A Chestnut Is in the Rough

Another week, two more individuals have been sued by the Department of Justice for allegedly promoting phony tax schemes. Rodney Chestnut and Nafeesah Hines are alleged to have found a unique way for you and I to obtain tax refunds: redemption. You see, there are supposedly secret tax accounts that you can get money out of just by filing phony Form 1099-A’s and 1099-OID’s.

I can’t tell you much more about this method, because it doesn’t exist. There are no secret tax accounts. This method (redemption) is as phony as a three-dollar bill.

Mr. Chestnut and Mr. Hines will have the joy of trying to find those secret accounts when they get their day in court. Good luck–they’re going to need it.

Posted in IRS, Scams | Comments Off on A Chestnut Is in the Rough

What the New Form 1099-K Hath Wrought: Changes on Business Tax Forms

There’s a new information reporting form coming this year: Form 1099-K. This form will report how much in payments are received by anyone via credit card and other third party payment systems (e.g. PayPal). This seems like a good way for the IRS to make sure that all credit card payments are being reported. (This was mandated by a law Congress passed a few years ago.)

However, what the IRS has done is redesign Form 1120, Form 1120S, Form 1065, Schedule C, and Schedule E. All of these forms now have a line asking for the amount received via merchant cards. (These are draft forms, so the forms could change. However, based on what I’ve been told these lines will remain.)

For business entities, there will be problems. Most businesses, especially large businesses, aren’t keeping track of income by payment type. For the larger entities, they may have to back into sales by credit card based on the Form 1099-K.

In any case, the amounts on the Form 1099-K’s will not match true sales. First, these amounts will include sales tax, shipping, and other non-sales charges. Second, the amounts on the Form 1099-K’s will be reported using cash basis. Any business that is accrual basis will have matching issues. Third, the reporting will likely be meaningless for any business that reports on a fiscal (non-December year-end) year.

Of course, any business could have matching problems. Consider online-inc.com, a company that only sells by credit card. On December 30th, they sell $1,000 by credit card. The company is accrual basis, so they report the income. Their 1099-K will not include the income.

But the same issue likely would occur for a cash-basis entity, too. Most smaller businesses enter credit card sales when they happen. The credit card company will note the sale on the 1099-K when the money actually goes to the customer.

The solution that I expect most businesses to use is to just use the Form 1099-K to populate this line. It’s simple, and guarantees that there will be no matching problems. Of course, that puts the cart before the horse but if you’re a business owner or a tax professional this solution is likely the one that lessens the risk of an audit.

Personally, I think this is just going to lead to problems. Before last month’s OCEA meeting, we discussed this issue and realized that most of our business clients are unprepared for what’s about to happen. Indeed, most business entities ignore 1099-MISC’s as the forms aren’t needed to prepare their returns. The same won’t be the case for the new 1099-K, so tax professionals will need to educate their clients…and soon. Overall, this is just another reason why tax professionals likely have lifetime employment.

Posted in IRS | Tagged , | Comments Off on What the New Form 1099-K Hath Wrought: Changes on Business Tax Forms

PTIN Follies, Year 2

The IRS announced today that tax professionals can renew their PTIN, an identification number used on tax returns. Seeing no reason to delay spending $63.00 I went headfirst into the process.

What a kludge. And yes, I’m being derisive. The IRS converted my user ID to all capital letters from all lowercase. I had to have the IRS email me my user ID (which is how I discovered this). Next, the password I set up last year didn’t work. I don’t know if they converted that, too, to all caps but I had a temporary password emailed to me.

Then I went to the application itself (after resetting the temporary password). I went through it, and it said there was a problem. The software didn’t take me to the problem — that would be too easy. Instead, it took me back to the beginning of the application. I figured out that I needed to enter the expiration date of my credential (Enrolled Agent), and had to edit the line where my EA number showed up. (There is nothing on this line to note there is missing information, btw.) It then allowed me to conclude and give the IRS $63.00. (The cost if you are a first-time PTIN registrant is $64.25.)

I’m underwhelmed.

Posted in IRS | Tagged | 1 Comment

An Intuit of a Problem

I have more information on the coding issue: The problem lies with my software company, not the IRS. It seems that in a limited number of cases, my software (ProSeries, made by Intuit) returns a code “5” indicating that an electronic payment has been rejected when the actual transmission from the IRS is a code “4” indicating that the payment was accepted.

What is making me upset is that when I called Intuit this morning that they were aware of the problem and were working on it. They apparently do not consider this serious enough to proactively tell their user base about it. I asked for a supervisor to call me back; I have yet to get that call today.

Consider a hypothetical client, John Smith. Mr. Smith owes the IRS at the extension deadline $20,000. He chooses to have the funds electronically debited. His return is filed electronically and accepted, but the electronic funds payment is supposedly rejected. You tell Mr. Smith he needs to mail a check to the IRS for the $20,000 which he dutifully does. However, the payment was really accepted.

The client discovers two days later that the IRS has debited his account. Meanwhile, does he put a stop-payment on the check he sent the IRS (incurring fees from the IRS and his bank)? Or perhaps the check is cashed by the Treasury and now Mr. Smith is out an additional $20,000 for a few weeks. (The IRS will send a refund for the double-payment, but Mr. Smith loses the use of that money for a while.) Or perhaps the check bounces as Mr. Smith only had $30,000 in his bank account. Is Intuit going to cover Mr. Smith’s fees?

As best as I can determine, I had four clients impacted by this. I assume there are hundreds if not thousands impacted nationally. It will be very interesting to see how Intuit responds to this major issue.

Posted in Tax Preparation | Tagged , | Comments Off on An Intuit of a Problem

Possible Problem With IRS Coding of Rejected Tax Payments

If you are a tax professional and have recently had a client (or clients) whose IRS payment shows as rejected on Form 9325, it is possible that the payment actually went through.

When an individual files his tax return electronically, he can also pay electronically. Sometimes that payment is rejected for various reasons. I have seen multiple clients in the past few days whose payments were “rejected” actually have their payments accepted. I do not know if this is an issue with my software vendor, the IRS, or some combination thereof. I am going to be talking with both the IRS and my software vendor tomorrow.

I will post an update tomorrow (Thursday) with what I discover.

Posted in IRS | Comments Off on Possible Problem With IRS Coding of Rejected Tax Payments

Recharacterization Deadline for Roth IRAs is October 17th

Many individuals converted their traditional IRA to a Roth IRA in 2010. It seemed like a great idea but then the stock market went down. Now, some of these individuals owe tax on money they no longer have.

You can actually get a do-over: You can reverse (recharacterize) your Roth back to a traditional IRA. The Smart Money blog has more.

Hat Tip: Roth Tax Updates

Posted in IRS | Tagged , | 2 Comments

Sometimes the Light at the End of the Tunnel Is an Oncoming Train

September revenue in California came in at a bit more than $300 million under forecast. That brings the fiscal year to somewhere between $700 and $800 million below forecast. (The California Controller’s office and the California Finance Department use slightly different numbers, so the exact shortfall number varies between the departments.)

No matter, if we take $700 million for three months and project that out for twelve months, you get $2.8 billion under forecast. As the Bloomberg article I linked to notes, automatics spending cuts in California are almost certain to happen.

The problems the Bronze Golden State face can be summed up simply in that the state hasn’t found a regulation that they don’t like and a tax they don’t want. Add in a recession nationally (no matter if the pundits haven’t officially called it a recession, the public is acting as if it is a recession) and neither businesses nor individuals want to spend money or do anything else that increases California collections.

California should, of course, cut regulations and make the state more business friendly. Unfortunately, that has as much chance as it snowing in Irvine today.

A good juxtaposition with this is that Governor Jerry Brown signed the so-called “Dream Act” into law. This law will consider illegal immigrants in California state residents and allow them to enter California state colleges and universities and pay resident rates (which are less than non-resident rates). That will, of course, increase the costs to the universities and increase the state’s deficit.

Posted in California | Tagged | Comments Off on Sometimes the Light at the End of the Tunnel Is an Oncoming Train

Former NFL Player Sacked for Evasion

Jeffrey Lynn Walker played three seasons in the NFL in the 1980s with the San Diego Chargers and the New Orleans Saints. Mr. Walker was an offensive lineman, so he was trying to make holes for the offense. After his football career ended, he became a businessman.

Let’s fast forward twenty years. Mr. Walker purportedly became involved with a resort in China. He solicited funds from investors. Somehow, those funds went from a bank in Las Vegas to a bank in Mississippi to his own bank account and were used for buying personal items like a Hummer. The funds didn’t make it toward the Chinese resort.

The money did not go toward paying the Internal Revenue Service. That’s a problem because all income is taxable, even illegal income.

Mr. Walker pleaded guilty to wire fraud and tax evasion charges. He could face up to 23 years at ClubFed and a large fine.

Posted in Tax Evasion | Comments Off on Former NFL Player Sacked for Evasion

Bad News for Medical Marijuana

Yesterday the Associated Press reported that US Attorneys in California have sent letters ordering medical marijuana dispensaries to close. The problem is that while medical marijuana use in California is legal under state law, marijuana remains illegal under federal law.

Adding to the trouble is the results of an audit of a medical marijuana dispensary called Harborside in San Francisco. I’ve reported on the case before (most recently in March). It appears that Harborside received the results of its audit of 2007 and 2008 at the hands of the IRS: Send us $2.4 million and, oh yes, we’re auditing 2009 and 2010, too.

Under tax law, anyone who sells a Class I controlled substance cannot deduct business expenses. Effectively, you have a gross receipts income tax. And the law is on the IRS’s side here.

Harborside is appealing the results of the audit, and that appeal will likely not be heard until the end of this year or early next year. I expect the appeal to lose and the case to eventually go to Tax Court. Unfortunately for proponents of medical marijuana, the law is on the side of the IRS as are precedents.

Of course, one must wonder about the Obama Administration here. This is the same administration that publicly pronounced in its first year in office that they would not go after medical marijuana. Yeah, right.

Hat Tip: Taxdood

Posted in IRS | 1 Comment

Four Weeks of Freedom Could Cost Ten Years at ClubFed

I’ve reported on Tony and Micaela Dutson before. The couple, who were nominated for my prestigious Tax Offender of the Year award (but did not win in 2010), apparently wanted to try again in 2011. Back In June 2010 I reported on their convictions for tax evasion. Well, the Dutsons apparently didn’t like it when their crimes were called, “the epitome of disrespect of the law.” So they decided not to report to the Bureau of Prisons after sentencing; they were supposed to report on May 23rd of this year. Each of them removed the electronic monitoring devices that they wore.

The couple then fled from Elgin, Oregon to Phoenix. It only took a few weeks for the Marshals to pick them up.

They were found guilty this past week of failing to surrender to serve their original sentences. They’re truly most recent Bozo behavior could add ten additional years to their original ten-year sentence.

I hope those four weeks in Phoenix are worth the potential ten additional years at ClubFed.

Posted in Tax Evasion | Tagged | 2 Comments