Colorado Voters Reject Tax Increase

Colorado voters had a chance to increase taxes drastically. Amendment 66, which would have made Colorado’s taxes very progressive (with far higher taxes impacting most citizens), was defeated. With about half the votes cast, the no’s were leading by 66% to 34%.

The initiative was sponsored the the teachers union and was strongly supported by Democrats including Colorado Governor John Hickenlooper. The supporters outspent those opposed; however, it appears not to have mattered with Colorado voters.

Posted in Colorado | Comments Off on Colorado Voters Reject Tax Increase

The Real Winners of the 2013 World Series of Poker

Nine individuals came to Las Vegas on Monday and Tuesday to compete for the championship at the World Series of Poker (WSOP). Who would be the lucky winner? And who really got to keep the money?

Congratulations to Ryan Riess of Las Vegas. Mr. Riess, a professional poker player, beat out amateur player (and casino VIP host) Jay Farber and took down $8,359,531…before taxes. Mr. Riess, who went by the nickname “Riess the Beast,” kept holding good hand after good hand and came from behind to beat Mr. Farber. Riess’s final hand was AK (which dominated his opponent’s Q5). When neither player made a pair, Riess’s Ace-high won him the hand, and the tournament.

Gambling winnings are taxable in the United States for both amateurs and professionals. Mr. Riess doesn’t have to deal with state income tax (Nevada doesn’t have a state income tax). However, he does have to pay both federal income tax and federal self-employment tax. I estimate that Mr. Riess will owe $3,478,818 to the IRS (a 42% tax rate). Mr. Riess, who in interviews say he has trouble in the past saving money, will hopefully save up the $3.5 million he’ll owe in taxes.

Mr. Farber didn’t do badly by finishing second; he earned $5,174,357. As an amateur gambler he doesn’t have to worry about self-employment tax. Still, he’ll have to fork over an estimated $2,026,527 in tax (39%)

In third place was professional Amir Lehavot from Weston, Florida. Mr. Lehavot will have to be satisfied with the $3,727,823 he received (before taxes). A professional gambler, Mr. Lehavot (who is married) will lose an estimated $1,549,200 to federal taxes. Mr. Lehavot, a resident of Florida, does not have to worry about state tax on his winnings.

A note before I move on: Mr. Lehavot sold pieces of his action (backing). It’s likely that his true winnings will be significantly less than the amount shown above. Unless I know with certainty from public sources regarding backing, I ignore it for this analysis.

Finishing fourth was the man who I think was the biggest winner, Sylvain Loosli. Mr. Loosli, a Frenchman, relocated to London, England. I suspect taxes were definitely one of his motives with his move: The United Kingdom does not tax gambling winnings from its residents including professional gamblers (Mr. Loosli is a professional). The tax climate in France is anything but pleasant; Socialist President François Hollande has asked for a 75% marginal tax rate! While President Hollande has been rebuffed on that rate, the current maximum French marginal tax rate is 49%. That nice round zero in the United Kingdom sure sounds good in comparison to that! While Mr. Loosli finished fourth, his net winnings put him into third place. (The US-UK Tax Treaty exempts gambling income from UK residents from US tax.) His gross (and net) winnings were $2,792,533.

J.C. Tran, a professional poker player from Sacramento, finished fifth for $2,106,893. Mr. Tran led the final nine players going into final table action but had a disappointing day on Monday. Mr. Tran may also be disappointed when he learns how much of his income will go toward taxes; he faces the highest tax bite for an American at the final table (47.56%). Mr. Tran will end up with a very high 13.3% marginal tax rate on his California taxes; he must also pay federal tax (including the new 39.6% rate) and self-employment tax. Mr. Tran will owe an estimated $1,001,977 in tax.

The sixth place finisher was Marc-Etienee McLaughlin of Brossard, Quebec. Mr. McLaughlin will lose 30% of his winnings “off the top” to US tax withholding (though he can file a return to recover some of this based on his other US gambling losses). Additionally, he probably owes Canadian and provincial tax on his winnings.

The tax regime in Canada for gamblers is not as certain as it is in the US. The Quebec tax authorities are more aggressive than other provinces in collecting income tax from professional gamblers. Additionally, the rulings of Canadian courts on the taxation of gambling have not been consistent. For example, a professional gambler in British Columbia was recently found not to owe Canadian income tax on his gambling winnings. (That ruling may be appealed, though.)

Still, given that Mr. McLaughlin lives in Quebec I think he’ll end up having to pay tax on his winnings. He should get a full tax credit for the tax withheld by the US. Unfortunately, Quebec has the highest marginal tax rate in Canada for income–50%. Overall, Mr. McLaughlin will likely owe over 49.5% on tax ($792,935 of his $1,601,024 of winnings).

Michael Brummelhuis of Amsterdam finished seventh. The US-Netherlands Tax Treaty exempts his income from US taxation. The Netherlands taxes gambling winnings at a flat 29%; thus, Mr. Brummelhuis will owe $355,353 on his winnings of $1,225,356. Note that while Mr. Brummelhuis finished in seventh place, on an after-tax basis he finished in sixth.

Finishing eighth was David Benefield of New York City. Mr. Benefield, a student at Columbia University, is a former professional poker player. While he won’t owe self-employment tax, Mr. Benefield does have to pay both state and city income tax on his winnings. Of the $944,650 he won, I estimate he’ll owe $437,201 in tax (46%).

Mark Newhouse of Los Angeles finished in ninth place. A professional poker player, Mr. Newhouse did not win anything additional to the $733,224 he took home in July. I estimate he’ll lose just over 44% to tax ($322,879)

Here’s a table summarizing the tax bite:

Amount won at Final Table $25,932,167
Tax to IRS $8,626,311
Tax to Belastingdienst (Netherlands) $355,353
Tax to Franchise Tax Board (California) $321,611
Tax to Canada Revenue Agency $312,628
Tax to New York Dept. of Taxation & Finance $78,394
Total Tax $9,642,011

That’s a total tax bite of 37.18%.

Here’s a second table with the winners sorted by their estimated take-home winnings:

Winner Before-Tax Prize After-Tax Prize
1. Ryan Riess $8,359,531 $4,880,713
2. Jay Farber $5,174,357 $3,147,830
4. Sylvain Loosli $2,792,533 $2,792,533
3. Amir Lehavot $3,727,823 $2,178,623
5. J.C. Tran $2,106,893 $1,104,916
7. Michael Brummelhuis $1,225,356 $870,003
6. Marc-Etienee McLaughlin $1,601,024 $808,089
8. David Benefield $944,650 $507,449
9. Mark Newhouse $733,224 $410,345
Totals $25,932,167 $16,290,156

Once again the big winner was not the man who came in first; rather, it was the Internal Revenue Service. The tax agency has been rocked by scandals this past summer but it did very well at the Rio. The IRS will collect $8,626,311 for the United States Treasury. That’s more than the pre-tax first place prize of $8,359,531, over $3 million more than the after-tax first place prize, and more than the combined first and second place after-tax amounts. That’s because we all know that the house–the IRS–always wins.

Posted in Gambling | Tagged | 16 Comments

The Wrong Kind of Education Leads to ClubFed

A California tax preparer decided he wanted to increase refunds for his clients. There’s absolutely nothing wrong with that–I want my clients to get the maximum possible refund allowed under the law. It appears that Kenyon Williams forgot those last three words; he was found guilty of two counts of wire fraud and two counts of aggravated identity theft earlier today.

Mr. Williams prepared tax returns in San Diego and opened his own practice in 2011. In early 2012 he called a friend in Tampa, Alesia Spivey. Here’s what the Department of Justice press release says:

Williams called his friend and fellow tax return preparer, Alesia Spivey, who lived in Tampa, Florida, and discussed the 2012 tax season and Williams’ desire to maximize refund amounts for his clients. During this conversation, Williams solicited information from Spivey regarding methods used, in Tampa, to increase tax refunds.

There’s nothing wrong with this at all–in fact, it’s a good idea to learn from others. However, there was an issue. Continuing with the DOJ press release:

Spivey and Carlista Hawls explained to Williams that individuals in Tampa were using a particular interest income scheme to file bogus tax returns with the IRS. Spivey instructed Williams on how to fill out the tax returns by employing this interest income scheme.

This is where Mr. Williams should have said ‘Thanks, but no thanks,’ and hung up the phone. Because I’m writing this I’m sure you’re several steps ahead of me: Mr. Williams implemented the interest income scheme, and filed 168 fraudulent returns. This resulted in $517,744 of bogus refunds being issued.

But it didn’t end here:

In addition, on March 2, 2012, Spivey and Hawls flew to San Diego, California to meet with Williams. During that trip, Williams provided Spivey and Hawls with a list of names, dates of birth, and social security numbers, including a stack of Navy blood donor records, to be used in preparing fraudulent tax returns in Tampa.

Thus, the identity theft charges. Mr. Williams is looking at up to 49 years at ClubFed. Both Spivey and Hawls pleaded guilty earlier this year.

Posted in Tax Fraud | Tagged , | 1 Comment

IRS Scandal Update

The political news has been dominated as of late by the ObamaCare follies. However, the IRS scandal continues to percolate. There has been some news this past week:

The National Organization for Marriage sued the IRS over the leak of its Form 990 Schedule B; that schedule contains NOM’s list of donors. That’s confidential under the law. Unfortunately, someone at the IRS leaked that Schedule B to its political opponent, the Human Rights Campaign. That in itself is a violation of federal law. It appears the House Ways and Means Committee has figured out who the villain is, and they would like to see the Department of Justice prosecute that individual. No word from the DOJ on this happening; given the politicized nature of the current DOJ, I doubt we’ll see this happen.

Meanwhile, it appears we know why Lois Lerner took the Fifth: The Washington Examiner accuses Ms. Lerner of sharing confidential tax information of several Tea Party groups with the Federal Elections Commission. That’s also a violation of the law. Though the Examiner is the accuser, it’s really Judicial Watch that’s making the accusation; that organization obtained emails under a Freedom of Information Act request that allegedly show Ms. Lerner emailed the confidential information. I’m sure the DOJ will get right on this (not).


For the IRS to function effectively, it needs both a reasonable budget and to be apolitical. It’s vital that the Department of Justice go after individuals who turn the IRS into a political organization from an apolitical one. Yet the current Administration apparently doesn’t see the urgency in this issue. That’s a huge mistake, and one that will definitely come back to haunt them and all Americans. We need a well functioning IRS…and given what the Administration is doing (and not doing), it’s very likely the budget for the IRS will continue to shrink.


Welcome Instapundit readers. I cover taxes with an emphasis on small businesses and gambling (my two tax practice specialty areas); I also focus on Nevada and Maryland (where our two offices are) and California (where I used to live and work). I try to have some fun with taxes as the subject is generally tedious.

Posted in IRS | Tagged , | 3 Comments

Bubba Paris Sacked, Pleads Guilty to Not Filing a Tax Return

Former San Francisco 49er William H Paris, Jr. (aka Bubba Paris) is now a motivational speaker. He’ll have a new topic to talk about: Why You Should Pay Your Taxes.

Back in February Mr. Paris was indicted on three misdemeanor counts of failing to file a tax return. He was alleged to have earned between $41,700 and $83,800 annually from 2006 to 2008. He pleaded guilty on Wednesday to one count of not filing a tax return in a plea deal. Mr. Paris agreed to make restitution of $126,530; he’ll be sentenced next February. He faces up to one year at ClubFed and a possible fine of up to $100,000.

That’s the second former football player who has not had a good week. Former Philadelphia Eagle Freddie Mitchell was sentenced to 37 months at ClubFed earlier this week. Mr. Paris, though, is not facing as lengthy a sentence. At most he faces one year in prison; given that he has promised to make restitution it’s likely he’ll get probation.

A hint to celebrities: You’re a perfect target for IRS Criminal Investigations when you don’t file and pay your taxes. If you are convicted, it will be covered in the news. Consider that Bubba Paris didn’t report tax on $182,743 and is paying restitution of $126,530 (which include penalties and interest)–That’s a tax rate of 69%! He’ll also have to pay California, too. It’s a lot easier to just pay your taxes in the first place.

Posted in California, Tax Evasion | Tagged | 1 Comment

Illinois’ Bankrupt Pension Systems and Tax Hikes

I was born and raised just outside of Chicago. I still root for Chicago sports teams (Blackhawks, Bears, and Cubs). Yet I’m quite happy that I don’t reside in Illinois today. Illinois’ pension systems are basically bankrupt and Democrats in the Illinois legislature have but one solution: tax hikes.

The Illinois Policy Institute has a research report noting that taxpayer contributions to state pension funds have skyrocketed. But didn’t Illinois pass a tax increase in 2011 that would “solve” the state’s budget woes? Yes, such a tax increase passed; no, the budget woes haven’t vanished.

Unfortunately, the Democrats in the Land of Lincoln have a proposal that will solve the problems: more tax hikes! State Representative Naomi Jakobsson has introduced HJRCA0033 which would make Illinois’ state income tax progressive, with a top rate of 9%. The state’s rate would be 4% at just $18,000 of income (the state’s tax rate is supposed to be just 3.75% in 2015). .As the Illinois Policy Institute noted, this will hurt the working and middle classes hard.

The only true solution is to attack the cause of the problems. That means pensions and state spending in Illinois will need to drop drastically. That’s not likely to happen until the voters force it upon Springfield.

Posted in Illinois | Comments Off on Illinois’ Bankrupt Pension Systems and Tax Hikes

PTIN Follies, Year 4

This is the fourth year I’ve had to pay for my PTIN (my third year to renew it). A PTIN is a Preparer Tax Identification Number–it’s a number I use when I prepare a tax return. It’s a means for the IRS to identify which returns are prepared by which tax professionals.

The IRS announced that renewals are open. Seeing no reason to wait I decided to log into the system. I did remember that my user name is all caps (the IRS converted it back for my first renewal, 2011).

Again, my password doesn’t work so I request a new one. I get into the system fine, and enter my information, hit “next” and…I’m logged out. I re-enter the system…and am immediately logged out again.

I try calling the help number for the system…and after hitting the correct combination of digits on my phone, hear the helpful message, “There is no one available to help you at the present time. Your call will now be disconnected.” CLICK!

I remain underwhelmed. (I’ll try again in a week.)

Posted in IRS | Tagged , | 1 Comment

Noguez Gets More Charges

Los Angeles County Assessor John Noguez finds himself facing more felony counts in the ongoing bribery/tax evasion scandal rocking the Los Angeles County Assessor’s Office. The new charges relate to three more building where Mr. Noguez and consultant Ramin Salari allegedly took bribes to lower the building’s assessments. Both Mr. Noguez and Mr. Salari pleaded not guilty to the new charges.

The last time I wrote about this scandal was last October. The preliminary hearing is set for January.

Posted in California | Tagged , | Comments Off on Noguez Gets More Charges

Coming Attractions: When the IRS Writes New Law When They’re Not Allowed To

The IRS is part of the Executive Branch of government. The Executive Branch can’t write law–they can issue regulations based on laws passed by the legislative branch (Congress) and then only when Congress authorizes it. There’s an issue percolating in the courts which is likely going to cause a huge headache throughout the country: tax credits for federal health care exchanges.

Today, a federal court judge in Washington denied the Administration’s request to stop a lawsuit challenging the IRS’s interpretation of the ability to give tax credit subsidies on federal health care exchanges. US District Judge Paul Friedman denied a preliminary injunction but did order the case tried on an expedited basis; he said that he expects to issue a ruling by February. Earlier this year a judge in Oklahoma also denied an Administration dismissal request in a similar case. There are two other cases filed on this matter.

Jonathan Adler of the Volokh Conspiracy notes the issue succinctly:

The IRS rule contravenes the plain text of the PPACA, as the statute only authorizes tax credits (and subsidies) for the purchase of insurance in an exchange “established by a state” under Section 1311 of the law…Supporters of the IRS rule claim that Congress could not have intended that Americans in dozens of states would be unable to obtain tax credits to help them purchase insurance. They’re right. Congress intended for every state to create its own exchange, as PPACA supporters said time and again, but states refused. Now that their assumption has been proven wrong, this does not provide an excuse to rewrite the plain statutory text.

This matters because in tax when a statute says “x,” it’s “x.” A good example of this is some of the ludicrous ways the Alternative Minimum Tax impacts individuals. Judges have stated in their rulings that these make no sense but because it’s written into the statute, there’s no choice on this matter: Until Congress changes the law, they’re stuck. I expect the same thing to happen here. Of course, Congress could change the law but the chance of that happening is equivalent to the chance of snow in Las Vegas in July.

Assuming that this suit is successful, it will strike at the heart of the mandates in the law. Assuming this ruling comes in February, there will be even more of a mess with the law. The ObamaCare rollout has hardly been something one could call “smooth.” Proponents have been hopeful that the light they’re seeing is the end of the tunnel. To me, it looks like an oncoming train.

Posted in IRS, Legislation | Tagged | 1 Comment

Sigh: 2014 Tax Season to be Delayed up to Two Weeks

Just the news that every tax professional wants to hear: The 2014 tax season (2013 tax returns filed next year) will be delayed one to two weeks. It appears the start date for processing will be sometime between January 28th and February 4th (instead of January 21st).

The IRS gives as the reason the government shutdown and I have no doubt they’re correct. In prior years, I remember that all IRS computer systems going down on Columbus Day weekend (which is a federal holiday) to begin updating the IRS computer systems for the next year’s filing season. This didn’t happen this year as the employees who would have done that work weren’t working. So I do think the IRS is behind, and that this is a direct result of the shutdown.

This will be the second straight tax season that begins late. The just concluded tax season began late because Congress didn’t enact needed legislation until January 1, 2013. Unfortunately, there’s a chance that the upcoming tax season could be delayed even further if the government shuts down again. The current funding will run out on January 15, 2014. I don’t expect that to happen…but we’re dealing with Congress and, well, we’ve seen them in action (or is it “in inaction”) before.

Posted in IRS | Tagged | 1 Comment