Sailing Away

If you receive a free meal, can you take a tax deduction for it? That’s a simple question, and I’d guess that 99.99% of the public would use common sense to answer the question: No, of course not. How can you take a deduction when you’re getting something for free?

However, one inventive tax preparer had a different slant on the question. Martin Kapp, a CPA from El Segundo, California, believed that individuals in the transportation industry could get the “Mariner’s Deduction” for meals that were provided by their employers.

I had never heard of the “Mariner’s Deduction,” so I investigated Mr. Kapp’s website. I note that he states, “While retaining travel receipts is always very desirable, the Johnson decision clearly states taxpayers can rely upon the government’s written statements that taxpayers may indeed elect to deduct the pre-approved OCONUS and CONUS incidental rates – all without receipts.”

The IRS and Justice Department alleged that Mr. Kapp had “…prepared returns for the mariners claiming deductions for the costs of meals they received for free from their employers.” The DOJ brought suit in Los Angeles to stop Mr. Kapp.

And that’s why I wrote the he had a different slant. Judge George Schiavelli ruled that Kapp must no longer prepare federal tax returns with the “Mariner’s Deduction.” He must also turn over his client list to the DOJ/IRS. His clients can look forward to receiving a “Dear Soon-To-Be Audited Taxpayer” letter from the IRS.

The judge noted that Kapp “knew or should have known” that the deductions were illegal. And, indeed, this is not the first time the “Mariner’s Deduction” has led a tax preparer into hot water. In 2004 – 2005, the DOJ and IRS successfully stopped five Louisiana tax preparers from using this sham deduction.

So remember my rule: If it sounds too good to be true, it probably is. You can deduct legitimate business expenses, including unreimbursed business expenses and meals. But if an expense costs nothing, that’s how much you get to deduct—nothing.

Posted in Tax Fraud, Tax Preparation | Comments Off on Sailing Away

Taxes $200,000, Collectibles 756

The Associated Press is reporting that Barry Bonds’ 756th home run ball will be auctioned. Matt Murphy, the man who caught the ball, has consigned the ball to Sotheby’s SCP Auctions. The ball is expected to be worth over $500,000.

Mr. Murphy, who is 21, told the AP, “I’m upset by the decision I had to make…I wanted to keep it. I’m young. I don’t have the bank account. … It would have cost me a lot more to keep it.”

Mr. Murphy was told by several people that he would owe tax on the $500,000 that the ball is worth even if he kept it. While I personally disagree with that (I think he wouldn’t have owed anything until he sold it), it is very clear that he will owe tax on the ball when he sells it. Given federal, New York, and New York City combined taxes (Mr. Murphy is a resident of Queens, New York), I expect that Mr. Murphy will owe about 40% of the net sales price (the gross sales price less the commission the auction house receives).

As for Barry Bonds, his Giants are now playing out the string (they are in last place in the National League’s Western Division). There’s no new news regarding his possible indictment on tax charges.

Posted in IRS | Tagged , | Comments Off on Taxes $200,000, Collectibles 756

November 14th Is Not Before November 13th

If you receive an IRS Determination Letter, and decide to file a petition in Tax Court, make sure you file by the deadline. The Tax Court won’t accept your petition if you file late, as another taxpayer discovered today.

Our unlucky taxpayer moved twice between the time the IRS mailed the Notice of Deficiency and the time he received it. Normally, you have 90 days to respond; however, the taxpayer in question had only 75 days (until November 13, 2006). He sent his petition (using FedEx) on November 14th.

The IRS asked the Tax Court to dismiss the taxpayer’s suit because it was filed late. The taxpayer argued that he should either get extra time because of the moves or that the IRS notice was inaccurate because of the wrong address.

I’ve written before that the Tax Court is a stickler for deadlines. This case was no different. The statute says that the taxpayer has 90 days from date of mailing (the taxpayer actually had 91, as the 90th day from the date of mailing was a Sunday), and the Court must obey the plain language of the statute. Additionally, the IRS correctly sent the notice to the (then) right address.

Once again, deadlines count. The taxpayer’s case has been dismissed, and he must pay the deficiency. He can file a claim and pursue a case in US District Court or the US Court of Claims, but that’s only after he pays the tax.

Posted in Tax Court | Comments Off on November 14th Is Not Before November 13th

Phone Taxes

Today’s Wall Street Journal has an interesting article about a phone tax battle in Missouri. [Note: $Pay$ Link] Various municipalities have claimed that their city telephone taxes apply to cellular phones; the cellular carriers disagree. On Thursday, a St. Louis County Circuit Judge will rule on whether or not he can rule on the case by summary judgment or whether a full trial will have to be held. No matter how he eventually rules, the case will likely be appealed.

You may remember that I wrote in May about the City of Los Angeles’ cellular telephone tax increase being illegal. One of the arguments that the carriers are making is very similar: a popular vote is required under Missouri law for a new tax to be approved. Cities are arguing that the tax isn’t new. Legislation was passed capping the cell phone tax, but it was ruled unconstitutional by the Missouri Supreme Court.

The carriers could owe as much as $500 million, including interest and penalties. One thing is certain, though. If the tax ends up being owed, the bill will be passed on to consumers. That’s the nature of all taxes.

Posted in Legislation | Comments Off on Phone Taxes

California Has a Budget

The State Senate finally approved a budget late today. It goes to the Governator for his signature (he has said he will sign it) and for his “blue pencil” (the line item vetoes).

For more details on what this budget really means, go to the Flash Report. You will find State Senator Tom McClintock’s commentary and State Senator Dennis Hollingworth’s commentary. Note in particular what Senator Hollingsworth said: “[The budget] is still one that will result inevitably in a near $5 billion deficit next year…Further, we all need to begin addressing next year’s looming fiscal problem–now, and not wait until we are so far into the budget that our options to balance it become fewer and more difficult.” Those are words to live by, but I don’t expect them to be heeded in Sacramento.

Posted in California | Comments Off on California Has a Budget

Father Son Fraud

This past February, Roy Albert Lewis, a Danville, California dentist, was sentenced to two years at ClubFed for hiding $300,000 over ten years. This past week, it was his father’s turn.

Leroy Albert Lewis is an oral surgeon, but his medical career likely came to an end last week. He pleaded guilty in May to one count of tax fraud. He was sentenced to two years at ClubFed, plus he must make restitution of $909,527. Leroy Albert Lewis is the father of Roy Albert Lewis.

His attorney said that the elder Mr. Lewis suffered from “hubris and greed.” Both Lewises fell victim to secret offshore bank account scheme operated by Tower Executive Resources, Ltd. Joe Kristan reported on Tower back in 2006; Paul Harris, the promoter of Tower, was sentenced to five years at ClubFed. The scheme made the payments look like they were for consulting services. They weren’t; it was simple tax fraud.

The younger Mr. Lewis is doing his time in ClubFed in Lompoc. It’s quite possible that the elder Mr. Lewis will soon be in a neighboring bunk.

News Story: San Francisco Chronicle

Posted in Tax Fraud | Comments Off on Father Son Fraud

Another Strip Club, Another Jail Term

Last year, I wrote about James Andrew Yeager. Mr. Yeager operated a strip club in Columbia, Missouri. Strip clubs are a cash business, and Mr. Yeager decided that he needn’t report all the cash as income. He pleaded guilty last year to tax evasion.

Last week, he found out his sentence: 21 months at ClubFed, and restitution of $140,543 plus paying additional back taxes of $36,732.

The strip club, Club Vogue, is still in operation. The news story from last year said he owned the club; this year’s story makes that unclear. If Mr. Yeager is the owner, the US government may soon own a strip club (seizing the assets to pay the back taxes).

So if you are a strip club owner, may I recommend—as I have before—that you pay your taxes. Cash income is taxable….

Posted in Tax Evasion | Tagged | Comments Off on Another Strip Club, Another Jail Term

Faulty Language or Not, Guilty as Charged

Yesterday I wrote about Dr. Frederick Kriemelmeyer, a dentist in LaCrosse, Wisconsin. Dr. Kriemelmeyer was found guilty today of three counts of filing false tax returns. He’ll be sentenced on October 30th. Given that the testimony in the trial ended today, the jury didn’t need much time in deciding the verdicts.

And that appears to be understandable, unlike Dr. Kriemelmeyer’s use of the English language. As I noted yesterday, Dr. Kriemelmeyer believes in David Wynn Miller’s dialect, “In the Truth.” He doesn’t believe that our current American flag is valid. He doesn’t believe that our Tax Code is valid.

Based on federal sentencing guidelines, Dr. Kriemelmeyer is looking at 27-33 months at ClubFed. And no use of language such as this, “FOR THE EDUCATIONAL-CORRECTIONS OF THE MODIFYING-COMMUNICATIONS ARE WITH THESE CLAIMS OF THE FICTIONAL-ADVERB-VERB-USURY WITH THE OPERATIONS/METHODS OF A FICTIONAL-MODIFICATION-LANGUAGE,” will lessen his sentence. (That quote was taken from Mr. Miller’s website.) And if he tries to lecture a judge in using the English language, I won’t be shocked to see him getting the maximum term of 9 years (3 years per count) plus restitution.

Posted in Tax Fraud | Comments Off on Faulty Language or Not, Guilty as Charged

“English Is a Fraudulently Conveyed Language”

If you are wondering about the headline, so am I. But it’s a quote out of the trial of one Frederick Kriemelmeyer, a dentist in LaCrosse, Wisconsin. Dr. Kriemelmeyer is accused of four counts of tax evasion.

As the LaCrosse Tribune reported, Dr. Kriemelmeyer is a believer in David Wynn Miller. Miller does not use standard English; instead, he used a dialect he invented called “In the Truth.” It’s got a lot of capital letters, prepositional phrases, and not much in the way of punctuation. You can see samples by going to Mr. Miller’s website.

In any case, Dr. Kriemelmeyer challenged the indictment because it was in English—our English. That didn’t work (the judge let the indictment stand). The dentist challenged the US flag in the courtroom. No, I’m not joking about that. He didn’t win that argument.

David Wynn Miller believes that if you add extra punctuation to a tax return, you will somehow not have to pay taxes. At least, that’s what I think he espouses. Dr. Kriemelmeyer is a follower of Mr. Miller, and is conducting his own defense.

The government plans on having 15 of Dr. Kriemelmeyer’s patients testify as to how much they paid him. The government alleges that if there was an asterisk by a patient’s fees in Dr. Kriemelmeyer’s ledger, the actual payment was much higher. For example, $20* meant that the patient paid $100. If the government proves that, they’ve proved the case. The total tax evasion is alleged to be about $364,000.

The trial will likely last another few days.

Posted in Tax Fraud | Comments Off on “English Is a Fraudulently Conveyed Language”

A Tax, A Compact, A Battle

Today in San Diego a federal judge will hear arguments in a case between the Rincon Indian tribe and the State of California. The battle is over whether or not California negotiated in good faith over a compact with the Indian tribe for more slot machines for the Rincon Indian’s casino (north of San Diego).

An expert from the state estimated that the 500 additional slot machines proposed for the tribe’s casino would bring in just under $40 million a year. The tribe argues that California wanted about $38 million of that as the fee for the allowing the additional slot machines. The tribe argues that the state did not negotiate in good faith, and that the $38 million would be a “tax” rather than a fee.

On the other hand, California argues that they have negotiated in good faith; that they have reached agreements with numerous other tribes, including the neighboring Paula tribe; and that the additional machines would bring in money for the Rincon tribe.

A decision will likely be announced in a few weeks.

News Story: Here.

Posted in California, Gambling | Comments Off on A Tax, A Compact, A Battle