Just Say No, Sacramento Style

It’s been a while since I’ve reported on the California budget situation, but it seem apropos given that June is right around the corner and with it the constitutional deadline for California to have a balanced budget. Democratic Governor Jerry Brown would really, really like to have four Republican votes to increase taxes; however, all he has found is “no.”

With last year’s change in the California state constitution, a budget only requires a majority vote so Democrats can pass whatever they want…except tax increases. On July 1st, the temporary hike to California’s sales tax (1%) and the income tax (0.25%) expire. Republicans have stated since Brown was elected that they would not vote for any tax increases, and they’ve kept their word.

California’s budget situation isn’t as dire as it was earlier this year. April tax revenues to the state came in $6 billion higher than projected, so the state is currently facing a budget deficit somewhere between $9 and $16 billion. What’s truly needed (massive cutting of the statue bureaucracy and regulations) won’t happen–indeed, Governor Brown signed a new contract with the prison guard’s unions that will, in the long-term, just aggravate the state’s problem–so we’re left with what will probably be more phony measures and budgetary gimmicks (even though Governor Brown pledged that there would be none of these).

As for the budget, we’ll have to see; but as for tax increases, it’s very clear. They’re not going to be happening, and plans need to be made for other methods of handling the situation.

Posted in California | Comments Off on Just Say No, Sacramento Style

Staking and the WSOP: 2011 Update

Back in 2007, I wrote this post regarding staking and the World Series of Poker. Generally, nothing has changed. Caesar’s (formerly Harrah’s) still runs the WSOP and still refuses to obey IRS rules regarding Form 5754. That means that a US player must collect Form W-9 from his American backers.

However, three new scenarios have been presented to me recently. What happens if an American is backed by an individual from a Tax Treaty country (such as Russia)? Under the US-Russia Tax Treaty, the gambling income of a Russian is not subject to US taxation. Second, what happens if an American is backed by an individual from a non-Tax Treaty country (such as Australia) or from Canada (the US-Canada Tax Treaty mandates withholding)? Finally, what happens if someone from a non-Tax Treaty country or Canada is backed by an American?

For all three scenarios, let’s assume I’m entering the main event of the WSOP (the buy-in is $10,000); my backer is paying $5,000 and is receiving 50% of my winnings. I place in the event and win $20,000, so my backer is owed $10,000 (all numbers before withholding).

Scenario #1: US Player Backed by an Individual from a Tax Treaty Country.

Let’s assume I’m playing and am backed by Ivan from Russia. I receive a W-2G for $10,000 (my net winnings). It would seem all I have to do is just pay Ivan his $10,000 share of my gross profit, right?

Wrong.

Even though Ivan is from a Tax Treaty country, paperwork is required or tax must be withheld. Ivan needs to provide you either a Form W-8BEN or a Form W-8ECI. The Form W-8BEN is used to note the benefits of a Tax Treaty. Ivan would complete the form, including his ITIN and note the Article of the Tax Treaty that specifies that there would be no withholding. As long as you receive the completed Form W-8BEN you can then pay Ivan his share. If you pay by cash or casino chips, make sure you get a signed receipt from Ivan acknowledging his receipt of the money.

What if Ivan doesn’t have an ITIN? Then you must withhold at 30% even though he’s exempt from withholding. You would need to complete Form 1042-S and depending on the amount withheld very quickly remit that money using EFTPS to the IRS. (EFTPS is now the only method available for making withholding deposits to the IRS.) Ivan can get the money back by filing a Form 1040NR following year-end.

If Ivan has a business operating in the US, he would provide Form W-8ECI with either his Employer Identification Number (EIN) or his ITIN. This will allow you not to withhold to Ivan.

Note: Even if no withholding is required a Form 1042-S must be submitted to the IRS. See this post.

We can see that even the easy scenario isn’t necessarily that easy.

Scenario #2: US Player Backed by an Individual from a Non-Tax Treaty Country

This case is relatively straightforward. Let’s say your backer is Jon from Canada or Australia. (Although Canadians can get some to all of their money back by filing Form 1040NR after year-end, you are required to withhold on their income per the US-Canada Tax Treaty.) You must withhold 30% of their winnings. You would pay him all of his $5,000 investment and 70% of his $5,000 winnings ($3,500) for a total of $8,500. You would complete Form 1042-S with his information and note that $1,500 of his $5,000 of income has been withheld. Depending on the amount withheld, there can be very quick deadlines for remitting that withholding to the IRS; that withheld funds must be remitted using EFTPS.

Scenario #3: Non Tax-Treaty Player Backed by an Individual from the US

This is the ugly scenario. Suppose Jon is backed by Russ from the US. Russ isn’t subject to any withholding on his money (he’s a US citizen, after all) and is more than willing to provide a completed Form W-9. Unfortunately, because Caesar’s will not issue multiple W-2Gs/Form 1042-S’s, all of the $10,000 Jon wins will be subject to withholding. So Jon will receive $17,000 (his $10,000 entry plus $7,000 of his $10,000 in winnings).

Jon is left with two bad options. He could pay Russ $3,500 (half of the amount he has won). Russ will rightly be annoyed as he should receive $5,000. Jon has no way of telling the IRS that $1,500 of his tax withheld is for Russ [See Note 1 below].

Alternatively, Jon can pay Russ $5,000 and now he only has $2,000 of his winnings (rather than the $3,500 he should have). That method probably doesn’t appeal to Jon at all.

Unfortunately, neither option is palatable to both individuals and these are the only two options available. There is a solution: Americans should not back individuals from non-Tax Treaty countries. (The better solution, Caesar’s issuing multiple W-2Gs/1042-S’s, will have to wait until the IRS goes after Caesar’s on their policy.)


There are some other things that need to be pointed out. The participant will likely have to issue 1099-MISC’s or 1042-S’s to individuals. You probably don’t want everyone to know your social security number. If you’re a professional gambler, there’s a solution: Apply for an EIN. You can do this at no charge online at the IRS website. You must have an EIN if you are going to have to withhold funds.

Next, if there’s a possibility you are going to be a withholding agent, you must have both an EIN and an EFTPS account. After you get the EIN, immediately enroll in EFTPS. Your passwords are mailed to you; this takes about 10-14 days from the date you enroll, so get this going now if you are going to be playing in the 2011 WSOP and this applies to you.

Third, you can give Caesar’s a piece of your mind (nicely, though) and let them know about the ridiculousness of their policy. That’s especially true if you’re from Australia and you would like to be backed by an American (or someone from a country with a favorable Tax Treaty with the US).

The only good news with all of this is that I don’t see me being unemployed any time soon….

[Note 1]: It is likely the IRS would reject a Form 1040NR filed by Jon noting his extra withholding. The IRS won’t understand the issue given that there is no tax treaty issue (say, Jon is from Australia) and say, “Take it up with Caesar’s.” It’s a classic Catch-22.

Posted in Gambling | 6 Comments

How May We Not Serve You Today?

This post has nothing to do with taxes, but everything to do with customer mis-service. You’re forewarned.

On Tuesday, May 10th, I logged on to my blog and attempted to write a post. I was unable to save the post — the “Publish” button didn’t appear. I couldn’t figure out a reason, so I called technical support. They didn’t know of anything (it was clearly a call to India), but did let me know that my hosting company, 1&1 Internet, had done an upgrade. They suggested it might be a billing issue.

So I called billing, and discovered that the problem was that I had exceeded my space limitation. I was guilty as charged, but when I went with 1&1 (after my then hosting company announced they were going out of business) I was told that I could upgrade my space quickly. So I told the individual I spoke with I was more than willing to do that.

Before we get into the adventure that’s about to follow, I need to point out that I had exceeded my space limitation for several months. However, 1&1 never told me or I would have immediately taken care of it.

In any case, I was transferred back to India, where the helpful tech person put through the order to increase my space allocation. I was told that the order would take 24-36 hours to process, and then the blog would need to be transferred (they’d walk me through that on the phone).

On Thursday, the order still hadn’t processed. I called technical support and they admitted that the order had failed due to a problem on their end. The tech support person I spoke with told me that they had “escalated the problem so that it would be resolved.” I should hear back within 24 hours.

Well, I didn’t hear anything, so I called back on Monday, May 16th. I asked what the status was, and I was told that nothing had been done; that there was still a problem on their end. I asked to speak with a supervisor, and I was told the supervisor was unavailable. I told the individual I spoke with (again, from India) that I needed this problem resolved, and I expected to be contacted by a supervisor by the end of the day. He said he’d pass on what I said.

I never heard back from anyone at 1&1.

My partner, who is far more tech savvy than I am, took the lead in finding a new hosting company (we began looking on Tuesday, May 17th). On Wednesday, May 18th we signed up with them; on Thursday, May 19th, we began the process of moving the blog. With the aid of Brian Cribb (who has helped me in the past with WordPress issues), we moved the blog by yesterday. We then updated the dns servers and tonight everything is back to normal (other than the two weeks off).

As for 1&1, I shouldn’t say I haven’t received anything from them as that’s not completely accurate. I have received two emails. The first even had the name of their General Manager, Frederick Iwans, listed at the bottom. Mr. Iwans wished me “best regards” as I could win $25,000 by telling 1&1 in 300 words or less where .com will take my business. Here’s my entry:

With 1&1 Internet, https://taxabletalk.com would be taken out of business.

I suspect I won’t be winning one of the prizes.

Today 1&1 noticed that we’ve moved taxabletalk.com off their servers. They note that I can contact their support team for assistance. Hmmm, I think waiting for Godot might have a better chance.

Posted in Taxable Talk | Comments Off on How May We Not Serve You Today?

We’re Almost Back to Normal

If you can see this post, you’re seeing Taxable Talk hosted by my new hosting company.  New posts are coming tomorrow (Thursday), along with a rather scathing review of a certain hosting company. That post could be titled, “Indian Customer Service Unserves You.” It’s also very apparent to me that they don’t care.

Anyway, all is almost back to normal, and tomorrow is just a day away.

Posted in Taxable Talk | Comments Off on We’re Almost Back to Normal

We’re Going Down to Come Back Like a Phoenix

My current hosting company has decided they don’t want my business. I am being forced to switch companies (something I’ll write about next week). For now, we will likely be going down and then reappearing like the proverbial Phoenix and be back in business next week. Given the way dns servers update, and everything that must be done, I’m guessing we’ll be back in business fully next Tuesday.

Again, I am extremely annoyed about everything that has happened but we should be up and running again soon.

Posted in Taxable Talk | Comments Off on We’re Going Down to Come Back Like a Phoenix

Hawaii Likely to Increase Film Credits; What Could Go Wrong?

Do you like Hawaii Five-0? No matter, it’s very likely you will see far more films and television productions made in Hawaii in the near future. The legislature in Hawaii is considering increasing the film credit rate from 15% to 35% in Oahu and 20% to 40% on all other islands. One film company has a goal of ten movies and two television shows a year! It sounds great, as it would lead to thousands of jobs. What could go wrong?

Plenty. Joe Kristan has been covering the Iowa film credit scandal; see, for example, this update from last week. Let’s just say when there’s a lot of money involved, there’s the urge by some to stick their hands in the cookie jar. Perhaps this won’t happen in Hawaii, but instead of making Hawaii a better place for filmmakers, why not lower the tax rates for everyone so that Hawaii encourages all industries to locate their. A far simpler solution than targeted tax breaks, but its also one that usually can’t lead to corruption.

Posted in Hawaii, Iowa | Comments Off on Hawaii Likely to Increase Film Credits; What Could Go Wrong?

Radio Russ

I am once again the guest on Bart Hanson’s Deuce Plays podcast this week. We discuss “Black Friday” in the online poker world, and its probable impact on taxes, and the possible future of online gambling in the United States. You can download the podcast directly here.

Posted in Gambling, Taxable Talk | Comments Off on Radio Russ

One Down, Two to Go

This afternoon, PokerStars announced that they are now ready to return balances in Americans’ accounts back to them. Depending on the balance, this can be done by check, electronic funds transfer, or wire transfer (only balances of $50,000 or more can be done by wire). PokerStars notes that it could take up to one week for an EFT to reach your bank account.

It is very clear that PokerStars received the assurance of the Department of Justice that nothing would hinder the movement of funds, and that the same assurance was provided to PokerStars’ payment processor. Otherwise, there is no chance of this having moved as quickly as it has.

Meanwhile, Full Tilt has not made any announcements of when they will be ready to process cash-outs. I’d expect that to occur sometime in the next few weeks.

Finally, the silence is deafening from Absolute Poker (owner of Absolute Poker and Ultimate Bet). At the end of last week Absolute made an announcement noting that they’re reviewing their legal options. I would not hold my breath as far as receiving money that you have on Absolute or Ultimate Bet. I do think you will see it…eventually.

Another winner with today’s return of funds is the World Series of Poker run by Caesar’s Entertainment. Many of the individuals who would participate in the WSOP (which begins in just over four weeks) might have had their funds tied up due to the DOJ’s actions; however, it appears that some to all of the funds should be returned just in time for the WSOP.

Posted in Gambling | Comments Off on One Down, Two to Go

FTB’s Top 250 Delinquencies Not a Minor Affair

Right at the end of the tax season, the Franchise Tax Board released its list of the top 250 delinquencies. There is still a celebrity or two on the list, but the new list is a bit more mundane than in the past.

It took $305,057.11 to make the list (that’s what Affordable Termite Control, Inc. of nearby Orange owes the FTB). Tops on the list are Halsey and Shannon Minor of Los Angeles; they owe $14.2 million to the FTB. Mr. Minor is the founder of CNET, and he acknowledged last year the tax debt. His ability to pay the debt may be questionable, though; Mr. Minor also owes Charlottesville, Virginia $84,000.

Still remaining on the list is Pamela Anderson. Yes, that Pamela Anderson; she owes the FTB nearly $607,861.

This time around Ms. Anderson appears to be the lone celebrity on the mix. And that’s likely a good thing for Hollywood’s elite, as this isn’t the list you want to be on.

Posted in California | Comments Off on FTB’s Top 250 Delinquencies Not a Minor Affair

Another List, Another Bad Score for California

Here in the Bronze Golden State, discovering that you rank at the bottom of a list is all in a day’s work. Another list of business climate, this one from the Small Business & Entrepreneurship Council, ranks the best and worst states for small business owners. While this list came out in December, I didn’t discover it until this past week.

First, here are the top 10 states:

  1. South Dakota
  2. Nevada
  3. Texas
  4. Wyoming
  5. Washington
  6. Florida
  7. Alabama
  8. South Carolina
  9. Ohio
  10. Colorado

And now, the worst ten:

41.  Connecticut
42. Minnesota
43. Massachusetts
44. Hawaii
45. Rhode Island
46. Maine
47. Vermont
48. California
49. New York
50. New Jersey
51. District of Columbia

You might notice that the top six states share a common factor: no personal income tax. Somehow, I doubt that this list will make its way to any of the Democratic leadership in Sacramento. At least, California does not have the worst business environment of the 50 states and the District of Columbia.

Posted in California | 1 Comment