Do Businesses Base Decisions on Taxes?

The answer to this question should be obvious, but many liberals believe that taxes can be hiked, and hiked, and hiked some more, and businesses won’t do a thing but verbally complain.

That’s wrong. Businesses will locate will locate their operations rationally. They will seek to maximize net income. That could mean locating in a high tax area if there will be additional revenue to offset the higher taxes.

I can think of an obvious example where a business relocated because of taxes. Nissan Motors of America moved their corporate offices from Torrance, California to Tennessee. Tennessee is a low tax state while California is anything but a low tax state.

Washington state discovered the truth behind this. Boeing will locate the final assembly line for its 787 Dreamliner in Charleston, South Carolina. Historically, most of Boeing’s airplanes have been built near Seattle.

Mish notes that the unions refused to give Boeing a ten-year no-strike pledge for work on the 787 in Seattle; this apparently led (along with grants and tax breaks offered by South Carolina) to the decision.

For those who still say that businesses won’t react to costs and move, think again. Taxes matter, and if you increase them too high businesses will relocate.

Posted in South Carolina | Tagged , | 1 Comment

Definitely not a Treat for California Wage Earners

The latest gimmick of the legislature goes into effect on Monday, November 2nd for California wage earners. California income tax withholding has been increased by 10%. The goal of the increase is to have more money coming into state coffers. Taxpayers will get larger refunds (or owe less tax) but the state will be able to use that money in the meantime.

It’s just another accounting gimmick to “balance” the state’s budget. Of course it would have been better for the legislature to just cut more programs but that would require guts, something lacking in Sacramento.

There is a way for state wage-earners to get around this increased withholding: submit a Form DE-4 to your employer. You don’t want to change your federal withholding (we’ll assume that’s accurate) but you don’t want the state withholding dollars to change. If you submit a DE-4 your employer will adjust solely your state withholding allowances.

Here’s what to do. You will need your current paystub (it will show the number of allowances you claim). You will also need to look at the new table of withholding published by the EDD.

Let’s assume you’re married, paid weekly, claiming 2 allowances, and your pre-tax salary is $1848.00 per week. From page 6 of the table, we find that your state income tax withholding will be $78.28. From your last paystub, look at what your California withholding was. Let’s assume it was $73.50. We look on the same row of the table and find that $74.10 is the closest to the old withholding; that occurs at Married, with 4 allowances. So that’s what could be filled out on the DE-4.

Taxpayers do need to take care that they don’t underwithhold. You also do not want to exceed 9 allowances without discussion with a tax professional. That said, there is absolutely nothing illegal about matching your withholding to what you need withheld rather than what the state wants you to have withheld. Indeed, a refund means you’ve given an interest free loan to the government.

My hope is that California starts looking at real solutions to the state budget rather than gimmicks. Unfortunately, that’s about as likely as snow in Irvine.

Posted in California | Tagged | Comments Off on Definitely not a Treat for California Wage Earners

Just Like the Last Time…

When the first paragraph of a Tax Court decision ends, “Mr. Oropeza’s position is, in a word, “frivolous.” Just like we held it was the last time he was in Tax Court,” it’s likely the case is worth reading—if only for the humor value. And that’s the case here.

The petitioner earned wages in 2002 and 2003 but reported zeroes on his tax return because income wasn’t income constitutionally. That’s frivolous, and since the World Series began today, let’s call that strike one. Eventually the petitioner received a notice of Intent to Levy, and he responded to the IRS. He said he had learned his lesson: “In his request he specifically renounced any of his previous arguments that the Commissioner might consider frivolous, and asked only that the IRS verify that it had followed all required procedures.” The IRS did exactly that.

The petitioner got his hearing but he couldn’t raise any real issues. In the end, the petitioner said he’d see the IRS in Court. And that’s where the case went:

…Mr. Oropeza gives us no reason to upset the Appeals officer’s conclusion that a levy is appropriate–Mr. Oropeza did not suggest any collection alternatives to balance against the government’s interest in efficient tax collection.

We also reject Mr. Oropeza’s procedural arguments. Taxpayers who make only frivolous arguments aren’t entitled to face-to-face hearings. Lunsford v. Commissioner, 117 T.C. 183, 189 (2001). Taxpayers who make no arguments are likewise not entitled to a face-to-face hearing. Oropeza, T.C. Memo. 2008-94.

It’s not a good thing when the Tax Court can give as a citation your prior failed attempt in Tax Court. Needless to say, the petitioner lost the case. That’s strike two.

What is lucky today was that he didn’t suffer a penalty for bringing a frivolous case in the Tax Court. He certainly could have, so Mr. Oropeza should consider himself very lucky. Somehow, he avoided strike three, but he still does owe the tax.

Case: Oropeza v. Commissioner, T.C. Memo. 2009-244

Posted in Tax Court | Comments Off on Just Like the Last Time…

“The Producers” Doesn’t Work in Real Life

One of my favorite movies of all time is Mel Brooks’ The Producers with Zero Mostel as Max Bialystock and Gene Wilder as accountant Leo Bloom. They decide to produce the worst possible Broadway play–Springtime for Hitler–and sell several hundred percent of their show. The movie is wonderful and if you haven’t seen it it’s well worth the time.

Three federal lawsuits have been filed against ClassicStar LLC alleging the company oversold the breeding rights in various thoroughbred mares. In one lawsuit, filed in 2004, ClassicStar is alleged to have sold more than $160 million of mare lease rights when it only owned $40 million. As Leo Bloom would say, “You can only sell 100% of anything.”

Those lawsuits note that a federal investigation was ongoing. That reached fruition today when David Plummer, Spencer Plummer, and Terry Green all pleaded guilty to one county of conspiracy to defraud the United States. Acting U.S. Attorney Kent Robinson noted, “This nationwide fraudulent scheme is by far the largest criminal tax case in the history of Oregon.” Here’s some of how it worked.

Investing in race horses is done by wealthy individuals. It’s very expensive to do this, and you usually end up pooling your investment with others, especially if you are going to invest in the best horses. You’re betting on genetics, and sometimes it works and sometimes it doesn’t.

ClassicStar allowed investors to lease the reproductive capacity of specific thoroughbred horses. If the mare had a foal during the time that the investor held the lease, the investor would own the foal. And you get a tax deduction based on the losses incurred. Most investors financed their investments with loans from the purportedly independent National Equine Lending Company. But NELC wasn’t independent–it was owned by ClassicStar–and the money never really changed hands. Let’s add in that many investors apparently never had to make a loan payment and the fraud starts to stand out.

But that’s not all. ClassicStar also substituted less expensive quarter horse mares for thoroughbred horse mares as ClassicStar didn’t have enough of the thoroughbreds. So many individuals obtained tax deductions they weren’t entitled to, leading to refunds that they shouldn’t have received. The total size of the phony tax deductions is $500 million which led to a loss to the US Treasury of $200 million. Needless to say, the three who pleaded guilty are looking at very lengthy stays at ClubFed. Individuals who invested in ClassicStar are likely going to receive “Dear Valued Taxpayer” letters from the IRS in the very near future. And there are still the lawsuits to be resolved.

If you ever get the idea of selling more than 100% of anything, don’t. Only bad things can happen if you do.

Posted in Oregon, Tax Fraud | Tagged | Comments Off on “The Producers” Doesn’t Work in Real Life

The Responsibilities of a Tax Preparer

Robert Flach has published two excellent posts on the responsibilities of a preparer (post 1, post 2). In general, I agree with everything that Mr. Flach states.

Some excerpts:

“In order to make sure that you pay the absolute least amount of federal and state income taxes each year I need complete and accurate information from you at tax time.

This means I need specific numbers for deductions you are claiming. ‘Claim the maximum’ or ‘Whatever I am allowed’ or ‘Same as last year’ don’t cut it. The maximum is what you actually paid – and you are allowed what you actually paid! … I cannot make up numbers for you– I need you to tell me ‘$1023.50’ or ‘$20.00 per week for 50 weeks’ or ‘4638 miles’! …

It is not my responsibility to personally verify all the numbers or statements given to me by a client. I have no obligation, legal or ethical, to audit your return. This is up to the IRS, if they so choose. I am simply preparing the return, to the best of my ability, “based on information supplied by the client”.

Tax professionals are not agents of the IRS. Instead, we’re here to find every legitimate means of saving you money on your taxes. That said, Mr. Flach notes that if he obtains “direct personal knowledge” of facts contrary to what he’s been told (by a taxpayer), he must use the correct numbers (what he knows) rather than what he’s been told by the client. I agree with Mr. Flach on this.

One point where I disagree with Mr. Flach is the amount of time you should hold onto your documentation. He says, “You are responsible for keeping all of the necessary documentation of the income and deductions claimed on these returns for at least three (3) years.” I believe you should hold onto all documentation for a minimum of six years.

There are two reasons why I believe this. First, while the IRS statute of limitations in normal situations is three years from the due date of the return or date of filing (whichever is later), many states have longer statutes. California’s is four years, for example. Second, if you are accused of fraud the statute of limitations runs six years. Yes, the IRS has the burden of proof for fraud, but if you are accused of fraud wouldn’t you like to have your back-up information available?

Finally, I’m a member of the National Association of Enrolled Agents and the California Society of Enrolled Agents. I’m bound by the NAEA’s Code of Ethics and Rules of Professional Conduct. (Mr. Flach is a member of the National Association of Tax Professionals, and is bound by a similar code of ethics.) One reason why I have every client sign an Engagement Letter is so that they understand my responsibilities and they understand their responsibilities in preparing their tax returns.

Overall, Mr. Flach’s series on the obligations of a tax professional is excellent. Every so often I report on Bozo tax preparers who skirt the law. They cause pain to everyone in my profession. Luckily, most members of my profession are ethical and are looking out for the interests of the client.

Posted in Tax Preparation | Tagged | 1 Comment

Beat It, or It’s Human Nature to Evade

Eugene Cappello owns Connecticut Marketing and Consulting. The company sells Chinese made Michael Jackson memorabilia to the exclusive rightsowner of Michael Jackson products, Bravado. Given the untimely passing of Michael Jackson earlier this year, I’d expect that Mr. Cappello’s business is doing well this year.

It did well earlier this decade, giving Mr. Cappello the chance to join a local country club. He did so, spending $34,781. Add in the purchase of a yacht and things were going well.

Except that there was one other creditor that Mr. Cappello ignored: Uncle Sam. He used a family friend to route the money needed for his purchases so he wouldn’t have to pay income tax on that.

All was well until the IRS found out. Earlier this year Mr. Cappello pleaded guilty to structuring financial transactions and tax evasion. Last week he was sentenced to two years at ClubFed. Mr. Cappello has already paid his back taxes, penalties, and interest of about $400,000.

Mr. Cappello would have found it easier to save up for the lavish purchases after paying his taxes than becoming a smooth criminal.

Posted in Tax Evasion | Comments Off on Beat It, or It’s Human Nature to Evade

Lockyer Spanks the Legislature

Bill Lockyer is the elected Treasurer of California. He’s a Democrat, but after a year in office he understands the fiscal realities of the Bronze Golden State:

Excerpt:

It’s impossible for this legislature to reform the pension system, and if we don’t, we bankrupt the state. And I don’t think anybody can do it here, because of who elected you. … You’re just captive of the current environment — I don’t see any way out!

He also told the Democratic leaders of the legislature that they’re not doing their oversight, that two-thirds of the bills coming out of the legislature are junk, and that there is no chance for new taxes and that the legislature must learn to live with what’s coming in. Those are all things I’ve been saying for years.

Will the Democrats in Sacramento listen to one of their own? My bet is no.

Hat Tip: Hot Air

Posted in California | Tagged , | Comments Off on Lockyer Spanks the Legislature

You Could Always be in Michigan

I do complain about California’s politics from time to time (that might be an understatement) but it could be worse. I could be in Michigan.

Now, for my Michigan clients (and I have a few) I think that Michigan is a beautiful place. I grew up in the midwest, and there’s nothing better imho then spending a Saturday afternoon at the Big House watching a Michigan football game.

That said, your politics remind me quite a bit of Sacramento…except in reverse. In Sacramento, there’s a legislature that hasn’t met a tax they wouldn’t endorse but the pesky state constitution requiring a two-thirds vote for tax increases (meaning that Republican votes are needed) stymies them. Plus, Governor Schwarzenegger acts like a Republican some of the time.

In Lansing, there’s a Democratic governor but the Michigan Senate is controlled by Republicans. Michigan has been hurt economically in recent years, with high taxes and a major industry in trouble. So Democratic Governor Jennifer Granholm apparently wants a 3% tax on doctors in the Great Lakes State.

Meanwhile, Governor Granholm has vetoed school funding measures claiming a lack of revenue. Senate Majority Leader Mike Bishop (R-Rochester) promises no new taxes. This really seems familiar, and Michiganders are in for a long battle.

Of course, neither in California nor in Michigan will the correct solution be put into place. That’s to match the budget to the revenues, cutting taxes and services to solely essential services. A lowering of tax rates would lead to an increase in tax collections. However, politicians only look at economics when it matches their political beliefs.

Posted in Michigan | Tagged , | Comments Off on You Could Always be in Michigan

I Survived!

There’s a show on Discovery called I Survived. The show features individuals who survive situations that could lead to death.

Nothing like that for me (thankfully), but another tax season has come and gone. I can put 2008 to bed within the next few days (there are still a few electronically filed returns that haven’t been accepted by various tax agencies) and begin to think about the 2009 tax season.

First, I want to thank Scott Harker for his assistance in moving this blog. The news that my former hosting company was going to disband during the final weeks of the 2008 tax season was anything but good news for me. I asked Scott for his assistance in finding a new host and platform for Taxable Talk. He did a great job with both. Now all I have to do is understand all the wonderful toys that come with WordPress. I’ll probably figure this out before year-end…I hope.

Second, I want to thank Governor Schwarzenegger for helping California accountants get additional business. Last week the Governator vetoed a conformity bill. That bill (had it been signed) would have brought California tax law into general conformity with federal tax law. However, the Governator didn’t like a provision in the bill that dealt with refund claims. Thus, yet another reason I tell my friends that I have lifetime employment.

I also want to thank the Office of Professional Responsibility (of the IRS) for continuing the Nanny Statism. According to the California Society of Enrolled Agents (CSEA), my client communications (i.e. Engagement Letters, etc.) must be typed at a 12-point font. So my Engagement Letter for next year (the 2009 Tax Season) will have to be two pages.

Finally, I’m starting to go through all the old posts and put them in categories. I expect this process will take months. Unfortunately, there is no easy way to do this, so as I have time I’m doing it. I’m also putting Tags on all the new posts and selected older posts. If anyone has some other ideas about utilizing WordPress feel free to email them to me.

Posted in California, IRS, Taxable Talk | Tagged , , | Comments Off on I Survived!

Hatch Freed

Richard Hatch, a tax blogger’s best friend, is out of ClubFed. Mr. Hatch, convicted of tax evasion when he didn’t report his $1 million winnings from Survivor was freed on Friday. He will be on probation for three years and cannot leave Rhode Island without permission.

Hopefully Mr. Hatch has learned his lesson: 1 million witnesses are usually enough to find you guilty.

Posted in Tax Evasion | Tagged | Comments Off on Hatch Freed