Taxable Talk

As California continues looking at a massive budget deficit (somewhere between $8 billion and $20 billion) some in the state legislature are looking to implement a tax on the Adult Entertainment Industry. A 25% tax on film production, strip, er, adult entertainment clubs, and pornographic videos.

Larry Kaplan, head of the California Branch of the Association of Club Executives, said that this proposed legislation would “…devastate the San Fernando Valley…[I]t would take $3.5 billion out of California.” Matt Grey, a lobbyist for the Adult Entertainment Film Industry, told Reuters that it’s cheaper to fly performers to Bucharest, Romania than to drive them to the Valley.

Meanwhile, Republicans are still promising to block all tax increases so it’s likely that this porn tax is doa.

The city of Vallejo, in Northern California, will declare bankruptcy sometime in the next few days. Why?

Vallejo has a declining industrial base. That’s not a surprise—all of California has that problem. Companies that can move do (or don’t add to their existing facilities in California).

Vallejo had a huge employer—the Navy. However, the Navy left Vallejo several years ago and no one replaced them.

Vallejo (and many other cities in California) have huge labor costs for public employees. The public employee unions wouldn’t accept the cuts that the city asked. It’s certain that during bankruptcy that the city will ask for the contracts to abrogated.

Is Vallejo a harbinger of what impacts all of California? For some cities, perhaps. Cities in California that are dependent on a single employer, and have high fixed costs need to be watchful. It will be interesting how this plays out with the background of California’s huge budget deficit playing out.

The Los Angeles Times today editorializes that the way for California to escape the budget crisis is to tax services: “Lawmakers cannot act in a fit of panic, but the scope of this year’s challenge should encourage new solutions, including service taxes.”

On the contrary, instead of looking for new taxes California should really look outside of the box and cut or eliminate current taxes. I can just imagine the Times reading this and thinking I’m nuts. I’m not.

California has spent itself into this problem; we’re going to have to drastically cut spending. Some state employees are going to lose their jobs but they really should never have been hired in the first place.

What will happen if the state imposes a service tax? It will cost small employers–more bureaucratic paperwork to deal with. I’ll have to increase my fees to cover the costs. That will lead to fewer sales–if price increases and demand is steady, the quantity sold will drop (basic economics). The amount of money raised by the new service tax will be less than what will be projected.

As of today Republican leaders in the State Legislature are holding firm on no new taxes. It figures to be a long summer of the press and Democrats (and possibly the Governator) asking for new taxes and Republicans shooting those proposals down. At least I hope that’s the scenario that plays out.

The Franchise Tax Board will now begin to send out some refunds on LLC Fees paid. These fees have been challenged in three court cases. Two of these cases are still in litigation. The one case that’s been resolved is Northwest Energetic Services (NES), LLC v. Franchise Tax Board.

The NES case related specifically to a foreign (out-of-state) LLC that had registered in California with the Secretary of State but had no business in California. If you’ve filed a claim with the FTB and the FTB can determine that the LLC meets the NES criteria, then the refund(s) will be issued.

However, if the FTB can’t determine whether an LLC meets the NES criteria no refund will be issued. So if your LLC or your client’s LLC meets that criteria, then you should send the FTB the following:

* The LLC’s name, address, and the name and phone number of the managing member or designated contact person.
* The LLC’s Secretary of State file number or Franchise Tax Board temporary LLC number (for unregistered entities), and Federal Employer Identification Number.
* Taxable Year(s) involved.
* A statement that the LLC did no business in California for each of the taxable years for which the claim is being filed.

If your client hasn’t filed a claim for refund but wants to, include the above information in a letter along with the statement, “This letter constitutes a claim for refund for (taxpayer’s name) – No income attributable to California,” and the amount of claim per year. Any claim for refund must be signed by a representative with power of attorney (POA) or signed by the LLC’s managing partner.

You can fax the information to the FTB at 916.845.9796. You can also mail the information to the FTB to:

ABS 389 MS: F340
Franchise Tax Board
PO Box 942867
Sacramento, CA 94267-8888

If you use FedEx or another private courier, then send it to:

ABS 389 MS: F340
Franchise Tax Board
C/O FTB Notice 2008-2
9465 Butterfield Way
Sacramento, CA 95827

The FTB has issued a notice here.

The Franchise Tax Board has posted its six month revision of its 250 biggest scofflaws. The largest debtors from October are gone, and a new name leads the list: Pinehill Investment of Rye, New York owes the FTB $6.133 million. The largest individual debt is Michael S. Fitzsimmons of New York City; according to the FTB his debt is $4.436 million.

There is still at least one celebrity on that list. Orenthal Simpson probably has more to worry about than his $1.528 million debt.

It took $195,994.96 to make the list. And five taxpayers have paid in full (collecting $604,395.31 to California). Others are obviously on payment plans or in negotiations as the top tax delinquent is no longer on the list. What we don’t know is whether or not these taxpayers were shamed into paying or just happened to get around to it.