Another Way to Inflate Oil Prices

I’m definitely not an expert on oil and gas accounting. That’s a very specialized niche, and I only know enough to be dangerous. But one thing I do know is that you can’t inflate prices on joint ventures to allow partners to get tax credits. That’s tax fraud.

And that’s what one Ohio company and two individuals at that company are alleged to have done. The Justice Department has sued Mid-Con Petroleum of Heath, Ohio, and two principals of that firm, Daniel Weddington and James Earl.

Here’s how the scheme allegedly worked, according to the indictment (as reported by the Newark Advocate). Mid-Con would sell the interests in wells to customers using a payment plan that would ask for just a little bit down. Customers would then promise to pay the rest from profits from the well. Mid-Con would allegedly cash the payment after the customers received the tax credit on their next year’s tax return.

The DOJ news release alleges that Mid-Con inflated prices on the wells by having customers use “sham notes” to pay for most of the purchase price. The customers then allegedly used the inflated price to claim tax credits on intangible drilling costs.

But it gets better. The same intangible drilling costs were allegedly sold to multiple customers so that they could take the credit on the same drilling costs. Think of one oil well, but it got cloned into two or three or more. The DOJ suit alleges that Mid-Con has 200 customers so this is allegedly not a small-time fraud. Indeed, the DOJ believes that these alleged acts have cost the Treasury between $5.4 and $6.9 million.

The DOJ also alleges that Mid-Con has obstructed the IRS investigation into this matter. The DOJ is asking for this alleged scheme to stop. It appears that this “gusher,” if there was one somewhere in Ohio, has been capped.

Posted in Tax Fraud | Comments Off on Another Way to Inflate Oil Prices

Federal Tax Fraud: The Users Guide

As an author (my third book is due out in late January), one problem that I have faced is coming up with a title. It must be something that attracts your target audience to your book. A Norristown, Pennsylvania attorney allegedly came up with a title to describe the tax fraud he was allegedly committing—Federal Tax Fraud: The Users Guide.

Bernard Bagdis and ten other individuals were named in a 168-page indictment. Mr. Bagdis, who is accused of not filing a tax return between 1990 and 2006, faces 35 charges: one count of attempting to impede the IRS, seven conspiracy counts, 16 charges of aiding and assisting in the preparation of a false tax return, six counts of failing to file a tax return (I guess the IRS was generous with the other five years), and five counts of not filing a currency transaction report. Mr. Bagdis is facing a very lengthy stay at ClubFed if found guilty on all of these charges.

The indictment alleges that Mr. Bagdis used shell corporations, a phony foreign bank, and a waterproofing company to hide $23 million worth of income allegedly owed by the other defendants; the tax due on that amount would be $4.6 million.

I guess Mr. Bagdis’ book may not see the light of day.

News Story: Philadelphia Business Journal

Posted in Tax Fraud | Comments Off on Federal Tax Fraud: The Users Guide

IRS Oversight Board “Gravely Concerned”

This afternoon I spoke to the Exchange Club of Irvine regarding tax law changes in 2007. One issue that came up that I couldn’t give a complete answer to was the Alternative Minimum Tax (AMT). Would Congress pass another “patch” bill for 2007? Would Congressman Rangel’s bill that included other tax increases pass? What would the impact be on the 2007 filing season?

Before I answer those questions, let me note that it’s not just taxpayers who are concerned. The IRS Oversight Board is “gravely concerned” regarding possible delays in the filing season due to changes with the AMT. Paul Cherecwich, chair of the Board, sent a letter to the Senate Finance Committee noting the Board’s concerns. The Oversight Board estimates that a late filing season start date of January 28, 2008 will result in $17 billion in delayed refunds, while a February 18, 2008 filing season start date will result in $87 billion of delayed refunds.

Other potential impacts of the delay include more taxpayers filing paper returns (the IRS can shut down electronic return processing but can’t stop paper returns from being mailed) increasing expenses, increase errors, and generally make next tax season a nightmare. “In conclusion, the Oversight Board urges Congress to take quick action so as to mitigate the risks of AMT changes on taxpayers. Although it is difficult to quantify the exact impact with certainty, the risks are high and the effect on taxpayers is potentially very burdensome.”

So, let me answer the questions that were posed today. Congress will pass an AMT patch that’s acceptable to President Bush and Congressional Republicans because the AMT primarily impacts “Blue” states. Congressman Rangel’s bill won’t pass as currently written; House Democrats will have to live without their “paygo” rules. As to the impact on the tax season, let’s just say that I think the rest of my hair will be gray by next April 15th.

Posted in IRS, Legislation | Comments Off on IRS Oversight Board “Gravely Concerned”

Yagman Gets Three Years

Civil rights attorney Stephen Yagman was sentenced today to three years at ClubFed for his 19 convictions on bankruptcy fraud, tax fraud, and money laundering. The government had asked for nine years; Yagman had asked to teach a course on morals at UCLA.

Yagman admitted today in testimony that “he got sloppy…I was aware that I had painted a target on my own back and I tried to be scrupulously careful. I made mistakes.”

Assistant US Attorney Alka Sagar told the Court on Monday, “He went shopping on Park Avenue hours after his bankruptcy was filed. This was brazen conduct.”

Judge Stephen Wilson noted, “Like so many cases in modern history, it’s always the cover-up that’s worse than the crime. Frankly, I was shocked by his testimony because it was transparently untrue in many areas.”

Yagman will appeal his conviction. He must surrender to authorities on January 15th.

News Story: San Jose Mercury News (via AP)

Posted in Tax Evasion | Tagged | Comments Off on Yagman Gets Three Years

Mileage Rates for 2008

A sure way to know when the IRS will announce the standard mileage rates for the following year is to look at my schedule. At lunch today I spoke to the Exchange Club of Irvine on 2007 tax law changes. Naturally, this afternoon the IRS issues Revenue Procedure 2007-70 with the 2008 mileage rates.

Those rates are:

Business Miles: $0.505/mile (up from $0.485 in 2007)
Charity Miles: $0.14/mile (unchanged)
Medical or Moving: $0.19/mile (down from $0.20 in 2007)

I’m not sure how any mileage rate goes down from 2007 to 2008 given the price of gasoline. However, the IRS uses an independent contractor to determine these rates.

Posted in IRS | Comments Off on Mileage Rates for 2008

Tomorrow, Tomorrow…

The sun’ll come out
Tomorrow
So ya gotta hang on
‘Til tomorrow
Come what may
Tomorrow! Tomorrow!
I love ya Tomorrow!
You’re always
A day
A way!

Those lyrics, from the musical Annie, describe Stephen Yagman’s fate. After a six-hour sentencing hearing today in Los Angeles, the attorney still does not know his fate. He was convicted earlier this year on 19 counts of tax fraud, bankruptcy fraud, and money laundering.

As I noted over the weekend, Yagman would like to teach morals at UCLA. The Department of Justice would like him to visit ClubFed for nine to eleven years.

The news report noted that Judge Stephen Wilson asked, “How do you reconcile his desire to continue to practice in one of the most stressful areas with his medical condition?” Yagman’s attorney said that Yagman has been suffering from heart disease.

Yagman’s fate will probably be set by the judge tomorrow. I suspect a visit to ClubFed is much more likely than an immediate trip to Westwood. As Chuck Gallagher, a business ethics speaker (and a former ClubFed resident for tax evasion) said, “Yagman has shown from his conviction that he has a disregard for the law through his actions related to hiding assets in bankruptcy and from the IRS (tax evasion). Hence, it would be far reaching to think that the government would consider him a likely candidate to teach morality.”

Posted in Tax Evasion | Tagged | Comments Off on Tomorrow, Tomorrow…

FBARs

Several months ago, I participated in a phone form on the FBAR program (Foreign Bank Account Rreporting); generally, if you have a foreign bank account with $10,000 or more in it you must file Form TD F90-22.1 with the Department of the Treasury by June 30th of each year. Today I received information on questions that were asked in that phone forum (the phone forum was in early June, so it took nearly six months for the answers to be distributed…).

Some of the answers are different than what I was led to believe during the conference call.

  1. The due date of the FBAR is June 30th, but the form must be received by June 30th, not postmarked by June 30th. This is different from tax forms which have a postmark due date.
  2. You must file a form if you have $10,000 in one or more foreign bank accounts. This is determined by adding the maximum balance in each account during the year, not the maximum balance of all the accounts at one point during the year. For example, the maximum you have in foreign accounts is $9,500 ($9,000 in account 1 and $5,000 in account 2 on June 15th). However, the maximum you had in account 2 was $4,000 on August 10th (the maximum in account 1 was $9,000). You are required to file Form TD F90-22.1.
  3. A faxed signature is not acceptable for an FBAR.
  4. Foreign life insurance can be considered a foreign financial account subject to reporting (by the policyholder) on an FBAR.
  5. A line of credit does not have to be reported on an FBAR.

There were many other items listed in this email; I’ve only posted the highlights. Anyone who believes they are impacted by this should talk with their tax professional to get full information on their situation.

Posted in IRS | Tagged | Comments Off on FBARs

The “Fair Tax”

I’ve been asked if I am a supporter of the “Fair Tax.” The Fair Tax is an idea of scrapping the current U.S. Tax Code and replacing it with a national sales tax. You can go to the Fair Tax website and get detailed information on the program. The site gives fundamentals behind the program here.

I hadn’t seen an unbiased review of the Fair Tax program until this weekend. Hank Adler, a professor of business at Chapman University, has published a lengthy critique of the Fair Tax. You can read it here (it is best read using Internet Explorer rather than Firefox). Professor Adler comes to the conclusion that while our current Tax Code may need to be replaced, the Fair Tax isn’t the way to go.

I agree that our current Tax Code is not a very good system. I’m still digesting material on the Fair Tax, and haven’t reached Professor Adler’s full conclusion, but I do have many reservations about the Fair Tax.

Posted in Legislation | Comments Off on The “Fair Tax”

Three Years to Learn English (and Repent)

Back in August I reported on the case of La Crosse, Wisconsin dentist Frederick Kriemelmeyer. Dr. Kriemelmeyer is an adherent of the philosophy of David Wynn Miller’s “In the Truth.” And he doesn’t believe in the US flag and the US Tax Code. He was found guilty on three counts of filing false tax returns.

On Monday he found out that he’ll have time for remedial English—three years to relearn the language while at ClubFed. He’ll also have time to repent for being “greedy,” according to Judge Barbara Crabb who sentenced Dr. Kriemelmeyer. He also has to pay $8,000 to repay the government for his prosecution and make restitution of $135,000.

Posted in Tax Evasion | Comments Off on Three Years to Learn English (and Repent)

9 Years or Teaching Undergraduates “Morality”

Back in June prominent Los Angeles attorney Stephen Yagman was found guilty of 19 counts of tax fraud, money laundering, and bankruptcy fraud. Yesterday at the sentencing hearing, Yagman’s attorney, Barry Tarlow, asked that Yagman be sentenced to teaching morality to undergraduates at UCLA.

I’m not making this up.

UCLA professor Frances Olsen asked Yagman to teach the course. Ms. Olsen, according to her biography, specializes in “legal theory, social change, and feminism.” The Wikipedia page on Ms. Olsen states that she is “…a noted member of the school of Feminist Legal Theory.” Apparently ethics aren’t part of that theory.

For the record, I’ll note that Mr. Tarlow believes that the prosecution of Mr. Yagman was a “vindictive prosecution.” And that Mr. Tarlow believes prison would be a bad choice for some other reasons: bad health and possibility of being attacked. Vindictive or not, when a person is convicted of 19 felonies he should expect to visit ClubFed rather than teach at UCLA.

Judge Stephen Wilson will likely sentence Mr. Yagman on Monday.

Hat Tip: Patterico’s Pontifications

Posted in Tax Evasion | Tagged | Comments Off on 9 Years or Teaching Undergraduates “Morality”