Impersonating a CPA and Miscounting His Bankruptcies Lead to Five Years

Nick Holquin, Jr. was a tax preparer in San Jose. He decided to invest in a Mississippi land development project. When the economy tanked, the project did, too.

Mr. Holquin was able to get twelve individuals to loan him money for this project. Unfortunately, he neglected to tell them about his bankruptcies. His attorney, Dennis Lempert, told the San Jose Mercury that he should have disclosed the one bankruptcy he was aware of. Trouble is, there were at least four others.

He also told clients he was a CPA. He wasn’t.

And the topper was that he neglected to file his own state tax returns…for the last 20 years.

Back in March Mr. Holquin pleaded no contest to tax evasion and fraud. He was sentenced on August 4th to 44 months in prison plus he must make total restitution to the fraud victims and the Franchise Tax Board of over $1.4 million.

Posted in Tax Fraud | 1 Comment

Cost of Government Day

Americans for Tax Reform released their study on “Cost of Government Day.” This study looks at for an average individual in each state, how long you are working for the Government rather than yourself. On average, you’re working for the government until August 12th. That’s actually down two days from last year.

Unfortunately, not all states are created equal. Here are the bottom ten:

40. Massachusetts (August 15th)
40. Pennsylvania (August 15th)
42. Illinois (August 17th)
43. California (August 18th)
43. Minnesota (August 18th)
43. Washington (August 18th)
43. Wisconsin (August 18th)
District of Columbia (August 18th)
47. Maryland (August 20th)
48. New York (August 30th)
49. New Jersey (September 6th)
50. Connecticut (September 10th)

However, there are some states which don’t tax you as much:

1. Mississippi (July 19th)
2. Tennessee (July 20th)
3. South Carolina (July 23rd)
4. Louisiana (July 26th)
4. New Mexico (July 26th)
4. South Dakota (July 26th)
4. West Virginia (July 26th)
8. Alabama (July 29th)
8. Arizona (July 29th)
8. Kentucky (July 29th)
8. Nevada (July 29th)
8. Oklahoma (July 29th)

The end of the Executive Summary notes something that needs to be taken to heart by Congresscritters and state legislators:

Barriers to an earlier COGD remain. As of this writing, a deal to raise the debt limit in exchange for significant spending reform has not been reached. As the country exhausts its nearly $15 trillion in borrowing authority, the evolving debt debate represents an unprecedented opportunity to shift the paradigm of government spending. If it fails to do so, the forecast for future Cost of Government Days looks bleak.

The full report is well worth your reading.

Posted in Federal Budgeting, Legislation | Comments Off on Cost of Government Day

Perhaps $1 Million a Rider

How many individuals want to ride high-speed rail through California’s Central Valley? That’s not an academic question, as that will be the first leg of the line built by the California High-Speed Authority. The line will run from Shafter (population 17,000) to Madera (population 61,000): just north of Bakersfield to just south of Merced.

The first major city north of Bakersfield is Visalia, with a population just above 124,000. The line will then pass through Fresno (510,000) before reaching Madera. Just how many of those people need to get from one end of the Central Valley to the other?

Let’s be real: This is a colossal waste of money. And it’s now over budget by somewhere between $2.6 billion to $6.8 billion.

Yes, I realize the goal of the line is to connect the Bay Area with the Los Angeles Basin. While the news article I linked to notes a cost of $43 billion, the true cost will undoubtedly be higher. I’m guessing that the eventual cost per rider will be about $1 million. It currently costs around $100 each way to fly that route. Given where our government is today, wouldn’t a better use of the $43 billion (or $143 billion) be paying down all of our government’s debt and not building a white elephant?

I also realize that California voters approved this measure. This is one time the legislature should step up, and let the voters know that a mistake was made. Return the federal funds to Washington, and stop the project. White elephants like this is why the government is in the mess it’s in.

Posted in California, Federal Budgeting | Tagged | Comments Off on Perhaps $1 Million a Rider

California Revenues Below Expectations; State Likely Looking at a $5 Billion Deficit

I’m shocked, just shocked to find out that the Bronze Golden State is already falling behind on collections.

That was sarcasm, of course.

In June, California collections were $350 million below the budgeted amount. In July, they were $539 million less. That’s a total of $889 million in two months. If we extrapolate that out for an entire year, we get a $5.3 billion shortfall. Back when the budget passed I said,

And there’s a projected $4 billion increase in revenues…inserted because California had $1.2 billion in higher tax collections than projected in April. Finally, there’s the usual accounting gimmicks (moving certain payments to the following fiscal year) that will result in $1 billion of “savings”.

Surprise, surprise: $5 billion in shortfall with a budget containing $5 billion of imaginary revenue.

Unfortunately for Californians, there’s nothing to drive an increase in state revenues. As I wrote last month,

The problem for California is, there really is no driver for continued revenue growth. The new Amazon Tax will lead to less revenues in future months (it won’t be a huge loss, but it will be a loss) rather than the $200 Million increase that was written into the budget. Unemployment is increasing, and California businesses continue to face regulatory hell. I’m not seeing any improvement in the national economy.

California policymakers are hoping, of course, that I’m wrong. But for business to expand there must be reasons to do so. The administration in Washington is giving no one a reason to expand. Sacramento is following suit. Unless something drastic changes, California is looking at another year of malaise.

What the state legislature should do is obvious. Unfortunately, what they will do is also obvious: nothing.

Posted in California | Tagged | Comments Off on California Revenues Below Expectations; State Likely Looking at a $5 Billion Deficit

$89,000 or $5.79

While on vacation I spoke with a good friend of mine from Illinois. A couple of years ago his firm had a sales tax issue with the Illinois Department of Revenue. The Illinois DOR accused his firm of not paying all his sales tax on a timely basis, and after audit accused him and his firm of owing hundreds of thousands of dollars.

The audit apparently lasted months, and in the end the DOR and my friend’s firm couldn’t come to an agreement. The case ended up in court with my friend eventually winning. It was something of a Pyrrhic victory, though: Fighting the case cost him $89,000 (that includes the cost of penalties and interest paid to the Illinois DOR and attorney’s fees).

My friend was noting that he had read my blog post on being penny wise and pound foolish. After this case occurred everything he sends to a government agency is sent via certified mail, return receipt requested. Yes, the original issue with the Illinois DOR came about because he couldn’t prove he had timely mailed a sales tax return. He noted that he learned this lesson the hard way.

It’s your choice, but my friend likes the idea of not paying $88,994.21 needlessly. I urge you to use certified mail, return receipt requested (or timely file electronically). It really is a no brainer.

Posted in Taxable Talk | Tagged | Comments Off on $89,000 or $5.79

You Can’t Take It With You When You’ve Already Given It Away

If I give my brother $100, do I still have that $100? Of course not: My brother has that. The same holds true for any gift I give him; that property is now his and I have to live with the consequences of that gift. Today, the Tax Court looked at a situation where an individual gave a gift but said he hadn’t done so.

The Tax Court noted the issue quite well: “The issue for decision is whether distributions petitioner received from an S corporation exceeded his adjusted basis in the corporation’s stock.” This is an issue of basis, and basis remains one of the most troubling concepts for the lay person in tax.

Basically, your basis in something is what you paid for it less whatever you’ve taken out of it. For an S Corporation, there are two bases: stock (capital) and loan. If you take distributions in excess of basis, you have a taxable distribution.

In this case, the taxpayer signed a purchase agreement with his son to sell his son some of the stock of the business in 2002. The business had two classes of stock, and some of each kind was sold to the son. However, the son didn’t pay for it; instead, it apparently was given to his son (with a Gift Tax Return being filed for the year in question).

The IRS examined the taxpayer’s return and found that the taxpayer had distributions in excess of basis in 2003. The Court had to determine whether there was or wasn’t basis and, therefore, whether or not there was or wasn’t a taxable distribution.

The Court began by noting the obvious:

[W]hile a taxpayer is free to organize his affairs as he chooses, nevertheless, once having done so, he must accept the tax consequences of his choice, whether contemplated or not.

The gift of the stock was noted on the 2002 Gift Tax Return, and that really was the case.

Today, I had a client call me wondering whether or not he could take a distribution from an S Corporation without having basis. I told him he could, but he’d have a taxable gain. Just ten minutes later, I read this case. Hopefully he’ll get the idea that if you don’t have basis, you do have a gain if you take a distribution.

Case: Milller v. Commissioner, T.C. Memo 2011-189

Posted in Tax Court | Tagged , | Comments Off on You Can’t Take It With You When You’ve Already Given It Away

No Longer a Bully, Now a Tax Evader

As I’ve said before, I’m not a fan of rap. My best friend considers my musical taste to be quite boring. That said, we both pay our taxes. It appears that rappers are having problems remembering to do this.

Beanie Sigel (aka Dwight Grant) is a Philadelphia hip hop artist who, according to Wikipedia, has sold more than 2 million albums. That equates to a good income. In Mr. Sigel’s case, his after-tax income equaled his pre-tax income from 2003 to 2005. That’s a difficult feat when your income is about $1 million.

Unfortunately for Mr. Sigel, someone at the IRS or the Department of Justice apparently enjoys hip hop enough to realize that there should be a tax return filed for Mr. Sigel for each of those years. There weren’t, and that led to him pleading guilty today to three counts of not filing a tax return. Mr. Sigel is likely looking at a trip to ClubFed since the tax loss is estimated at over $340,000; he has served time before on a weapons charge and for a probation violation.

If you’re wondering why I used this title for the post: Mr. Sigel’s most recent album was The Broad Street Bully.

Posted in Tax Evasion | 1 Comment

While I Was Out…

…Nothing much happened, right? (I’m ignoring that AAA/AA+ thing, of course.)

The IRS announced that Form 8939 for estates for 2010 will be due on November 15th. However, the form has yet to be released.

Joe Kristan noted that the Wesley Snipes strategy didn’t work (again), this time in nearby Bakersfield. A Mark DeVries didn’t like the results of his audit, and among his other brilliant ideas he sued the IRS Revenue Officer and Revenue Agent handling the case…for $50 million (plus punitive damages). As Joe noted,

Suing your IRS agent for “libel, slander, nuisance, intentional and negligent infliction of emotional distress, trespass, conspiracy and imposition of a constructive trust” hasn’t worked yet. Perhaps a less confrontational approach to IRS exams would have been wise.

Peter Pappas noted that low taxes lead to economic growth. Well, I knew that but a lot of people in Washington don’t.

Phil Hodgen is running a series on PFIC’s. If you deal with them, it’s a must read.

The Franchise Tax Board has a new amnesty program (aka “Voluntary Compliance Initiative 2”). This program is for taxpayers who avoided California tax through either Offshore Financial Arrangements or Abusive Tax Avoidance Transactions. Filing period for this amnesty runs through the end of October. Taxpayers who sign up for this amnesty must file amended returns, sign a participation agreement, and pay all tax, penalties and interest by the end of October. Note that the Noneconomic Substance Transaction Understatement Penalty, the Accuracy Related Penalty, the Interest Based Penalty, and the Fraud Penalty are removed with this amnesty; however, the Large Corporate Understatement Penalty (if applicable) and the Amnesty Penalty cannot be waived.

Finally, I feel relaxed and ready for ten days of tax work to be squashed into the rest of the week. Yes, I enjoyed my vacation.

Posted in California, Estate Tax, International, IRS, Legislation, Tax Fraud | Comments Off on While I Was Out…

Vacation

It’s time for my annual vacation. If something earth-shattering in the tax world happens while I’m relaxing, I’ll take time out to post on it. Otherwise, enjoy the fine bloggers listed in the blogroll on the right. I’ll be back on Tuesday, August 9th.

Posted in Taxable Talk | Comments Off on Vacation

Speaking of California’s Use Tax…

A couple posts ago, I reported on the Board of Equalization having a Use Tax Table available for next year’s filing season. An article in today’s Orange County Register reminded me how California regulations hurt small businesses and bring in far fewer revenues than projected.

Back in 2009, the legislature passed a law that said that any business that would otherwise not have to file sales tax returns that had $100,000 or more of gross receipts would have to file Use Tax returns. Once you register for the program, you must file returns until your business closes. The law was projected to bring in $81 million in its first year, eventually rising to $651 million.

So how much has the new law brought in? A total of $56 million for all three years…at a cost of $23 million.

For small businesses, the cost to comply with the regulation continues forever (or until your business stops or leaves California).

Welcome to the Bronze State….

Posted in California | Tagged | Comments Off on Speaking of California’s Use Tax…