Did a Maryland Tax Increase Cause Taxpayers to Flee the State?

An organization called ChangeMaryland has a new study that states that 31,000 individuals left the state from 2007 to 2010. ChangeMaryland believes that it’s the tax hikes in the state that have caused the exodus.

Maryland is a decidedly liberal (“blue”) state with relatively high taxes. The study states that the millionaire’s tax, which ran from 2007 to 2010, cost the state $1.7 billion in tax revenues: Individuals impacted by the tax fled to low-tax states (primarily Florida). As I noted last December, California lost over 720,000 taxpayers and $48 billion of AGI from 1993 to 2008 while the population of the state increased.

There is an obvious conclusion: Tax rates matter, and individuals will move to avoid higher taxes. I’m an example of that, and it appears that many former residents of Maryland are, too.

Posted in California, Maryland | 2 Comments

If Only He Had Driven a Yugo Instead of a Ferrari

Sometimes it’s best to be inconspicuous. That’s definitely the case if you’re doing something that’s illegal. From Bergamo, Italy comes the story of an unidentified Italian man who loved his Ferrari F131. Even in Italy that’s a car that will get you noticed. Unfortunately for that Italian, members of La Guardia di Finanza (the Italian Finance Police) happen to see the car one day this past January. They traced the license to the man and pulled up his tax return.

It was all zeroes.

Needless to say, the Finance Police wondered where he got the money for such an expensive car. It turned out the man was a director and legal representative for various companies. And those companies had very high costs and very low revenues from 2007 to 2010. That allegedly cost the Italian government something like €3 million.

The man, who also piloted high-speed racing boats, had two other expensive cars that he leased: a Hummer and a Dodge luxury vehicle. All-in-all it was a lot of conspicuous consumption without paying taxes. He’s been arrested. If the allegations against him are proven, he’s looking at spending some time in prison, fines, and paying the back taxes.

Sometimes it’s best not to flaunt it.

News Story: English (UPI), Italian

Posted in International, Tax Evasion | 2 Comments

When an Agent’s Fees Are Not Deductible

Suppose you are a professional athlete and you hire a sports agent to negotiate with you. Those fees are, in the United States, generally deductible as an “ordinary and necessary” business expense. However, the same is not true in Canada.

The Canada Revenue Agency ruled several years ago that agent’s commissions are not deductible. Given that most athletes hire agents (who typically receive 3% to 5% of a player’s salary), this can be a significant issue. This impacts all four major sports leagues (there are several hockey teams in Canada, along with the Toronto Blue Jays of Major League Baseball and the Toronto Raptors of the NBA; additionally, the NFL’s Buffalo Bills play three home games a year in Toronto), and sooner or later some “lucky” athlete was going to be audited by the CRA.

That happened when Michael Caruso, a defenseman with the Florida Panthers, was audited. He lost, so he appealed his decision to the Tax Court of Canada. In Caruso v. Queen, Canada’s Tax Court ruled against Mr. Caruso.

Canadian tax law is similar to, but not identical to, American tax law. In the US, any business expense that is both “ordinary and necessary” is generally allowed. However, Canada’s Income Tax Act states, “Except as permitted by this section, no deductions shall be made in computing a taxpayer’s income for a taxation year from an office or employment.” It would seem that an agent’s fee would be deductible, given that Paragraph (8)(1)(b) states a deduction can be taken for, “(b) amounts paid by the taxpayer in the year as or on account of legal expenses incurred by the taxpayer to collect or establish a right to salary or wages owed to the taxpayer by the employer or former employer of the taxpayer;”

So are an agent’s fees legal expenses? Not in Canada:

In this case the services rendered by the agent were the services in negotiating the contract that was entered into between the Appellant and the Florida Panthers. When the Appellant was asked about the services provided by the agent, he referred to the additional $60,000 in signing bonuses that the agent was able to obtain for him…

To the extent that any of the services provided by AKT Sports Management Consultants Inc. (or MFIVE SPORTS) could be regarded as legal services, the services were not to collect salary or wages owed to the Appellant (the services were rendered before any contract was signed) nor were such services rendered to establish a right to salary or wages. The services were rendered to negotiate the contract. There was no right to any salary or wages until after the agreement was signed, which was after the services in question were rendered by the Appellant’s agent.

While there is a proposed amendment to this part of Canada’s Income Tax Act that would change the law, the judge in the case stated it would still not apply to agent’s fees:

As well, not all legal services will qualify. Only amounts paid for those legal services provided to collect amounts owed to the taxpayer or to establish a right to such amount will qualify for the deduction under this paragraph. Therefore even if such amendments were now effective the proposed changes would not result in the amount that was paid to the Appellant’s agent being deductible.

Now, decisions of this court can be appealed; however, based on this news story it appears that won’t be happening in this case. That said, this decision impacts every hockey player and many other athletes. Mr. Caruso did not earn a huge salary; I suspect some highly salaried player, such as Roberto Luongo of the Vancouver Canucks, will end up fighting this issue if he gets audited. (As an aside, Mr. Luongo will be competing in the main event of the World Series of Poker which begins on Saturday. Mr. Luongo’s $10,000 buy-in is being paid for by the British Columbia Lottery Corporation.)

Hat Tip: Robert Raiola

Posted in Canada, Gambling, International | Tagged , , , | Comments Off on When an Agent’s Fees Are Not Deductible

It’s a Tax: What ObamaCare Means for You

Unless you were shipwrecked on a deserted island you know that the Supreme Court ruled that the Affordable Care Act, aka ObamaCare, is a legal “tax.” Back in February 2010 I wrote about the taxes in ObamaCare. Let’s run down the entire list (now that we know what’s in the bill) and see how this impacts you. The italicized text is from February 2010 (the proposal). Numbers refer to [individuals]/[families].

1. Individual Mandate Tax. For those who don’t purchase health insurance, this income tax surcharge continues to exist in this plan. I couldn’t determine the exact rate. This begins on January 1, 2014. The penalty is $95 (at first) but increases to the greater of $695 or 2.5% of modified adjusted gross income (MAGI) in 2016. (Families pay three times the individual number for the minimum tax.) The tax is indexed to the Consumer Price Index (CPI) for future years.

Something to realize is that most of the taxes in the measure are based on MAGI. This means your income before itemized deductions. For individuals who are, say, amateur gamblers who have $100,000 of wins and $100,000 or losses, you will pay taxes based on your winnings but not your losses. This is not a good thing (unless you like paying lots of taxes).

2. Employer Mandate Tax. On businesses with 50+ employees that do not offer health care, and at least one employee qualifies for a tax credit, $750/employee. This will cause many small businesses to stop growing once they reach 49 employees. Those figures come from the prior version.

In the final version of the law, the Employer Mandate Tax is $2,000/employee with it going into effect on January 1, 2014. There is also a $3,000/employee penalty if the government finds they provide workers with “unaffordable” health insurance. There ‘s an obvious solution to small employers: Don’t hire employee #50. And for those who have 51 or 52 employees, let those “excess” employees go. And that’s exactly what is guaranteed to happen.

This tax is guaranteed to hurt the economy in numerous ways. It will cause employers to cut employees. It will cost employees health insurance; if the $3,000/employee penalty applies to health insurance that’s unaffordable and you have just 30 employees, the solution is simple–don’t offer health insurance. The title of my previous post was, “It’s unpopular, unworkable, and insane, so naturally they’re in a hurry to pass it.” It remains an insane plan.

3. Excise Tax on Health Insurance Plans. Beginning in 2018, 40% tax (the percentage may be wrong) on plans costing $10,200/$27,500. Is indexed to CPI. This is in the law at the percentages and dollar amounts noted; it goes into effect in 2018.

4. Health Insurance would be reported on W-2s. Another mandate that increases costs for business. It’s unclear whether this mandate survived. However, the White House release states that loopholes will be closed which implies this remains. It survived and is in the law.

5. “Medicine Cabinet Tax.” Limitation on HSAs, FSAs, and MSAs to purchase non-prescription medication except insulin. This is in the law and is already in effect (as of 2011).

6. HSA Withdrawal Tax Increased. The tax would increase to 20% from 10%. It’s in the law and went into effect in 2011.

7. FSAs capped at a maximum of $2500. They are now uncapped. This goes into effect in 2013 (it is indexed to CPI after 2013). This will especially hurt parents of special needs children who have utilized FSA dollars for special needs education. That kind of education can easily run over $10,000 per year.

8. 1099 Reporting for corporations. Requires businesses to send 1099-MISCs to corporations. This is another cost for businesses. This will begin in 2011 and will definitely increase my income. This is definitely in the proposal, but it’s unclear if this starts in 2011. While this was in the law, Congress repealed this section of the law after outcries from almost every business in the country.

8. Tax on Charitable Hospitals. This excise tax of $50,000 per hospital impacts hospitals that don’t meet new Department of Health and Human Services regulations. It’s unclear whether this is in the proposal. This went into law in 2010 and impacts hopspitals that do not meet “community health assessment needs,” “financial assistance,” and “billing and collection rules” set by the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS).

9. Tax on Drug Companies. There’s definitely a tax on drug companies, but the size and timing of the tax is unclear. This went into effect in 2010 as a $2.3 billion annual tax based on the share of sales made in a year.

10. Tax on Medical Device Manufacturers. This tax is in the bill, but the size and timing of the tax is not clear. This goes into effect in 2013, and is a 2.3% excise tax. How many medical device manufacturers will now establish overseas subsidiaries not subject to US taxation? I’d expect many to do so. Given that there are 360,000 people employed in the US in this industry, there will be layoffs in this industry caused by this tax.

11. Tax on Health Insurers. This tax is definitely in the bill, but the size and timing of the tax is unclear. This tax goes into effect in 2014, and phases in gradually until 2018. The tax immediately hits firms with $50 million in profits (or more) and is based on premiums collected.

12. Elimination of tax deduction for employer provided retirement prescription drug coverage. It is unclear whether this tax is in the measure. It’s in the law and goes into effect in 2013.

13. Increase of percentage of AGI required to deduct medical expenses from 7.5% to 10%. Few can deduct medical expenses today; fewer will be able to deduct them tomorrow. This goes into effect in 2013. However, for those 65 or older the AGI percentage will remain at 7.5% through 2016 (seniors will join everyone else at 10% in 2017).

14. Compensation Limitation for Health Insurance Executives. If you work in that industry, you will be limited to a salary of $500,000. There’s no mention of this in the measure. However, given the Obama Administration’s stance on various pay-related measures, it’s likely included. It goes into effect in 2013.

15. Medicare Payroll Tax Hikes. Once your income exceeds $200,000/$250,000 (MFJ), you will pay an additional 0.9% tax. Note that the employer will only collect (and be responsible for this tax) if you earn $200,000/$250,000 or more. This also impacts the self-employed. And the law is written so that the self-employed cannot deduct half of the new tax as a deduction to income tax. It appears this provision is dead. However, it’s been replaced with something worse (see below). Unfortunately, this tax is in the final version of the law and takes effect in 2013.

16. New Hospital Insurance Tax. “The Act will include an additional 0.9 percentage point Hospital Insurance tax for households with incomes exceeding $200,000 for singles and $250,000 for married couples filing jointly.” I remember then-candidate Obama stating that if you made under $250,000, he wouldn’t increase your taxes. Yeah, right. This tax is not in the final version of the law.

16. New Unearned Income Tax. “[The Act] would add a 2.9 percent tax for households with incomes exceeding $200,000 for singles and $250,000 for married couples filing jointly to unearned income including interest, dividends, annuities, royalties and rents (excluding income from active participation in S corporations).” This is yet another measure which will stifle the economy in the United States. For my amateur gambling clients, this is particularly bad—it means your taxes will go up based on your gambling winnings, not your gambling net income. This goes into effect in 2013. While it’s called a “Surtax on Investment Income,” it will include dividends, capital gains, interest (the things you think about), passive income (partnerships, S-Corps, and trusts), royalties, rents, and Other Income (including gambling income). It does not include active business income, distributions from retirement plans, and sales of ownership interests in pass-through entities. It also does not apply to non-resident aliens.

17. Blue Cross Tax. There is a tax deduction available today for Blue Cross and Blue Shield companies; this tax deduction will vanish if they don’t spend 85% (or more) of premiums on clinical services. There’s no mention of this in the proposal. However, it was in both the House and Senate Democratic proposals and I expect it’s in this one, too. This went into effect in 2010.

18. Tax on Indoor Tanning. A new 10% excise tax on indoor tanning salons. This one made the cut. This went into effect in 2010.

19. Paper Production and Cellulosic Biofuels. “[Close] the loophole that allows certain byproducts of paper production to be eligible for the cellulosic biofuels producer credit.” This new tax provision is in the measure. This went into effect in 2010.

20. Strengthen Economic Substance Rules. “[Help] prevent tax shelters by clarifying the definition of when activities have true “economic substance” beyond evading taxes.” While the details aren’t listed, it’s clear that this provision will strengthen the economic substance rules. This will increase costs for complex transactions, and will likely depress economic activity. This went into effect in 2010.


President Obama and his surrogates have stated that the ACA (ObamaCare) is not a tax. White House Press Secretary Jay Carney stated the following:

“It’s a penalty, because you have a choice. You don’t have a choice to pay your taxes, right?” Carney said.

Carney was initially reluctant to assign a label to the fine when pressed repeatedly by reporters Friday. “Call it what you want,” he said…“You can call it what you want,” he said. “If you read the opinion, it is not a broad-based tax. It affects one percent, by CBO estimates, of the population. It is not something that you assess like an income tax.” It was unclear which Congressional Budget Office estimate Carney was referring to. Despite being pressed on the issue, though, the spokesman would not relent.

Bluntly, this is B.S. There are twenty tax increases in ObamaCare. You can parse words any way you like, but many of these measures are labeled as “taxes” and “surtaxes”. If you can read what I wrote above about the twenty tax increases in ObamaCare and still state that it’s not a tax, well, I suggest you apply for a job at the White House. The Supreme Court said it’s a tax. It contains twenty tax increases. President Obama’s argument that it’s not a tax is clearly wrong.

For the rest of us, this gives a clear choice in the election this November. Mitt Romney has pledged that his first job if he takes office will be the repeal of ObamaCare. President Obama and his administration have pledged the full implementation of ObamaCare (and the rescinding of the Bush Tax Cuts). You can’t get a much clearer choice than that.

Posted in Legislation | Tagged | 2 Comments

Lauryn Hill Pleads Guilty to Tax Evasion Charges

Yet another music star has tax troubles. Singer Lauryn Hill pleaded guilty to failing to file tax returns on more than $1.5 million she had earned from 2005 through 2007. Ms. Hill’s attorney indicated that she plans on paying the back taxes (plus interest and penalties) prior to her sentencing in November.

Ms. Hill stated she didn’t pay her taxes “…since she withdrew from society to guarantee the safety and well-being of herself and her family.” What? I’m sorry, but that’s nonsensical. Just pay your taxes–it’s a whole lot easier than not doing so.

If you’re a celebrity, you should realize you’re a potential target of the IRS. There are thousands to millions of witnesses to you making money. Even the worst IRS agent could show you had income. Otherwise you will be joining Richard Hatch in the entertainment industry wing of the Bozo Taxpayers Hall of Fame.

Posted in Tax Evasion | Tagged | Comments Off on Lauryn Hill Pleads Guilty to Tax Evasion Charges

Now He Gets to Watch Paint Dry

Willard Douglas Kerr of Phoenix operated DK Coatings, LLC, a painting and wall covering company in Manassas, Virginia. Mr. Kerr had many employees, and the business was apparently successful.

Mr. Kerr also had some pressing needs at home. He needed a new car. His swimming pool needed repairs. He also wanted to put more money into his business. So he did what you should never, ever do: He didn’t remit his federal trust fund taxes.

As I’ve said over and over, if you have employees and don’t remit your trust fund taxes, the IRS will come after you. It’s only a question of when, not if. If you’re an employer make sure you sign up for EFTPS and check to make sure that your trust fund taxes are being remitted; you will be held responsible if they’re not. That’s why you absolutely positively need to use a reputable payroll company. But I digress….

In any case, Mr. Kerr’s actions were discovered. In April he pled guilty to tax fraud; on Friday he was sentenced to 24 months at ClubFed. He must also make restitution of the $1,111,352 in taxes he owes to the IRS. Now he’ll get to watch the paint he sold dry.

Posted in Payroll Taxes | Comments Off on Now He Gets to Watch Paint Dry

Jerry Brown Dreams of a Tax Increase and Other California Tidbits

Quite a few things to report on from the Bronze Golden State.

First, the budget was signed by Governor Jerry Brown. The budget only “works” if voters approve the new taxes he proposed and that will be on the November ballot. However, if a competing measure proposed by activist Molly Munger passes (or if neither passes), there will be major problems with California’s budget.

One of the budget “trailer” bills changed the placement of measures on the ballot, and moves Governor Brown’s tax proposal to the top (with others falling underneath). Molly Munger has sued the California Secretary of State stating that you can’t change the rules in the middle of the game.

Even if a tax increase passes at the ballot box–and that’s definitely uncertain–taxes almost never bring in the money that politicians think they will. Individuals modify their behavior. California continues to drive businesses out of state (like mine), and the fix is one that is anathema to Democrats in Sacramento: Regulations and taxes must be cut, not increased, to make California more competitive economically with other states.

If I were a development officer in Arizona, Nevada, Colorado, Texas, or Utah, I’d be ready to make some phone calls as there will likely be plenty of businesses ready to head east.

Posted in California | Comments Off on Jerry Brown Dreams of a Tax Increase and Other California Tidbits

eFile an FBAR? Use Internet Explorer, Not Firefox or Chrome

Some of my clients have had problems efiling the FBAR on the BSA system. The FINCEN support group have confirmed that the system works only using Internet Explorer. So if you need to file an FBAR, use Internet Explorer, not Firefox or Chrome (or any other browser).

As a reminder, if you need to file an FBAR you have until Saturday, June 30th to file the form. Note that is a receipt deadline, so if you’re putting it in the mail do it now, not later.

Posted in International | Tagged | 1 Comment

IRS Announces New Procedure on RRSPs; Jaywalkers Apparently No Longer Subject to Firing Squad

The IRS announced yesterday a new procedure to deal with “low compliance risk” taxpayers who have innocently not filed FBARs or tax returns noting their RRSPs (a Canadian retirement account similar to a 401(k) or IRA). While the full details have not been released (the plan will go into effect on September 1st), it appears that the IRS has heard the complaints from tax professionals and others regarding the “one size fits all” voluntary disclosure plan.

Of course, the devil is in the details but they look reasonable at this point:
– Taxpayers will need to submit delinquent tax return for the last three years;
– Taxpayers will need to submit delinquent FBARs for the last six years; and
– Pay any tax and interest due with the submission.

Note that to qualify for the plan your unpaid taxes will need to be less than $1,500 per year.

Once the full details are announced (probably in late August) I’ll report on them.

More: Roth Tax Updates, Janet Novack

Posted in Canada, International | Tagged , | Comments Off on IRS Announces New Procedure on RRSPs; Jaywalkers Apparently No Longer Subject to Firing Squad

Can Online Gambling Help Solve State Debt Woes?

That’s the question this FoxBusiness report asks. (I am quoted in the story.) Of course, convincing politicians that enacting something that the public actually wants and that brings in tax revenues that the public wants to pay should be a no-brainer.

Yet in the recent California legislative session the state could not enact legislation. Nevada has already licensed two online poker sites (play is likely to begin in early 2013). Other states are almost certain to follow. The big question is will federal legislation be enacted. The odds are against it, but something could happen in the Lame Duck session following the November elections.

Posted in Gambling | Tagged | Comments Off on Can Online Gambling Help Solve State Debt Woes?