 3,667 $             (828,842)
Total (720,131) $       (48,481,982)

 

You may ask, hasn’t California’s population increased from 32 million in 1994 to 37 million in 2010? That’s absolutely correct; the increase is from births and deaths and immigration to California from outside of the US. Unfortunately, a large number of Californian’s who were earning good incomes have decided to enjoy their gold in places other than the Golden State.

Posted in California | 1 Comment

When Silver Is Better than Gold

Today’s closing price for silver is $32.72 an ounce. Meanwhile, Gold is $1,749.35 an ounce. So how can silver be better than gold?

If you’ve been a reader of this blog, you’ve seen me write numerous times about California’s tax and economic policies. Bluntly, if California were a corporation, it would be delisted from the Pink Sheets. (For those unfamiliar with the “Pink Sheets”, that’s the home for stocks that get delisted from the NYSE, American Stock Exchange, or NASDAQ.) Meanwhile, the only recipe that Democrats in Sacramento have is to increase taxes.

My tax bite is roughly 10% to California. For every dollar I make, ten cents goes to Sacramento. (Yes, I get a benefit from that in that state income tax is deductible on federal tax. However, because of the Alternative Minimum Tax even that benefit is capped.) For the past few years I’ve considered if I could move my business to a friendlier environment. Earlier this year, I decided to do so.

I’ve sold my house in Irvine, and am in the process of purchasing a home in the Las Vegas area. I will be in a much friendlier business environment, with a lower cost of living. The home I’m purchasing is nearly double the size of my current home and costs almost 50% less than what I sold my current home for.

There comes a point where decisions are forced on you. With the growth of my business, I looked at possibly hiring another tax accountant in 2010. When I ran the numbers, I found that I would lose money by hiring a productive tax accountant. That’s because of all the regulations and costs that I would immediately incur if I had an employee. I’m not stupid: If I lose money by hiring someone, I’m not going to do it.

Yet my business was (and is) growing, and I had to do something. As you may know, I’m adding a partner (Aaron Lion, E.A.). He’s based near D.C. rather than California. As of a week from now, I will have executed my own Escape from California.

Democrats in Sacramento constantly say that with all of California’s advantages (and the state does have a lot: great climate, a large diverse population, and diverse industries) that increasing taxes doesn’t impact employment. That’s hogwash. It’s driven large companies (e.g. Nissan) to Tennessee. It’s driven me to the Silver State, Nevada. Sure, I’m just one job but the money I earn goes to support others’ incomes. That will still be the case, but not in the Golden State, California.


With the movers coming tomorrow, and everything that’s been happening with the move and with what will happen over the next two weeks, it’s likely that posting will be minimal until mid to late December.

Posted in California, Nevada, Taxable Talk | 12 Comments