Reversing Two Penalties That Should Never Have Been Charged

When are tax returns due? For most individuals, its April 15th. However, if you are outside of the United States on April 15th for purposes of employment or self-employment you get an extra two months (until June 15th) to file your return. There are no penalties but interest is charged. As the IRS states (see the link), you simply attach a statement to the return and no penalties are supposed to be charged. I’ve been preparing returns for expatriates for years and never had any problem with this…until last year (the 2012 tax season for filing calendar year 2011 returns).

For whatever reason, I had several clients who were charged penalties who were outside of the United States on April 17, 2012 (last year’s tax deadline) for employment/self-employment purposes. I checked with my software vendor and they told me that nothing had changed with the software–the notices were attached to the filed returns. I believe them because I had two clients who paper-filed who were charged penalties! In all cases, a statement was attached to the return noting the taxpayer was outside of the US on the tax filing deadline.

In most of these cases, I was able to reverse the penalties with a phone call. However, I have had three clients where I have had to write letters to the IRS. Here’s how one case was resolved.

This client’s return was filed in early June. She took the automatic extension, with a statement attached to her return. She had a small balance due which was paid through electronic debit (with the filing of her return). In mid-July she received a CP14 notice noting that she owed late filing and late payment penalties. I obtained a Power of Attorney and called the IRS. The IRS refused to lift the penalties. I wrote a letter in early August explaining that no penalties should be owed. In mid-September, I received a response from the IRS that they hadn’t resolved the situation. In mid-December, the IRS denied removing the penalties.

We have carefully reviewed your case. However, the information provided did not establish reasonable cause. Thus we are unable to remove your penalties for failure to file and failure to pay.

Did the IRS even read the letter I wrote? I asked for the penalties to be removed based on the out-of-country automatic extension, not for reasonable cause. (And yes, it took the IRS over four months to give an answer to my letter.)

We then appealed the decision. The hearing was held in late March and was the shortest Appeals hearing I’ve ever had. The Appeals Officer stated that we were correct, and that no penalties should be charged. “I can’t remove the interest,” he noted. I told him that was fine–the client does owe the interest. The Appeals Officer told me that he had no idea why this couldn’t have been resolved at the Service Center level or by Service Center Appeals Screening. (All appeals are first screened for obvious cases where the appellant is correct. A few years ago, I filed an appeal on behalf of a client who was charged the late filing penalty when his efile return was rejected on October 15th; he had mailed the return the next day–and mailed it using certified mail, return receipt rejected. The screening staff granted our appeal.)

Well, I may be able to answer the question as to why this couldn’t be resolved at the Service Center. I suspect that staff answering the notices (generally, the automated underreporting unit, or AUR) have problems when it’s not something they’ve encountered before. (I cringe when I have a client who receives a CP2000 notice regarding, say, a W-2G. Most personnel at the IRS rarely see gambling-related tax issues and don’t understand the law.) Most likely, the individuals who reviewed the letters I sent had no idea that there’s an extended deadline when you’re outside of the US on April 15th. Since they didn’t know of it, it couldn’t exist.

Second, the sheer volume of notices being sent out is creating a huge volume of responses. This means the staff handling those responses have been overworked. Given that two-thirds of IRS notices are incorrect (in part or in whole), the IRS is likely getting lots of letters. Overwork leads to errors in responses.

I don’t know if I’ll actually have to go to Appeals on the other two clients whose cases have yet to be resolved. (These are both going through the same IRS Service Center which rejected my first client’s out-of-country extension.) In the end, I’m certain my clients are in the right. But consider the expense to my clients and the expense to the IRS. As Joe Kristan noted last week, the IRS could do a better job in spending the money it has. I would expect that basic training in the deadlines would be given (or at least, knowledge of the rules or a database of where to look).

Unfortunately, I don’t expect things to get better. The problem is that the AUR program is a huge moneymaker for the IRS. Far too many individuals see an IRS notice and blindly pay it. Most of my clients have been reading my newsletter (or this blog) and know the reality of IRS notices and don’t blindly pay IRS notices. Make sure you don’t either.

Posted in International, IRS | Tagged , | 2 Comments

How Not to Deduct 85,491 Miles

Having resided in Southern California, I know you can put a lot of miles on your car in that area. One engineering teacher learned the hard way from Tax Court that a written mileage log is essential if you want to deduct your business miles.

The petitioner taught at several schools in Southern California. He was not reimbursed by the schools for his mileage. He claimed 85,491 business miles driven–a deduction of $46,593. The IRS allowed only 4,970 miles. That’s a difference of 80,000 miles and a difference that large led to the case going to trial.

Unfortunately, the petitioner did not keep a contemporaneous written mileage log. The Cohan rule (allowing the Court to estimate an expense) does not apply to automobile expenses.

To meet the heightened substantiation requirements, a taxpayer must substantiate the amount, time of use, and business purpose of the expense. Sec. 274(d); see also sec. 1.274-5T(b)(6), Temporary Income Tax Regs., 50 Fed. Reg. 46016 (Nov. 6, 1985). To substantiate by adequate records, the taxpayer must provide both an account book, a log, or a similar record, as well as documentary evidence, which are together sufficient to establish each element of an expenditure…Documentary evidence includes receipts, paid bills, or similar evidence…To substantiate by sufficient evidence corroborating the taxpayer’s own statement, the taxpayer must establish each element by the taxpayer’s statement and by direct evidence, such as documentary evidence.

Unfortunately, the petitioner didn’t maintain a contemporaneous log.

During his testimony petitioner submitted into evidence a mileage log which was created after the 2008 tax year. Petitioner claimed he drove 88,820 miles related to business travel in 2008. Corroborative evidence used to support a taxpayer’s reconstruction of expenditures “‘must have a high degree of probative value to elevate such [a] statement’ to the level of credibility of a contemporaneous record.”

The question for the Court was whether the testimony of the petitioner was enough to prove the 80,000 miles were for business but not commuting (commuting mileage is never deductible).

We find the mileage summary to be insufficient under section 274(d) because the mileage amounts were not entered at the time the vehicle was used. Petitioner testified that the mileage log he presented at trial was prepared “after [he] was approached by the IRS”. Outside of the syllabi petitioner presented, we are unable to determine for what purpose petitioner was traveling to and from the various schools outside of class time. Petitioner provided no evidence to corroborate entries in the mileage log for random trips to the schools other than testimony that he made various trips to prepare for the semester. We are unable to verify whether these trips were for business or were personal.

The petitioner also attempted to argue that even if the mileage were commuting mileage, these were temporary positions. The problem is that commuting to temporary positions outside of the metropolitan area where you reside can be deducted (this would be a travel expense). Unfortunately, all of the positions were within the Los Angeles metropolitan area.

Petitioner worked and lived in the same metropolitan area, and therefore we find that petitioner’s commuting expenses do not qualify for the exception to the general rule of nondeductibility. We hold that petitioner’s commuting expenses were nondeductible.

If you’re going to deduct mileage, keep a contemporaneous written mileage log. It takes just a few seconds to note your starting and ending mileage, the date, where you went, and the business purpose. It could be the difference in deducting 80,000 business miles.

Case: Daniel-Berhe v. Commissioner, T.C. Summary Opinion 2013-33

Posted in IRS, Tax Court | Tagged | 1 Comment

1700 Miles and a 7% Difference

One of the most difficult things to explain to a non-tax practitioner is the tax concept of domicile. For most individuals, your domicile is your residence. I reside in Las Vegas, Nevada. It’s my only home. In my case, my domicile and residence are identical (as is the case for most people).

However, some individuals have multiple residences. Take Ken Mauer. Mr. Mauer has a home in Afton, Minnesota (just east of the Twin Cities). He also has a home in Fort Meyers, Florida. They’re both residences, so which is his domicile? If Mr. Mauer’s had residences in Nevada and Florida, this wouldn’t be a big issue (neither state has a state income tax). However, Minnesota has a state income tax so being considered a Florida resident would save Mr. Mauer thousands of dollars in state income tax.

Shock of shocks, Mr. Mauer declare himself a Florida resident and didn’t file Minnesota tax returns for 2003 or 2004. After the Minnesota Department of Revenue objected, he filed a part-year 2003 return. Mr. Mauer was audited by the Department of Revenue and lost. He appealed the decision to the Minnesota Tax Court and lost. He then appealed to the Minnesota Supreme Court. That court upheld the previous decision.

I’m not going to into Minnesota’s 26-factor test, or the factors that led to Mr. Mauer being considered a resident of the Gopher State rather than the Sunshine State. One factor, though, is key: Mr. Mauer spent more time in Minnesota than Florida. Few tax agencies will consider you a resident of the other state if you continue to spend a lot of time in their state. Suffice to say, it you are in such a situation it’s best to cut all ties to your old state…or at least spend 183 days in your new home. In Mr. Mauer’s case, he’s liable for Minnesota state income tax for 2003 and 2004.

Hat Tip: How Appealing

Posted in Florida, Minnesota | 3 Comments

Use EFTPS If You Use a Payroll Service

Most payroll services are reputable. They help companies comply with the myriad of laws and regulations in payroll by preparing payroll checks, paperwork, and even sending the withheld payroll taxes to the IRS and state tax agencies.

Of course, where most won’t go the Bozo wing of payroll services happily head to. From Maryland comes the story of AccuPay. The payroll company is accused of failing to remit payroll taxes to the IRS and Maryland. After local police investigated, the company filed a Chapter 7 bankruptcy case. The owner of the firm refused to testify (citing the Fifth Amendment right against self-incrimination).

The stories read horribly, with some owners having to take out loans, and other firms perhaps going out of business. Yet there’s a way today to make sure your payroll tax company is remitting your taxes: EFTPS. It takes about two weeks to enroll (passwords will be mailed to you). Once you are enrolled, you can see your payroll tax remittances. There’s no reason to be a recurring victim of this kind of theft.

Senator Barbara Mikulski (D-MD) will be proposing a bill that would require payroll firms to register with the IRS and be bonded or certified by the IRS. I oppose this, because it’s not needed. Use EFTPS and you can see for yourself if your payroll taxes are making it to the IRS.

Posted in Payroll Taxes | Tagged , | Comments Off on Use EFTPS If You Use a Payroll Service

Kudos to Kenneth Ryskamp

Who is Kenneth Ryskamp? He’s a Senior Judge in the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida. Judge Ryskamp was born in 1932, and has been a US District Court Judge since 1986 (and a Senior Judge since 2000). Why am I noting Judge Ryskamp? Because of a sentence he imposed on Thursday.

Mary Curran of Palm Beach, Florida inherited Swiss bank accounts from her husband. Those accounts had not been reported (and likely the interest not reported on tax returns). Her attorney, Roy Black, tried to get Mrs. Curran into the Offshore Voluntary Disclosure Program (OVDP) but her name had already been given to the IRS. She paid a large fine ($26 million); the Department of Justice brought criminal charges. She pleaded guilty to two false tax return charges. Judge Ryskamp wondered why:

Based on these facts, did it ever occur to the government to dismiss these charges. Instead, the government decided it had to make a felon out of this woman?

Judge Ryskamp gave Mrs. Curran one year of probation. Given Mrs. Curran could have faced six years at ClubFed, that sentence in itself was a huge win. But she got more good news a few moments later: The judge immediately revoked it! Her probation lasted all of five seconds. Judge Ryskamp noted:

This is really a tragic situation…It seems to me the government should have used a little more discretion.

The judge also suggested that Mrs. Curran request a presidential pardon, which he would endorse.

As Joe Kristan noted, the government goes after the accidental offenders with shotguns while slapping the wrists of some big-time offenders. Perhaps the IRS and DOJ will use some discretion in the future…but that’s probably asking too much.

News Coverage: Palm Beach Daily News, ABA Journal

Posted in IRS | Tagged , | Comments Off on Kudos to Kenneth Ryskamp

Bayern Munich Head Reports Self for Tax Evasion

Uli Hoeness is the president of Bayern Munich. Who? Well, if you asked a resident of Bavaria this question, you’d get shocked looks–the same as you would get from a New Yorker asking about the Yankees. Bayern Munich is a soccer team in Munich. They’re very successful and already have clinched this year’s bundesliga. This New York Times story notes that the club just won their 13th straight game.

OK, I’m not a soccer fan. However, I am interested in cases of tax evasion and here’s one possible such case. Mr. Hoeness apparently has an issue with a Swiss bank account. Mr. Hoeness filed an amended tax return; the public prosecutor’s office is checking to make sure that the amended return is accurate. If the amended return is accurate, the penalties in Germany for filing the first ‘bad’ return can be lessened.

This is similar to US tax law in that the IRS (and Department of Justice) almost always take a much harder line on individuals that the government finds that have cheated on their taxes than on individuals who have voluntarily come forward.

Posted in International, Tax Evasion | Tagged | 1 Comment

IRS Gives Extra Three Months for Filing and Payments to Boston-Area Taxpayers; Massachussetts Deadline Should be the Same

As I’m still not really working, here’s the press release from the IRS:

WASHINGTON — The Internal Revenue Service today announced a three-month tax filing and payment extension to Boston area taxpayers and others affected by Monday’s explosions.

This relief applies to all individual taxpayers who live in Suffolk County, Mass., including the city of Boston. It also includes victims, their families, first responders, others impacted by this tragedy who live outside Suffolk County and taxpayers whose tax preparers were adversely affected.

“Our hearts go out to the people affected by this tragic event,” said IRS Acting Commissioner Steven T. Miller. “We want victims and others affected by this terrible tragedy to have the time they need to finish their individual tax returns.”

Under the relief announced today, the IRS will issue a notice giving eligible taxpayers until July 15, 2013, to file their 2012 returns and pay any taxes normally due April 15. No filing and payment penalties will be due as long as returns are filed and payments are made by July 15, 2013. By law, interest, currently at the annual rate of 3 percent compounded daily, will still apply to any payments made after the April deadline.

The IRS will automatically provide this extension to anyone living in Suffolk County. If you live in Suffolk County, no further action is necessary by taxpayers to obtain this relief. However, eligible taxpayers living outside Suffolk County can claim this relief by calling 1-866-562-5227 starting Tuesday, April 23, and identifying themselves to the IRS before filing a return or making a payment. Eligible taxpayers who receive penalty notices from the IRS can also call this number to have these penalties abated.

Eligible taxpayers who need more time to file their returns may receive an additional extension to Oct. 15, 2013, by filing Form 4868 by July 15, 2013.
Taxpayers with questions unrelated to the Boston tragedy should visit IRS.gov, or contact the regular IRS toll-free number at 1-800-829-1040.

Meanwhile, the Massachusetts Department of Revenue has extended the deadline until at least April 23rd. The press release states, “The IRS is expected to provide details on the federal extension shortly. DOR will match whatever extension the IRS announces.”

Thus, for taxpayers living in and around Boston (and individuals impacted by the bombings, including participants and first responders), they should not owe penalties. Interest, however, is statutory and cannot be waived. The Boston-area tax deadline will be Monday, July 15th.

Posted in Massachusetts | 1 Comment

When a Day Late Isn’t a Dollar Short

I’m in zombie mode — it’s midnight and the last of the work is done (for a short time). I’ll be out the rest of today (Tuesday). Tax Day is over.

One place where it’s sort of not over is California. The Franchise Tax Board had major computer issues with their website on Monday. The FTB announced that anyone who pays their tax on April 16th via the FTB’s webpay system (for individuals or for businesses) on April 16th will be considered to have made the payments on April 15th.

Posted in California | Tagged | Comments Off on When a Day Late Isn’t a Dollar Short

Bozo Tax Tip #1: Don’t Be Suspicious!

As I write this (in March), I just got off the phone with one of my clients. He just did very well in a poker tournament, and won just over $11,000. He took the money in cash (rather than a check) as he thought he was going to need the cash. He doesn’t, so he was wondering about making a cash deposit of over $10,000 as there would be a Currency Transaction Report issued.

I told him that a Currency Transaction Report isn’t anything to worry about it. The IRS gets so many of them that as long as you’re paying your taxes they’re not a big deal. Just smile as the bank teller fills out the extra paperwork.

On the other hand, if you break up your $11,000 transaction into two $5,500 deposits, you can get in trouble. Big trouble. A suspicious activity report (SAR) might be issued. The IRS doesn’t get as many of these, and almost all of them are investigated. And you will never know when one is issued.

You don’t believe me? Here’s a tale of woe that caused the downfall of a politician.

He was a prosecutor, and he used the Bank Secrecy Act (among other laws) to help send many individuals—primarily in organized crime—to prison. He then became Attorney General of his state, serving two terms in that office. He was then elected Governor.

But our public figure had a problem. He enjoyed the world’s oldest profession. While traveling to Washington, D.C. he used a service called the Emperor’s Club. He funded his nighttime activities by making multiple wire transfers of just under $10,000.

Come on, could a politician who used to use the Bank Secrecy Act actually get blindsided by the Act? Yes. Eliot Spitzer’s wire transactions were duly reported by North Fork Bank. That led to an IRS investigation which led to an FBI investigation which led to a governor becoming an ex-governor.

So if you want to send money, go big-time. Send more than $10,000. But whatever you do, don’t break up your cash transactions into smaller pieces to evade the reporting requirements. One day you might find two armed federal agents at your door, reminding you, “You have the right to remain silent….”


I hope you enjoyed this series of humorous posts. I’ll be back with normal content in one week.

Posted in IRS | Tagged , | 1 Comment

Bozo Tax Tip #2: Nevada Corporations

A repeat follows, but it’s one again getting a lot of play due to business conditions in California. While I’m focusing on California and Nevada, the principle applies to any pair of states.

Nevada is doing everything it can to draw businesses from California. Frankly, California is doing a lot to draw businesses away from the Bronze Golden State. But you need to beware if you’re going to incorporate in Nevada.

If the corporation operates in California it will need to file a California tax return. Period. It doesn’t matter if the corporation is a California corporation, a Delaware corporation, or a Nevada corporation.

Now, if you’re planning on moving to Nevada incorporating in the Silver State can be a very good idea. But thinking you’re going to avoid California taxes just because you’re a Nevada corporation is, well, bozo.

Posted in California, Nevada | Tagged | 1 Comment