What If Your Tax Professional Vanishes?

Yesterday, a new client called me. It seems that his tax professional (we’ll call her Jane Doe) vanished. She’s not answering phone calls (nor returning messages–and her voice mail is now full), nor returning mail, nor returning faxes. My client thought an extension was filed (with a payment), but his records are with Ms. Doe, and my client really doesn’t want to have to pay for a tax return twice. What are his options?

First, I hope that nothing has happened to Jane Doe. That said, it appears that her ability to prepare tax returns has vanished with her vanishing. Clearly if she’s not around she’s not going to be preparing any returns.

My new client asked me several good questions:

1. Is my extension valid? It is (and an extension was filed–see below); the extension is for you, the taxpayer, and is valid no matter who prepares your return.

2. Can I verify that the extension was filed? Yes, you can. You can either call the IRS (800-829-1040), request a “Tax Account Transcript,” or you can authorize a tax professional to obtain it on your behalf. (My new client signed a Tax Information Authorization and I ordered transcripts from the IRS. The extension was filed.)

3. I don’t want to pay to have the return done twice. Can I get the files back from Ms. Doe? If a client requests his files to be returned, a tax professional is required to return them. There’s an obvious issue if a tax professional dies; Ms. Doe won’t be here to return the files. In theory, the Executor of Ms. Doe’s estate should return those files…but that’s not likely to happen prior to the extended tax deadline.

My new client probably has a claim against Ms. Doe (or her estate). She was paid to complete the tax returns; if she doesn’t, there’s a clear issue. If she has died, you could file a claim against her estate. If she just vanished, you have to find her in order to get your money back.

There’s no way, though, of avoiding paying for the tax work a second time. I make my living preparing returns for money–I need to be paid for my work.

4. How do we prepare the return when Ms. Doe has all of my 1099s? Luckily, we can order a Wage & Income Transcript from the IRS. This should show all of the government paperwork you received (1099s, 1098s, W-2s, W-2Gs, K-1s, and 5498s). This will help with some of the issues.

However, my new client is self-employed. He’ll need to redo some work (providing his deductible business expenses and income from his business). If you use QuickBooks (or another accounting system), the new tax professional will need to see various reports. That’s easily done and shouldn’t be a problem.

You may have to recreate other records. If this needs to be done, start now. If you need to request bank or credit card statements, do it now; it can take a few weeks for them to appear. You are subject to the October 15th deadline, so start on this today!


There are some takeaways for everyone:

1. Make sure you get a copy of your tax returns from your tax professional (and keep these!). While you can order a Tax Return Transcript from the IRS, it’s a lot easier to have the actual returns. (A Tax Return Transcript is free from the IRS. You can also order a copy of your actual return, but this takes far longer and you must pay for it.)

2. Make sure you receive your files are returned. We scan everything into an electronic filing system, and return all files (I have far too much paper in my office and don’t want more).

3. If your tax professional is a solo practitioner (or a small office), ask the question, “What would happen if something happened to you?” It is a valid question and is one of the main reasons I brought in a partner a couple of years ago.

4. Make sure your tax professional communicates with you. My new client mentioned that Ms. Doe had been, in his words, “flaky.” If you have qualms about a tax professional, why are you continuing to use her? Tax professionals have access to your personal, confidential information. You absolutely, positively should be very comfortable with your tax professional. If not, consider someone else.

Posted in Tax Preparation | 1 Comment

IRS Scandal Update

More news this week on the IRS scandal. First, Tax Analysts has sued the IRS. “On May 21, Tax Analysts sent a FOIA [Freedom of Information Act] request to the IRS seeking all materials used since 2009 to train IRS personnel in the IRS exempt organizations determinations office in Cincinnati.” The IRS extended the deadline on June 25th to July 10th, and then to August 9th, and then to September 20th. Tax Analysts had enough…and they sued to force the IRS to comply with the FOIA request. The IRS may be overwhelmed with FOIA requests, but the law only gives the IRS a certain amount of time to comply.

Lois Lerner is now accused of sending files from her business email address to her personal email address. Eliana Johnson discussed this on CNBC’s Kudlow Report:

Ms. Johnson notes that this appears to be quite intentional targeting, and those involved knew it was wrong. One certainty at this point, the meme that this was a case of bad judgment or it was four rogue agents in Cincinnati is dead.

Posted in IRS | Tagged | 1 Comment

California Goes After Flow-Throughs with Passive Investments in California

Let’s say you’re the manager of a business in Florida. Your business has some excess capital, so you decide to invest in the RussFox Fund, LLC. Your investment makes up a whopping 0.02% of the fund. (Put another way, you own 2/10000 of the LLC.) The RussFox Fund invests and trades capital equipment, including some in California. You take no part in the management of the fund–you’re clearly a passive investor.

One day you open the mail and see a notice from California’s Franchise Tax Board, California’s state income tax agency. It says you’re Florida business is liable for the $800 California minimum franchise tax (plus penalties and interest, of course) because your business has California-source income.

Now, would California do that? The answer is they have already done so. The facts that I gave mirror the facts of a case written up by Tax Analysts on a Kansas-based company called Swart Enterprises, Inc. Swart paid the FTB and then filed a claim for refund. That claim was denied; Swart has now filed a lawsuit in Fresno County Superior Court. It will likely be some time before this case is decided, but it will be interesting to follow.

Of course, the conclusion that Tax Analysts writes is exactly what I thought: “While states are always on the lookout for each and every dollar of tax revenue, taxing investments in California serves as a big disincentive for out-of-state companies to invest in the state.”

Posted in California | Tagged | 1 Comment

Massachusetts Has a New Software Sales Tax

Taxachusetts, er, Massachusetts has had for years a reputation of being a high tax state. Lately, Massachusetts has become a somewhat better locale (based on taxes). It’s not that Massachusetts has improved; rather, other nearby states have enacted or increased taxes. Just when you thought you could throw away the Taxachusetts label, out comes a new sales tax.

Last month, the Massachusetts legislature passed a new sales tax on computer software services. At 6.25%, it’s the highest sales tax rate on this in the country. The tax applies to all “computer software, including pre-written upgrades, which is not designed and developed by the author.” The law was effective July 31, 2013.

One website has published a piece about how confusing this new tax is. Consider:

This added levy is not only cumbersome, it’s super confusing. For example:

  • if you install software (Microsoft Office, Constant Contact, Drupal, etc.), it’s taxable
  • if your client clicks the mouse to install it, it’s not taxable
  • training your client to use this software is not taxable
  • but if you “customize” or configure the software in any way, it’s taxable
  • if you don’t actually make any changes, but just discuss them and plan them, it’s consulting and not taxable
  • if you create graphic design mockups, it’s not taxable
  • but as soon as you implement that design (i.e. program it), it becomes taxable if you’re using “prewritten” software “not developed” by you (such as WordPress)

At least, that’s how we think it works.

The Massachusetts high-tech community is up in arms over the new tax. As Christopher Anderson, president of the Massachusetts High Technology Council, said in an interview on WBZ-TV (as reported in the Boston Globe,

“When we impose a tax that no other state in the country imposes as broadly as this, it is going to have an impact on those small and midsize companies, initially, in terms of their ability to win and retain business or add or retain employees,” he said.

“In fact, a number of them are telling me they may have to shed employees just to maintain the business load they have,” Anderson added in the interview with WBZ’s Jon Keller.

Democratic state Senator Karen Spilka has filed a bill to repeal the measure. Meanwhile, Florida Governor Rick Scott has urged unhappy Massachusetts companies to consider moving to the Sunshine State. I am certain that if this tax remains law Massachusetts will see some companies move out-of-state. Taxes matter, and when a business in Massachusetts faces a confusing 6.25% tax while a business in neighboring New Hampshire doesn’t, a business owner might just move.

Posted in Massachusetts, Sales Tax | Comments Off on Massachusetts Has a New Software Sales Tax

Full Tilt Poker Remission Claims to Begin in Mid-September

The Garden City Group (GCG) posted the following information on the Full Tilt Poker Claims Administration website yesterday:

Important Update About the Start of the Claims Process

Starting on September 16, 2013, GCG will email a Notice with instructions on how to submit a Petition for Remission online to all potentially eligible claimants identified by GCG utilizing data supplied by Full Tilt Poker (“FTP”). The deadline to submit a Petition for Remission is November 15, 2013. Instructions concerning the filing of Petitions will be included in the Notice and will be posted on this website. Please continue to check this website for updates. Please note that the registration process for email notification is no longer available…

If you do not receive an email notice and you believe you are eligible to participate in the remission process, you may file a claim online using the directions that will be provided on this website.

Once claims are filed, GCG will have to verify the claims (relatively simple in cases where the claimant agrees with the information sent by GCG but more complex where there are differences), total the amount of approved claims by all claimants, compare that to the total available for remission, and then pay the claims. However, the DOJ then must approve the amounts.

While in theory claims could be paid this year (after all, this is all electronic information, etc.), it’s far more likely that the review and payment process will take at least 90 days and probably longer. I’d expect payment in mid-2014 based on the announcement, and take later rather than sooner if I had to guess. We could get lucky and have a Christmas present of the Full Tilt funds…but it’s far more likely to be a 2014 Christmas present.

Posted in Gambling | Tagged | 1 Comment

Nite Moves Asks Supreme Court to Rule on Constitutionality of Taxing Pole Dances in New York

When I think of “Night Moves” I think of a Bob Seger song. That’s not what this post is about. It seems that the upstate New York adult entertainment facility named Nite Moves isn’t happy with a New York state sales tax on pole dancers. The essential question: Is a tax on just certain kind of music or entertainment legal?

New York’s highest court, the Court of Appeals, held in a 4-3 decision that a sales tax on pole dancing is just fine. The owner of Nite Moves, Stephen Dick, has filed a writ of certiorari with the US Supreme Court asking the Court to overturn the tax. The question of whether pole dancing is a form of art or something that doesn’t promote culture (and so can be taxed) might be argued next Spring in Washington.

Speaking of Night Moves:

Posted in New York, Sales Tax | Tagged | 1 Comment

Once Again, Registration of a Tax Preparer Doesn’t Stop Him from Bad Behavior

With tonight’s season premier of Breaking Bad, it feels apropos to note a tax “professional” who is accused of bad behavior. The US Department of Justice filed suit against Michael Turner of San Diego.

Mr. Turner is alleged to have,

…failed to sign or affix a Preparer Tax Identification Number (PTIN) to many of the returns that he has prepared. In addition and according to the government, Turner takes bogus deductions on his customers’ returns in order to claim larger refunds for his customers. His customers then recommend Turner as a tax preparer to their friends, which helps Turner to expand his customer base and further increase his own profits. Specifically, the government alleges that Turner claims inflated or fabricated deductions on the Schedule A of his customers’ Form 1040 tax returns, claiming that his customers have large non-cash charitable contributions and unreimbursed employee expenses. The complaint also alleges that when Turner’s customers are audited, Turner has provided false documents to those customers in an attempt to assist them in substantiating charitable contributions and employee expenses that they did not incur. According to the complaint, however, Turner has instructed his customers not to identify him as their tax return preparer in communications with the Internal Revenue Service (IRS).

That’s a multitude of bad behavior if proven. Of course, Mr. Turner doesn’t have a license, right? Well, no. California requires all paid tax preparers to have a license. Preparers who are unenrolled (not EAs, CPAs, or attorneys) must obtain a license from the California Tax Education Council (CTEC). And Mr. Turner has a license from CTEC.

This shows two points: First, that having a license cannot stop bad behavior. And second, the government has methods today of stopping tax preparers who are breaking bad. As the DOJ noted in their press release, “In the past decade the Justice Department Tax Division has obtained injunctions against hundreds of tax preparers.” I suspect this point just might make it into the arguments in the Loving appeal.

Posted in IRS, Tax Preparation | Tagged , , | 1 Comment

Ledyard 3, Mashantucket Pequots 0

Back in mid-July the 2nd Circuit Court of Appeals ruled on an interesting case regarding tribal sovereignty at Indian casinos. The case pitted the country’s largest casino, Foxwoods, against the town of Ledyard and the State of Connecticut. The issue: Could Ledyard and Connecticut levy a personal property tax on non-tribal vendors who lease slot machines to Foxwoods? The original court decision held that various laws prevented Ledyard and Connecticut from imposing the tax on tribal vendors. However, the 2nd Circuit unanimously reversed the decision.

The main issue is whether or not the federal laws, such as the Indian Gaming Regulatory Act (IGRA) prohibits the tax. The court held that the interests of the state and town outweigh the federal interest.

The tax, imposed on non-Indian vendors, is likely to have a minimal effect on the Tribe’s economic development. While IGRA seeks to limit criminal activity at the casinos, nothing in Connecticut’s tax makes it likely that Michael Corleone will arrive to take over the Tribe’s operations.

Or, as the court put it,

The Town and State have more at stake than the Tribe. The economic effect of the tax on the Tribe is negligible; its economic value to the Town is not. The Tribe’s sovereign interest in being able to exercise sole taxing authority over possession of property is insufficient to outweigh the State’s interest in the uniform application of its generally-applicable tax, particularly where, as here, there is room for both State and Tribal taxation of the same activity.

Ledyard has begun to again receive tax payments. The other question is will the Pequots appeal to the Supreme Court or ask for an En Banc appeal to the entire 2nd Circuit? We’ll know the answer to that question soon.

Hat Tip: Victor Rocha

Posted in Connecticut, Gambling | Tagged | Comments Off on Ledyard 3, Mashantucket Pequots 0

IRS Postpones August 30th Furlough Day

The IRS will be open for business on Friday, August 30th (the Friday before the Labor Day weekend). The IRS postponed the scheduled furlough day, noting:

“We have made substantial progress in cutting costs. … Our progress is such that we have decided to postpone the furlough day scheduled for Aug. 30. We still have more work to do on the budget and cost-savings, so we will reevaluate in early September and make a final determination as to whether we will need another furlough day in September,” said Danny Werfel, IRS Acting Commissioner, in a message to IRS employees.

Posted in IRS | Comments Off on IRS Postpones August 30th Furlough Day

IRS Delays Disclosure Authorization Retirement for Three Weeks

Good news for tax professionals. When I went to IRS e-services this morning, I was greeted by this message:

DA and EAR Retirement delayed by three weeks

The planned retirement of Disclosure Authorization and Electronic Account Resolution on August 11, 2013 has been delayed until September 2 while IRS completes the transition to our new web portal. DA and EAR users have an additional three weeks to use both electronic products. Once the portal transition work is complete, DA and EAR would then be retired as previously planned and will be unavailable for use.

So we have another three weeks, until September 2nd, when tax professionals can save the IRS money and time by entering Forms 2848 and 8821 ourselves in e-services.

Posted in IRS | Tagged | Comments Off on IRS Delays Disclosure Authorization Retirement for Three Weeks